Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'

Time's Pork 100: Most Influential List in Media Led by...Joe Scarborough?!

By Tim Graham | April 21, 2011 | 14:22

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

Turn a few pages of the "Time 100" -- ostensibly the "most influential people in the world"  -- and you can easily see it as a gimmick, and not a serious attempt to measure influence. Look no further than the media. In the new 2011 list, one media name stands out  -- Joe Scarborough, the liberal-pleasing "Republican" MSNBC host Mark Levin calls "The Morning Schmo." There are no Fox News hosts and no liberal-media TV stars and no talk-radio titans. Time editor Richard Stengel is a guest on the Scarborough show, and they often hype the new Time magazine cover, so declaring him influential looks very much like a bit of commercial/political pork-barreling. The tribute to Joe came from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg (the two Manhattan centrists have been talked up as a presidential dream team):

As a group, cable-television talk-show hosts are not exactly known for independent political analysis that is free of partisan favoritism, but that is exactly what makes Joe Scarborough, 48, so refreshing — and so important. Joe's approach to politics is the same as mine: call 'em like you see 'em, and even if people don't agree with you on every issue — and they won't — they will respect you for being honest. They will know you are not shilling for a party or an ideology. And they will do exactly what you would hope any voter — and any viewer — would do: listen with an open mind and come to their own conclusions.

On every issue, Joe speaks his mind without fear or favor, because he puts his country before his party. He served for seven years as a Republican Congressman from Florida, but he is a patriot before he is a politician or a pundit. That independence is what makes Joe Scarborough such a valuable voice in American politics. And it's what makes Morning Joe such a successful show. (That, and of course the real star of the show, Mika Brzezinski.)

For previous events in Time hero-pork, see the case of Bill and Melinda Gates -- Time funders in November, Persons of the Year in December.

Newsweek has also honored Scarborough, and then-Newsweek editor Jon Meacham has also been a Morning Joe regular. Take as a sign of Joe Scarborough's apparently imposing global influence this piece for Newsweek in early 2010: "Is the Tea Party Over? The anti-Obama anger that helped fuel the ‘Massachusetts Miracle’ is now threatening to tear the movement apart."

Oprah Winfrey was acknowledged, and the author was CNN founder Ted Turner:

I have always admired independent thinkers, those with the courage, faith and intuition to forge their own ways. In business, these pioneers take calculated risks; care less about bottom lines and more about ideas and innovation; and are intent on bettering the world along the way. Oprah, 57, defines this approach. She has not only made it to the top with the cards stacked against her, but she has also made extraordinary contributions to our global community through her philanthropic efforts.

CNN revolutionized the news based on a good idea, good people and a lot of inspired guesswork. Under Oprah, the OWN channel is primed to combat the tabloid programming we've become accustomed to with smart, enlightened, informative content.

I have often said that if women ruled the world for the next 100 years, we'd all be better off. I have a feeling that with the possibilities at Oprah's fingertips, we may be one step closer.

Dan Rather was assigned to hail the journalism of Al-Jazeera English reporter Aymed Mohyeldin:

All journalists hope that at least once in their career, they'll be covering the world's biggest story and be the best at doing it. With Egypt's revolution, Ayman Mohyeldin's hopes became reality. Many journalists did good work in Egypt at the country's - and the region's - historic turning point, but none matched Mohyeldin, 31. He put us in the middle of the action and took us behind the scenes; he riveted us to the story as it developed toward its climax and kept us along for the aftermath. By dint of his experience, persistence and talent, he lifted the profile and reputation of the al-Jazeera network. And for one brief, shining moment, he was the best in the world.

Julian Assange was hailed by uber-feminist writer Germaine Greer: "There were many scoops but few surprises amid what we learned from WikiLeaks. Regardless of what happens to Assange, which he will almost certainly not deserve, the construction of stateless, secure and indestructible Internet drop boxes cannot be undone. Secrets will never be safe again."

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Mike Bloomberg
  • Time
  • Celebrities
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Ooh, this is going to make a very special boy very, very happy.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 2:30pm.

Nice to know that Joe is more influential than Rupert Murdoch, who sadly didn't make the cut.

Then again, Biden made the list, too. 

  • Login to post comments

Joe?

Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:05pm.

Joe who?

  • Login to post comments

I thought April Fools Day was just the 1st.

Submitted by IdahoJim on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:15pm.

Now we have an example, all in one place, of the real April Fools.

"I find that I am deeply offended by political correctness." IdahoAndy

IdahoJim

http://idahoandy.net

  • Login to post comments

Wouldn't a TV Host

Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:37pm.

Need to have an audience to have any influence. Who would he be influencing?

  • Login to post comments

Yea, without an audience you have no influence.

Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:24pm.

The MSM keeps forgetting that and basically are talking to each other now.

Joe gets 300,000 viewers on a good day. Not even 1% of the country watches Scarborough and he is one of the most influential? That's not saying much. Good for DC cocktail Party invites I bet.

  • Login to post comments

I think they must have used the wrong definition

Submitted by richb313 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:48pm.

I think they must have used the wrong definition. Influence means that without that item or person something would be different than it is. Einstien infulenced the modern world. No Einstien no modern world.

They have to be using a different definition. Gravity influences bodies in motion. No gravity, no universe. Take away Joe what would change, nothing.

  • Login to post comments

Rich: You Missed the Correction, Investigation Finds Mistake:

Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:14pm.

Time Magazine admitted a mistake in the story. The word "least" was left out of the story.

Thus, the headline should have been: The 100 Least Influential Persons.

  • Login to post comments

Thanks

Submitted by richb313 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:29pm.

Now it makes sense. If only it were true.

  • Login to post comments

What's REALLY lacking in influence?

Submitted by Tim Graham on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:50pm.

Time magazine....like Newsweek, its audience and influence are collapsing.


  • Login to post comments

The way they teased this up,

Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:50pm.

The way they teased this up, I thought Glen Beck was the kicker, NOT Joe!!! He thinks he "shapes" what is discussed? Is he for real? Talk about your clueless, inside the beltway group think!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Dumb move for Time

Submitted by Boil It Down on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:59pm.

So... nobody at Time considered for a minute the ridicule they would have to endure across media and the blogs because of this list? Isn't there anyone at Time who is smart enough to keep this from making it to print? Then you have to consider that they actually wasted money on an effort to make them look foolish. How could anyone respect another thing they put out after this bit of comedy? Loyalty among the liberal cronies will be one of the major causes of their downfall.

This list is so clearly absurd that Time became even more of a joke than before. Then again, the frequency with which they've been shooting themselves in the foot seems to be accelerating.

  • Login to post comments

Time will be the next newsrag to be firesold

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 6:03pm.

It will go for $0.25.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

$0.25 Is Too Much

Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 7:35pm.

I am putting together a group of investors - TRASH Inc. - who will offer to take Time off their hands for negative $1,000 - that is Time will pay TRASH Inc. $1,000 to dispose of it. The writers will be offered Obama-Food-Stamps as severance pay..

  • Login to post comments

People that changed the world...

Submitted by big.league.slider on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 12:45am.

I didn't see the name of that hot Pakistani chick that gave an intellectual b@tch-slapping to that mullah on you-tube, at risk of receiving a fatwa. She was totally inspirational though, in many ways.

And I didn't see Rush Limbaugh. He inspires tens of millions, 5 days a week, 52 weeks a year.

Frankly, I didn't recognize most of the names on that list. It seemed to be mostly just a bunch of politically correct nobodies, that got their 15 minutes of fame doing something that presented no risk.

  • Login to post comments

In a group of 1000 people

Submitted by ConservaSerb on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 3:42am.

Does anyone really think more than 43 even know who Blo ScarredBrow is?



A wise & frugal government, which shall leave men free 2 regulate their own pursuits of industry & improvement, & shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. T. Jefferson
  • Login to post comments

He influences zero.

Submitted by Texndoc on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 4:48am.

"Time editor Richard Stengel is a guest on the Scarborough show, and they often hype the new Time magazine cover, so declaring him influential looks very much like a bit of commercial/political pork-barreling. "

Oh yeah, very much looks like.
Where do you EVER see TIME magazine, but on Moaning Joe?

Most of the brain-numbed liberals I know prefer Rachel Maddow, who is well liked among that crowd. I can promise they have never tuned to MSNBC in the mornings. And Fox and Friends has always slaughtered his show in the ratings. So define the article's "successful" to me.

  • Login to post comments

Time Magazine and Time.

Submitted by acaiguana on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 7:34am.

Time was that Time Magazine was a respected and actual real journalist rag that looked back on a week's work of news and made some in-depth reporting which informed people about things and events.

Then it became two years old.

When it hit the teen years it really went wild.  Hasn't grown up yet and seems to be devolving into a completely psychotic morass of infantile ravings.

That was history of course.  Doesn't matter if I just made it up; the result is clear.

Out of the 100 most influential media in the US and the World at large...

Time Magazine didn't make the list.

ACA

...

Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)

  • Login to post comments

Bloomberg? Joe Scarborough?

Submitted by okiehawk44 on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 8:07am.

I can tell anyone outside DC and NYC that it's a guarantee that no one on our side will vote for a ticket containing either of these 'er uh "moderates" or RINOs or whatever it is you are calling them these days.

The uber-liberal (gun control; nanny statism) Bloomberg doesn't know from day-to-day if he's a leftist Democrat (i.e. communist) or a leftist Republican (i.e. socialist) and when Trump said he might call on him to be his VP he immediately lost my support. There is a difference between making money -- even a boatload -- and having principles most of this country lives by that allow you to financially exist.

Why don't you Democrats stop trying to foist "your" choice for our presidential candidate on us like you think is your right. Hear that all you John McCain fans out there?

The Democrats are experts at knocking down candidates they don't want to run against and promoting those they know they can defeat.

  • Login to post comments

The first sentence says it all…

Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 8:43am.

“Turn a few pages of the "Time 100" -- ostensibly the "most influential people in the world” and you can easily see it as a gimmick, and not a serious attempt to measure influence.”

Obviously! – As evidenced by the fact that I - (you’re excessively humble and somewhat overly modest, Grumpy) did not make the list again this year.

- Grump :o)

"I wish I had an answer to that because I'm tired of answering that question." - Yogi Berra, (Baseball Great and Philosopher)
  • Login to post comments

Wow! He's even influential

Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 10:56am.

Wow! He's even influential when his radio show has had to take a brief hiatus while it's retooled to become even more awesome (if that's even possible). Everybody loves Joe; I know he's the talk of the town where I live. I ran into some total strangers while pumping gas last night and they said "Don't ya just love that Joe Scarborough? He's so dreamy!"




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use