AP Gives Credence to Ill. Gov. Quinn's Claim of 'Mandate' Despite 0.5% Victory Margin
It's strange how this "mandate" thing works, at least at the Associated Press.
In Ohio, Republican John Kasich defeated incumbent Democratic Governor Ted Strickland on Tuesday with a victory margin of about 2.5%, or almost 100,000 votes. Strickland is the first incumbent Buckeye State governor to lose a reelection bid since Democrat John Gilligan lost to Republican Jim Rhodes in 1974. In that race, everyone went to bed on Election Night believing that Gilligan had held on -- including Rhodes himself, who conceded the race -- only to wake up the next morning learning that late ballots had pushed Rhodes over the top by a razor-thin margin.
In Illinois, incumbent Democratic Governor Pat Quinn defeated Republican challenger Bill Brady by about 20,000 votes, a margin of about 0.5%.
Below the jump, you'll see who has permission to claim a "mandate," at least according to the Associated Press's headline writers:
Ill. Dem gov. earns chance to argue he has mandate (link)
Gov. Pat Quinn's quest to become the elected leader of Illinois was fulfilled Friday when his Republican challenger conceded the state's closest governor's race in decades, leaving Quinn to argue he has a mandate to push a tax increase in the face of one of the nation's worst state budget problems.
Quinn defied a national Republican surge that cost many other Democratic incumbents their jobs by defeating state Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, but it was far from a resounding victory with just more than 19,000 votes separating the two.
Still Quinn, who has held the office since replacing ousted Gov. Rod Blagojevich in January 2009, says he'll continue arguing for an income tax increase to deal with a budget shortfall that could soon reach $15 billion and already has forced the state to stop paying some of its bills.
"I have a mandate, I think, to serve Illinois for the next four years, and I'm going to take that seriously and work hard on the issues that I espoused in the campaign. ... I think there are those who understand the election returns gave us a lot of support, and that will help us get the votes in the Legislature to do challenging but very important things," Quinn said Thursday.
Well of course. Quinn has a "mandate" because he wants to increase taxes. Kasich apparently doesn't because he wants Ohio to align its tax receipts and spending without tax increases. In fact, Kasich has talked of gradually phasing out the income tax that John Gilligan and Democrats imposed on the Buckeye State in the early 1970s. Somehow, Ohio got by without an income tax until then without disappearing into Lake Erie. Since then, states without income taxes like Florida and Texas have generally prospered. Ohio? Not so much.
Separately, AP writer Deanna Bellandi describes Brady as "more socially conservative" than Quinn. This strong implication that Quinn is also socially conservative is not supported by the facts, as more fullly described here. Some examples:
- Quinn had the endorsements of gay agenda-supporting newspaper the Windy City Times, the Pro-Abortion Political Action Committee, Planned Parenthood Illinois Action, and the pro-gay lobby Equality Illinois. Brady did not.
- Brady had the endorsement of Illinois Family Action, the political arm of the prolife Illinois Family Institute. Quinn did not.
- Brady was rated as "100% prolife" by Illinois Citizens for Life. The same group tagged Quinn as "not prolife."
Other than that, there was very little difference between the candidates on social issues (/sarcasm).
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
So illinois is going the way
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 1:01am.
So illinois is going the way of NY and California in declining society. Gonna be lots of refugees from Illinois to nieghboring states.
A "mandate", huh? A 0.5
Submitted by Chris Norman on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 1:10am.
A "mandate", huh? A 0.5 plurality isn't even a minidate.
Nor a babydate...
I live in Illinois and I am
Submitted by Liberallies on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 1:11am.
I live in Illinois and I am so greatly disappointed.
However, this is the State were RINO Mark Kirk won, but Conservative Bill Brady could not win.
Mark Kirk won districts that Bill Brady did not carry.
Yes, Illinois is going the way of California and New York.
Our income taxes are going to be dramatically increased. Already State Fees on everything are ridiculously high.
There was a Democratic wave in Illinois. Except for RINO Mark Kirk winning, almost everyone else who won was a Democrat. Our legislature stayed Democrat, most high State positions became or stayed Democrat.
Just remember, we have the Chicago/Cook County machine working hard to keep Democrats in charge in Illinois
Why do the citizens always have to pay for the politician's inablity to stop spending?
Quinn only 'won' in the
Submitted by MidAmerica on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 6:27am.
Quinn only 'won' in the Chicago and St. Louis area. Everywhere else went for Brady. American Thinker has an article explaining the situation.
Republicans can only win state wide if they have a very wide margin outside of Chicago. If the election is close then the late reporting Cook Couny will come in with enough votes for the democrat to win.
The state of Illinois has become the private plaything for some power players in the Windy City. The governorship is more important to them than a senate seat because they need a cooperative governor. Of course it's a risky job to hold because many governors have been charged with crimes and several have gone to prison.
The middle of the country was the scene of the notorious gangsters of the 1920's and 1930's. We have been the setting for the likes of Bonnie and Clyde, John Dillenger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Machine Gun Kelly and of course Chicago's Al Capone. Even Jesse James was from the Midwest. The era of the bold bank robbing gangster was mostly a Midwestern phenomena. The only difference now is that they don't roam the backroads brandishing tommy guns. But..... they are still out there.
Liberal election analysis
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 7:22am.
When the Democrat wins by 2 dozen votes, it's a "mandate."
When a Republican wins by 300,000 votes, it's a "signal that the voters want the parties to work together."
What A Mandate!
Submitted by GeneralAl on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 7:24am.
You got to hand it to the Chicago thugs. Their get out the vote drive was very successful in all the Chicago and Cook County Cemeteries. Not a single dead person was denied the right to vote! As a result, even the dead Republicans voted for "The Mighty Quinn"!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
Technically Speaking...
Submitted by stratman on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 2:52pm.
By virtue of winning, the winner has a mandate from the populace, as does the loser.
Here is one dissenting view
Submitted by dbz77 on Sat, 11/06/2010 - 9:59pm.
Here is one dissenting view
Machine Politics
Submitted by Avitar on Sun, 11/07/2010 - 3:45am.
It is tto bad Illinois could have taken advantage of Machigans decline. This rule by virtual voters is getting old. When the Conecticut Democrats did not steal enough votes they just "Found" a bag full of votes that put their Governor over the top. Giving them a run of all the elections in the whole state. How likely do you think that was?
Hello, I would like to request investigations please. and ballots printed by the US mint. How much for special forces pole watchers? The Democrats Secretaries of State can not get ballots out to our military men without a live fire exercise near by.