Kos In Time: Palin, Angle Will Get People Killed
Time magazine asked a panel of 16 experts to answer the question "Are We Becoming An Uncivil Society?" While Time's selected Republicans and conservatives (including Glenn Beck) stayed civil and didn't point explicit fingers at liberals for trying to smear the Tucson shooting on conservatives, leftist Daily Kos blogger Markos Moulitsas rudely predicted (again) that one side of the aisle, inspired by people like Beck, Sarah Palin, and Sharron Angle were going to get Americans killed:
We have always been an uncivil society. Just ask John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. But being harsh and passionate in one's political discourse isn't the same as walking around with guns intimidating the opposition, or using apocalyptic and Armageddon-style rhetoric to paint your opponents as terrorists and enemies of democracy and freedom. Problem is, we now have a side that is gun-obsessed, whipping people up into a frenzy with lies about Obama taking their guns away and interning conservatives in FEMA concentration camps (to name just two conspiracy theories).
When Sarah Palin tells her followers not to retreat, but to "reload," when Sharron Angle says people should resort to "Second Amendment remedies" if they don't get their way at the ballot box, and when Glenn Beck spreads the latest insane conspiracy theory, well then, it's only a matter of time before people start getting killed.
This is not an April Fools' Day joke. Time invited Markos Moulitsas to speak of civility in a civil tone. Were they shocked he just kept frantically slinging mud? Is the Kos Kommandant incapable of decorum even as his bete noire Beck accomplishes it?
It seems bizarre to many that a forum on civility truly needs someone whose ethical views include "killing a defective infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person." But Time honored Princeton bioethics professor Peter Singer anyway, and he found blood on the hands of the NRA and allegedly "crazy" people who think ObamaCare curtails American freedoms:
To me the more significant aspect is that we allow people to get guns so easily, and not just any guns but semi-automatics, which can kill a large number of people in a very short time. That seems to me to be completely insane, and the U.S. is the only developed country in the world that does it. I think the NRA has blood on its hands, clearly. If those weapons were not available, maybe one or two people would have been killed, but not six or seven, as it may turn out to be. So I think that's the issue that the U.S. really needs to look at. I think that's been obvious for a very long time but this just shows it very clearly."
If you're referring to heated political rhetoric, I think some of the rhetoric has been crazily over-the-top, and there are a lot of people in the U.S. who hold what I think are nutty views about the dangers of government providing health care, for example - once again every developed country in the world except the U.S. provides health care to all its citizens, and I think those countries are just as free as the U.S. So I think there are a lot of crazy views out there and yes, there is a problem with that.
Here's a rundown of the rest of Time's contributors:
Fox News host Glenn Beck didn't say one discouraging word about the left in his submission to Time, even as he praised the country : "The fact that a vast majority of our society is miraculously civil might not make for exciting headlines, but it's absolutely true. I think that if you asked Adams or Jefferson to compare the discourse of today to the campaign of 1800, they'd be amazed at how civil we are."
Former NBC anchor Tom Brokaw backed away from the blame game, but still obsessed over guns: "But we are still unequipped in this society to deal with a manifestation of mental illness. And he was able to walk away from the college — even though everyone recognized that this was a potentially dangerous young man — and go into a gun store in Arizona and buy a semi-automatic without any background check whatsoever and create the mayhem that he did with it. Those are the issues that I think we ought to be talking a lot more about.
David Gergen of CNN (and Harvard) perfected the act of landing exactly in the middle: "There can yet be a silver lining to the Tucson massacre if we stop trying to exploit it for political purposes and instead seize upon it as a fresh chance to change our culture of violence — too much hate, too many guns, too many killings. The bitterness in politics is part of this larger trouble. There is no evidence it prompted Loughner — and the finger pointing should stop — but we knew long before Tucson it must be cleaned up. In coming weeks, President Obama should invite GOP leaders as well as chieftains of entertainment and news, the NRA and others to see if we can reach a higher plane."
David Boies, lawyer for Al Gore's post-election legal challenge in 2000: Blamed harsh talk and the media's appetite for it, but also turned to the guns: "The third thing is the increasing glorification of gun possession and use. We've always been a society where people have liked to hunt, but people have disconnected the normal utility of firearms from the culture of firearms per se. The automatic pistol, which has got no conceivable use in terms of hunting and very little conceivable use in terms of defense, becomes something that the possession of — and easy possession of — becomes almost a matter of principle to some people. I think all three of those trends together have a significant effect in terms of making events like that in Arizona more likely."
Jeff Flake, Republican Congressman of Arizona, also angling for moderation: "Arizona is conservative but there's a strong libertarian streak that runs here. There's perhaps more skepticism about the power of government to do good in a lot of cases. I'm not trying to ascribe this act to that but that's a very powerful strain that's reflected in a lot of politicians. That's just Arizona, it's what a lot of people like about the place. Though, many of us have been uncomfortable with the extreme rhetoric of late."
Deepak Chopra offered liberal New Age goo: "Inflammatory and vitriolic words are a form of violence. In many wisdom traditions, speech that is imbued with compassion and love is used as a form of healing. It's time for us to pause and reflect. Our society today has the unmistakable symptoms of inflammatory disease with violence and hostility at home and war abroad. How long can we live with this sickness? Do we want our children to grow up in an environment that nurtures their joy and creativity or one that suffocates their soul? Can we start our healing process with civil speech while maintaining our civil liberties?"
Francis Fukuyama, professor, Johns Hopkins University: "there's been a polarization and a kind of demonization of political rhetoric in the country that is very unhealthy and has been growing for a long time, and I think has gotten worse since the financial crisis. The second observation is that I don't think Tucson has anything to do with that whatsoever."
Tim Pawlenty, outgoing Republican governor of Minnesota: "To jump from that to some sweeping judgment or conclusion, based on those facts, would be premature, incomplete and unfair, particularly if you try to assign blame to any one individual or institution or outlet or the like."
Garrison Keillor, host of NPR's A Prairie Home Companion: "I am perfectly civil. Why people behind me are honking and shaking their fists, I don't know. It's an ugly thing and I try not to think about it." (That's his entire contribution.)
Robert Pinsky, former U.S. poet laureate: Polite tut-tutting of incivility.
Ed Rendell, outgoing Democratic governor of Pennsylvania: Blames both sides for vitriol against government: the "lack of civility is tearing the fabric of our nation apart."
Ruth Simmons, president, Brown University: Polite tut-tutting of incivility.
Frances Townsend, Bush security official: Polite tut-tutting of incivility.
Victoria Toensing, former Reagan administration official: Scolds slowness to respond to Loughner's mental health clues, mild scolding of blame on rhetoric.
Time's forum was perfectly free of any conservative underlining left-wing hatred and wishes for violence -- like Michelle Malkin's compilation posted on January 10.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Cushy MOS
Submitted by obageegee on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 5:30pm.
That's what a cushy MOS will get ya... soft in the head!
KOs is a whacko, naturally. He's another Jared.
Submitted by farstar99 on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 7:17pm.
The ones who complain loudest about a lack of civility are almost always the most uncivil.
Like children.
Like Democrats.
Markos is the kind of guy
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 5:39pm.
Markos is the kind of guy that wouldn't last 10 minutes in a bar without starting a fight. He'd be the guy at the pool table bumping into a shooter, and then snidely blame some woman who just left the room. He's all piss and vinegar yet he tries to mingle with the adults. And it's pretty obvious that the Army was not so kind to him- purely a political enlistment meant to establish him as some sort of above-the-fray patriot when his real goal is to be used by the behind-the-scenes elitist left to gain favor and eventual acceptance into their crowd. He's a child yearning for attention. A pre-teen still playing in the sandbox alone. An excitable little weasel who'd run from any sort of physical altercation while sniping back through tears how the other guy is just a mean old bully. And I wouldn't warn him of an oncoming train. Such a juvenile.
Other than that, he's alright.
My thoughts too
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 6:09pm.
I didn't know his MOS, but I remember we always had the dainty whiners no matter what unit or station I went to. He'd be a lot better served to not wave his Army hitch in front of himself.
Kosmonut incapable of transitional thought
Submitted by neutron on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 5:39pm.
If somebody could get Kos' high school essays, they would probably read the same as his recent statements. Regardless of the uncovered facts and changing events, the Kosmonut clings to and beats the same drum he's held close to his heart since, well, forever. Meanwhile, other pundits and even (in his mind) his enemies on the right, have moved on to discuss variations on the theme, and even some new themes.
Kos needs a psychiatrist as much as Jared Loughner.
Kosmosis, try some mouthwash...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 5:48pm.
...I don't know what you've been eating, but what is coming out of your mouth shore do stink!
Soo...this moron
Submitted by bbboss on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 5:54pm.
Soo..this moron's website had one of his regular bloggers 2 days before this shooting asking for Gabby Giffords to be "dead...dead...Dead!" The hyprocricy of these monsters is ....well, there are no words to describe. Frankly when I hear from these mental deficients a call for civility....I hear..."you shut up and never anything..and we will say whatever the hell we want and you cannot criticize us".
Left will use Arizona tragedy to promote Obamacare
Submitted by va5thdistrict on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 6:05pm.
The Reagan administration officia, Victoria Toensingn hit the nail on the head when she brought in the mental health issue. Tthe left will use this tragedy to promote Obamacare and fight the repeal legislation.
http://www.vadistrict5.com/2011/01/will-dems-use-arizona-tragedy-to.html
What about Montell saying
Submitted by mrskorn on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 6:17pm.
What about Montell saying that Bachman should just slit her wrists....or Matthews describing Rush's head blowing up, or Bernhardt saying Palin should be raped, a movie made about the assassination of Bush (not to mention all the kill bush signs). These people are dispicable. And didn't Marcos or whatever his name is, put a BULLSEYE on Giffords as well? Maybe this boy saw THAT!! Maybe HE is responsible and no one else.
These people are such hypocrites. I see the call to civility went over their heads.
Maybe we need to start looking at DRUGS as being a big part of this kids problem, rather than guns. You have to have the CRAZY thoughts first before going out and buying a gun to kill people. Yeah, let's go back to taking care of the drug problem and think about how that might have made this kid flip out.
No matter how much the leftie
Submitted by robert108 on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 6:20pm.
No matter how much the leftie liars lie, twist and spin, the fact remains that their leader, Karl Marx, advocated violent revolution as a legitimate political tactic. They just don't like it that we will be able to defend ourselves from his Marxism.
“…lies about Obama taking their guns away…”
Submitted by needle on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 6:21pm.
Replace “Obama” with “Liberals” and what you have is not “lies,” but a liar.
It would seem that Markos Moulitsas is intent on creating an impression that is exactly the opposite of the truth, which is that Liberals obsess constantly over how to circumvent the 2nd Amendment and disarm the citizenry. If they want to pretend that that is not what they are up to, the truth is not in them.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
History Repeating
Submitted by DemsRFascists on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 6:36pm.
Markos (and the rest of his Left Wing looney friends) sound a lot like Jefferson Davis, circa 1858...
Palin/Barbour '12
Yom tov!
I suggest David Boise read
Submitted by Ashrak on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 7:34pm.
I suggest David Boise read D.C. v Heller. His claim about usefulness in self defense is off base no matter how you look at it. First, he said "automatic". Can you say "semi"? He showed he doesn't know the difference. If he just "forget" the "semi" he is still off base. For the handgun is among the most useful in self defense - especially regarding carrying one "in case of confrontation". Oh and how about that target shooting and collecting?
Additionally, it is "almost" a matter of principle. It IS exactly that. That principle is called "rights" and many have died to see them protected and defended. Interesting how a "journalist" who makes their living exercising one, would actually go there - isn't it? How is that First Amendment principle there, David?
He had better check out Deepak, for if that fellow aligns himself with David, then David will have his bread winning principle under permit.
GK may say he doesn;t think about it, but he does, and like a true Liberal, he looks for, and expects, someone else to act.
"It's all fine with me. I'm a liberal and we love ridiculous government programs that intrude on personal freedom. But where are the conservatives who used to object to this sort of thing? " - Garrison Keillor
This fella knows full well that the left has lost the gun control argument. He knows it was lost in the backlash of the 1994 AWB.
But to this point directly, it looks to me like he has addressed this head on before.
“That’s the interesting thing: the density of Democrats. The potency of symbol and metaphor ought to be clear to us. Politics is in large part an art. It is not just a matter of laying out position papers and explicating policy. There is a large element of performance and creative use of metaphor and narrative…and the Democrats have lost that torch.”
http://www.nathancallahan.com/garrison2.html
Moulitsas isn't even the most
Submitted by TE on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 8:22pm.
Moulitsas isn't even the most vile, leftist freakshow freak in that predictable line-up of primarily uber leftists assembled by Time magazine.
Peter Singer, a self-described, so-called "bioethicist" at Princeton is infinitely more of a fringe, America hating, leftist freakshow freak than Moulitsas is. Singer, in addition to being a marxist, America hating, fringe abortion enthusiast, favors killing infants who he deems inconvenient.
Then I'm accusing Obama of trying to incite a race war
Submitted by lsudolemite on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 8:41pm.
in the midterms by exhorting Hispanics to "punish their enemies" and "reward their friends," as well as telling an audience that if Republicans bring a knife, they'll bring a gun, as well as telling his base to "get in their faces."
Isn't following the logic train fun?
→ Dolemite
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 8:49pm.
That's not what he meant. What Obama really meant was that you can't be hispanic unless you do as he tells you.
Why let facts get in the way of my interpretation?
Submitted by lsudolemite on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 12:26am.
You see, all I'm hearing is the violent political rhetoric and vitriol. And regardless of the context, that's only going to lead to violence sooner or later. The MSM says so, therefore it must be.
Pete Singer is not a physician.
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 9:21pm.
His CV does not list any health science credentials. I am very suspect whenever a person who has never practiced a health care profession tries to dictate standards to those who do. I would consider his word on any matter involving civility to be intellectually pretentious and sheer mountebank.
→ He's a communist folk singer
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 9:24pm.
Isn't he?
;-)
The left
Submitted by theprofessor on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 10:28pm.
practically salivates over the prospect that some poor Tea Party person will go nuts and do something stupid. They dream of such an event.
But if a muslim...
Submitted by jimbo297 on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 10:37pm.
...shoots a place up, they "hope his name isn't Mohammed."
Since we're playing...
Submitted by jimbo297 on Mon, 01/17/2011 - 10:51pm.
...the blame game, instead of assigning the blame to the actual gunman, where it belongs, shouldn't we start with the root causes and work our way up?
Drugs combined with adult onset schizophrenia...that's the background against which all of these exterior influences were reflected.
Political speech has some violent refersnces in it, for sure. You know what else has alot of violent content? Way more than what was on Palin's website? Just about everything in our culture. Family Guy cartoons, VIDEO GAMES, movies like Machete and Shooter, music with "explicit" lyrics.
But aren't we told by the tolerant left that these examples of entertainment, especially the 'music' has no effect on children, that rap music is just a portrayal of reality and doesn't glorify violence in the least. Certainly it doesn't lead to people changing their behavior.
If that's what they believe, then fine-but how can something as inconsequential as a political figure's website be blamed for inciting violence when at the same time Hollywood is churning out violent content that dwarfs any political speech.
Deal with root cause
Submitted by Gat New York on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 8:31am.
This vitriol of violent political rhetoric was premeditated by the left and began with the initial AP articles that could not get the name of the perpetrator right, or the sex of the 9 year-old, but made sure to blame Sarah Palin.
The left wing rhetoric has always been hate-filled - just review the last six years of the Bush administration. The rhetoric against Obama is tame compared to what was said.
And it was led by Daily Koz Moulitsas and his band of young fascists (to the left of communists).
I watched Chuckie Schumer come up with more government solutions to Tucson like getting the military to release records of unstable people to the FBI so that crazies cannot get guns. The there was Tim Coburn (M.D.) who retorted that it was not the answer. The root cause was a kid who initially engaged in heavy drug use and became schizophrenic. he was mentally ill and needed major help for years but his problems were pushed under the rug until he finally broke and came out firing.
Moulitzas & his gang of daily Kotzers make me wanna kill
Submitted by sheik yermami on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 1:33am.
That's right.
Just by themselves. Being what they are, doing what they're doing.
Moulitzas & his gang of daily Kotzers make me wanna kill.......
Submitted by sheik yermami on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 1:37am.
Is that hate-speech now? will I be arrested?
And I didn't even mention Palin or Glenn Beck........
How did this little twerp
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 1:43am.
How did this little twerp become a voice in politics? Just because he has an obnoxious web site? It doesn't take much to become "famous" in America today, does it?
To become famous nowadays...
Submitted by needle on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 10:41am.
... It helps to spew curses to obtain Soros’s blessing (and money).
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.