Tabloid Kiss-and-Tell: WaPo Hypes 'NC-17 Prose' About Clarence Thomas
The Washington Post stoops to the tabloid level today. On the front of Wednesday's Style section is this promotional plug: "The Supreme Court justice is only one of many partners whose caresses McEwen graphically recalls in NC-17 prose."
The justice is Clarence Thomas, and the author of the steamy passages is Lillian McEwen, a former Joe Biden aide and Clarence Thomas girlfriend. Last October, the Post promoted McEwen coming out to criticize Thomas after being silent for decades, including during the Hill-Thomas hearings. Now McEwen has issued her memoir, titled 'D.C. Unmasked & Undressed -- a book so lacking in market appeal that its publisher is Titletown, based in Green Bay, Wisconsin. But the Post is very interested in exploring Thomas's sexual activity, even as the paper's "Reliable Source" gossips pretended to care about his privacy:
Four months after Lillian McEwen broke a two-decade silence about her longtime relationship with Clarence Thomas, the retired administrative law judge has written a book.
And it is dirty. Really dirty.
McEwen's "D.C. Unmasked & Undressed" starts off as memoir of childhood abuse but evolves into twin journeys of sexual discovery and Capitol Hill careerism. The Supreme Court justice is only one of many partners whose caresses McEwen graphically recalls in NC-17 prose -- he doesn't even show up until midway through -- but he's singled out for special reminiscence.
The author swoons over the fit physique -- "velvet-covered cement" -- she says that Thomas hid under baggy suits, and kisses that "tasted like honey." We're sparing you a lot of bodice-ripping details that go way beyond the family-newspaper zone. A spokesperson for Thomas's office said the justice will not comment on the book.
Other than asking Thomas for a "no comment," the Post isn't attempting to determine whether any of McEwen's stories are true. But they're spreading this dirty laundry anyway. McEwen claimed that Thomas deserves it, since he accepted a nomination to the Supreme Court. There's no attempt to explain whether this weak excuse would meet the Post's journalistic standards if someone wrote a steamy book about the sex lives of Sonia Sotomayor, or Elena Kagan, or even Stephen Breyer.
McEwen acknowledged to us that she can provide no third-party verification for some of the racier pastimes she claims to have introduced to Thomas. "I have not used any real true names" of the other people in her orbit, she told us. "That would be something that would intrude on their privacy."
Well, what about Thomas's privacy? He's certainly named in the book. Doesn't even a Supreme Court justice deserve to have certain personal moments remain personal?
McEwen says no. When she was a staffer on the Senate Judiciary Committee, she saw nominees drop out of the confirmation process when confronted with sexual rumors, she said. "Sex was such an important part of [Thomas's] life, and his way of going through the world," she said. "His privacy is something he decided to sacrifice when he went forward with the nomination, as far as I'm concerned."
Now, maybe we're reading between the heavy-breathing lines, but. . . sounds like Thomas ("a national treasure") was fantastic. "He was the best!" McEwen replied, laughing. " It's why I stayed with him for so many years! Not the only reason, but it's up there at the top."
So what about when the shoe is on the other foot? Consider Gennifer Flowers, with whom Bill Clinton eventually admitted an affair in court in the Lewinsky saga in 1998. On April 25, 1995, the Post's Reliable Source gossip column offered this snarky item on her memoir, wishing that floozy Flowers would just go away:
Move Over, Hester Prynne
The presidential election is still eons away, but one Southern belle is happily out on the trail, determined to prove that slightly withered flowers can still be in season. Gennifer Flowers -- self-anointed presidential paramour, Penthouse pinup and newly minted authoress -- staged an L.A. news conference yesterday to hustle her new book, "Passion & Betrayal."
"This was not a book written in hate, but rather love," Flowers insisted to the 30 or so somewhat skeptical reporters. And then with some real histrionics, she gushed: "Bill Clinton will always have a piece of my soul, and I'll never love someone again the way I loved Bill Clinton. I think I'm going to cry now." (Gag us.)
White House spokeswoman Mary Ellen Glynn said succinctly: "More cash for trash."
Some of the reporters in L.A. could hardly conceal their snickering. To which Flowers shouted: "If you all would just read the book you would see for yourself! Look, I admit I was very wrong to have had become involved with him. I am a sinner, I'll sin again, but I've asked for God's forgiveness.
"I was a nightclub singer. . . . I was supposed to screw around. But now I have this scarlet letter A on my sweater and I'm not going to go in a corner and hide."
We can only keep hoping .
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
This is just one, no two more
Submitted by Miss_Me_Yet on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 9:42am.
This is just one, no two more nails in the democrat coffin. They just don't get it.
Liberals ... we can't live with them, they couldn't survive without us ...
Wow Clarence Thomas liked sex
Submitted by shawn. on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 9:49am.
And he w as good at performing it. What a huge scandal.The Compost took a step up?
Submitted by Ashrak on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 9:49am.
The path is chosen. Because Thomas dared enter openly and honestly the "Privileges or Immunities" arena, the left considers him target number one. This is the key that unlocks that chains that bind us all and the progressives know it.
Democrats know that their
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 10:52am.
Democrats know that their chances of holding on to the White House after 2012 are slim to none. Therefore, they're trying to knock out a conservtive justice now if they can. Don't see it working, however.
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
They didn't put "alleged"
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 10:03am.
Regarding the "relationship". I supposed they will say they don't have to, because "sexual" is not in the sentence.
Just another proof that "reliable sources" don't even meet wikipedia standards.
Isn't there a word for a
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 10:20am.
Isn't there a word for a woman who uses sex (or the claim of sex) with powerful people to gain money and fame?
You're kidding, right?!?!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:08am.
"... a steamy book about the sex lives of Sonia Sotomayor, or Elena Kagan, or even Stephen Breyer."
Fat chance any of these douche bags even had a damp, clammy sex life!
As for Thomas, I'm ashamed of him. What was he thinking having sex with a woman who was over the age of consent!?! He should have had a gay relationship, or boinked an underage intern (like Bubba) so that the Left would make excuses for him.
Liberals seem to have a hard (make that difficult) time getting their hands around (damn, make that grasping) the fact that a Supreme Court Justice would have an active, legal sex life! If you look at the schlubs that they nominate, you can understand why. I mean can you imagine ANYONE, man or woman, wanting to even WATCH Justice Ginsberg have sex?
EEEEEwwwww!
Breakfast coming up...
Submitted by uhohshortsonthe... on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 5:18am.
..at the mental picture of Ginsberg gettin' freaky.
Was Justice Thomas single, I mean NOT married, when he was having this relationship with this woman? If so, as every liberal media idiot would shrug, "so what, then?" He was having consenual sex with an adult woman, not using his position to get it from her (like certain unnamed Democrats did), and this woman thinks it is some kind of scandalous affair?