WashPost Awards Two 'Pinocchios' to Media for Inaccurate '98 Percent of Catholic Women Use Contraceptives' Claim
In Sunday's Washington Post, their "Fact Checker" Glenn Kessler caught up with some social conservative bloggers (like Mollie Hemingway at Get Religion) and assigned "two Pinocchios" to the media -- for regurgitating a bad statistic, namely that "98 percent of Catholic women use contraception." Set aside that the source, the Guttmacher Institute, has an intimate relationship with the liberal feminists at Planned Parenthood.
"If a statistic sounds too good to be true, be wary," wrote Kessler. "A spokesman for [House Minority Leader Nancy] Pelosi said she was saying that 98 percent of Catholic women have used birth control at some point in their lives — because that is how the media characterized it." And they did it over and over and over again, thumping on the idea that Catholic bishops were hopelessly out of touch with their flock. It turns out the media were out of touch with statistics.
Kessler continued that "judging from the examples above, the media has gotten it wrong. The journalistic shorthand has been that '98 percent of American Catholic women have used contraception in their lifetimes.' But that is incorrect, according to the research."
But while the study says that 98 percent of “sexually experienced Catholic women” have “ever used a contraceptive method other than natural planning,” the data shown in the report does not actually back up that claim. In fact, a supplementary table in the report, on page 8, even appears to undermine that statistic, since it shows that 11 percent of Catholic women currently using no method at all. That has led to criticism of the statistic.
The Guttmacher Institute, citing “confusion” over the statistic, on Wednesday posted the actual data behind it. It turns out it was based on a question that asked self-identified Catholic women who have had sex if they have ever used one of 12 methods of birth control. [Guttmacher co-author Rachel] Jones, in an interview, said the women were asked to answer “yes” or “no” whether they had used each of the different forms; only two percent had said they had used only natural family planning.
In other words, a woman may have sex only once, or she may have had a partner who only used a condom once, and then she would be placed in the 98 percent category. Jones said the correct way to describe the results of the research is this:
“Data shows that 98 percent of sexually experienced women of child-bearing age and who identify themselves as Catholic have used a method of contraception other than natural family planning at some point in their lives.”
But using an artificial contraceptive once might be a failing according to the church, but it doesn't equal a massive revolt from church teaching. It's certainly true that a majority of Catholic women aren't following church teaching on contraceptives, so why lunge at a liberal 'too good to be true" number like 98 percent?
Of course, a large number of American Catholics also fail to follow church teaching that they're obligated to attend Mass on Sundays (or Saturday night vigils.) But pollsters never separate the practicing Catholics from the inactive ones. It shouldn't be surprising that inactive Catholics wouldn't be in perfect harmony with the church. But in a democracy, do we give the same weight to citizens who never vote? If not, why honor the "Catholic" opinion of unchurched people?
Kessler didn't hand "Pinnochios" to Guttmacher, even as he explained:
The data listed in the Guttmacher report, meanwhile, referred to current contraceptive use among “sexually active women who are not pregnant, post-partum or trying to get pregnant.” That is a smaller universe of women, and it shows that 68 percent of Catholic women used what are termed “highly effective methods:” 32 percent sterilization; 31 percent pill; five percent IUD.
Again, only two percent currently used natural family planning. Interestingly, 11 percent used nothing, even though they were not trying to get pregnant. Four percent were placed in an “other” category, which mainly consisted of “withdrawal,” which is also not accepted by the Catholic Church as a birth-control method.
Mollie Hemingway suggested the 98-percent claim was a garbage number, and should have been dumped like bad garbage.
So I guess we could say that among women aged 15-44 who had sex in the last three months but aren’t pregnant, post-partum or trying to get pregnant, 87 percent of women who identify as Catholic used contraception. It’s worth pondering just who is left out of this 87 percent, other than, you know, everyone who doesn’t use contraception. Great stat, team journalist! I mean, the study was designed to find only women who would be most likely to use contraception. And it did.
So let that statistic die. Or accurately summarize it. (Hint: “Every woman who ever lived used 18 forms of birth control. For fun.” is not going to cut it.) Also, it’s shameful how many people just cited that stat without any reference to where it was found. You might remember I had to post a note asking for help tracking it down after I’d seen it repeated for the thousandth time. That’s not even OK for opinion pieces, much less news articles.
Mollie then demonstrated how liberal NPR typically slanted everything against the Catholic Church, so take some time to hop over there to Get Religion.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
⇒ Sounds like a plan
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:24pm.
It's almost as though if you get out there first, with an outlandish lie, it's just got to be true!
Tell that story often enough over the next two weeks, and the conservatives are floored that anybody really believed the lie in the first place.
Damage control time. Liberals will tell any lie, any time, for the cause of socialism.
I'll bet some of them would even use Whitney Houston's funeral for a chance to boost Obama. NAAAAH! Certainly wouldn't go that far.
Not just a lie. It's STOOPID
Submitted by GregE on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:32pm.
It would mean 98% of Catholic women have a need for birth control, regardless of age, 98%. Alrighty then. Does anyone in the media even THINK before vomitting such nonsense? (yea I know, dumb question)
⇒ Tru dat Greg
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:40pm.
Never know if your wife is the next Sarah, who gave birth to Isaac at what? 90 years old?
And
Submitted by KornKing on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 10:46pm.
What if your wife is the next Nancy Pelosi??
What if ...
Submitted by CO2Maker on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 10:43am.
What if your wife *is* Nancy Pirogi!
Has anyone asked the question
Submitted by redfish on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:46pm.
Has anyone asked the question of whether the statistics refer to observant Catholics, or just women who were raised Catholic and go to social functions?
Nope
Submitted by maryerin on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 11:34am.
As the article said there is no discernment between practicing and non practicing Catholics. Of course, there is never any discernment in the Liberal media.
Fulton J. Sheen
⇒ Doesn't matter, maryerin
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 12:02pm.
Taken to its extreme, if only one Catholic were observant, the remaining non-observant Catholics would still be treated as a legitimate Catholic demographic by pollsters, if only for the convenience that they call themselves Catholic.
It's a cozy thought that Catholics, as one colossal consequential juggernaut, will stand against the king's power grab, it's not going to happen. The Church in America gave an understanding nod & wink to contraception for too many years to expect it can play catch up now.
The President has tapped into a rift within the Church that is getting little attention. Most churches differentiate between the sinfulness of contraception and Abortion. Catholics do not, and now find themselves fighting what is presented to the rest of America as a contraception question.
The Bishops need to declare a day of repentance (for themselves) for having allowed heresy to run rampant through the flock while they sat silent.
I suggest they also do a lot more praying for the guidance of The Holy Spirit rather than relying on the philosophy they picked up in Seminary (circa 1965)
doesn't matter
Submitted by MidAmerica on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:48pm.
The Catholic Church's position on birth control is not tied to what individual Catholics do. What matters is the position the Church takes on this issue.
How many people have ever earned income during their lifetime and have not reported the income to the IRS? Is that a reason to abolish the tax code?
How many people have ever
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 1:18am.
How many people have ever earned income during their lifetime and have not reported the income to the IRS?
Is that a reason to abolish the tax code? Sounds good to me.
Famous Liberals
Submitted by CJohnson on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:54pm.
I read on Mr Colberts' bio that he is the youngest of eleven children. He should interview his Mother, age 91, about her opinion on birth control. I might watch him if he would interview a Conservative.
98%? Wow, so there's
Submitted by forest on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 7:55pm.
98%? Wow, so there's definitely not a problem with women's access to birth control.
Argument over.
If you are going to lie, cheat or steal...
Submitted by povertypimpin on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 8:14pm.
you might as well go big.
Didn't Saddam Hussein within elections with 95% of the vote?
Weren't 95% of weapons found at Mexican crime scenes traced back to the USA?
Now 98% of Catholic women use birth control.
Hey I've got a better contraceptive.
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 9:49pm.
Give Peloskiosky masks and for all the women.
Yeah, that'd give a big
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 10:47pm.
Yeah, that'd give a big 'leg-up' to the gay movement..............how many guys would want to see Ms. Botox in that position???
I look and listen to Ms. Frozen Face, Harry the Weasel, Bawny Fwank, Al Frankenstein, and a whole host of other clueless, classless, useless, and futless individuals (men, women, and other) in BOTH houses, and from BOTH (and beyond) parties...........and I'm NOT even considering the White House in this statement..........and it's not very hard for me to figure out why our country is in the shape it's in - on all accounts.
women
Submitted by angelann1 on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 10:07pm.
pelosi is neither catholic nor a women , she is a progressive dem commie !!!
Anyone else......
Submitted by GregE on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 10:44pm.
......think, "how dumb do this sound" when Newt has said in Republican debates, describing a Romney ad, that "his ad received 4 Pinocchios." Can't the Washington post help a Presidential nomination process fact check by using something a little more advanced than a Disney character aimed at 7 year olds?
I can see it now.......
Newt: "That ad was preposterous, it received FOUR Pinocchios"
Romney: "Oh yea? I know you are but what am I? My first ad got 3 smiley faces and a glitter star!! Where's yours, poopyface?"
Quote Of The Century
Submitted by kilrod on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 10:48pm.
L.A. Times CALIFORNIA REPRESENTATIVES
Quote Of The CENTURY:
"Frankly, I don't know what it is about California , but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I'm not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine , even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington , we're number one. There's no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on 'Macbeth'. The four of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don't know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words." -- columnist Burt Prelutsky, Los Angeles Times.-- (h/t MD)
(grins) kilrod "the Birther"
If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,??
That is awesome!
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 12:40am.
That is awesome!
Define Terms
Submitted by Gothampc on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 10:53pm.
I haven't read through the entire article, but in these types of studies you always have to have a hard look at how terms are defined. Does the term "contraceptive" include the rhythm method and abstinence or are they defining it as actual products that a person would buy such as condoms or the pill?
More liberal math.
Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 11:07pm.
Looking at actual statistics about the general US population from the US Census Bureau, we find:
a) As of the 2010 census estimate, there were approximately 157 million women and 152 million men
b) Approximately 120 million women were of approximate motherhood range or 120/156 = 77% of women - admittedly this is generous but given recent advances in in-vitro fertilization and assisted reproductive technology the age range was widened
c) Using the statistical methods of epidemiology, if the Catholic population were a valid subset analytic sample of the US population, then:
**1) 98% of Catholic women would NOT use birth control - I know of no valid reason why an 80 year old would be on the pill
**2) The liberals always say that 10% of the population is gay, so why would that 2.65 million lesbians (see below) need birth control?
**3) The 2008 estimate is that there are 52 million Catholics self-identified, so if we assume just a 51:49 approximate sex differential, this would mean 26.5 million were female, and of those (per liberal logic) says 2.65 million of these Catholic women are lesbians, and 77% of the remainder (approximately 18.4 million women) were within the extended motherhood range
**4) I challenge any valid epidemiologic survey to tell me that 18.4 million straight Catholic women are actually using contraceptives continuously
Stick to psychiatry, doc
Submitted by John Francroix Jr on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 10:03am.
Math and deductive reasoning are obviously not your forte.
Go ahead, dissect it for us.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 10:19am.
.
Exactly what I was going to
Submitted by NC Cop on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 10:24am.
Exactly what I was going to say, sol.
Please John, explain to us how it is, since you know so much.
Francroix - you have no clue about which you speak. ACA
Submitted by acaiguana on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 10:28am.
You obviously know nothing about mathematics, nor about logic.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
It's called Epidemiology, Frankie. You have dyscalculia?
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 2:44pm.
Go back to Daily Kos and talk about how those mean old conservatives are using sciences like mathematics, epidemiology and statistics to disprove what your masturbatory fantasy liberal women said about Catholic women and birth control. They not only had their numbers wrong, but they went against their own narrative.
If the truth hurts, you better get a pain consult. Of course, you will have to wait for your radical rectocraniotomy before you can do that.
Adios Deddy V. 42.3
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 6:30pm.
We hardly knew ya.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Hard to say which phrase is tops, ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 6:49pm.
"Adios Deddy", or "ACCESS DENIED".
:o)
MD
Banned? Why?
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 11:18pm.
Banned? Why?
Not sure, exactly, Greg, maybe for being felony ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:57am.
stupid. :o)
MD
⇒ No more Frank Whaahhh?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 1:10am.
Am I late for the memorial service?
I can sing "Oh Deddy Boy" in Irish.
Wonder how many other Deddy sockpuppets are there?
Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 12:19am.
The guy has more aliases than Jim and the Mission Impossible team--the Peter Arness version and not the Tom Cruise version. As a young man, I had a thing for Barbara Bain.
⇒ Barbara Bain
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 12:27am.
Never could understand her married to Martin Landau. He looked like a lizard.
Barbara Bain was a definite hottie
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 12:35am.
:-D
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
by the same reasoning...
Submitted by MidAmerica on Sun, 02/19/2012 - 11:57pm.
Considering the upcoming atheist gathering on the Mall in Washington and using the same methods and conclusions as this Catholic survey...
the question to ask would be "Have you ever been in a church?"
The answer would then be interpretated that XX% of all people are church goers.
The answer of course would result in a very high per centage and would include probably a majority of those who consider themselves atheists.
Pinocchio
Submitted by CO2Maker on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 10:46am.
Let's see. Pinocchio was a liar, which means, if he was anything like Prez Bill 42, that he was a cunning ..., um ... linguist. Now, take a look at that nose! Whoa!
A great article. Thanks Tim!
Submitted by wiwf on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 11:31am.
A great article. Thanks Tim!
I love this statistic!
Submitted by burnadams on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 11:47am.
Even though I knew this 98% statistic was probably not true, I still use it to my advantage when talking to liberals. The whole basis of why contraception HAS to be included on all insurance plans is to "insure access".
Well if 98 or 99% of women are using contraception, then access isn't really a big issue is it?
It sounds like a patently
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Mon, 02/20/2012 - 3:55pm.
It sounds like a patently absurd statistic to me
98% of women in a church that expressly is against artificial birth control, ignore their church?
Huh? That would seem to indicate that 100% of women who are PROTESTANTS (whose church does NOT prosletyze against contraception) use birth control.
It must be more than 98%... anyone believe that?
All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
Does seem odd numbers*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 1:19am.
There are about 3500 abortions per day in this country. 60% of them to unmarried women. Over 4 million babies are born every year and 40% of those are to unmarried women.
If we have so many abortions and millions of newborns, then where do they get that 98% of women are using birth control?