GOP Entrusts Debate to PBS Host Who Fawned Over Al Gore, Hillary
Tonight's GOP presidential debate (hosted by The Washington Post and Bloomberg TV) is moderated by longtime PBS late-night host Charlie Rose. His show has been touted as a "national salon," but it's a very cozy place for liberal media elites. Conservatives are not regulars. The most frequent guests include his journalist buddy Al Hunt (with 79 appearances), who now works at Bloomberg, and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman (74 appearances). Most of the GOP contenders have never been on Rose's PBS show. (Gingrich and Romney have. It's not shocking that the only one to appear in the last four years was Jon Huntsman, last December.)
Rose has been notoriously fawning with some major Democratic figures, including the Clintons, and perhaps most energetically with Al Gore. In a cozy 2007 interview taped inside a supportive liberal bubble at the 92nd Street Y in New York, Rose offered testimony of how correct Gore was on the issues and how graciously he accepted defeat in 2000 (apparently after the six-week marathon of legal battles). The experts Rose quoted on this matter were two liberal columnists from The Washington Post and a liberal venture capitalist:
CHARLIE ROSE: Welcome. Albert Gore. Nashville, Tennessee. Married to Tipper Gore. Four children, two grandchildren. Written two best-sellers. "Earth in Balance" and "An Inconvenient Truth." Filmmaker, best-selling author, speaker.
There's more. Here's what some people -- you think there is. Here's what some people have been saying. Richard Cohen: "Somebody ought to make a movie about Al Gore. I would call it 'An Uncomplaining Life.' The movie would be about a man who did not quit, who came out of -- came off the canvas after a painfully close election -- he won the popular vote after all -- who accepted defeat graciously and tried to unite the nation, who returned to the consuming passion of his early days, the environment, and spoke endlessly on the topic almost always for free. Who starred in a documentary based on his speech and who before a billion or so people won an Academy Award for his effort. This may or may not be a stepping stone to the presidency, but Gore gives us a lesson on how to live one's life. With an Oscar in his fist and triumph on his face, Al Gore is a man you can tell your kid about. That maybe is even better than being president." Richard Cohen.
There is more. There is Richard Branson: "I think Al Gore has almost single-handedly brought global warming to the forefront of the world."
E.J. Dionne, columnist. "Gore, to his credit, won't talk about Florida, but I will. Whatever flaws he has, Gore suffered through an extreme injustice with great dignity. His revenge is to have been right about a lot of things, right about the power of the Internet, right about global warming, and right about Iraq."
We will talk about all of that, but we will begin talking about "The Assault on Reason" by Al Gore, former vice president of the United States. Please welcome him to the 92nd Street Y.
AL GORE (to cheers and ongoing applause): Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Rose also honored his global-warming horror film/documentary:
ROSE: Let me just point out one thing, though -- "An Inconvenient Truth," a documentary, is one of the best-selling documentaries in the history of documentaries.
GORE: Thank you. [Applause]
ROSE: And it`s not about Anna Nicole Smith. It`s not about Britney Spears. It`s about the challenge to the planet.
GORE: Yes.
ROSE: So that says something.
This prompted Gore to begin his narrative about how "reason and logic and knowledge" suffered as we voted on war in Iraq, and he asked "Why is the Senate silent, ominously silent? Why is there no effort to lay out the pros and cons of this war? Why?" He then sent the praise back in Rose’s direction:
ROSE: But I had one person after another come to my program and say this is an unwise thing to do, to go to Iraq.
GORE: Your program is an oasis, Charlie, and it is -- it stands out for that reason.
Rose concluded with one last moment of fawning, reading Gore's own book back to him and the audience, underlining his idealism:
ROSE: I get the last word. "This book is dedicated to my father, Senator Albert Gore Sr., 1907-1998, who had a remarkable influence on his son and his daughters. The rebirth of democracy is a conclusion" -- I quote the last -- the first paragraph of conclusion -- "Almost 3,000 years ago, Solomon warned that where there is no vision, the people perish. But surely, the converse is also true. Where there is leadership with vision and moral courage, the people will flourish and redeem Lincoln's prophecy at Gettysburg, that government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the Earth." Our thanks to former Vice President Albert Gore. Thank you.
How perfectly PBS it was. Rose is a very polite host who doesn't usually offer windy questions. He's more likely to just set the table and let liberals talk.
In a 2003 interview with Hillary, as we noted in our Hillary book "Whitewash," Charlie Rose waxed about her personal growth, as if Hillary emerged a beautiful butterly from the chrysalis of the Clinton White House: "But you made a decision, bcause of your affection, love for him, to go to Arkansas, where he wanted to pursue his dream," he cooed. "You gave up some inedpendence because there was a higher value...Now here, in a sense, it's come full circle for you...It seems to be the emerged to me of a new independence for you since you're on your own."
Here's the Charlie Rose file at NewsBusters.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Republicans never, never
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:04am.
Republicans never, never learn.
Agreed
Submitted by panz on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:45am.
Simply stated truth. What is the matter with the GOP? Why do they continually fall into the traps set by the liberal media? This is for determining the person to represent the GOP in the general election.
They should not be doing any (as in 0) debates on any (as in 0) liberal networks. Who cares what they think? That garbage can be saved for the general election.
They know very well that Obama will never do debates (he's a coward) and they will have nothing to offer their viewers. Too bad. Stick with FOX, stick with other conservative networks and organizations.
Looks like a RINO selection
Submitted by daveinboca on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 1:07pm.
You can bet that now that Huntsman is dead meat, CRose will fawn all over Mitt Romney and try to make Herman Cain look like a naive political newcomer. Rose will never figure out and the legacy networks never mention that Cain was Vice Chair and then Chair of the Kansas City Federal Reserve for four years and knows more about business, economics, rocket science [he was an army ballistics expert] and just about everything else, except sucking up, than Obamarx. Rose will attack Perry viciously like Brian Williams did.
Wasn't Katie Couric available?
Army Ballistics expert?
Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 4:44pm.
Army Ballistics expert? Really? I KNEW I liked that guy.....
We all know the direction Rose will take the debate!
Submitted by scottyusmc on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:12am.
His "job" is to create divisive talking points for the liberal establishment media to demonstrate GOP division. WE ALL KNOW IT!!!! The reason why I probably won't even watch the event... Listen America - almost the entire media establishment is in the tank for the liberals and we know that they will do everything possible to get their "master" elected in 2012... Don't fall for the circus show!!!
I would LOVE it if the
Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:04am.
I would LOVE it if the candidates asked some questions in return. Each of them should save a bit of time from their wandering answers and return fire on the obvious hostile positioned questions Charlie will ask.
"...By the way Charlie, this debate will be viewed by far fewer people than the last one covered by Foxnews who put more resources into the effort. Why should we support your obvously liberal organization with tax dollars?"
C Rose
Submitted by NewLife56 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 8:21am.
The economy is all that counts yet now we'll hear the Mormon Issue, the OWS protest and everything accept Obama's record or lack there of
I don't know why the
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:05am.
I don't know why the Republicans do this..............who sets these debates up, anyway - a lib/Dem mole in the 'R' party??? The best we can hope for is that the candidates call BS on the 'questions' that are actually designed to put them on the spot, or elicit some kind of response that Rose and all of his lib buddies in the MSM, as well as the opposition, can use against them. I know Newt has been doing it - they ALL should do it!!! Make Rose look bad...........rephrase his questions...........refuse the premise.....give an answer that is straight-forward with regards to the real issue...............don't go along with the direction that the 'moderator' is trying to take.
Don't forget the question to Cain...
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 5:49pm.
...to determine if he is an "authentic" black man. Y'all just know that Charlie Rose has been on his cellphone all day to idiots like Cornel West, Danny Glover and Tavis Smiley.
I don't know what motivated the GOP to allow Charlie Rose and his intellectually pretentious staff to moderate this debate, but I hope Cain has an opportunity to go after stupid questions and comments.
Like Charlie brown getting fooled by Lucy...
Submitted by donnyvee on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:17am.
...they just never learn. I predict at least three questions about religion. A couple about gay rights. And certainly two or three about abortion.
Expect lots of false
Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:58am.
Expect lots of false sequiters such as "Now that Iraq was proven to be a mistake, do you ......."
Snort. This debate will be
Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:47am.
Snort. This debate will be about the ISSUES!!! Yeah, not holding my breath.
Ronald Reagan
Concur: One wonders what the
Submitted by BD on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 9:57am.
Concur:
One wonders what the RNC thinks they are accomplishing by turning over some of its debates to hostile mediums?
Do they think they are exposing the RNC to new audiences? Hell no.
Do they think the PBS crew will treat them better in the future for this magnanimity? Hell no.
Do they think they will get larger audiences? Hell no.
THey should schedule all their debates with the only impartial medium - Fox news.
Charlie Rose?
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:01am.
Why not Rosie O'Donnell or Al Gore...the repubs are wussies and loony...look out for Charlie's oh so measured sarcasm, reality denial and attacks posed as questions...SAD!
Done watching them
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:25am.
I'm done watching these things. I'm not even going to try, in fact, I'll just switch to my bluray player and watch one of the Star Wars movie that recently came out in bluray(the complette saga). Or any other movie.
But HELL NO on the debates. And I don't hold much hope for any of the Rs that are doing this, they keep setting themselves up for failure, these days, it's almost like a genetic condition.
-Jon
it is rather stupid to
Submitted by jkwtrading on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:50am.
it is rather stupid to continually have debates which are monitored by lefties. The GOP should wake up, have their debates from Conservative moderators. How hard can it be to establish the debate forum. If they cannot establish a debate forum (very small) how the hell do one expect them to run a country, which is a zillion times larger.
Obama's worldview unknown to Charlie Rose
Submitted by rwnewsnut on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 10:53am.
If Charlie Rose gets testy with any of the candidates, they should resort to asking why he never learned candidate Obama's worldview, heroes, etc...
The Republicans have to learn to push back - push back twice as hard.
****************************************************************************************
ROSE: I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
BROKAW: No, I don't, either.
ROSE: I don't know how he really sees where China is.
BROKAW: We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
ROSE: I don't really know. And do we know anything about the people who are advising him?
BROKAW: Yeah, it's an interesting question.
ROSE: He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational (sic) speeches.
BROKAW: Two of them! I don't know what books he's read.
ROSE: What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
BROKAW: There's a lot about him we don't know.
Well....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:24pm.
we certainly know what is world view is now, don't we.
Charlie Rose is still alive?!
Submitted by Edditor on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:15am.
My favorite Charlie Rose exchange was with Tom Brokaw when they talked about Obama....and the fact that they actually knew NOTHING about the man.....worthy of a First Base routine.
The same could be said of
Submitted by goldbar on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:37am.
The same could be said of Herman Cain who I really hope is the republican nominee. Bring on that 9% national sales tax!
The real question is why did the Republicans agree to...
Submitted by Conservator on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:40am.
... to participate in a debated hosted by The Washington Post and Bloomberg TV and moderated by Charlie Rose? All are associated with lefty news media outlets. I recall that Democrats running for the Presidential nomination in 2008 refused to attend any debate hosted by Fox News. The GOP often are there worst enemy.
Just plain STUPID
Submitted by Delsa on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:48am.
I am not watching
This is enfuriating
Submitted by DaMav on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 11:56am.
There are numerous qualified moderate & conservative personalities available to moderate these debates. Wolf Blitzer was bad enough. Rose is from a network we want to defund, and punked Palin with his "Bush Doctrine" bullcrap.
So he gets rewarded by Republicans?
The mind is a terrible thing to loose...
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:23pm.
..or to have lost one's mind......
As I read the story I got to the line, "....two liberal columnists from The Washington Post and a liberal venture capitalist" and my poor brain read, "two liberal columnists from The Washington Post and a liberal ventriloquist". Oh, well.......... :-)
Why-oh-why~
Submitted by GG_NB on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:52pm.
It is infuriating to see Repubs set themselves up -- again. What is NOT to understand?! Read up on Alinsky, people!
Over and over again, the Repubs catch momentum on their side, and they are just bound and determined to shoot their own feet.
Foolish, foolish, foolish.
"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan
Charlie Rose makes me gag.
Submitted by totsotvaitn on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 1:36pm.
Why should I subject myself to this buffoon hosting the GOP debate? What a joke. He has that "I am superior to you look" that Lawrence O'Donnell displays during his pathetic show on the mess network. I know the GOP is trying to be fair to the media but really GOP, lamebrain media doesn't deserve the consideration.
Maybe Newt will put him in
Submitted by pfwag on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:32pm.
Maybe Newt will put him in his place.
Chris Mathews wasn't
Submitted by pfwag on Tue, 10/11/2011 - 6:31pm.
Chris Mathews wasn't available.