Ed Schultz Spills: A Lot of Liberals Listen to NPR, 'Huge' in D.C., New York
MSNBC host and radio talker Ed Schultz gave a "What I Read" interview to The Atlantic, but the reading list was less interesting than his complaining about how talk radio is owned by conservatives: "Citadel doesn't do liberal talk radio. Bonneville doesn't do liberal talk radio. The Salem Radio Network, same thing." Of course, he admitted, If Ed Schultz owned 600 radio stations, I can guarantee you Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity or any other right-wing hack job would not be on my stations. But until liberals go out and buy signals, you're not going to get a lot of liberal talk radio."
Then Schultz admitted where liberal radio is located. It's at the left end of the dial. "I don't buy that there are more conservative listeners than liberal listeners. A lot of the liberal listeners are listening to NPR. In Washington or New York City, the NPR station has huge listenership. That's where most of the liberal audience is and that's who we, the commercial liberal format, have to peel away listeners from. This industry is ideologically-driven. That's the culture of it."
Say, Ed, why don't you call for defunding NPR, which might improve the business climate for commercial liberal radio? I'm guessing your socialist audience won't go for that idea.
Ed is not at all about attracting the mushy middle: "The hosts out there that think they can strike a chord with the middle of the road people have it all wrong. What's the middle of the road position on universal health care? What's the middle of the road position on having the wealthy pay taxes? What's the middle of the road position on fighting foreign wars? Liberal radio has identified absolutes. If you're true to your conviction, I think you can run a business in this industry."
Actually, "What I Read" isn't exactly a great title for this lecture, since he only identifies -- yawn -- that he reads The Huffington Post, The Washington Post, and The New York Times, and he's not "a big magazine reader." He identifies more with broadcasters, praising Andy Rooney and despite the political disagreement, Paul Harvey.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Ed is an idiot, that's why he
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:55pm.
Ed is an idiot, that's why he has no audience, I also seriously doubt he can read. Note to Ed, "Atlas shrugged" isn't a story about weight lifting.
He needs to understand
Submitted by FastEd on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:55pm.
if that is possible, that there are more conservative folks then libs - and that logic demands that liberal thinking is not logical, but easy - it's hard to have ideals, easy to everything 'under the sun' - it's hard to be responsible.
"We the People . . " Hey, congress - I'm one of the people - start listening!
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Nauseating, as usual
Submitted by deadeyedan on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:59pm.
Well, Ed inadvertently identifies the problem. It's well known that the FILTHY rich live in the D.C. and Manhattan strongholds, just gaze at the latest published demographics.
That would mean that (by his own admission) the people who listen to the falling-off-the-event horizon leftist broadcasts are the ones not paying their "fair share" - pretentius maximus. They talk the talk, but they will not walk.
LIBERALISM - government of the people by the theories and for the ideologists
No wonder I have no desire to listen to NPR. That is...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 12:50am.
where liberals go to listen while I go to listen to Laura, Rush, Sean and Mark.
Kinda
Submitted by Prisondog1776 on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 3:29am.
like these numbers? http://www.ihatethemedia.com/radio-ratings-liberal-talk-radio-dying
The Lefty talk stations died because of no content.
Liberal talk radio sucks....
Submitted by David-Ford on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 5:12am.
Liberal talk radio sucks.... pure and simple. You may not agree with Rush or Beck etc, but at least they are entertaining
Now that is funny.
Submitted by NeoKong on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 7:40am.
"If Ed owned 600 stations".
You cannot own 600 stations and NOT have Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity. Add Michael Savage to that too. Plus Laura Ingraham as well.
Right-wing talk IS radio.
Guys like Ed want to forget that colossal failure called Air America. Liberal talk radio has been tried and it stunk up the room. It's no different than MSNBC. Just a bunch of lefties always whining and complaining and constantly telling people who might listen that they don't like them.
I have two words for you, Special Ed-
Submitted by johnsonl on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 10:09am.
"Air America".
Exactly
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 5:15pm.
I was about to post that very thing.
The Left is perturbed that no one wants to listen to them. They claim that that majority of Americans are liberal, yet they can't explain how conservative talk does so well while attempts like Air America totally flop.
Ed is our gift to the rest of the world.
Submitted by goon on Wed, 11/16/2011 - 11:13am.
Ed Schultz is a blow hard buffoon, the reason I know that is because I am from North Dakota and Ed was polluting the air waves in our great state before he was unleashed on the rest of the world. Ed Schultz is a poster boy of what is wrong with the left wing.
Ed also changes his views to where ever his pay check is coming from. First Ed was the voice of the NDSU Bison football before he became the voice of the Fighting Sioux football team. The Sioux and the Bison were bitter rivals... Sgt Schultz was a Republican before he had some epiphany and switched over to the democratic side. If the Republican offered him more money he would switch parties and affiliation again.