Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

GOP Entrusts Debate to PBS Host Who Fawned Over Al Gore, Hillary

By Tim Graham | October 11, 2011 | 07:56

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

Tonight's GOP presidential debate (hosted by The Washington Post and Bloomberg TV) is moderated by longtime PBS late-night host Charlie Rose. His show has been touted as a "national salon," but it's a very cozy place for liberal media elites. Conservatives are not regulars. The most frequent guests include his journalist buddy Al Hunt (with 79 appearances), who now works at Bloomberg, and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman (74 appearances). Most of the GOP contenders have never been on Rose's PBS show. (Gingrich and Romney have. It's not shocking that the only one to appear in the last four years was Jon Huntsman, last December.)

Rose has been notoriously fawning with some major Democratic figures, including the Clintons, and perhaps most energetically with Al Gore. In a cozy 2007 interview taped inside a supportive liberal bubble at the 92nd Street Y in New York, Rose offered testimony of how correct Gore was on the issues and how graciously he accepted defeat in 2000 (apparently after the six-week marathon of legal battles). The experts Rose quoted on this matter were two liberal columnists from The Washington Post and a liberal venture capitalist:

CHARLIE ROSE: Welcome. Albert Gore. Nashville, Tennessee. Married to Tipper Gore. Four children, two grandchildren. Written two best-sellers. "Earth in Balance" and "An Inconvenient Truth." Filmmaker, best-selling author, speaker.

There's more. Here's what some people -- you think there is. Here's what some people have been saying. Richard Cohen: "Somebody ought to make a movie about Al Gore. I would call it 'An Uncomplaining Life.' The movie would be about a man who did not quit, who came out of -- came off the canvas after a painfully close election -- he won the popular vote after all -- who accepted defeat graciously and tried to unite the nation, who returned to the consuming passion of his early days, the environment, and spoke endlessly on the topic almost always for free. Who starred in a documentary based on his speech and who before a billion or so people won an Academy Award for his effort. This may or may not be a stepping stone to the presidency, but Gore gives us a lesson on how to live one's life. With an Oscar in his fist and triumph on his face, Al Gore is a man you can tell your kid about. That maybe is even better than being president." Richard Cohen.

There is more. There is Richard Branson: "I think Al Gore has almost single-handedly brought global warming to the forefront of the world."

E.J. Dionne, columnist. "Gore, to his credit, won't talk about Florida, but I will. Whatever flaws he has, Gore suffered through an extreme injustice with great dignity. His revenge is to have been right about a lot of things, right about the power of the Internet, right about global warming, and right about Iraq."

We will talk about all of that, but we will begin talking about "The Assault on Reason" by Al Gore, former vice president of the United States. Please welcome him to the 92nd Street Y.

AL GORE (to cheers and ongoing applause): Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Rose also honored his global-warming horror film/documentary:

ROSE: Let me just point out one thing, though -- "An Inconvenient Truth," a documentary, is one of the best-selling documentaries in the history of documentaries.

GORE: Thank you. [Applause]

ROSE: And it`s not about Anna Nicole Smith. It`s not about Britney Spears. It`s about the challenge to the planet.

GORE: Yes.

ROSE: So that says something.

This prompted Gore to begin his narrative about how "reason and logic and knowledge" suffered as we voted on war in Iraq, and he asked "Why is the Senate silent, ominously silent? Why is there no effort to lay out the pros and cons of this war? Why?" He then sent the praise back in Rose’s direction:

ROSE: But I had one person after another come to my program and say this is an unwise thing to do, to go to Iraq.

GORE: Your program is an oasis, Charlie, and it is -- it stands out for that reason.

Rose concluded with one last moment of fawning, reading Gore's own book back to him and the audience, underlining his idealism:

ROSE: I get the last word. "This book is dedicated to my father, Senator Albert Gore Sr., 1907-1998, who had a remarkable influence on his son and his daughters. The rebirth of democracy is a conclusion" -- I quote the last -- the first paragraph of conclusion -- "Almost 3,000 years ago, Solomon warned that where there is no vision, the people perish. But surely, the converse is also true. Where there is leadership with vision and moral courage, the people will flourish and redeem Lincoln's prophecy at Gettysburg, that government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the Earth." Our thanks to former Vice President Albert Gore. Thank you.

How perfectly PBS it was. Rose is a very polite host who doesn't usually offer windy questions. He's more likely to just set the table and let liberals talk.

In a 2003 interview with Hillary, as we noted in our Hillary book "Whitewash," Charlie Rose waxed about her personal growth, as if Hillary emerged a beautiful butterly from the chrysalis of the Clinton White House: "But you made a decision, bcause of your affection, love for him, to go to Arkansas, where he wanted to pursue his dream," he cooed. "You gave up some inedpendence because there was a higher value...Now here, in a sense, it's come full circle for you...It seems to be the emerged to me of a new independence for you since you're on your own."

Here's the Charlie Rose file at NewsBusters.

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Wire Services/Media Companies
  • Bloomberg
  • PBS
  • Washington Post
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Republicans never, never

Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:04am.

Republicans never, never learn.

  • Login to post comments

Agreed

Submitted by panz on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:45am.

Simply stated truth. What is the matter with the GOP? Why do they continually fall into the traps set by the liberal media? This is for determining the person to represent the GOP in the general election.

They should not be doing any (as in 0) debates on any (as in 0) liberal networks. Who cares what they think? That garbage can be saved for the general election.

They know very well that Obama will never do debates (he's a coward) and they will have nothing to offer their viewers. Too bad. Stick with FOX, stick with other conservative networks and organizations.

  • Login to post comments

Looks like a RINO selection

Submitted by daveinboca on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 1:07pm.

You can bet that now that Huntsman is dead meat, CRose will fawn all over Mitt Romney and try to make Herman Cain look like a naive political newcomer. Rose will never figure out and the legacy networks never mention that Cain was Vice Chair and then Chair of the Kansas City Federal Reserve for four years and knows more about business, economics, rocket science [he was an army ballistics expert] and just about everything else, except sucking up, than Obamarx. Rose will attack Perry viciously like Brian Williams did.

Wasn't Katie Couric available?

  • Login to post comments

Army Ballistics expert?

Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 4:44pm.

Army Ballistics expert? Really? I KNEW I liked that guy.....

He is best who is trained in the severest school." -Thucydides, "History of the Peloponnesian War" (431-404 B.C.)
  • Login to post comments

We all know the direction Rose will take the debate!

Submitted by scottyusmc on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:12am.

His "job" is to create divisive talking points for the liberal establishment media to demonstrate GOP division. WE ALL KNOW IT!!!! The reason why I probably won't even watch the event... Listen America - almost the entire media establishment is in the tank for the liberals and we know that they will do everything possible to get their "master" elected in 2012... Don't fall for the circus show!!!

  • Login to post comments

I would LOVE it if the

Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:04am.

I would LOVE it if the candidates asked some questions in return. Each of them should save a bit of time from their wandering answers and return fire on the obvious hostile positioned questions Charlie will ask.

"...By the way Charlie, this debate will be viewed by far fewer people than the last one covered by Foxnews who put more resources into the effort. Why should we support your obvously liberal organization with tax dollars?"

He is best who is trained in the severest school." -Thucydides, "History of the Peloponnesian War" (431-404 B.C.)
  • Login to post comments

C Rose

Submitted by NewLife56 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:21am.

The economy is all that counts yet now we'll hear the Mormon Issue, the OWS protest and everything accept Obama's record or lack there of

NewLife56
  • Login to post comments

I don't know why the

Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:05am.

I don't know why the Republicans do this..............who sets these debates up, anyway - a lib/Dem mole in the 'R' party??? The best we can hope for is that the candidates call BS on the 'questions' that are actually designed to put them on the spot, or elicit some kind of response that Rose and all of his lib buddies in the MSM, as well as the opposition, can use against them. I know Newt has been doing it - they ALL should do it!!! Make Rose look bad...........rephrase his questions...........refuse the premise.....give an answer that is straight-forward with regards to the real issue...............don't go along with the direction that the 'moderator' is trying to take.

  • Login to post comments

Don't forget the question to Cain...

Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 5:49pm.

...to determine if he is an "authentic" black man. Y'all just know that Charlie Rose has been on his cellphone all day to idiots like Cornel West, Danny Glover and Tavis Smiley.

I don't know what motivated the GOP to allow Charlie Rose and his intellectually pretentious staff to moderate this debate, but I hope Cain has an opportunity to go after stupid questions and comments.

  • Login to post comments

Like Charlie brown getting fooled by Lucy...

Submitted by donnyvee on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:17am.

...they just never learn. I predict at least three questions about religion. A couple about gay rights. And certainly two or three about abortion.

Donnyvee
  • Login to post comments

Expect lots of false

Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:58am.

Expect lots of false sequiters such as "Now that Iraq was proven to be a mistake, do you ......."

He is best who is trained in the severest school." -Thucydides, "History of the Peloponnesian War" (431-404 B.C.)
  • Login to post comments

Snort. This debate will be

Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:47am.

Snort. This debate will be about the ISSUES!!! Yeah, not holding my breath.

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Concur: One wonders what the

Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:57am.

Concur:
One wonders what the RNC thinks they are accomplishing by turning over some of its debates to hostile mediums?
Do they think they are exposing the RNC to new audiences? Hell no.
Do they think the PBS crew will treat them better in the future for this magnanimity? Hell no.
Do they think they will get larger audiences? Hell no.

THey should schedule all their debates with the only impartial medium - Fox news.

He is best who is trained in the severest school." -Thucydides, "History of the Peloponnesian War" (431-404 B.C.)
  • Login to post comments

Charlie Rose?

Submitted by Dr. Ron on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:01am.

Why not Rosie O'Donnell or Al Gore...the repubs are wussies and loony...look out for Charlie's oh so measured sarcasm, reality denial and attacks posed as questions...SAD!

Ronald John Lofaro, PhD
  • Login to post comments

Done watching them

Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:25am.

I'm done watching these things.  I'm not even going to try, in fact, I'll just switch to my bluray player and watch one of the Star Wars movie that recently came out in bluray(the complette saga).  Or any other movie.

But HELL NO on the debates.  And I don't hold much hope for any of the Rs that are doing this, they keep setting themselves up for failure, these days, it's almost like a genetic condition.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

it is rather stupid to

Submitted by jkwtrading on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:50am.

it is rather stupid to continually have debates which are monitored by lefties. The GOP should wake up, have their debates from Conservative moderators. How hard can it be to establish the debate forum. If they cannot establish a debate forum (very small) how the hell do one expect them to run a country, which is a zillion times larger.

  • Login to post comments

Obama's worldview unknown to Charlie Rose

Submitted by rwnewsnut on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:53am.

If Charlie Rose gets testy with any of the candidates, they should resort to asking why he never learned candidate Obama's worldview, heroes, etc...

The Republicans have to learn to push back - push back twice as hard.

****************************************************************************************
ROSE: I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.

BROKAW: No, I don't, either.

ROSE: I don't know how he really sees where China is.

BROKAW: We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.

ROSE: I don't really know. And do we know anything about the people who are advising him?

BROKAW: Yeah, it's an interesting question.

ROSE: He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational (sic) speeches.

BROKAW: Two of them! I don't know what books he's read.

ROSE: What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?

BROKAW: There's a lot about him we don't know.

  • Login to post comments

Well....

Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:24pm.

we certainly know what is world view is now, don't we.

  • Login to post comments

Charlie Rose is still alive?!

Submitted by Edditor on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:15am.

My favorite Charlie Rose exchange was with Tom Brokaw when they talked about Obama....and the fact that they actually knew NOTHING about the man.....worthy of a First Base routine.

  • Login to post comments

The same could be said of

Submitted by goldbar on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:37am.

The same could be said of Herman Cain who I really hope is the republican nominee. Bring on that 9% national sales tax!

  • Login to post comments

The real question is why did the Republicans agree to...

Submitted by Conservator on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:40am.

... to participate in a debated hosted by The Washington Post and Bloomberg TV and moderated by Charlie Rose? All are associated with lefty news media outlets. I recall that Democrats running for the Presidential nomination in 2008 refused to attend any debate hosted by Fox News. The GOP often are there worst enemy.

  • Login to post comments

Just plain STUPID

Submitted by Delsa on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:48am.

I am not watching

  • Login to post comments

This is enfuriating

Submitted by DaMav on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:56am.

There are numerous qualified moderate & conservative personalities available to moderate these debates. Wolf Blitzer was bad enough. Rose is from a network we want to defund, and punked Palin with his "Bush Doctrine" bullcrap.

So he gets rewarded by Republicans?

  • Login to post comments

The mind is a terrible thing to loose...

Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:23pm.

..or to have lost one's mind......

As I read the story I got to the line, "....two liberal columnists from The Washington Post and a liberal venture capitalist" and my poor brain read, "two liberal columnists from The Washington Post and a liberal ventriloquist". Oh, well.......... :-)

  • Login to post comments

Why-oh-why~

Submitted by GG_NB on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:52pm.

It is infuriating to see Repubs set themselves up -- again. What is NOT to understand?! Read up on Alinsky, people!

Over and over again, the Repubs catch momentum on their side, and they are just bound and determined to shoot their own feet.

Foolish, foolish, foolish.

"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan

  • Login to post comments

Charlie Rose makes me gag.

Submitted by totsotvaitn on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 1:36pm.

Why should I subject myself to this buffoon hosting the GOP debate? What a joke. He has that "I am superior to you look" that Lawrence O'Donnell displays during his pathetic show on the mess network. I know the GOP is trying to be fair to the media but really GOP, lamebrain media doesn't deserve the consideration.

  • Login to post comments

Maybe Newt will put him in

Submitted by pfwag on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:32pm.

Maybe Newt will put him in his place.

  • Login to post comments

Chris Mathews wasn't

Submitted by pfwag on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:31pm.

Chris Mathews wasn't available.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use