Headline and sub-headline in today's OpinionJournal.com:
The Kids Are All Right
Economic literacy test: High school seniors beat Congress.
Excerpts (bold is mine):
Since its founding in 1969, the NAEP has become something of an annual exercise in American educational masochism. Last year, only 54% of students met NAEP's "basic" standard--the equivalent of a passing grade--on the science test. The previous year tested history; a mere 47% passed. But when knowledge of economics was tested this year, well, let's just say the supply curve shifted. NAEP reported this week that 79% of twelfth graders passed this first-ever national economics test. Holy Hayek.
..... The depth of knowledge shown by ordinary seniors suggests that they have been able to absorb basic economic truths from their daily experiences. Now, if this wisdom can only survive four years of instruction by your average college faculty.
It also helps that the high schoolers are too young to have much exposure to, or interest in, the economic pablum and partisan distortion regularly disseminated on the evening newscasts, on most cable TV shows, and by egghead economic and business reporters at outfits like the Associated Press (two of many examples here and here) and MarketWatch ("best" examples here and here).
Some of the questions on the assessment are here.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
How much more if we allow
August 10, 2007 - 16:18 ET by Senior ChiefHow much more if we allow our children to listen to Rush and access to NB. Holy cow, they'll have a flag day and prayers at school daily...and they might even demonstrate in front of the Capitol on weekends and demand Congress to act right!
Yep, my 12YO twin girls understands the difference between "needs" and "wants". If Congress understand this concept, we should have lots of money in the bank. But then again, they're not spending their OWN money...
Funny how governments do not
August 10, 2007 - 16:30 ET by Sonny LykosFunny how governments do not change even from Voltaire's era:
"In general the art of government consists in taking as much money as possible from one class of citizens to give to the other." [Voltaire]
Couldn't agree more. On
August 11, 2007 - 08:01 ET by rob6677Couldn't agree more.
On the subject of needs and wants, I can't decide if the t-shirt girl is a need or want?
I didn't want to stray from the subject, but damn is she distracting!
"I hired you to get some track laid, not jump around like a bunch a kansas city faggots" Slim Pickens
After looking at the
August 10, 2007 - 16:32 ET by KhyrisAfter looking at the questions on the assessment, I must say I still find 79% a disturbingly low number. I had no problem zipping down the list and ending up 100%. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they're doing better at SOMETHING, but better just doesn't mean good enough.
It just makes you wonder how many parents sit down and explain supply-and-demand and the basics of living in a capitalist society to their kids. (present company excluded)
I'm with you
August 10, 2007 - 17:14 ET by Carbon SasquatchLooking at the percentage of students who correctly answered the
sample questions, the rest of the test must have been gimme's to get
the final result up to 79%.
Never go to a gunfight with a caliber that starts with less than four
Heard this discussed on NPR
August 10, 2007 - 17:01 ET by Carbon SasquatchThe example used was 'what does the bank do with the money in your
checking account?' The correct answer, of course, was 'loan it
out to other customers.' Since this is evidence of the most basic
understanding of economics, why do politicians and news commentators
get so wrought up over the Social Security Trust Fund being a box full
of IOU's? Do they all believe that other government agencies are
sub-prime borrowers?
Never go to a gunfight with a caliber that starts with less than four
George Bailey tried
August 10, 2007 - 17:56 ET by drillanwrGeorge Bailey tried explaining the concept of banking to the town folks who stormed in with a run on the bank for their money (incited by that evil Robert Byrd-looking guy Mr. Potter ... no relation to Harry Potter).
I saw this on
August 10, 2007 - 17:51 ET by drillanwrI saw this on OpinionJournal.com, and was going to post it's link on NB, but yunz beat me to it!
Thanks, NB!
Among high school seniors:
August 10, 2007 - 20:28 ET by ding7777Among high school seniors: 35% are proficient in reading and 23% are proficient in math, but 42% are alleged to be proficient in economics. As Kevin Drum asks:
"how can you be
August 10, 2007 - 20:34 ET by jcrapes4"how can you be "proficient" in economics if you aren't also proficient in reading and math? Does that make any sense? "
Its beer math:)
The tagline says it ALL
August 13, 2007 - 05:52 ET by UnsaneAll one needs in economics is to be knowledgeable of Latin. If you understand my tagline, you hold the key to mastering economics. It's just common sense.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.