Yesterday, the Associated Press, in its ongoing campaign to make sure that readers get and stay downbeat about the economy, made sure that its story on January's retail sales had can't-miss gloom and doom in it:
Retail sales posted a surprising rebound in January following a dismal December, although much of the strength reflected rising gasoline prices. Economists saw the increase as a temporary blip rather than a sustained recovery.
..... The Commerce Department reported Wednesday that retail sales rose by 0.3 percent last month after having fallen by 0.4 percent in December.
..... But the positive retail number did little to change the view of economists who are forecasting the economy will fall into a recession in the first half of this year.
..... Given all the troubles facing the economy from a prolonged slump in housing to rising food and energy costs, job losses and turbulent financial markets, analysts said it was not surprising to see lackluster retail sales.
It took until Paragraph 6 for the writer to inform us that economists thought reported sales would decrease:
Economists had predicted a 0.3 percent decline in January sales. They noted that without the big jump in gasoline, sales would have risen by a much smaller 0.1 percent. They pointed to a number of areas connected to the troubled housing industry where sales took a tumble including declines at furniture, hardware and appliance stores.
Surely the expert economists AP referred to had already factored in the increase in gas prices when they made their predictions of -0.3%. That is, one can accurately say that "without the big jump in gasoline, economists would have predicted a steeper sales decline of 0.5%." The point is that retail sales beat expectations by 0.6%, the difference between +0.3% and -0.3%. The AP's writeup is a direct attempt to make the reader think that the difference was only 0.4% (+0.3% vs. -0.1%).
It's just all in a day's work in AP's reporting on business and the economy.
Presented in briefer form as part of this post at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
It is called vote for a Democrat who wants your wallet
February 14, 2008 - 16:29 ET by Lame CherryAll of this is quid pro quo. Democrats talk down the economy and if one pays attention OPEC is about to open the oil valve to make Americans less angry over prices so by the fall of 2008 they will vote for the GOP.
I personally would help Obama or McCain in this Soros bought for duo in working for either of them to simply set about an economic plan for America to gain production, end inflation, so that all Americans would become wealthy to care for their own needs.
That solves all problems physical and then it ends worries about recession as everyone could ride the ups and downs of supply and demand.
Darth Al Gore is still in the wings though and this nation is screwed if he punts his way into office.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
The 'temporary blip' has
February 15, 2008 - 10:56 ET by mattmThe 'temporary blip' has been going on since 2002.
(Not to say that the economy's great - there's still too much liberalism out there...)