NPR Anchor Interviews Sen. Coburn -- From the Right, with Grover Norquist Criticism
If you thought of a place on the radio dial on a Saturday morning where Sen. Tom Coburn would be pressed as squishy, it probably wouldn't be NPR. But on Weekend Edition Saturday, NPR anchor Scott Simon asked some basic questions about a budget deal, and then shifted to Grover Norquist's criticisms of Coburn for being a tax hiker. This could be seen as quite an anti-Grover segment, with how strongly Coburn attacked him:
SCOTT SIMON: Let me ask you about a debate that was brought to my attention this week. You're -- Oklahoma, I think can fairly be identified as a farming state. You're opposed to ethanol subsidies.
TOM COBURN: Well, I'm specifically opposed to the ethanol blending credit, which is just one of the subsidies that we give for ethanol.
SIMON: This has opened up, as I don't have to tell you, a pointed disagreement with Grover Norquist and his group, Americans for Tax Reform.
COBURN: I'm not sure that they add anything positive to the debate today being dogmatic in their position that if you don't give the most profitable companies in this country -- who, by the way, sent me a letter saying they don't want this money -- that we're going to send them $5.9 billion and call that a tax increase by not sending them money that they're not earning, to me, seems ridiculous and the average American's going to look at that and say 'That's stupid.'
SIMON: This gets fairly intricate but we're talking about the 45 cent-per- gallon ethanol tax credit.
COBURN: For blending.
SIMON: Yeah, for blending ethanol, which I think, difficult to understand but I think the argument that Mr. Norquist and others are making is this represents a tax increase.
COBURN: He's saying it's a tax increase. If we take away this -- which they don't agree with the blending credit either -- but if we don't cut somebody's taxes somewhere else, I am a heretic and I no longer am a conservative Republican who believes in limited government.
SIMON: And as far as you're concerned, they're...
COBURN: I think it's background noise and it doesn't play for what the real problems are in front of us.
For the ATR response, see Greenwire at The New York Times from Wednesday:
ATR tax policy director Ryan Ellis responded within hours in a letter of his own that took no issue with Coburn's criticism of government ethanol supports. "[T]he best policy outcome is to eliminate the ethanol tax credit in a way that leaves money in the hands of taxpayers, not increases the amount of money going to Washington for the Appropriations Committees to spend," Ellis told Coburn. "Your amendment as written to repeal the ethanol credit (unfortunately) does the latter."
NPR would love to claim this shows they're not liberal because they interviewed Coburn, and asked him something that conservatives are squabbling about. The interview does qualify as a step toward balance with guests. The only way this shifts back to the left is any joy from making mischief between conservatives.
Perhaps NPR has already pestered a liberal Democrat with the unhappy Code Pink line on Libya? No. They certainly tried that with Nancy Pelosi before. A search shows they haven't mentioned Code Pink since the last favorable Revolutionary Nutcracker ballet story from San Francisco.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
No doubt...
Submitted by okiehawk44 on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 6:27pm.
Let's see here. Tom Coburn is not an automatic vote for ethanol subsidies even though he is from Oklahoma a farm state? I don't really care where Coburn is from -- ethanol should not be subsidized. Ethanol is bad for our economy and bad for our environment. Ethanol is the poster child for the "unintended consequence" dictum.
Ethanol is bad policy
Submitted by Dollface on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 7:26pm.
The policy of putting our gas tanks in competition with our food supply is idiotic. It may be a good way to raise the price of corn, but it will never solve our energy problems. We should be drilling for oil and natural gas everywhere we can. As a matter of physics, ethanol doesn't produce as much energy as a gallon of gasoline. Plus, when burned, a gallon of ethanol puts more hydrocarbons into the air. As a matter of economics, the only reason ethanol is cheaper than gasoline is the tax breaks and subsidies that it receives. But, farmers vote, so we're probably stuck with it for a long time.
I second that! What a crime!
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 7:38pm.
I second that! What a crime! A perfect example of government "planing" at work. Now on to healthcare "improvements." We are the government and we are here to "help." RUN!!!!
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
The fed spends their time
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 7:44pm.
Inventing ways to rip off the citizens.
I highly recommend we tell them to stop!
Tim. Or pestering abortion advocates with Jimmy Carter's views
Submitted by Gary Hall on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 8:31pm.
Tim. Or pestering abortion advocates with Jimmy Carter's views (2005 quotes)..
NPR doesn't do that to Democrats/liberals.
The entire interview of Sen. Coburn was a setup - a "hit," if you will.
(;~/ gary
DIdn't even Al "I Invented The Internet" Gore
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 9:42pm.
admit that this ethanol for energy is a mistake? Further, has it not been shown that the ethanol in the gas damages engines?
Oh, and let's not forget about how the ethanol nonsense also drives up the cost of grain and thus famine.
What the heck is wrong with this folks?
"What the heck is wrong with
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 11:00am.
"What the heck is wrong with this folks?"
I'll tell you what! It is a war, both spiritual & cultural, & the devil is in charge of the controlling influences. Freedom & free enterprise has been a miracle cure for starvation and poverty! Look how the US has prospered vs. highly controlled economies around the world throughout the 1900's. Now these "wise" people in the media, colleges, & politicians tell us how bad the freedom of capitalism is!!! Marxism 101.
When I was touring liberal "Christian" Hendrix University in AR, a girl had a self-made poster on the wall with a diatribe about how everything you learned growing up was a lie & that you had to find your own truth (via your Marxists profs). This was likely a class project... sure she got an A+.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
+1
Submitted by okie-pastor on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 11:57am.
+1
No way will NPR ever be 'balanced' nor is that the point
Submitted by DaMav on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 10:43pm.
I remember back in 2001 when the Republicans could have defunded NPR as they had promised and emerged gleefully with the 'new strategy' of making NPR more balanced. It was a fool's errand then, and would be a fool's errand again now.
Subsidizing a profitable industry is not a proper function of government, period. And those who don't understand this and do it professionally will never ever be able to 'balance' their viewpoint by definition.
Don't even start down that road, it winds up in a dead end. Eliminate all federal funding for public broadcasting and destroy the eggs as well as the cockroaches. Period. No more excuses.