FCC vs. Bristol Palin: More Proof Free Speech is the Enemy of the Left
In movies like "Fahrenheit 451" and "1984," neighbors inform the police about serious crimes against the State like subversion and book possession. In real America, people call 911 because McDonald’s has run out of McNuggets.
We’ve grown accustomed to hearing about people using police to rectify situations that used to be done with simple human interaction. So we shouldn’t be surprised, when a daughter of America’s most prominent conservative advances to the finals of a dance contest and some people petition the government for a redress of jitterbug. Though no action was taken by the government, according to a Smoking Gun article there were numerous emails and letters sent to the Federal Communications Commission regarding the move of Bristol into the final round of Dancing With The Stars.
The FCC grew out of the FRC, which was established in 1927 only to assign radio frequencies and licenses. But giving the Federal Government a little authority is like giving a gremlin a snack after midnight. Since then, the FCC has moved into a much more powerful position, determining what content can be transmitted on the “public” airwaves, and insuring that the voices heard are as diverse as an NPR Kwanzaa Party.
With the assorted class action suit commercials advertised on late night TV, people today are encouraged to collect settlements on damages they didn’t even realize they incurred. A recent law was passed turning down the volume of commercials, an arduous task that heretofore required reaching all the way over to the coffee table and picking up the remote. So why wouldn’t Leftists appeal to the FCC to handle their dirty work against Bristol Palin and others?
There have been numerous calls for the FCC to suspend the licenses of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, two entities that do not require FCC licenses. The Party who thinks requiring proof of US citizenship in order to vote qualifies as a constitutional violation wants FCC licenses for Americans exercising their First Amendment rights.
Ultimately, what people are complaining about is democracy in its truest form. Rush Limbaugh is on the radio because 21 million people tune in every week. Fox News leads all other cable news channels by a margin wide enough for Michael Moore to slip through (while giving Kirstie Alley a piggyback ride). Bristol might have not been the best dancer, but more people wanted to see her in the final round than Brandy.
We all know it isn’t always the most talented who succeed. There are comics funnier than Dane Cook and better singers than Katy Perry. Yet both are at the top of their profession because they posses a couple assets that make them irresistible to the public (a similar argument might be made for the 2008 election).
For all the talk about the Right Wing being full of fascists, you never really hear the Right trying to censor the Left. If the FCC were inundated with letters every time a left-wing cause was advanced on network TV, one episode of The West Wing would have made FCC desks look like the final courtroom scene in Miracle on 34th Street.
There may be outrage from the right over a taxpayer-funded art installation or NPR, but such outrage is usually directed against the funding of these things. Most conservative Americans respect free speech, they just don‘t think they should be forced to pay for it. (In an age of record deficits, children yet to be born will still be paying long after the ants have crawled off Jesus.)
As we move forward, into the new Congress, I expect the complaints to get louder. The left’s politics can only succeed in an intellectual vacuum, so Leftists strive to control the dialog. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a Communist dictatorship like North Korea, or a small Liberal Arts college, they instinctively know that free speech is the enemy of Marxism.
And if you can’t win a debate (or a reality show dance contest), arrest the opposition.
- Tim Slagle's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
After googling FCC Complaints
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 7:36pm.
After googling FCC Complaints I was somewhat surprised to learn that liberals are not the only group filing complaints with the FCC.
The first page of results alone mentions complaints against Family Guy, Adam Lambert, and Showtime for a Penn and Teller ad, as well as Palin.
I'm guessing liberals made the complaints about Palin. Any guesses on the others?
My guess on the others is
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 7:48pm.
My guess on the others is that they are liberals posing as conservatives to make it appear that conservatives are complaining about the shows.
I'll bet.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 7:51pm.
I'll bet.
It happens all the time
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:00pm.
Really, it does.
Liberals posing as
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:02pm.
Liberals posing as conservatives at a rally is one thing. Writing complaint letters to have their own favorite shows kicked off the air? Well, just think about it.
Who really knows how far
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:07pm.
Who really knows how far liberals will go to make a point? It's well within the realm of possibility.
No really. Think about it.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:08pm.
No really. Think about it. Which party is more likely to complain about television content?
When you think about it, it's
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:11pm.
When you think about it, it's the liberals who are trying to get Fox News and Rush Limbaugh off the air.
Is anyone on the Right calling for CNN or MSNBC to be shut down?
Outside of Newsbusters?
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:17pm.
Outside of Newsbusters? Likely.
Likely???
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:19pm.
Shouldn't be too hard to link to facts then, should it.
As soon as you finish up the Vet, get on that, will ya?
Chop chop!
Indirectly I'm calling for
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:20pm.
Indirectly I'm calling for MSNBC to be shut down. I'd like Immelt and GE to stop getting government money, which would hopefully force MSNBC to be shut down due to lack of profits.
Aah, to dream.
~I just don't watch
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:17pm.
shows I think are vile. Never crossed my mind to formally complain.
I don't buy it. You MUST
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:53pm.
I don't buy it. You MUST have a side that enjoys filthy humor. After all, I have a side that enjoys the PG stuff too. ; )
No, no one has a side that
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:29pm.
No, no one has a side that enjoys you.
Regardless, you can't let the government pick winners/losers
Submitted by herc0 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 7:58pm.
Some of the latest earmarks in a tax extension bill during a lameduck session when our deficit is already unsustainable... Pathetic
26CX
Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:31pm.
I started off with this angle to stupid bal, below, but then realized just how stupid his post was and... lost my way. :p
Yes, activist/progressive liberals are (and I mean this) one notch up from islamic extremists, as far as going to any lengths to achieve their goal.
- Shy Platinum
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
More stupid from Mr. Screen Names
Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:26pm.
Well, just think about it.
Okay.........................................................
Yep. Thought about it.
Okay, stepping outside, bringing a camera to document it, making a sign, etc., all part of going to a rally and posing as a conservative...... or...... sitting at your computer and shooting off faux-conservie letters to producers/networks.
Hey, stupid bal, which would you do?
- Shy Skills
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
You a Mets fan?
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:31pm.
You a Mets fan?
As well as conservatives
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:14pm.
As well as conservatives posing as prostitute and boyfriend about to evade taxes, smuggle people and prostitue children.
Yes it happens.
Different thing, there Trog.
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:19pm.
Different thing, there Trog. They exposed criminal activity by a left-leaning organization.
You don't think criminals are going to come out and expose themselves on their own, do you?
Well they didn't.
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:24pm.
But that is a whole other story.
Are you sure about that,
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:32pm.
Are you sure about that, Trog?
Do you have no trust in the justice system?
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:41pm.
Where is a state attorney when you need him?
Or her. Women can be state
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:44pm.
Or her. Women can be state attorneys, too, you know.
I apologize
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:57pm.
if I offended any female state attorney from Maryland by my presumptuous comment.
~You sorry-
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 11:57pm.
-@ss sonofab!@$h I'm gonna fry your gonads for that and feed them to my Yorkie. To think I let you off on a plea deal the last time you got hauled up for molesting your neighbor's miniature goat. No more Ms. Nice Prosecutor. $#!#$@%$!!!
How original
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 7:52pm.
.
Is "how original" supposed to
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:08pm.
Is "how original" supposed to be an original comment?
~Actually
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:15pm.
Trog thought he was being pithy and subtle.
If I wanted to be original
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:21pm.
I'd write that comment in latin.
But instead you opted for
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:23pm.
But instead you opted for banality. Interesting choice.
Considering your theory
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:31pm.
it was the obvious choice.
Wow! That was really
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:36pm.
Wow! That was really original!
I am skewered on the point of your rapier wit!!
Wouldn't be too original
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:27pm.
A lot of people have written in Latin around here.
Ok you have a point.
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:28pm.
Hebrew would have served that end better.
Or perhaps,
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:34pm.
Θα μπορούσατε να έχετε δοκιμάσει ελληνικά.
:)
OK
Submitted by troglodyt on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:44pm.
You've got me. Thank god there is google translate.
So I can post in Aramaic?
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 8:25am.
:-)
Portray fathers as less than prefect?
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 8:30am.
You mean like "Life of Riley" and "Danny Thomas"? The sitcom from its inception was set to portray fathers as idiots. Nothing new about that.
Danny Thomas?
Submitted by october271986 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 5:14pm.
That is going back before my time. I am just borrowing from the PTC's ratings of shows in which it has, I believe, complained about the protrayal of fathers in network TV. But my main point is that the PTC exists and complains about the content of TV shows to advertisers and the FCC. It is not a liberal organization.
Brent Bozell, Leftist Plant
Submitted by october271986 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:03pm.
It's widely known that liberals have totally inflitrated groups like the Parents Television Council, which encourages it's members to write to the FCC to complain about programming they find might too accurately depict real life. Any program in which teenagers drink or have sex or in which families are lead by anything but a strong, perfect father figure, draw the ire of the PTC, Focus on Family, and Florida Family Council. These groups, which are as diverse as a Pat Robertson Christmas party, were set up to make conservatives look like they want to dictate public morality.
Where ya been this past year?
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:06pm.
Where ya been this past year?
~Coughing up hairballs
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:13pm.
Under a bridge in Hackensack.
Madame Detective, any idea
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:19pm.
Madame Detective, any idea who october is?
Reggie Jackson. And that's
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:21pm.
Reggie Jackson.
And that's MR. October, thank you.
Weird. I just posted a
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:24pm.
Weird. I just posted a Yankees comment on another thread not one minute ago.
De...
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:52pm.
I'm thinking that can be explained using Quantum Theory, but I don't understand it well enough to know for sure.
You could explain it to me
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:55pm.
You could explain it to me even in the Bill Nye kind of way, and I still wouldn't get it.
Maybe we all just have baseball on the mind as our NFL teams crumble into the "missed the playoffs again" abyss.
You're probably right, TOD.
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:59pm.
You're probably right, TOD. Have to have something to look forward to...
I'm guessing Favre's done for good this time.
Are you a Minnesota fan? I
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:09pm.
Are you a Minnesota fan? I would like to apologize if you are, because it was one of my Bills who put Favre on the ground last week ending the streak.
If only we could have won that game too!
26CX, no freakin' way. Are
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:31pm.
26CX, no freakin' way. Are you serious?
Radical
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:50pm.
Me? Serious? Have you been paying any attention to my posts this evening?
~It's hard to tell
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:26pm.
He could have had more history before the wipeout.
Nope. Google cache has
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:30pm.
Nope. Google cache has nothing on him.
But October 27, 1986 was game 7 of the World Series... Met's won.
Any Mets fans here?
~Hmmm
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:37pm.
I thought that the cache was already timed out, but I haven't done a search on anything lately.
I wish I was 24
Submitted by october271986 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 5:09pm.
But unfortunately, I am an old Met fan, well, not that old. Sports is the one area in which I "root for laundry." In politics, I don't.
Which is why I will acknowledge that some liberals or Democrats have pushed for advertisers to pull out of shows like Glenn Beck and O'Reilly. However, the idea that only liberals want to use the FCC or advertiser pressure to dictate content of the airwaves has to be a joke. Michael Powell was no liberal and the FCC dealt out record fines in his tenure. The Parents Television Council is a conservative organization.
I still have my '86 Mets
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 5:14pm.
I still have my '86 Mets World Champs t-shirt after all these years, even though I'm a Yankees fan.
As far as your post, I have nothing else to offer. We agree.
Anyway, welcome to Newsbusters. I hope your stay is a pleasant one. ; )
Now that's just
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:34pm.
funny, Bru...
(posted by accident)
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 10:19am.
----
Feeling snarky today?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 7:52pm.
Feeling snarky today?
Wouldn't you if you were me?
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 7:54pm.
Wouldn't you if you were me? Never mind.
No, I was just pointing out a big fat grand canyon sized hole in the story.
Nope ADK, but then again I'm
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:17pm.
Nope ADK, but then again I'm not posting over on HuffPo either. ;)
There is a huge difference between objecting to news and political views, than there is to objecting to turning on the t.v. and seeing/hearing lewd behavior or just plain gross stuff.
But you knew that.
Okay, tell me you didn't
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:20pm.
Okay, tell me you didn't drink the Kool-Aid too.
And next, if you wouldn't mind, clearing up your statement about HuffPo.
~She means
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:22pm.
You're hanging out on a site that leans in the opposite direction you do. What do you expect?
Ah, got it now. No worries,
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:26pm.
Ah, got it now. No worries, Rad.
Thanks, WB.
Thanks Bru.
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:27pm.
Thanks Bru.
Rad79
Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:57pm.
My head is hurting from all this stupid.
NB really has to draw a line on intelligence levels.
- Shy IQ
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
More like a pin hole.
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:23pm.
Care to share with the readers what the complaints were about?
I know you think Christians should just disavow their faith and worship at the altar of the intellectual elite, the controversial artists, and the perverted, but try, just try to see the difference between being offended by rauch, and being offended by the mother of a bad dancer.
Google it. Then, um, think
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:27pm.
Google it.
Then, um, think about your foolish beliefs.
Go.
Sit in the corner and think about it.
I said now!!!
But you did such arduous work
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:32pm.
To prove so little. Thought you might want a chance to redeem yourself.
That, and I needed another laugh.
Ah, you're a self-laugher.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:39pm.
Ah, you're a self-laugher. Did I just get a little peek into the life of RESTLESS1? A white padded room with a childproof computer where he types and laughs and types and laughs at his funny jokes about religion...
So, this wasn't you.
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:43pm.
This wasn't you, casually dismissing Chistians as engaging in optional exercise.
Some of would say that the commands fo Christ are more powerful than the commands of the flesh, but I doubt you have the capacity to understand this.
Now, shouldn't you get back to giving your bestest buddy The Vet what you went to town to get?
Hurry now, run along.
Jim Jones is hardly a concern
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:51pm.
Jim Jones is hardly a concern of mine.
That wasn't a dig at Christianity. It was a dig on those who believe homosexuality is a choice.
~What would be the big deal
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:57pm.
if it were? Seriously.
What would be the big deal?
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:00pm.
What would be the big deal? A breakthrough of such enormous potential?
I don't even know where to start. Do you really want to get into such a heavy philosophical debate? You know I am.
Anybody else hear that?
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:20pm.
Bru, is that you making a Forum topic???
~I would
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 11:49pm.
if a certain pseudo-intellectual hack would refrain from flogging her favorite necrotic equine. If I have to read anymore useless excrement about ear hair and finger length I'm going to go postal.
Well, it came off as a dig on
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 8:58pm.
....Wait a minute???
Do you see the difference between complaining about raunchy, gross, inappropriate content on the airwaves and complaining because you don't like someone's mommy or do you not?
Absolutely. Did I ever deny
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:06pm.
Absolutely. Did I ever deny that?
My point, which you chose to attack while avoiding any attempt to back up your own argument, still stands. It's a silly notion, and a dishonest notion to suggest free speech is an enemy of the left when sites like Newsbusters exist to publish daily conservative complaints over disagreeable content.
You're losing it dude.
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:16pm.
So posters airing their thoughts on a blog are against free speech,but whiners complaining to the FCC because they don't like a bad dancer's mommy are for it?
What you have failed to show is how the conservative complaints are as vapid as the liberal ones against Bristol's prescence in the final.
Okay, you're right. Liberal
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:20pm.
Okay, you're right. Liberal Hollywood, run by liberals, paid for by liberals, is secretly having our faithful file complaints with the FCC over the content we put on television.
Is this what I am to believe? That liberals are the true culprits behind the PTC?
Do you know who started the PTC?
Focus!!!!!
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:23pm.
Conservative complaints to the FCC tend to be about bad language, nudity, risque content.
Liberals are bellyaching about Bristol's prescence in the final of some stupid show.
Which has more legitimacy???
And no, I don't think liberal are busy trying to get their shows cancelled.
Who started the PTC?
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:28pm.
Who started the PTC?
You've been busted.
I have chewed you up and spat you out.
Go back to high school, junior.
Whatever boyo
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:40pm.
The only one bringing up the PTC is you. Straw man.
You have once again shown your ass here. I now know why the Vet has had it with you,(not that I didn't before, but you are easy entertainment for me).
You seem to have a drug problem, because I have drug you up and down this topic.
C-ya.
ZINNNNNNNNGGGGGG Good one.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 10:24pm.
ZINNNNNNNNGGGGGG
Good one. I can assure you I am LMAO quite maniacally on the inside.
As for your, um, final (?) argument here, well it still doesn't address the issue.
The Parents Television Council was founded by...wait for it...
Brent Bozell
Now there is no mistaking Mr Bozell for anything but a conservative, and there is no question that the PTC is anything but a conservative organization. In 2003 and 2004 the PTC was responsible for 98% of complaints filed with the FCC.
So now, who seems to be having the issue with free speech?
Hard to tell
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 10:43pm.
Without knowing what they were complaining about, or what recourse they were seeking from the FCC.
You STILL have not answered those questions. Keep searching.
~Ummm..
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 11:44pm.
Not to take sides or nuthin', but Restless has a point here, Ted. Liberals threw a fit over Bristol's continued presence on the show, just like they throw a fit about Rush being on the air (don't make me link to all the crazy crap they spew about him, please).
And Ted, Restless knew about you a long time ago and didn't rat you out. Don't bare your fangs at him unless you want to look like a...well, you know.
The answer is neither one has
Submitted by Satchmo on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 12:58am.
The answer is neither one has any legitimacy.
Shut up pervert!!
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 9:00am.
You have no legitimacy. At least Ted doesn't try to insist that fuc#$ng one's daughter is harmless if it is consensual.
There really should be a way to hide trolls like incestmo here. Admins!!!!
Restless---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 12:12am.
hide as in conceal?
Or as in remove the skin from? :o)
MD
bal
Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 9:22pm.
when sites like Newsbusters exist to publish daily conservative complaints over disagreeable content.
NewsBusters
Publishing Daily Conservative Complaints Over Disagreeable Content
No, eeeeediot. That's not the tagline. Not even close. Here it is, just for you, ya' simpleton:
NewsBusters
***Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias***
- Shy Can't Take Stupid Much Longer
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
complaints
Submitted by sarge329 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 12:38pm.
I don't find Family Guy amusing at all. Guess what? I don't watch it. Adam Lambert does nothing for me. So, I don't watch/listen to him/her/it. I don't get Showtime, so I don't see Penn & Teller. But then, I'm not intereted in them. Conclusion: If I fault with an entertainer or production, I don't give it any attention. Guess what? I happen to be a conservative. So, I suspect that " The Original De... " needs to get his facts straight before he makes a fool of himself. Again.
To a conservative, watching a
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Tue, 12/14/2010 - 11:52pm.
To a conservative, watching a show like "Dancing with the Stars" is an irrelevant little escape that allows them to unwind from the day. To a Lefty, watching a show like "Dancing with the Stars" is nearly an orgasmic experience. Lefties live for superficial fluff like this, especially when it centered around their Roman Gods from the entertainment industry.
For them, an hour of Dancing with the Stars should be an intellectually stimulating hour of celebrity ogling but it was totally screwed up for them when the voters insisted on keeping the child of a famous conservative around even though she really didn't have the dancing skills. It was almost like the election of 2008 when they kept voting to promote an unknown idiot manchild with no actual experience in running anything other than his mouth.
If I had known how Brisol Palin was angering those lefties I could have looked into finding out how to vote for her just to screw up an election THEY found so important. Screw up my elections and I will screw up yours.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
There's a difference
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 10:26am.
We're talking about political censorship, not about moral content of fiction. Political censorship should have a higher standard. Or to put it another way, we are talking about "free speech", not censorship.
BTW, are you saying we should show non-judgementally such things as teen-age sex and drugs, because they happen in real life? How about other common things from real life, like kids getting beat-up because they are different? Should we show that non-judgementally? Or are you saying that the left ADVOCATES teen-age sex and drugs? (Actually, I have no issue with tenn-age sex, presuming they are married.)
(I avoided such things as painting swastikas on synagogues, since the left basically encourages that sort of thing.)
The Parents Television
Submitted by Satchmo on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 1:06am.
The Parents Television Council is probably the biggest censorship organization in the United States. I didn't realize Bozell was the founder. Wow. Mr. Slagle's entry is dripping with unintended irony.
Complaints to FCC about Family Guy over Rush Limbaugh
Submitted by Dotcoman on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 2:24am.
The first page of results alone mentions complaints against Family Guy, Adam Lambert, and Showtime for a Penn and Teller ad, as well as Palin.The complaints to the FCC about Family Guy were because Rush Limbaugh made a guest appearance and turned Brian into a Radical Republican. It sucked the whole way through, so there's probably that working for it too?
there is a HUGE difference between liberals and conservatives...
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 9:17am.
When there is some speech that a conservative disagrees with their answer to that is usually more speech to point out their disagreements.
When there is some speech that a liberal disagrees with their answer is usually to try and silence the speaker
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Television Content
Submitted by Gazinya on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 11:03am.
I tried once to watch Family Guy when it first came out. Then it was American Dad. I had given up on South Park, Survivor, Dancing, Swap Wifes, Nannies. et.al. I still enjoy a good Simpson but having discontinued my satelite service and turning to other forms of entertainment I am probably not informed enough about these shows to complain. My T.V. feed comes over an antenna but then I had no idea of the pure vomit that is 'commercial broadcasting'. If you want to try something 'completely different', turn it off. Cruise the internet for an hour and then go for a walk. I guarentee you will not be 'in the dark' about the world, it just won't be 24/7 and the conversations are shorter but better.
The Difference, As I See It...
Submitted by ljacone on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 2:20pm.
...Is that complaining about Family Guy is about a potentially offensive piece of content in a scripted show, while complaining about Bristol Palin on DWTS is about not liking the outcome of a game.
It's akin to me complaining to the FCC that my Carolina Panthers got shelled by the Falcons on Sunday, on television for everyone to see. (Oy what a season...)
If the issue was that Palin was wearing an outfit which was too revealing, then the complaints would at least make sense. The hypothetical risque garment could then be debated. But complaining to the federal government because your side didn't win a game? Do they realize how stupid that sounds?
It's just a popularity contest
Submitted by yabkpjo on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 8:17pm.
If DWTS were supposed to be a serious dancing competition rather than a popularity contest, then there would be no viewer voting and the professional judges would determine everything. People voting for Bristol because they like her mother's politics is no less legitimate than people voting for another celebrity contestant because they like his/her TV show/band/sports team/etc. In fact, I think after each dance that got low scores, the show hosts would tell the viewers that if they liked that candidate and wanted to see him/her come back the next week, then they needed to call in to vote, to override the judge scores.
I've been a fan of Bristol's ever since she started using the media attention on her personal life to promote a positive message for young girls; and I find it sad when both supporters and critics of Sarah Palin treat Bristol as an extension of her mother rather than her own person (you'd think she was dancing in a Gadsden flag dress with the way many media/bloggers talked about her dancing performances).