Politico's Revealing Coverage Double Standard on Challenges to House Leaders

Photo of Tom Blumer.

JonesAndBoehner0509Those who believe that Politico is a hangout for former establishment media journalists who want to recreate a combination of the New York Times and Washington Post on the web -- complete with the insufferable biases of those two publications -- can look to the disparate treatment of two challenges to party congressional leaders as affirmative evidence.

In a search on "Cindy Sheehan" at Politico, I found that in covering the congressional candidacy of former media darling Cindy Sheehan in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Northern California district, the online news site carried two tiny items. Only one of them was originally produced there.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The first, carried at its Crypt blog in July 2007, noted that the anti-war activist was planning to run against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as an independent -- "unless she introduces legislation to impeach President Bush within the next two weeks." The second was a five-paragraph Associated Press item noting that Sheehan had qualified to run as an independent against Pelosi in the general election. Sheehan was runner-up to Pelosi on November 4, with 16.2% of the vote, even though the U.S. military victory in Iraq was self-evident by that time.

But on May 11, Politico's Josh Kroushaar posted a two-page, 887-word treatise about a less well-known though colorful county sheriff who is thinking -- only thinking -- about running against House Minority Leader John Boehner in the 2010 GOP Primary.

As you'll see, Politico even interviewed the challenger, Butler County Sheriff Rick Jones:

Even before Jones explored the race, his penchant for attracting headlines earned him the nickname “Spotlight Jones.” A conservative with a populist streak, he regularly appears on Cincinnati conservative talk show host Bill Cunningham’s radio show to speak out against illegal immigration, and Jones has attracted attention for refusing to evict homeowners facing foreclosure.

In an interview with POLITICO, Jones said he is thinking seriously about running against Boehner because he’s been dissatisfied with Republican congressional leadership.

“The party is in the toilet and in the wilderness. I don’t know where they’re going. Being an incumbent in Washington is not really the best thing right now,” Jones said.

“Remember David and Goliath? It sounds like [Republicans] are saying: ‘How dare he challenge someone who’s so powerful?’ Well, I’m not a person who’s intimidated,” said Jones, who was first elected sheriff in 2005. “I always do what I believe is the right thing to do. I don’t have any lobbyists who control me. I try to do the right thing, and I’ve never forgotten that.”

Jones, once described by the Dayton Daily News as a “cross between John Wayne and Rush Limbaugh,” said he would focus on immigration as a major theme if he runs. As sheriff, Jones has posted billboards in the county warning employers not to hire illegal immigrants and has lobbied for local law enforcement officials to crack down on immigration violations. During the presidential campaign, he bought an ad in the Cincinnati Enquirer accusing Republican presidential nominee John McCain of being weak on immigration.

..... “Politics is a contact sport. It’s not for sissies,” Jones said. “I don’t want to get into something I’m going to lose. I’ve got to have the resources and the support. And at this point, that’s something I’m trying to garner.”

..... To illustrate his conservative credentials, Boehner spokesman Don Seymour cited his leadership against President Barack Obama’s stimulus legislation, his long-standing refusal to accept earmarks for the district and his high-profile opposition to former President George W. Bush’s comprehensive immigration reform bill.

Seymour noted that Jones requested millions in stimulus money to help refurbish his sheriff’s office, which could undermine his attempts to win over conservative primary voters.

As one of the party’s top fundraisers, Boehner will have little trouble mounting a defense of his seat.

Though Jones is conservative on many issues, Politico "somehow" missed Jones's announcement late last year (link is to a blog post; original story was in the Cincinnati Enquirer, whose original link no longer available) that, until winter ended, he was "ordering his deputies to disregard eviction orders when people have nowhere else to live."

Yes, Jones is an elected official, and Sheehan never has been, but no one can credibly claim that Jones is more well-known in John Boehner's entire congressional district, which includes part or all of five other counties in the Dayton media market, than Sheehan was in San Francisco last year.

By devoting so much attention to Jones, who again is only thinking about a challenge, Politico appears to be giving away its interest or hope that Boehner will have to deal with a viable challenger. Regardless of whether that's the case, the fact that it virtually ignored the real candidacy of much better-known Pelosi challenger Sheehan, whose sentiments against the Iraq war were arguably more in line with the far-left views of voters in California's 8th Congressional District than some of Jones's positions are in Ohio's 8th, is a pretty clear example of a double standard.

Thus, Politico seems well on its way to achieving its goal of becoming a NYT-WaPo online clone. Coverage disparities such as the one demonstrated here may also lead it to clone the two print publications' shrinking popularity and lack of profitability.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Sheehan vs Pelosi.

It is almost impossible to find out what percentage of the vote Sheehan received other than backing into it.

On CNN.com it shows Pelosi (72%) and the Republican (10%) and that's it.  Where is the other 18%?

They left Sheehan out even though she received more votes than the Republican!!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/individual/#mapHCA/H/08

The Politico does the same thing:

 http://www.politico.com/electionmap2008/index.html

Of all people, MSNBC did show her, although given what we know about MSNBC I guess it makes sense:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25362662/race/house

I went to a PDF at the California Secretary of State ....

.... which is why I didn't link to it.

I had no idea that Politico and CNN didn't even carry Sheehan's vote count or %. That reinforces the theme of this post.

Maybe Sheehan could get some media coverage

if she heads back down to Crawford, Texas with her unwashed bunch of leftist, lesbian losers!  Politico, like the MSM, is a tremendous joke.

Angry White Dude

www.angrywhitedude.c...

She has bigger fish to fry

She is probably looking for Nancy's seat, so I bet she will be camping with code pink like in 07'

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

LOST

Lost respect for, and confidence in, The Politico a good while back.

A shame, too.  Their beginnings were quite promising.

Re Lost

Yes, Puff Ho seems to be their role model. Too bad.

No offense meant here at

No offense meant here at all Tom, but the people who started the Politico lean to the left or are full-blown leftists ...I used to comment there now and then, only do so now once in a blue moon, do go there once in awhile to get info or an article, but I never, ever, thought they would be fair or balanced as a whole....not even close.

Great catch about Sheehan and their double standard regarding Pelosi/Boehner.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

bt, I remember

bt,

I remember exchanging comments with you before on the subject of Politico. We agreed that although they were bland in their bias, they were still almost always canted towards the Democrats. Kind of like the networks were 25 - 30 years ago. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Hey Chris...right you are,

Hey Chris...right you are, I had forgot about that until you brought it up now.

...and these guys are now everywhere on all networks as the political spokesman for DC etc...the newest darlings in the political circuit via the TV screen.

I have to be amused, or I'd be angry all the time with what has gone on...the msm isn't even getting close to fair and balanced and aren't about to anytime soon.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

bt, all these Politico guys

bt, all these Politico guys and gals are always calm and polite, kind of understated, but definitely sympathetic towards the Democrats. I don't know which kind of bias gets me angrier - the "in-your-face" bias of MSNBC, or the blandly quiet kind of Politico. At least the blatant bias is indentifiable for most everyone to recognize as cheerleading, while the quiet kind masquerades as neutral analysis.

Evidence: the first sentence in the biography on Jonathon Martin on the Politico web site:

" Just as Dick Cheney had 'a fever' for launching the Iraq war (or so Colin Powell told Bob Woodward), Jonathan Martin has had "a fever" for politics, government, public affairs and history from an early age."

- Now, why did they have to start off with that swipe against Cheney as a comparison to Martin's love of politics? Like we didn't know what a "fever" for something was?

By the way, what happened to Martin? He was all over the place during the campaign, but I haven't seen him on anything since...

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Hey Chris... Now that you

Hey Chris...

Now that you mention it, I haven't seen Martin forever either.

He must be in an undisclosed location.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

His biography ends during

His biography ends during the 2008 campaign. He used to work for the National Review, but I never  got the sense he was sympathetic at all towards the Republicans. His analyses always seemed to favor Obama.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Re past discussions

Last year about a week or so before the election, there was an article from Politico where they admitted there was bias in the old media in favor of the Bamster, including at Politico itself. I think it was written by the editors, Harris and VandeHei. That generated some articles here at which Politico bias was discussed at length.

I read Politico every day.......

I usually will use it to print out stories and read them for the cold hard facts instead of an opinion.

 Well starting about 3 or 4 weeks ago, Poltico took a hard turn to the left in their stories and headlines on the site. Things would just jump off the page at how slanted they were. I don't know why. Prior to that, they place was about as down the middle as one can find by a mainstream outlet.

 I wish these people would realize, more people will flock to their site if they call it down the middle on both Republicans and Democrats. I can handle them calling out a conservative, if they do the same for a liberal. Too bad most can't understand that.

I think you have a point

Politico was the only publication that talked about how Obama has concentrated unprecedented power in the WH at the expense of Cabinet posts in early February. I think it was the one that broke the story about the Census too. It broke some stories during the primaries that weren't helpful to Obama or Hillary.

Haven't seen much similar lately, and it's not like there isn't a lot of material to work with.