Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'

WaPo Story Honoring House for LGBT Teens Has Zero Space for Disagreement

By Tim Graham | May 23, 2011 | 22:39

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

You know you’re reading the liberal Washington Post when a story rejoices in the D.C. government offering "a measure of freedom she has never had" to "slip on a flower-print blouse and shave her face." The place is Wanda Alston House, named after a lesbian activist staffer of NOW and the Human Rights Campaign who was stabbed to death in 2005.

The top story in Sunday’s Metro section was headlined: "A Haven from the Streets: For lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youths, who face a higher risk of becoming homeless, D.C.’s Wanda Alston House offers refuge where they don’t have to fear being themselves." Reporter Theresa Vargas was typically all sympathy and zero skepticism for the politically correct cause:

As the District takes significant strides to advance the rights of LGBT residents — for example, recently legalizing same-sex marriage — the youths who pass through the Wanda Alston House tell of the vulnerability the community still faces. The house, named after an LGBT leader and mayoral adviser who was killed in 2005, is one of a handful of transitional houses in the nation that cater to people who experts say are more likely to become homeless and who, once in that category, pose challenges most shelter systems are unequipped to address. Should a transgender female be placed in a shelter with men or women? Where should a transgender male who still has the anatomy of a woman shower?

..."These kids get swallowed up in the system," says Brian Watson, who manages the house through the District’s Transgender Health Empowerment program. He says he has seen young people come from shelters who have been sexually abused, ridiculed and, in one case, made to sleep in a common living room instead of a bedroom because she was transgender.

"These are good kids, really good kids," Watson says. "They just need a chance."

The story not only dominated the front page of Metro, but all of page C-4. There were also two videos, also unanimous. In one, Watson explains "There’s just a lot of non-understanding of what is a transgender person, what is gender identity. I think that our GLB youths are at risk, but our T youth, our transgender youth, are definitely at a higher risk." Everyone in the Alston house are good, and all who fail to accept their moral choices are bad:

In Room 1, Devin [a female transitioning to male] sits on his bed, a broken guitar and Bible nearby, reading a poem he has written:

I don’t subscribe to their norms. So I must be the enemy. Unsurprisingly, both they and I share the same make up, the same creator, and some of the same sentiments. I too delight in the breeze on a warm summer day. I enjoy traveling even though I haven’t gone very far. I appreciate companionship, a listening ear, a warm heart. Yet somehow these human similarities are disregarded, and I become reducible to a "he/she" or an "it." An animal, an alien, a traitor. (Italics theirs.)

In the second video, there's more in this prose poem from Devin, including hostility to critics:

That is why I hold my humanity near to me. I hide it. I cherish it. I pray over it and ask it never to abandon me. Enough people are trying to steal it from me. They are telling me that I don’t deserve it, that I am not allowed to have it. I detest these statements, these actions, these ignorant and emboldened proclamations. This life, this joy, this fortitude was given to me by my creator, and in order to survive, I have to slip it into my pocket and hide it from the thieving populus...I deserve the same amount of respect as everyone else. It becomes terribly tiresome to become the only civilized individual in a crowd of decision-making organisms.  

In addition to all the raging inaccuracy of pronouns -- where the transgendered person in question gets to define which sex they are regardless of the biological realities -- we get strange phrases like "biologically born men," as opposed to the inauthentic kind:

Devin’s girlfriend, who had only dated biologically born men before meeting Devin in college, says the hardest part of his transition has been his family’s "abandonment, just their not being able to handle it." At the beginning, his mother couldn’t talk to him on the phone without crying and telling him he was going to hell, but now Devin says they have brief conversations. "I hope, and he doesn’t have a choice but to hope," his girlfriend says, "that someday she’ll be able to spend time with him."

This is the closest the Vargas story gets to an opposing point of view – hoping for the "heartbroken" mother to convert to the pro-LGBT point of view, as the Post suggests everyone eventually must, and will.  MNN

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Both

Submitted by mamabear on Wed, 07/06/2011 - 7:39pm.

Homosexual behavior, like most behavior, is a conscious choice. There's very good evidence now that orientation, who you are attracted to, is not a conscious choice. Certainly, I don't know many straight people who think they could make a choice and become attracted to people of the same gender, so I'm not sure why they think orientation must somehow function differently for gay people.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

I see your point.

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 7:53am.

I'm pretty sure all those schizophrenics out there are just completely outraged at the thought of science researching an organic cause for their condition.

Now, we're pretty sure schizophrenia is organic, and that people are born that way. Should we stop administering to them? Should we see their lifestyles as equal to those that are not schizophrenic. Sure, some do bad things to other people, but there are bad apples in every bunch, right?

If it seems I compare the two quite a bit, I suppose I do. What if the same gene vulneralbilities thought to be factors in schizophrenia are factors in homosexuality? It seems these vulneralbilities allow for life events to have more of an effect than would normally be the case. Is it not plausible that something similar might be happening in homosexuals? Am I homophobic for asking these questions?

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Not homophobic, just kind of stretching!

Submitted by mamabear on Sat, 07/09/2011 - 9:38am.

Um, I don't think most schizophrenics want to be schizophrenic, but I'll bet even the ones that want to function normally find the idea of drugs that mess with their brain a little scary. Anything that changes personality is major, and should be addressed very carefully.

And that's all I've argued here. You keep asking me if we should stop searching for causes/cures for XX comparison as though that's what I'm saying about homosexuality. I'm not. I'm saying that it is understandable that people who feel normal and happy the way they are (which is not, as far as I know, generally true of schizophrenics) might object to being told that the way they are is a mistake or a wrong that should be corrected. So don't compare it to schizophrenia, compare it to the way you would feel if someone tried to tell you that being attracted to the opposite sex was a gross mistake of nature and you might feel like it is right for you, but trust them, you're wrong.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

Not sure crazy people know they're crazy,

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sat, 07/09/2011 - 10:24pm.

Until told they are. Does a fish know it's wet?

Anyway, you keep arguing this as if 2+2=5. It doesn't. Heterosexuals are wired correctly, homosexuals are not. There are basic laws of mechanics, basic laws of hydraulics, and basic laws of nature. You saying I should consider how I would feel if people were telling me that heterosexuality is wrong, but they can fix it is kinda like asking be to believe that two hydrogen and one oxygen makes nitrogen. It is not a salient point.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Yeah, they do

Submitted by mamabear on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:25am.

Ever known anyone who was OCD? The knowledge that compulsions don't make sense does not remove the need to perform them. I'm sure some people don't know they are afflicted with something, but someone who's really affected by a disorder knows that other people don't act the way they do.

If homosexuality is how some people are wired (glad to see you admit that, at least), then you can't expect it to feel to them like 2 hydrogen and an oxygen making nitrogen. Whether the wiring is right or wrong, it probably feels just as imperative as it does to you.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

So what???

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 1:47pm.

An alcoholic FEELS it's imperative to have a drink. Doesn't make it a good idea.

Where have I denied the possibility that homosexuals are not born that way, (at least true homosexuals, not the hangers on and so called bi-sexuals)? Lots of people are born with lots of abnormalities. Doesn't mean we should turn society on its head to accommodate them.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

But we do

Submitted by mamabear on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 10:29pm.

We do all kinds of things to accommodate people who are born differently than most. Ramps, left handed desks, braille on signs, we do our best to make society as welcoming of difference as we can. Why would this not be the same? Society doesn't have to turn on its head-- abolishing marriage would be turning it on its head. Including more people in marriage is broadening society, not wrecking it.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

Changing the definition

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 11:05pm.

Nobody is abolishing marriage, just bastardizing it. The redefinition of marriage doesn't necessarily broaden society. Turning our backs on every traditional aspect of our society does nothing to broaden it.

Nobody is arguing for denying gays any rights of survivorship, visitation, what have you. Marriage is NOT a right.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Well, people are denying them those rights

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 8:47am.

...but you don't need marriage to fix that. Not every state allows gay civil unions either, that's what they need to have those rights. I said before I'd be all in favor of government getting out of marriage altogether. Everyone, gay and straight, would get a civil union to affect taxes, partnership rights, etc. Marriages could be entirely private affairs that each church could decide to grant to a couple or not, as per their beliefs.

I understand why that's not good enough for the real activists out there, on both sides, but I think it is by far the sanest way to go.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

Perhaps civil unions

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 11:19pm.

Should once again be what they are fighting for. We actually have some common ground here. I certainly don't give a marriage done outside of religion the same legitimacy as those done within. It is really contractual law when sanctioned by the state, and like any contract, there is a penalty to pay to get out of it.

I am unwilling to rob the legitimacy of marriage as consecrated by God to make a few feel better.

(full disclosure: I was married to my wife at the courthouse. If that makes it a civil union, and saves the definition of marriage as it truly is, then so be it.)

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

"homosexuality has been tolerated in diffrent cultures"

Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 06/17/2011 - 10:10am.

Tell that to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Sodom. No tolerance there.

The fact that we turn a blind eye to the behavior is a prime example of just how immoral our culture has become. It is the Christians duty to point out that God loves all, but hates sin in any form. Practicing Homosexuals will not be allowed into heaven. Jesus said so, and I believe him.

 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!

  • Login to post comments

Huff, huff, huff, huff, huff....

Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 06/17/2011 - 12:44am.

I knew better, but i came and read anyway. Whew! My eyes are out of breath! I think I might stay away for a while, the multiple-page posts, to make a simple point are just so much more than my poor, old eyes can take. GrislyBear, you are the most hard-headed person I've ever seen, but, you never give up, I'll give you that... keep it to one or 2 pages to make a point, k? You too Fut, y'all take too long to make a simple point! Whew, but don't stop, stick to it! ; )

_____________________________________________________________ I'm not too drunk to dance! It's just that people keep stepping on my hands!
  • Login to post comments

"Good philosophy must exist,

Submitted by lotr on Sun, 06/19/2011 - 3:21pm.

"Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy needs to be answered."

— C. S. Lewis

Hopefully that provides a brief, "to the point" justification for some of the "long windedness" found above....

  • Login to post comments

Oh, it's not a problem most of the time

Submitted by Rukus on Mon, 06/20/2011 - 12:39am.

I understand it takes a lot to explain some things, that's a given. But taking several screens to make a single point (often going off on a tangent) get's hard to read. But yes, some of the "long windedness" is certainly ok. I didn't mean to broad brush all the longer post's. Your point is taken.

_____________________________________________________________ I'm not too drunk to dance! It's just that people keep stepping on my hands!
  • Login to post comments

Why do we have the Spelling

Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 06/20/2011 - 10:47am.

Why do we have the Spelling Nazis, the Grammar Nazis and now we have Length of Posts Nazi? LOL

but i agree, at least as related to me, I can say a very little with a lot of words! LOL

  • Login to post comments

Wow, Speaking of Nazis... READ this! "The Pink Swastika"

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:37pm.

Documented historical fact not taught in schools. Snip in-part http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/080515

Lively's crime? In his book, "The Pink Swastika," Lively exposes a secret homosexual activists don't want you to know about Nazi Germany: that although the Nazis did persecute homosexuals, the homosexuals the Nazis persecuted were almost exclusively the effeminate members of the gay community in Germany, and that much of the mistreatment was administered by masculine homosexuals who despised effeminacy in all its forms.

Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that "not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal."

In fact, the Nazi Party began in a gay bar in Munich, and Ernst Roehm, Hitler's right hand in the early days of Nazism, was well-known for his taste in young boys. William Shirer says in his definitive "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich," not only that Roehm was "important in the rise of Hitler," but also "like so many of the early Nazis, (he was) a homosexual."

Hitler eventually had Roehm shot, not because he was a homosexual but because his influence over the Brown Shirts made him a political threat to Hitler's control. The Roehm Purge, or "Night of the Long Knives," was largely implemented by homosexuals.

Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual. They also, sadly, comprised most of the leadership of the Hitler Youth, resulting in frequent instances of sexual molestation.

The Brown Shirts were Hitler's enforcers. According to Nazi historian Louis Snyder, Roehm recruited homosexuals into the SA because Roehm felt Germany needed "a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in (Roehm's) eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals."

Of the Brown Shirts, historian Thomas Fuchs says, "The principle function of this army-like organization was beating up on anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals."

Historian H.R. Knickerbocker writes, "Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops, had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual, he had no chance of advancement."

Most of Hitler's closest aides were homosexuals or sexual deviants. This circle included not only Roehm but the Hitler Youth leader, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Economics, Hermann Goering (who may not have been homosexual but who liked to dress in drag, paint his nails and put rouge on his cheeks), his personal attorney and his bodyguards. Hitler himself likely functioned as a male prostitute in the days of his youth in Vienna.

Heinrich Himmler, second in power only to Hitler, was publicly opposed to homosexuality but may have been a closet homosexual himself, and served Roehm faithfully and loyally until Roehm fell out of Hitler's favor. Himmler was deeply immersed in the occult, as was Hitler, which led them ultimately to replace every Christian holiday on the German calendar with a pagan counterpart.

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

MaximusBraveheart, Well this

Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 06/21/2011 - 4:36pm.

MaximusBraveheart,

Well this is an unspoken history about homosexuality. It is politically incorrect to speak real history. The Nazi Party was full of homosexuals many of them in the dreaded SS and Ghestapo. High ranking Nazi officials, etc.

And well said about the Nazi Party being immersed in the ocult. The Nazi Party which was full of atheist, just like the French Revolution, with the Enlightment, also full of atheist, just like the anti-Catholics in the Cristero Wars, Spanish Civil War, which were full of atheist, replaced Christian holidays with pagan counterparts. The whole point of these horrific atheist movements was to stamp out Christianity.

  • Login to post comments

10% homosexual in prison? Don't sign my kids up, thanks.

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Sat, 07/16/2011 - 6:41pm.

Related post to this thread... another indicator that the "lifestyle," and/or possible emotional damage that resulted in the choice, is not so healthy for these people:
---------------------

*new Not PC to disclose % nowadays? Nov 1976 EBONY! WOW!

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Sat, 07/16/2011 - 6:30pm.

A pro homosexual site I looked at said 20-40% in prison have homosexual sex. This November1976 EBONY article (w/ good pic of OJ & family on cover! Go to cover at top) by the Executive director of Cooke County Prisons said 60% of prisoners are homosexual! The PC police had not been set up yet in 1976. His remarks are referring to the 85% which are re-offenders: He said most did not have fathers, or had ineffectual fathers, with no masculine role model. That they started getting in trouble at the start of grade school and somehow desire masculinity via displays of violence. Hmm that may explain why homosexual partnerships have statistically much higher assault rates? Also said that the No. 1 cause of murder in prison was homosexual involvement! "Love triangles" cause murderous level of anger... that practicing homosexuals are typically promiscuous and looking for new action. All this in the first couple pages of the article. On the third page (pg. 86 of mag) he says that prison guards, POLICE, and related work has a disproportionately high level of homosexuals that come in with "sadistic or otherwise perverted inclinations." That may well explain the TSA complaints...

Take a look! Cover price is $1.25! Look at the phone co. ads! Someone should archive this for history! Google may well delete soon! Yahoo Answers had removed discussions similar to this thread due to their "policy" (of not allowing freedom of speech). You could still pull up in the cache. Looking briefly, I didn't note anything hateful either. Guess the truth, like a grenade, is just too disturbing.

LINK to Nov. 1976 EBONY article: http://books.google.com/books?id=mM0DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&dq=percen...

M-B

Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/mike-bates/2011/07/16/cnns-begala-least...

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use