MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski Lauds Bush-Bashing Book by N.Y. Times Reporter

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Tina Brown’s liberal Daily Beast website (a Huffington Post wannabe) contains a feature called "Buzz Board," where Brown-favored personalities recommend their new favorite things, from restaurants to movies to books. MSNBC’s Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski sounded a lot like her Carter administration-serving dad Zbig in enjoying a good rip into the Bush foreign policy. Mika recommended a Bush-bashing book by a prominent New York Times reporter:

David Sanger's The Inheritance is one of the best books I've read about the complex foreign-policy issues of the past eight years. Using his incredible access, David lifts the veil of secrecy in Washington and exposes the missteps and missed opportunities of the Bush administration. He interviews high-level government officials and puts you in the front row in the White House Situation Room. This is the kind of reporting we need a lot more of in this country.

Mika’s not the only one. The Sanger book comes with supportive blurbs from CBS’s Bob Schieffer and PBS’s Jim Lehrer, both presidential debate moderators last fall. What "kind of reporting" is necessary? As Clay Waters noticed at our Times Watch site, the New York Times itself lauded a "let ‘em rip" indictment of Bush’s over-aggressive war on terror:

Mr. Sanger, the chief Washington correspondent for The New York Times, drops the strict detachment of a daily reporter and lets rip, delivering a withering indictment of his longtime subject: President George W. Bush’s foreign policy, which he writes "has left us less admired by our allies, less feared by our enemies and less capable of convincing the rest of the world that our economic and political model is worthy of emulation."

...These unvarnished conclusions by Mr. Sanger will of course confirm the perfidy that Karl Rove and Bill O’Reilly presume lies in the black hearts of Times reporters. But Mr. Sanger’s criticism, the product of extraordinarily diligent reporting, is too hawkish to be easily dismissed by conservatives.

Hawkish? Clay also noted that Sanger went on the Charlie Rose show on PBS and announced his book told the story of how the Iraq war was a massive blunder:

The argument of the book is that Iraq not only cost 4,000 American lives, $800 billion and untold casualties among Iraqis and Americans, it occupied so much of the attention and the resources of the top levels of the U.S. government that we ignored much bigger threats, short-term and long-term.

Sanger also appeared on The Daily Show, and host Jon Stewart compared the Bush administration to a group of drunken bar bullies who were spoiling for a fight every night. Sanger joked that designation clearly fit Dick Cheney.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Mika says: " This is the

Mika says: " This is the kind of reporting we need a lot more of in this country."

But she fails to ever mention the lack of this "hard hitting" reporting that was no where to be found during the campaign.  I don't recall her asking Mr. Obama any "hard hitting" questions nor did anybody else.

Hard hitting reporting is only nessessary (or wanted) when talking about the Bush admin. or republicans in general.  Not for democrats.

The war in Iraq was not

The war in Iraq was not without mistakes, no war is waged error free.  But to say that "the Iraq war was a massive blunder" is to suffer from a severe case of cranial/rectal inversion. 

 

Liberals Disdain for Life

There has never been a perfect foreign or domestic policy. But the left always shows their serious self-centeredness. They would never give their lives to free a people from bondage. During the campaign Obama said how we should stop genocide wherever it was, like Rwanda and a host of other places and countries, and the liberals all cheer because they know they never will do that. But what about the genocide Saddam caused? Gassing the Kurds was genocide. But that war is a waste of lives to them. Their hatred of our defenders, our military, is palpable. Their pretense at caring about the loss of Americans is as phony as a three dollar bill.
The left more times then not, show by their policies and stands and criticisms, their extreme hatred toward human life. The only time they champion it is when it serves their political ends.
Conservatives do not agree with a lot of Bush's policies. And worse, I personally blame the House and Senate Republicans for selling out Conservatism these past eight years. Because of their behaving like Democrats the whole economic debacle is upon us and our saving were flushed down the toilet. Worse, because of them we now have Obama and his destruction of Capitalism. We really do need Conservatives that know what they believe and why they believe it to run for office.
TSF Protests!

 One has to wonder how Mr.

 One has to wonder how Mr. Sangers books sales are going over in Iraq----a now "war-on-terrorism-free-zone".

And some one should ask Mika how much American real estate crumbled to the ground after Bush's foreign policy changes.

 Rovin

Wow. A compilation of

Wow. A compilation of NYT/Sanger-slime, all in one handy, easy-to-use container.

I am positive this epic tome will displace Mark Levin's "Liberty and Tyranny" as the number one bestseller on Amazon.

Whaaa?

This isn't "reporting"!

This is hindsight, half-a$$ed Monday-morning quarterbacking by a lightweight with an axe to grind. 

Lame has a new definition.

 

 

 

 

Just what's needed.....

 

another opinion bashing Bush. I am surprised someone hasn't come up with an opus magnus blaming him for the fall of mankind from grace.

 

~There ya go, folks

This is it.
You heard it here.

The excuse to be repeated endlessly when the bombs start going off here in the States. Drumroll please...............

it occupied so much of the attention and the resources of the top
levels of the U.S. government t
hat we ignored much bigger threats,
short-term and long-term

It won't be because of Obama and his policies, it'll be because of the war in Iraq. Bush's war.

I called it. 

 

That high-pitched scream you hear is the troll under my heel. 

Oh and don't forget

  That "Bush's war" is the reason they hate us!!!

sheryl & chose - Bush was THE MAN

Actually, "Bush's war" is the reason truckloads upon truckloads of evil dirtbags that hated the west and the U.S. and were overtly seeking it's destruction, are now dead and not a threat to us anymore.

MAN, Bush was a stud. Really makes me sick to my stomach to see what we have in the W.H. now... :( 

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

MrShy

  You know it!  What I wouldn't give to have Bush back in office again.  Heck, I wouldn't even mind CLINTON (Either of them) at this point!!!  But you are right! Bush IS the MAN!!!

~Bush

Made sure our enemies feared us. I have the utmost respect for Bush as a man. I would be honored to shake his hand.

 

That high-pitched scream you hear is the troll under my heel. 

Imagine if we had another

Imagine if we had another attack like 9/11 now.  With Bush, we knew we had a real MAN to guide us through it and protect us.  I for one would take no comfort knowing Obama's at the helm.     

Another Bush-bashing book

Well, Mr. Obama and his cohorts have already

said there is no war on terror.   We're not going to

shoot down a North Korean missile.  We're gonna

give more money to Pakistan military.    Can't call

anyone a terrorist, and hints at a "one world

government and money for us"    HOW GREAT

IS THAT?  And, this has occured only in his

first few months in office.   We're going downhill,

and its now his responsibility, not George Bush's.

 

Sanger

To quote,"Less admired by our allies, less feared by our enemies". He's referring to Bush? What do you think our allies in Poland and the Czech Republic think about us as they send their kids to Russian as a second language class? The rest of NATO/EU when Russia uses energy as a weapon? That makes us popular, less feared by our enemies, because Sgt. Schultz is in charge? Is this guy for real?

Inheritance? Where's the book on the Clinton missteps?

Inheritance? Where's the book on the Clinton missteps?

...lifts the veil of secrecy in Washington and exposes the missteps and missed opportunities of the Bush administration. He interviews high-level government officials and puts you in the front row in the White House Situation Room. This is the kind of reporting we need a lot more of in this country..

I don't seem to remember an hour, in the life of the MSM, during the past 8 years, where the reporting was on much other than their view of the missteps, etc., of the Bush administration.

What I wonder is, where is that kind of reporting on what was missed and screwed up during the Clinton years?

He missed on Somalia, Rwanda, the Middle-East, Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, and the DR Congo (millions and millions slaughtered). He missed on addressing the 3rd world HIV/Aids pandemic (millions and millions more died and became infected). He missed on Afghanistan - big time - anyone remember the Taliban taking control of Afganistan (seems to me something bad happened after that)? He missed on North Korea, on Tibet, on Chechnya. He missed on the dot.com bubble and allowed Bush to inherit an economic mess. He missed on Immigration - Medicare - Social Security reform. He missed on protecting New Orleans from hurricanes (and we had all those surpluses to spend.) He missed on rebuilding Homestead, Fl. He missed on the great Mississippi floods of 1994.  He missed on improving education in America, and on keeping jobs at home. He missed on Kyoto - ha ha ha ha. He even missed, on Monica.

Where's the book to showcase, Mika?

(;~/ gary