NPR Announces Internal Review of Juan Williams Firing, Forces Out VP Who Fired Him Over the Phone
On Thursday, the NPR Board of Directors announced it has concluded an internal review of the firing of senior analyst Juan Williams for comments on the Fox News Channel. In what a spokesman called “two distinct pieces of news,” the internal review came with the resignation of Ellen Weiss, NPR’s senior vice president for news, the one who fired Williams over the phone. Weiss, whose husband Rabbi David Saperstein is an adviser to President Obama’s faith-based initiative, told Williams he didn’t have enough remorse for his comments admitting fear of Muslims:
"She took the admission of my visceral fear of people dressed in Muslim garb at the airport as evidence that I am a bigot. She said there are people who wear Muslim garb to work at NPR and they are offended by my comments. She never suggested that I had discriminated against anyone. Instead she continued to ask me what did I mean and I told her I said what I meant. Then she said she did not sense remorse from me. I said I made an honest statement. She informed me that I had violated NPR's values for editorial commentary and she was terminating my contract as a news analyst."
Williams chose not to participate in the review (perhaps knowing his view of the firing was already quite public.) The idea that Weiss's departure is coincidental doesn't come across in the Board's findings:
The facts gathered during the review revealed that the termination was not the result of special interest group or donor pressure. However, because of concerns regarding the speed and handling of the termination process, the Board additionally recommended that certain actions be taken with regard to management involved in Williams’ contract termination.
The Board has expressed confidence in Vivian Schiller's leadership going forward. She accepted responsibility as CEO and cooperated fully with the review process. The Board, however, expressed concern over her role in the termination process and has voted that she will not receive a 2010 bonus.
NPR also announced that Ellen Weiss, Senior Vice-President for News, has resigned.
NPR is already citing tonight's report for All Things Considered, in which media reporter David Folkenflik will explain Weiss "joined NPR in 1982 and rose through the ranks, holding a variety of key positions, such as executive producer of All Things Considered and national editor. She helped lead coverage of some of the biggest stories and highest-impact investigations in recent years. And she is credited with leading the network through an era of wrenching changes in journalism. But her dismissal of Williams — by phone — became a flashpoint in the debate."
Apparently, if Weiss had fired Williams face to face, after hearing his attempts to save his position, then the NPR Board would have kept her.
The NPR board stressed that going forward it would attempt “consistent application” of its Ethics Code about outside media appearances, something conservatives found wildly inconsistent when applied to Juan Williams but not to other NPR liberals like Nina Totenberg or Mara Liasson. The Board also stressed the need to “balance” their media diet so as to avoid “conflicts of interest that may compromise NPR’s mission.” Perhaps they will explicitly put on paper that NPR employees may not appear on Fox News in prime time, which is what the firing of Williams said implicitly.
The passage that most strains credulity is NPR seeking a broad range of viewpoints:
Ensure that its practices encourage a broad range of viewpoints to assist its decision-making, support its mission, and reflect the diversity of its national audiences. The Human Resources Committee of the Board is working in conjunction with key members of NPR management on this issue.
What the Williams firing really underlined for media-watchers is that when NPR sees its "mission" as compromised by appearances on Fox News programs like The O'Reilly Factor, it is saying that its devotion to its own liberal audience base and its liberal identity is the most important measure of their professionalism.
The announcement of the internal review and Weiss's "coincidental" resignation are clearly designed to provide more a more soothing statement when NPR officials are called before the new GOP House majority to explain their actions and address their budget. These actions are clearly not enough to keep Republican House members from asking tough questions about the intolerance of NPR for conservative opinions and the overt liberal editorializing and news judgment of their taxpayer-subsidized programming.
UPDATE: Jeff Poor at The Daily Caller noted Juan Williams reacting on Fox News:
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
It Remains To Be Seen
Submitted by Utherpend on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 5:04pm.
Will Issa get to NPR and the other Publically funded organizations and demand they become equal in content or lose their funding? Some how I see them getting a pass as always and remain exactly the same as before.
How much do you want to bet Ellen gets a job with an organization that is a subsidiary of the CPB or PBS.
Nahhhhh
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:23pm.
She's going straight to the White House.
Hearings? We don't need no stinking hearings!
Submitted by neutron on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 10:24pm.
The House does not need to hold hearings or conduct investigations to set or remove an item from the budget.
If the House wants to investigate a matter, to determine right, wrong, or culpability, they have supoena powers to unearth the facts of the matter, but does anyone care about the internal politics of NPR or Daily Kos or HuffPo?
Funding or not funding something need not be connected to hearings. Should a particular bridge be included in the Highway Bill? Should a Mars mission be included in NASA's budget? Should taxpayers subsidize National Public TV and Radio (when Sesame Street makes more money than most American businesses)? It all depends on the marginal utility of the expenditure to the Representatives who draft and then the whole House when they vote on the budget.
I don't care about the details of and the motivations surrounding NPR's firing of Juan Williams. Most Americans, especially those who pay taxes and are not on the public dole, believe that there is not enough money (any more) to toss to inconsequential projects.
Originally, NPR and NPTV were started to bring media to small and rural markets without a major media company providing access in their area. Today, NPR and NPTV stations are found at liberal universities in major urban centers, and not in rural or small market areas. Most cities have multiple NPR and NPTV stations with overlapping signal coverage, providing identical programming on nominally different channels.
With the advent of modern technology and media access from phone and Internet service providers, the funding appeal of the NPR NPTV mission has been overcome by events.
Hearings? We don't need no stinking hearings! Zero-out the NPR and NPTV line items in the budget, or strike them out completely!
OK, what went around came around
Submitted by StarAZ on Fri, 01/07/2011 - 11:12am.
Juan is an amiable fixture, a "safe vote" for Obama on panels, he was treated horribly, but it's over, can we just wander along now...?
From what's been said, NPR must have our funding to survive.
Submitted by Thalpy on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 5:29pm.
Let's see to it that NPR doesn't receive our funding.
Why is it that everytime
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 5:49pm.
Why is it that ever time another left wing conspiracy is brought out into the light of day, it's like America is trapped in a sick game of " Six Degrees of Barack Obama " ?
From A.C.O.R.N. ( he lied about being intimately involved in every aspect of this criminal enterprize ) ( still needs major investigating ), somehow mixed up in Blago corruption trial ( as a defendant, if he wasn't president ), illegal take over of GM & Chrysler by corrupt backroom deal, expansion of Fannie & Freddie, Van Jones, ObamaCare scam, and now this leads right back to the White House proving his fingerprints and DNA somehow mysteriously wind up at the scene of the crime..
Rep. Issa is going to be one very busy man......and he's not playing games, either.
Barack_Must_Go.....
This seems to be a case of
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 5:48pm.
This seems to be a case of "too little, too late." It also seems to be more of a strange appeasement move but appeasing whom?
This just in!!!
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 5:53pm.
NPR has "values" for editorial commentary. Who knew????
Natinally Promoted Racism
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 5:53pm.
NPR stands by its policy of discriminating against Blacks who refuse to stay on the Plantation.
Be sure to tune in for the Tavis Smiley show, premiering this February.
??? Fabio works for NPR?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:29pm.
Cuz that's him, I'm sure of it.
Self-Preservation Mode!
Submitted by circusstorm on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 6:59pm.
When a Parasite sense's an attack from it's host's defense's, it try's to convince the host it is dead!... just playing dead of course!
ONE DOWN, ONE TO GO
Submitted by Herbster on Thu, 01/06/2011 - 11:09pm.
So the VP had to fall on her sword.....yet the commander is still in charge of the troops. Juan Williams is a class act. What he was doing working in looney land is beyond me. Unfortunately, we taxpayers cover the salaries of the NPR C in C, Toad-enberg and their ilk. Let National Propaganda Radio compete in the marketplace. They'd be out of business in six months.
I wonder if the C in C lady at NPR has a picture of her hero, Joseph Goebbels, on her wall in her office. I suspect she like to play "Dress-up," put on a man's SS uniform and goose step around her desk. Has she invited Rosie O'Donnell into her office yet for a "Personal" interview? They should get along fine.
I think she'll soon resign, "To spend more time with Janet Reno."
Just defund the Corp for Public Broadcasting
Submitted by DaMav on Fri, 01/07/2011 - 12:49am.
Every penny of tax dollars should be savings. The Juan Williams fiasco and the fact that NPR rearranged the deck chairs has nothing to do with the fact that using tax dollars to finance a highly profitable industry is a complete waste we can no longer afford.
This is the canary in the coal mine regarding Republicans. If they can't even defund CPB they are not serious about making cuts anywhere. This is the low hanging fruit. If they pass it up the Republicans have cut their own throat.
Funding
Submitted by Farley on Fri, 01/07/2011 - 11:19am.
I am not REQUIRED to fund (buy) the New York Times*. Why should I be required to fund NPR?
* At least not yet.