AP Predictably Tells Only One Side of Wis. Judges' Altercation
Despite the accumulated reportage and commentary available to the Associated Press this morning, the wire service, at 9:58 a.m Eastern Time (saved here for future reference, fair use, and discussion purposes), only reported on one side of the story relating to an altercation that took place between Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices David Prosser, Jr. and Ann Walsh Bradley. In doing so, it ignored the existence of a follow-up story published at least 12 hours earlier at the Milwaukee Journal, the newspaper it cites as the primary source of its original coverage.
In AP-Land, despite contrary assertions, the relatively conservative Prosser is the alleged choking aggressor, and the left-leaning Bradley the supposed innocent victim. Taking all known accounts into consideration, the matter is hardly so clear-cut.
Prosser "just so happens" to have won a hotly contested Supreme Court race in April which was seen as a referendum on the popularity of 2011 Wisconsin Act 10, commonly known as the "Budget Repair Bill," which imposed out-of-pocket pension and health insurance premium costs on most Badger State public-sector workers while limiting their collective-bargaining rights. On June 14, the Supreme Court reinstated the law, overruling a Dane County judge who the court ruled had usurped her authority in nullifying the law on procedural grounds. Act 10 appears to be set to become law on July 1.
Here are key paragraphs from the unbylined AP report (internal link added by me):
Wisconsin justice accuses colleague of choking her
A Wisconsin Supreme Court justice has accused another justice of choking her during an argument in her office earlier this month - a charge her colleague denied.
Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that Justice David Prosser put her in a chokehold during the dispute. She contacted the newspaper late Saturday after Prosser denied rumors about the altercation.
"The facts are that I was demanding that he get out of my office and he put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold," Bradley told the newspaper.
Prosser said in a statement the allegations "will be proven false" once a "proper review of the matter and the facts surrounding it are made clear."
Wisconsin Public Radio and the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism, quoting anonymous sources, reported Saturday that the argument occurred before the Supreme Court's decision earlier this month upholding Republican Gov. Scott Walker's bill eliminating most of public employees' collective bargaining rights.
... AP's description is at the very least irresponsible, in light of the following item published at the Journal Sentinel yesterday at about 6:30 p.m. Central Time (based on when the first comments appeared; bolds are mine):
Sources told the Journal Sentinel two very different stories Saturday about what occurred. Some confirmed Bradley's version. According to others, Bradley charged Prosser, who raised his hands to defend himself and made contact with her neck.
A joint investigation by Wisconsin Public Radio and the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism first reported on the incident early Saturday, stating that Prosser "allegedly grabbed" Bradley around the neck.
Before Bradley spoke to the Journal Sentinel, Prosser issued a statement that said: "Once there's a proper review of the matter and the facts surrounding it are made clear, the anonymous claim made to the media will be proven false. Until then I will refrain from further public comment."
A source who spoke to several justices present during the incident told the Journal Sentinel that the confrontation occurred after 5:30 p.m. June 13, the day before the high court's release of a decision upholding a bill to curtail the collective bargaining rights of public employees.
... The conversation grew heated, and Bradley asked Prosser to leave. Bradley was bothered by disparaging remarks Prosser had made about Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, a source said.
... another source told the Journal Sentinel that Bradley attacked Prosser.
"She charged him with fists raised," the source said.
Prosser "put his hands in a defensive posture," the source said. "He blocked her."
In doing so, the source said, he made contact with Bradley's neck.
When the AP article went up, this was at a minimum a he-said, she-said situation where, depending on the truth, either party may be subject to discipline or other sanctions. By omitting the alternate version of events in the Journal Sentinel's follow-up report, the AP either negligently or deliberately gave the nation's readers an incomplete and substantively false version of what has been alleged, creating the impression that only Prosser could be in the wrong.
Madison, Wisconsin blogger Ann Althouse has been following the situation since news about it first appeared, and is none too pleased with how leftists are dishonestly attempting to orchestrate a political hit. Her posts on the topic, as of 3 p.m. this afternoon, are, in chronological order, here, here, here and here.
This blogger's speculation: If this information about an alleged June 13 incident took 11-12 days to surface, it has the distinct aroma of a group of people possibly attempting to coordinate to get their stories straight. But it looks like someone may have busted that plan.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
This is another one that's about to get ugly
Submitted by bkeyser on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 4:23pm.
The Left is becoming completely unhinged. The Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism is funded in part by the Open Society Institute (Soros) and just began a new "project" to "shine a light into the operations of Wisconsin's government."
AA makes another great point- will those calling for the resignation of Justice Prosser do the same if i's proven that Bradley is the true nut? Not likely, I suppose.
Violence in the workplace
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 4:31pm.
Yes, an intolerable situation. Violence between judges is anarchy in the making. If it can be proven either way, one must go and should be prosecuted as well.
Agreed
Submitted by Dave81 on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 6:15pm.
Regardless of what really happened and who's to blame, it's truly sad that two judges are resorting to physical altercations. Our country isn't being led by teenagers.
If there wasn't violence, our
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 8:19pm.
If there wasn't violence, our society should not tolerate lying judges either.
Prosser admitted that he called Chief Judge Abrahamson
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:07pm.
"a total bitch" and threatened to "destroy" her this past March.
Absolutely outrageous.
It appears Prosser is the one who has become completely unhinged.
Jer
So what
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:22pm.
How does that excuse Bradly's violence.
I dont know much about the history of any of these folks, but it seems their is a lot of anomosity between them.
You're assuming Ann Bradley was violent, Boudin.
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:33pm.
Why? Bias?
Jer
Are you assuming ....
Submitted by Tom Blumer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:34pm.
.... she wasn't?
Nope...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:37pm.
awaiting the facts.
Jer
To avoid confusion, Jer,
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:22pm.
the incident you describe took place in 2010. The article that refers to the exchange was written in March of this year. Here is the opening paragraph of the article:
As the deeply divided state Supreme Court wrestled over whether to force one member off criminal cases last year, Justice David Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson behind closed doors, calling her a "bitch" and threatening to "destroy" her.
Just want to help make sure the timelines are right...
Thanks...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:30pm.
The incident which occurred in Feb. 2010 was acknowledged by Judge Prosser this past March.
Jer
Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:28pm.
Sticking up for a lib?
Absolutely outrageous.
Your balance between haranguing both conservatives and liberals will soon have the potential to tip over like the island of Guam. (h/t that ignorant liberal fool elected to office by other ignorant liberal fools - is this a great country, or what? I am definitely leaning towards 'or what')
MD
How so, Matthew?
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:35pm.
Prosser admits to the behavior I referenced..
Jer
Jer, I forgot the---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 11:18pm.
:o), after "Absolutely outrageous". :o)
MD
AP has corrected its reporting ...
Submitted by Tom Blumer on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 1:58pm.
... the Prosser-Abramson incident occurred in March 2010, not March 2011.
That's not exculpatory, but it definitely eliminates any linkage of that incident to the budget repair bill, and one would think if there were serious issues with the year-old incident, they would have been resolved by now -- meaning that it really wasn't seen as a serious matter until Bradley v. Prosser occurred.
Once again ...
Submitted by Tom Blumer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:35pm.
... we're getting only one side, and have no idea what might have prompted this.
Why Jer?
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 5:29pm.
Did Prosser wake up on the wrong side of the bed and lash out at the first person he saw wearing a robe other than his wife? Or do you think he has a habit of calling people he works with such things?
bk...Here are excerpts from a Sentinel article
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 5:56pm.
which provides at least some of the background info:
"I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted. . . . They (Abrahamson and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley) are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements. This is bullying and abuse of very, very long standing."
The Feb. 10, 2010, incident occurred as the court privately discussed a request to remove Justice Michael Gableman from a criminal case. "In a fit of temper, you were screaming at the chief; calling her a 'bitch,' threatening her with '. . . I will destroy you'; and describing the means of destruction as a war against her 'and it won't be a ground war,' " Bradley wrote in a Feb. 18, 2010, e-mail to Prosser and others. "In my view, a necessary step to address the dysfunction is to end these abusive temper tantrums. No one brought in from the outside is going to cure this aspect of the dysfunction."
Three days later, Justice Patience Roggensack wrote to Bradley, criticizing her for copying judicial assistants on her e-mail. "You were trying to make David look bad in the eyes of others, as a person who uses language that we all find offensive - and I include David in that 'we,' "
Roggensack wrote. "Do you think that copying others on your e-mail increased the collegiality of the court or decreased it? "You are a very active participant in the dysfunctional way we carry-on. (As am I.) You often goad other justices by pushing and pushing in conference in a way that is simply rude and completely nonproductive. That is what happened when David lost his cool. He is not a man who attacks others without provocation. Until you realize that you are an active part of the provocation, not much will change. Perhaps a third party will help you realize that you are not part of the solution; you are part of the problem."
The next day, Feb. 22, 2010, Bradley wrote Roggensack. "Regardless of our disagreements, there is no justification for this abusive behavior," Bradley wrote. "Blaming his abusive behavior on others merely enables it."
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/118310479.html
Jer
Jer
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 8:13pm.
Maybe a merlot summit?
boy is this a deliberate provocation...
Submitted by Paarl on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 6:02pm.
reischstag fire anyone ??
Paarl of Rhodesia
I find it hard to believe
Submitted by picofaradpjf on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 6:15pm.
I find it hard to believe that if leftist hack Bradley's version was true it would take 12 days for the story to get into the media. Also being lost here is where the focus should be. The fact that liberals on the court are deliberately trying to stall the court from making rulings until the Democrats can try to make a comeback via the recall elections or in 2012. That was the whole reason the agruement between Prosser and Bradley started in the first place. And yes Bradley and the other libs are such blindly committed leftist activist that they would lie to smear Prosser, no doubt in my mind.
So, where's the police report
Submitted by UpNorth on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 7:00pm.
on this "assault" filed by the innocent victim? The one who's trying to adjudicate this in the press, rather than in court.
If she waited 11 days to file a report, I'd tell her she waited too long.
Come on
Submitted by Franksam on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 8:58pm.
If you were a judge, would you want your fate to be determined by the justice system?
Good point,
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 11:47am.
Franksam. I hadn't given that any thought.
Can anyone imagine the jury selection, the pool would have to include every citizen of Wisconsin, and they'd still not be able to pick a jury.
Who won?
Submitted by Fredy on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 7:00pm.
Am supposed to believe that Prosser was so upset at being on the majority side of the court in the case that he needed to assult a judge on the short end?
Or am I supposed to believe Prosser was so upset at having his reelection confirmed 2 days before that he went off the deep end?
As for the AP, they simply are not interested in honest reporting.
Eye Witnesses
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 9:45pm.
Justice Bradley is obviously lying. Others present won't corroborate her story. Time she is retired.
As for the AP...
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
AP
Submitted by HockeyKid on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 11:03pm.
Associated Prevarication
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Get rid of both for wasting
Submitted by jessieH on Mon, 06/27/2011 - 10:35am.
Get rid of both for wasting taxpayers time and money.