Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

AP's Woodward Commits His Own Gaffes While Chronicling 2010 Campaign Gaffes

By Tom Blumer | October 30, 2010 | 09:39

A  A
Tom Blumer's picture

Per MerriamWebster.com -- Gaffe: 1) a social or diplomatic blunder; 2) a noticeable mistake.

The Associated Press's Calvin Woodward has had a few shining analytical moments during the first two years of the Obama administration (examples here and here).

The AP reporter's dispatch on "gaffes and gotchas" Friday morning, which attempted to communicate a sense of bemusement tinged with condescension, both aimed mostly at first-time candidates, is not one of them, and contained its own gaffes:

Memo to novice political candidates: Know thy Constitution. Don't tell Hispanics they look Asian. Pay special attention to what you say when you are in front of cameras. Which you almost always are. Expect your chitchat to go viral.

 

... This is the year of the neophyte in politics. Anti-incumbent sentiment in general and the tea party in particular have brought fresh faces forward, many wet behind the ears in the brutalities of a modern campaign.

 

The result: a rash of impolitic politics - gaffes, raw rhetoric, unsettling theories - followed by gotchas, recycled mercilessly by opponent's campaign ads, cable TV and the blogs. [1]

 

In Delaware, Christine O'Donnell got tangled in the First Amendment, appearing unaware it separates religion and government. [2] The Second Amendment caused grief for fellow Republican Sharron Angle in Nevada, who entertained the notion of "Second Amendment remedies" - that would be a call to arms [3] - if government isn't brought to heel.

 

... Senate candidates Mark Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, and Mark Kirk, Republican of Illinois, exaggerated their military records. [4]

 

... The experienced Harry Reid, Senate majority leader and Angle's Nevada opponent, cast himself as a savior of epic proportions, remarking that "but for me, we'd be in a worldwide depression." [5]

 

... Still, the success of scores of tea party favorites in Republican primaries gave rise to a phalanx of eager achievers unaccustomed to the hothouse; hence, more rough edges. A pizzeria owner, rancher, doctors, war veterans and a pilot are among them. [6]

 

One of the most prominent of the tea party picks, though, is Joe Miller, a lawyer, former judge and Yale grad who's taken a series of rookie missteps.

 

Miller, a Republican Senate hopeful from Alaska, criticized federal unemployment, health care and farm aid only to acknowledge his family has benefited from those subsidies in the past. [7] And he's been saddled by the disclosure that as a borough attorney in 2008, he admitted to lying about improperly using government computers and was disciplined. [8]

Before delving into the specifics above, it should be noted that Woodward failed to mention that Christine O'Donnell's Democratic opponent Chris Coons couldn't correctly name even one of the five freedoms (speech, religion, assembly, petition, press) in the First Amendment. Coons could only incorrectly identify "separation of church and state."

Now to the details:

[1] -- For a rash of "gaffes (start here and go backwards), raw rhetoric," and "unsettling theories," see Barack Obama for President, 2008.

[2] -- The press won't let their made-up "gaffe" on Christine O'Donnell and the First Amendment go, will they? Ms. O'Donnell challenged her opponent Mike Coons as to whether separation of church and state is in the Constitution. All the crowd laughter and press ridicule that occurred then and is still occurring won't change the fact that it isn't. Woodward's "clever" rephrase -- " appearing unaware it separates religion and government" -- is an attempt to keep the remnants of that smear alive without actually repeating it.

[3] -- "The Second Amendment solutions" audio with Lars Larson is here. The quote involved is: "I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out. "How does Woodward know that this "entertains" a "call to (take up) arms"? Of course, he doesn't. When I hear "Second Amendment solutions," I think of so many people who have told me that they have felt the need to arm themselves and learn how to use a gun in case civil order breaks down. God forbid if that should ever happen, but if it does, it will largely be because Congress spends the next few years, as O'Donnell said, "going the way it is" and destroying the country's economic and legal foundations.

[4] -- The AP reporter committed his own gaffe with Blumenthal's first name, referring to him as "Mark" (as seen here in this Google search; it was corrected in his 11:56 a.m. update). It is Richard, or Dick. As to specifics, Mark Kirk corrected a written item in 2005 which erroneously stated he had served "in" Iraq instead of "during" Iraq while he was also serving as a stateside congressman. The Kirk campaign also mischaracterized and has since corrected a Navy intelligence award as an individual honor instead of as one for his unit. If there is a record of Mark Kirk telling an audience that he served "in" Iraq, it hasn't surfaced. Dick Blumenthal himself, by his own admission "on a few occasions," has falsely told audiences that he served "in" Vietnam, not "during" Vietnam. Blumenthal himself has also spoke of "when we returned" from Vietnam, obviously implying that he was among those who was there in the first place. He wasn't. Tricky Dick's lies stretch in time at least from 2003 to 2008. Woodward's attempt to make Kirk's and Blumenthal's service misstatements equivalent is disgraceful.

[5] -- Harry Reid's "but for me, we'd be in a worldwide depression" statement doesn't fit the definition of "gaffe" above. What it represents is "the height of arrogance and self-aggrandizement."

[6] -- Heaven forbid that people with real-life experiences run for office. We've been so well-served by career politicians (/sarcasm). And Cal, ol' buddy 'ol pal, how could you, in essence, write that military veterans are "unaccustomed to the hot house"? Just an FYI: Every post-World War II president until Bill Clinton served in the military (Truman, Ike, JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush 41), and there was a time when voters considered such service an indispensable qualification to be considered for the presidency.

[7] -- Here we go again. It's the extension of the pathetic press meme that used to be: "You're not allowed to complain about government programs if you've ever received any kind of benefit of subsidy." Woodward extends it to "anyone in your family." What's next, "anyone in your neighborhood"?

[8] -- Miller's "offense" was taking an online survey on a government computer during work hours. Oh, the humanity.

This post didn't even get to the predominantly Democratic mega-gaffes Woodward ignored, including but certainly not limited to those involving Coons (noted earlier), Florida Congressman Alan Grayson, Michigan Congressman John Dingell, Ohio Governor Ted Strickland, and crybaby GOP Senate primary loser and write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski.

Despite the occasional references to experienced politicians, Woodward's piece comes across to this reader as an offensive and distasteful "how dare these plebes rise up and assert themselves" riff. Very weak, Cal. Very weak.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

  • Bias by Omission
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Double Standards
  • 2010 Congressional
  • Congress
  • Guns
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Calvin Woodward
  • Chris Coons
  • Christine O'Donnell
  • Joe Miller
  • Mark Kirk
  • Richard Blumenthal
  • Sharron Angle
  • Wire Services/Media Companies
  • Associated Press
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Gaffes about Gaffes about Gaffes

Submitted by Beresford on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 11:17am.

I agree with much of what you wrote, Tom, but on your line:

If there is a record of Mark Kirk telling an audience that he served "in" Iraq, it hasn't surfaced.     I would invite your attention to this video of Kirk saying on the floor of the House that the last time he was in Iraq he was in uniform...flying over the country at 20,000 feet and being shot at by Saddam's air defenses.     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeFf4JNx3tc&feature=player_embedded     Kirk later said that he "simply misremembered it wrong" referring to his military record. An has said there is no proof he was ever fired upon.      http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=7479489     May "IN" Iraq and "OVER" Iraq aren't quite the same -- but the Congressman was clearly embellishing his military record.  We don't need any more liars in Congress --- from EITHER party.    
  • Login to post comments

Thanks for that info. Bereesford

Submitted by Tom Blumer on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 2:12pm.

I am NOT a Mark Cap n Trade Kirk fan, but Giannoulias would be a complete disaster (thank you, Illinois RINO Party, for hand-picking Kirk and holding an early primary before opposition could coalesce -- /sarc).

Did Kirk visit Iraq while he was still an enlisted soldier AND a Congressman? I think the answer is yes, so I don't have a problem with that aspect of what he said.

Was the aircraft he was flying in shot at? How would we know otherwise?

And the fact that "(he) has said there is no proof he was ever fired upon" doesn't mean the aircraft wasn't fired on." I don't think they issue daily "fired upon" bulletins for public consumption.

Yeah, Kirk is embellishing, but getting back to Woodward, Blumenthal has flat-out lied multiple times, and an AP reporter making the two items seem comparable is disgraceful.

  • Login to post comments

They were shooting at us. They were. Yes. They were shooting.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 4:23pm.

  The Iraqi military were actively shooting SAM's at our planes flying over Iraq. OUR planes. US. They were shooting at us. All throughout the 90's. I was listed as one of the 22 reasons on the Authorization of Force that Congress signed in October 2002.

  They were shooting at us. The United States. It's planes. Flying over Iraq. They were shooting at us.

  I was on a ship in Desert Storm. Saddam Hussein was trying to kill us. He placed mines in the gulf to kill us. Did he specifically target my ship? No. It was all of us.

 Looks like  Beresford was just introduced to the English language.

  And his link don't work. I had to copy and paste to view the CUT OFF IN MID SENTENCE video.

 

  • Login to post comments

What a difference a little "t" makes

Submitted by troglodyt on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 4:56pm.

I was listed as one of the 22 reasons on the Authorization of Force that Congress signed in October 2002
.
What did you do, that made the US go to war with Iraq?
 

  • Login to post comments

Trolling straight out of the troll bible.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 5:11pm.

 You have issues with something I said Fake German? Or you just here to troll?

26. Attack typos and ignore the content of the message. Point out your opponent's grammatical flaws and spelling errors. By doing this you can concentrate on form while ignoring substance. This is a very handy method to discredit your opponent and by extension his position, without once again exposing your ignorance of the issues begin discussed in the thread.

 

  • Login to post comments

TVFKAJWF

Submitted by troglodyt on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 5:11pm.

Please don't prove that you lack sense of humor. But why the capitalized "F"?

  • Login to post comments

Official Title.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 5:46pm.

 

Rule 6. Capitalize any title when used as a direct address.   Example: Will you take my temperature, Doctor?

 

Another example - You suck, Fake German?

  • Login to post comments

I know you are trying to be humorous.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 6:06pm.

  Or at least I think you are trying to be humorous.

  But there is a string of burnt bridges behind you. Try rebuilding a few of them before you start in on teh funnies.

Do you support our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Do you think Israel has a right to exist?

Do you think the United States is an exceptional country?

Try answering those questions and the bridges might start getting repaired.

  • Login to post comments

All of that would require for

Submitted by troglodyt on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 8:11pm.

All of that would require for you to back down from this whole fake German claim. This has been more than ridiculous.

  • Login to post comments

Then stop acting like we are buddies.

Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 10/31/2010 - 9:13am.

  I don't need a troll correcting my typo's and acting like it is all in fun and games.

 You are a fake German, nl207 and I have proved that beyond any doubt. Next time, don't grab such an outrageous lie when you troll.

  And quit acting like we are buddies with you idiotic takeoffs on my typo's and telling me not to lose my sense of humor when you point out my typos..

  You are a fake German and a fake buddy as well.

  • Login to post comments

geez little "t" troglodyt, maybe lettin Iraq INVADE Kuwait..

Submitted by upcountrywater on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 5:51pm.

One of my favorite moments was when we bombed some fiber optic node that the Chinese were building. Fiber optic can be used to enhance tracking radar for SAM's.

As if you care. I'm sure you heard that we just bombed a phone company.

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

ucw

Submitted by troglodyt on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 8:19pm.

The Vet let Saddam invade Kuwait?

  • Login to post comments

Thanks for your reasoned reply...

Submitted by Beresford on Sun, 10/31/2010 - 4:43pm.

As opposed to some of the other knee jerk jerks who expose their ignorance.

My understanding is that Kirk was not a soldier in Iraq...but a naval reserve intelligence officer whose squadron flee missions over Iraq prior to the fall of Saddam.  The type of aircraft used in his squadron did not require intell officers aloft.  He may have flown over once or twice (according to one of the other posters below) in an observer capacity.  If the flights were fired on -- and anyone onboard noticed -- there would be a record -- this is how you get air medals.

I am suggesting that Kirk's exaggerations are as bad as others -- but readers of this blog should not dismiss them just because he is (sort of) on their side.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

Beresford

Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 10/31/2010 - 4:48pm.

Did you mean to say Kirk's exaggerations are as bad as others, or are not as bad as others?

"But my advice to you can be summed up in two words: Thicker skin." - Jer
  • Login to post comments

double post

Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 10/31/2010 - 4:49pm.

Sorry.

"But my advice to you can be summed up in two words: Thicker skin." - Jer
  • Login to post comments

Thought I jumped on you too hard there. I was wrong.

Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 2:21pm.

1. You appear to be dismissing someone because they were not shot at IN COMBAT. So only combat vets can run for office now?

2. The actual award he won. YES HE WON IT. He was in charge. He was part of the unit. He can claim the award. The actual award IS NOT A MILITARY AWARD.

Say again. Repeat. Over.

3. The actual award was NOT A MILITARY AWARD. It was from an outside organization.

4. There is no Intelligence Officer of the Year award in the military as far as I can tell. So it is not like he was trying to pull an award away from a guy that actually won it.

5. It was on the bio on his web page. Government run web page. He probably did not write it. Yes, he should have looked it over.

6. I will come back here after the election. Like Mr. Blumer, I ain't no big fan, but I will take Kirk over any Democrat any day. Yes. I live in Illinois.

7. Let's hear about your 20 year record in the military. Hmmmm. How bout it. And you best cross every single t and dot every single i because I will pour over it like I got a gun to my head and see what gets spit out.

8. The actual award IS NOT A MILITARY AWARD. So it ain't like he goofed on a medal or ribbon he did not earn.

  • Login to post comments

I don't like you. I don't like you at all Beresford.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 4:45pm.

1. I have a chest full of ribbons and medals. Point to one or two of them and I will be hard pressed to say if it was a UNIT citation or a PRIVATE citation.

2. Some of the videos I found have Mark Kirk walking around in a VFW hat. I am a member of the VFW.

3. Nah. I don't like you at all. I would have gladly serverd under Mr. Kirk anyday. I would not cross the street to spit on a dishonest little person like you. Now why would I say that? I have never linked to any video of anyone that was cut off in mid sentence and even cut off, THEY WERE SHOOTING AT US. Yes. ME. I was part of the military then. They were shooting at OUR PLANES. That is US.

Look at this --- The Huffington Post of all sites ----

But an Associated Press review of Navy personnel documents – as well as interviews with former colleagues, commanders and experts – shows Kirk has been an exceptional officer entrusted with vital, sensitive duties. His work was important but not glamorous.

If Kirk had limited his statements to his actual military record, he would not have lacked for achievements to brag about.

He has spent his entire career in military intelligence. Early on, that meant studying Latin America, particularly drug activity there. Later Kirk was assigned to the Joint Intelligence Center at the Pentagon, where he briefed top military leaders on crises.

As he rose in rank, Kirk eventually began taking shifts overseeing the entire intelligence section of the Pentagon war room, monitoring activity around the world in case anything required U.S. action.

He also served, temporarily, aboard ships such as the aircraft carrier John C. Stennis and in Afghanistan, where he again studied drug trafficking.

The fact that Kirk was entrusted with those positions suggests his superiors considered him one of the best, said Thom Kroon, a former Reserve intelligence analyst.

"They're going to be looking for a hard-charger who has done a great job for people in the past," Kroon said.

Military records indicate Kirk delivered a "brilliant and knowledgeable briefing on international economics." He established an intelligence team to monitor sudden developments in Cuba and Haiti. He prepared a map of combat forces in the Balkans. He was praised as "the finest orator" in the Navy.

"He was generally thought of, as I recall, as a very capable up-and-comer in a group of very capable up-and-comers," said Peter Feaver, who served in a Reserve intelligence unit with Kirk and is now a professor and national security expert at Duke University.

Kirk's time with the Prowler unit produced some of the most dramatic, high-stakes work of his career.

First during the Kosovo bombing campaign and then during Operation Northern Watch over Iraq, Kirk helped figure out where to send the EA-6B Prowler planes, what their goals should be and how to get them back home.

An intelligence officer's work is "pretty crucial" to the mission, said Sergio Posadas, himself a former intelligence officer and Prowler crew member in the Marines.

Experts say Kirk's work would have involved reviewing information from American intelligence agencies and pulling out the portions that would help Prowler pilots find the enemy. What frequencies had they been using? Where had they been located recently? Was there any trend to suggest where they would go next?

Michael Graham, who served in a stateside intelligence unit with Kirk for about five years, said Kirk figured out a way to uncover important information during the Kosovo conflict. A video of Kirk's presentation on the method was used in intelligence training for years afterward, he and others said.

During the Kosovo bombing campaign, Kirk coordinated intelligence for multiple squadrons – the largest Prowler intelligence group "in the history of naval aviation," according to a commendation that Kirk earned.

Kirk's group earned an award as top intelligence unit. He later began saying that he had been named the Navy's intelligence officer of the year.

Kirk's commanding officer at the time, Capt. F. Clay Fearnow, defends Kirk's incorrect claim. "There would have been no team without Mark Kirk's leadership, and there certainly would have been no award," Fearnow said in a statement distributed by Kirk's campaign.

Fearnow did not return calls for comment from The Associated Press.

Kirk would not agree to an interview and has largely stopped answering questions about his military service. He refers reporters to his fitness reports, which offer an overview of his work and the opinions of his commanding officers but do not include details of specific incidents. He refuses to release other records that would provide additional information about his service.

Kirk was not a pilot, but he took SERE training – for "survival, evasion, resistance and escape" – so that he could go along on some flights as an observer. Veterans and military experts said that would have provided valuable real-world experience for an intelligence officer.

Kirk's campaign did not say exactly how many times he flew but said records indicate it was at least three times – once over Kosovo but not in a Prowler, and more than once over Iraq.

Kirk and his campaign have described him coming under fire on those flights. But once questions about his military service arose, Kirk backtracked and said he could not be certain that his plane was specifically targeted on those flights.

Experts said they see no reason to doubt his account.

"If he flew in Kosovo, and he flew in Operation Northern Watch, I would be surprised if he weren't shot at," said Doug Roulstone, Kirk's commanding officer when he served aboard the John C. Stennis.

As an observer, Kirk would have been in a noisy jet listening to crew discussion of enemy fire and perhaps seeing tracers, said Posadas, the former Prowler crew member. It would have been easy to know there was activity without knowing whether the plane was in danger.

"It may feel very personal but never come close to your particular aircraft," Posadas said.

More recently, Kirk has made two trips to Afghanistan, spending two or three weeks there each time. His commanding officer on the first trip said Kirk showed "tremendous personal courage" while serving in dangerous areas.

Kirk has said that on his second trip, at the end of 2009, he was shot at. He will no longer answer questions about what happened.

Maj. Fred Tanner worked alongside Kirk on that first stint in Afghanistan. He said Kirk studied drug activity and, because of his past intelligence work involving drugs, was able to write a report with concrete suggestions for organizing the military's response.

Tanner said he was not expecting much from a member of Congress but Kirk threw himself into his work.

"Mark actually produced. He actually wrote stuff," Tanner said. "It kind of shocked me."

  • Login to post comments

You see, Vet, the Huffington

Submitted by Jer on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 5:24pm.

You see, Vet, the Huffington Post "of all sites", even though predominantly lib/progressive, does on occasion publish articles by conservatives, articles favorable to conservatives, and articles presenting pro and con positions on issues.

I continue to point this out, yet I continue to be scoffed at for doing so.  ;-)

Uncle Jer

  • Login to post comments

Yep. This is why we love teh Uncle Jer.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 5:50pm.

  Tell you what, we gonna knock $500 off that $8000. So you go back to Potter and Pimp Slap him until he coughs up the $8000 and you get to pocket an easy $500.

  Never gonna hear me whine about you defensinating HuffPo from hence forward forwith.

  • Login to post comments

The Huffington Post---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 10/31/2010 - 2:20am.

"does on occasion" ---blah-blah-blah-yada-yada-yada.

On occasion.

Which does not necessarily lend itself to showing Huffington as being the fair and balanced and upstanding and wonderful and kind to conservatives and aware of both or even all sides of the issue and inherently transparent with every single issue they deal with by honestly stating every single time that they are left wing loonies, even, when they do, on occasion, come out with an item that may, possibly, show a trace of evenhandedness that is most certainly and positively not the norm.

Funny.

Peculiar, not "ha-ha".

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

There was some digs in that piece.

Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 10/31/2010 - 9:23am.

  I was not exactly happy with them. But it was quick and did put his 20 years in a good light.

  If we were to listen to the trolls (not not not Uncle Jer), this site has never been right. I seriously doubt any of them has gone back to MM or DKos and said - Say, these guys got a point.

  • Login to post comments

The latest swarm of liberal

Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 11:20am.

The latest swarm of liberal elitist gaffe-flies, though annoying at times, are nothing that a good citronella candle or a dollar store fly swatter for that matter, couldn't be managed straight away.

Barack_Must_Go.....

  • Login to post comments

LBJ and Reagan served in the military, but --

Submitted by Galvanic on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 2:24pm.

LBJ was a member of Congress who, like many on the Hill, wankled a commission as a lieutenant commander in the US Naval Reserve, and then galavanted about as sort of a self-appointed inspector.  He persuaded someone to allow him to fly as a passenger on a bombing run over the South Pacific.  The mission came under attack, and the Navy gave the Ciongressman-LCDR a gratuitous Silver Star.

Later, FDR ordered that sitting members of Congress choose between military service or fulfilloing their Congressional duties (I imagine termination of double-dipping was used as leverage), and LBJ hung up the uniform to return to the House.

Reagan was commissioned in the US Army, but spent his war service in Hollywood making training films.  He went home to his wife every night.

Technically, they did serve, but as celebrities, they were given the grand treatment.

  • Login to post comments

Don't tell Hispanics they look Asian

Submitted by CO2Maker on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 4:12pm.

Let's see: Sharon Angle was addressing Mexicans or people from Central or South America, right? The Hispanics she referred to are from indigenous American ancestry blended with European (Spanish) and other ethnic backgrounds. 

Where did those "indigenous" Americans origniate. Let me see ... oh yes, Asia!!!

Several years ago at UNC-CH, I showed a professor some stock photos to use in her book (on ESL learning).  She was a native of Bolivia or Venezuela, IIRC, but had lived in the US for 20+ years (since her undergraduate years). 

I showed her photos of children who looked Peruvian (or generally South American) to me. "No," she said, "they look Japanese."

D'oh-kay.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use