Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun

Oh the Humanity! Per AP's Julie Pace: Congress Is 'Heavily-Laden With Republicans'

By Tom Blumer | December 28, 2010 | 18:01

A  A
Tom Blumer's picture

To those who have spent time following new reports emanating from the Associated Press, it's not exactly a secret that many of the alleged journalists who work there are having difficulty with the idea that there will be a new Republican majority in the House during the next two years. A further annoyance is that many members of that majority, especially the newer ones, hold sensible, Constitution-based views inspired by Tea Party movement. But as supposed professionals, you would think that the folks at the wire service might try a little harder to avoid blatantly revealing their bias.

If the AP's Julie Pace was really trying to stay within the bounds of the patently obvious, she failed miserably, as the bolded words in the following paragraph from her 2:31 p.m. report (also saved here for future reference, fair use, and discussion purposes) on President Obama's decision to delay submitting a budget to Congress until mid-February indicate:

Lawmakers left Washington last week without a plan to fund the government through the end of fiscal year 2011, which ends in October. They did pass a continuing resolution to fund the government through early March, meaning the president will have to negotiate with a Congress more heavily-laden with Republicans to fund the government through the rest of 2011 and 2012.

As was the case earlier today (at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog) when I researched the clearly unusual use of the word "bold" by an AP reporter describing the latest authoritarian moves by Venezuela's Huge Chávez, a trip to the dictionary is required to guard against possibly overreacting. Here, from dictionary.com, are the relevant possible meanings of the adjective "laden" and the verb "lade":

laden -- "burdened; loaded down."

lade --
- "to put (something) on or in, as a burden, load, or cargo; load."
- "to load oppressively; burden"

Neil Diamond, 1970, and The Hollies, 1969: "He Ain't Heavy, He's My Brother."

Julie Pace, 2010: "They Are Heavy, They're a Bunch of Republicans."

There is a relatively obscure meaning of "laden," which is "to fill or cover abundantly," but Ms. Pace won't be able to sell me or other readers here that this alternative meaning is what she meant. She's telling readers that Republicans are big, oppressively loaded pain in the Beltway. Oh, the agony.

Not that anyone will be surprised, but a a Google News search on "heavily-laden with Democrats" (in quotes) returns no results. The same search of Google News's Archives returns a grand total of three results. One is a seemingly light-hearted item at the Christian Science Monitor published in 1958 ("Dodgers Drive In Democrat Runs?"). The second and third contain a quote from election commentator Larry Sabato in a single column written by Andrew F. Tully. The point is that I could find no allegedly serious journalist in the past 50-plus years -- perhaps none ever, if the CSM item is really not meant to be a serious piece -- who has directly used the phrase "heavily-laden with Democrats." Most journalists, who vote overwhelmingly Democratic, would be inclined to replace "laden" with "blessed."

A similar Google News Archive search on "heavily-laden with Republicans" also comes back with nothing relevant, which is good news and bad news. The good news is that it's never been done before. The bad news is that the AP and Pace appear to be attempting to open up a new frontier for labeling their perceived opposition.

I would suggest that if Ms. Pace and any of her other colleagues at the AP and elsewhere in the establishment press find dealing with the reality of a Republican-controlled House such a heavy load to have to carry for the next two years, they should find an alternative, less burdensome lines of work. After all, especially as it applies to the AP, according to you guys (cough, cough), the economy is "brightening." By all means, have at it.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

  • Covert Liberal Activists
  • Double Standards
  • Labeling
  • Budget
  • Congress
  • Economy
  • Government Agencies
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Julie Pace
  • Wire Services/Media Companies
  • Associated Press
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

As if that's a burden

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 6:28pm.

"They did pass a continuing resolution to fund the government through early March, meaning the president will have to negotiate with a Congress more heavily-laden with Republicans to fund the government through the rest of 2011 and 2012."

 

Well, since Obama is having problems getting a budget when Congress is heavily laden with Democrats, perhaps this is a blessing and not a curse.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

I think that "infested" was

Submitted by scrubjay on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 7:20pm.

I think that "infested" was the word she was searching for.

  • Login to post comments

Resume enhancing

Submitted by Jerry Mack on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 7:29pm.

Perhaps she is enhancing her resume for a job in the propaganda wing of the Messiah's administration. 

  • Login to post comments

I'd suggest....

Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 7:40pm.

she'd better hurry up and get her resume in. Otherwise, it's going to get a little more use than she'd hoped for.  ;-)

  • Login to post comments

Imagine......

Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 7:42pm.

...how "laden" it's going to be in January, 2013.

  • Login to post comments

Gotta laugh......

Submitted by tampamom25 on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:13pm.

I can't wait to watch all these so-called reporters next year, breathless with their anxieties about having the Republicans (and Tea Partiers) with a majority in the House and more even representation in the Senate.  By gosh, we might even get to see some of the damage that Obama has done get undone.  Wonder if Chris Matthews will still get a tingle up his leg when the liberals aren't in total control???    It's gonna be fun:o)

  • Login to post comments

stylebook intrudes again...

Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:21pm.

Back in the seventies any time a firearm was even remotely involved the phrase "fully loaded" was always inserted (i.e., "the armed robber was arrested with a fully loaded handgun"). Always begging the question, what jackass would go to a robbery with a half loaded handgun?

Now it seems we're to be treated to a corollary in the form of "a Congress heavily laden with Republicans". Was there anyone not getting the election results this year?

"Oh my, what a maroon." - Bugs Bunny

  • Login to post comments

Heavily-laden

Submitted by xraynova on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:31pm.

 

"... meaning the president will have to negotiate with a congress more heavily-laden with Republicans..."

This is an obvious reference to the fact that all those extra Republicans may cause the Capitol Building to tip over...capsize, as it were.

Where the heck is hank johnson when you really need him ?

  • Login to post comments

She is right that the Republican moved for position.

Submitted by Avitar on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 11:14pm.

This is a reaction of Bagdad Bob faced with the "burdon" of sneaking out of Babdad as the US rolled in. 

  • Login to post comments

Forget this bimbette for the Ministry of Statist Misinformation

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 12/29/2010 - 10:34am.

...what those repubs that will be loaded up in the next House had better realize is that they are on Double Secret Probation, and if they aren't causing Julie Pace and her fellow-traveling BS propagandists to be spinning on their eyebrows and spitting nails with smoke coming out of their ears by the end of this coming January, they, too, are going to be gone come January of 2013. 

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • National Media Skip Over Charges U.S. Ambassador Abused 'Minor Children'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use