Radio Mud: Thom Hartmann Responds to Weiner With Old Enquirer Boehner Story
The sour grapes were incredibly sour on the Thom Hartmann radio show on Thursday when they led off with the news that Anthony Weiner was resigning. Broadcasting live from the Netroots Nation hootenanny in Minneapolis, Hartmann went right from an admitted sex scandal to an unproven old story from last November in the National Enquirer:
Looks like Anthony Weiner’s about to step down. John Boehner’s involved in a major sex scandal. It’s all over the page of the National Enquirer. Two different women, they’re naming the women. So this is this is shades of the John Edwards revisit.
The Edwards case certainly proved that the Enquirer sometimes has the journalistic goods on wandering politicians. But the Boehner story of romancing a lobbyist (complete with the rumor that the New York Times is investigating) sounds more like the crumbled Vicki Iseman story used against John McCain.
The subject re-emerged when The Nation’s John Nichols joined the show. Hartmann was quick to assert the bizarre point that the National Enquirer has only been wrong once in the last thirty years. He cited a story involving Carol Burnett as an example. They asserted that Eric Cantor was the face of the Republicans for the Weiner story because Boehner has skeletons in his closet:
NICHOLS: I don’t like this kind of politics, it doesn’t have much interest to me but I think its significant –
HARTMANN, jumping in: – I think if it wasn’t for the Weiner thing we wouldn’t even be discussing it.
NICHOLS: Boehner never stepped up; they kept having Cantor out front to talk about it. Cause Boehner was afraid because he doesn’t want --
HARTMANN: He’s got some skeletons in his own closet.
NICHOLS: Skeletons? It’s like a whole graveyard in that closet.
HARTMANN: Amazing!
Liberal talk radio doesn't wait for the "establishment" media to report on these alleged adulteries. They just trust the Enquirer first (they're never wrong, says Hartmann) and ask questions later.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
The Same Liberals That...
Submitted by GeneralAl on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 5:48pm.
These are the same liberals that claimed Teeny Weeny Weiner had been hacked on his Tweeter account. I'd sooner believe Baghdad Bob than these lying scoundrels!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
I never heard of this Thom
Submitted by ricklail on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 6:31pm.
I never heard of this Thom Hartman until the other day when I saw he had a program on the new network, Free Speech TV. It seems he may be getting a bit cocky since he has about 10 more listeners. By the way, from what I can tell FSTV is very liberal.
Funny, I hadn't heard of him
Submitted by Yarbles on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 7:24pm.
Funny, I hadn't heard of him until about 4 days ago myself. Time Warner reshuffled the digital channels so I was sorting through the new lineup and I came across a channel I had never seen before. The show was "The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann" and the channel was Russia Today, the Kremlin's propaganda channel.
if you have to go on a network called "Free Speech TV",
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 7:32pm.
the odds are one to one that you are a loon.
Love these paranoiac liberals....
Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 6:35pm.
....they keep coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches at a demolition site!
Turning to the National Enquirer as if it were some kind of respected news organization is pathetic. Is he going to quote the Weekly World News next?
So NOW they think NE has it right?
Submitted by Tenebrous on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 7:43pm.
Funny, they didn't think so during the Clinton years when dissatisfied staffers leaked stuff to them. They also poo-pooed on them when they were covering Edwards. Now that the NE might have had some dirt on the speaker, of course, then NE is a respected journalist organization.
The only people more adept at embracing what they denied yesterday were the Soviets.
Visions and Principles blog
I still bet that the NE
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 8:22pm.
Is more accurate then the lsm
"Thong Hartman" a LIBERALS LIBERAL..... OR
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Mon, 06/20/2011 - 11:37am.
If your a republican according to him you deserve to be dragged by your heels through the streets and hung... if your a liberal you can do nothing wrong.... some would call him a Liberals Liberal... I call him a DOUCHEBAGS DOUCHEBAG!