CNN Offered Story Lecturing About The Unwelcome 'Stigma' of AIDS

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Monday was World AIDS Day, and one standard item of media bias every year is lamenting how some people still persist in thinking "AIDS is a gay disease," or a disease acquired by intravenous drug users – in short, often acquired by behavior, not by chance. This is not an ideological argument. It’s a medical fact. From that claim, it’s often a way for reporters to lament that "homophobia" persists. CNN medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen reported on Monday morning with a Phil Donahue-style isn’t-this-a-new-century report.

HEIDI COLLINS, anchor: Wow, what a story. They live with a debilitating disease and they have to fight the discrimination of others, too. Still stigmatized by HIV. The story on this world AIDS day...Today marks the 20th anniversary of World AIDS Day. So years after the facts of AIDS are known, why does the stigma remain? Our medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen is here now with that story. It's a good question.

ELIZABETH COHEN, CNN MEDICAL CORRESPONDENT: It is a good question. Because you and I certainly remember the days of Ryan White and the stigma of HIV and AIDS was so huge. And we talked to experts has it gotten better and they said yes it has but it still has not improved as much as it should.

But wait: Ryan White was a child who acquired AIDS through a blood transfusion. There was discrimination against him, but the media also turned him into a dramatic cause celebre against AIDS ignorance. The villain in his story should be the anonymous infected blood donor at least as much as anyone who made him feel rejected. The videotaped story began (video is here):

COHEN (voice-over): 24-year-old Antron Reshaud knows a thing or two about stigma.

ANTRON RESHAUD, HIV POSITIVE: I found out that I was HIV positive, it was around 2004. When my mother found out it was one of the reasons why she decided to put me out.

COHEN: Reshaud was diagnosed at age 20. And the discrimination began almost immediately.

RESHAUD: It just hurts me so much when I hear the things, you know, the stories about how people are constantly kicked out of their homes or how they have to go to work and you know they are made fun or they're fired from their jobs because they happen to be positive.

COHEN: It's 2008. More than 25 years into the HIV, AIDS epidemic and still people who were infected are often unable to avoid the stigma that surrounds this disease.

Over that sentence, CNN aired footage of lesbians and gay men walking arm in arm and hand in hand at a march, a clear visual signal that "homophobia" was their target. Notice that Cohen doesn’t provide any statistics about how many are "constantly kicked out of their homes" or how many are "fired from their jobs because they happen to be" HIV-positive. For a medical reporter who’s laying on the politics a bit thick, perhaps more social science would be a good idea. But then, the story turned into how conservatism kills people with AIDS:

FRANK OLDHAM: It's a matter of pure ignorance. It's a matter of prejudice.

COHEN: Frank Oldham is president and CEO of the National Association of People with AIDS. He says that prejudice is deeply rooted in the belief that AIDS is still a gay disease and the consequences can be fatal.

OLDHAM: It acts as a barrier to people getting tested, getting their HIV test, knowing their HIV status, and getting into care and treatment. Because they're afraid to be identified as someone living with HIV/AIDS.

Let’s get this straight: Citizen A acquired the HIV virus, and fails to get tested because of his fear of societal attitudes, and so the blame is all on society? Notice the ideology behind these reports, the unscientific suggestion that AIDS is like acquiring a cold, that it just happens to people. Would a medical correspondent do a story on the "stigma" against smokers and how lung cancer just happens to them? If they fail to get cancer screenings, can it be blamed on the American Lung Association for adding to the stigma of smoking?

Cohen goes on to lament remaining ignorance about the disease, which is sad, but CNN is spreading the ignorance by suggesting to viewers that AIDS is transmitted like other communicable diseases.

COHEN: And for those who don't have the disease -

DR. KEVIN FESTON, CDC: There's the fear of contagion. The simple fear of becoming infected by HIV and not really understanding or knowing ways in which the disease is transmitted.

COHEN: Last year a three-year-old HIV positive boy was banned from using a public swimming pool and shower in Alabama. A few weeks ago students at a high school in St. Louis were ostracized when someone connected with their school tested positive for the disease. A survey by the MAC AIDS Fund found more than 30 percent of Americans are uncomfortable working with someone with HIV or AIDS. And that includes health care professionals.

OLDHAM: If the doctor doesn't claims he doesn't know how to treat them. They really don't want to treat them.

COHEN: One in five Americans with HIV doesn't even know he or she has the disease. When HIV is diagnosed late the results can be deadly.

FESTON: More than 40 percent of people who are diagnosed with HIV in the United States progress to full-blown AIDS within a year of their diagnosis.

COHEN: Reshaud hopes to reduce that number by convincing others to get tested and seek the proper treatment.

After the story ended, Cohen and Collins again professed their personal opinion that the AIDS "stigma" must vanish:

COHEN: Now because that stigma has not gone away even after all these years the Center for Disease Control does have a program to help ease that stigma. Maybe next year on World AIDS Day we won't be talking about the same story.

COLLINS: Well, I hope not. Is that program or are there other programs out there that are working on even more awareness? I don't know, in schools or something.

COHEN: Yes, absolutely. You know who has been really active on this has been churches. Churches in communities where HIV is more prevalent. The first step, the first thing they're trying to do is just to get people to talk about it. Because, you know, there was this saying that's been out there for a long time, silence equals death. Just talking about HIV is the first step. And sometimes it's hard to get people to do that.

Later in the day, at 1 pm, the Cohen report ran again, and anchor Betty Nguyen was asking about HIV-testing recommendations by the American College of Physicians:

COHEN: So, let us take a look at who ought to get tested for HIV. This group says that anyone ages 13 or over, should at least be offered screening. You don't want to be screened without knowing it, but you should at least be offered screening --

NGUYEN: 13, though? 13 and over?

COHEN: Sure. I mean, look we talked about that high school. Many people contract HIV when they're teenagers. And secondly, higher risk patients ought to be tested more frequently. So, we're talking about folks who are intravenous drug users, we're talking about folks who are gay. And then that screening needs to be repeated on a case by case basis because of course, you can be negative you know, one minute and you know, positive several years later. Or, you know, you can be positive the next day depending upon what you're doing.

After at least two airings of scolding about "stigma" about HIV/AIDS, Cohen is openly discussing how "folks" who are gay or intravenous drug users are at "higher risk" of getting HIV/AIDS. Isn't that exactly what some of the "stigma" promoters were trying to argue? Of course, no one who disapproved of the morality of some AIDS sufferers were allowed to speak at any time in Cohen's story.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.

Read commentsFree email alertsTake action

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's a gay disease unless your a heroine addict....

Sure it's not a 'gay disease' but in the U.S. it's still 90+% of the causes of the disease because insanity and anal sex seem to be closely related and you simply cannot convince gay men to either stop having sex with HIV infected partners, actually checking seriously to whether your partners ARE infected or convincing gay men to use condoms to prevent the spread of infection.

If there is a percentage of our population who simply would rather have AIDS than stop having anal sex, then I think we should stop trying to prevent them from their current 'lifestyles' and simply grant them their wish and let them die from the disease they are trying to hard to acquire.  It's just another form of suicide brought about from a mental illness known as 'an alternative lifestyle'.  Why care more about preventing the disease than the people do who are contracting it?  Are we insane?

How is this media bias?

Tell me how you would handle an education on the subject of aids. I really want to know what YOU would do Tim Graham. There's NO media bias here. People who are murdered in New Orleans are most likely to be drug dealers or users. So some person living in a housing project is shot and killed because of mistaken identity and you can spend from now to doomsday and not convince some that it was a case of mistaken identity and not a sour drug deal. Thats a stigma. How in the world would lamenting the the morality of drug dealers help people recognize people are murdered innocently also? How would lamenting the morality of drug dealers emphasize murder is bad, more so, than the murder of someone innocent? Murder is terrible. Do we have to nuance it?

Tell me Tim Graham, how would YOU educate people about disease?

GET OFF OF STUPID. You can be conservative and not a redneck fool. Limbaugh is bastardizing conservatism.

This is the second dumbest blog I've read on NewsBusters. Aids is a disease. Its not a political position or posture.
Do you honestly believe the person who donated the blood that gave Ryan White the disease, even knew they had it? By God, what purpose would be served by villianizing them?

If you don't engage in risky

If you don't engage in risky behavior, your chances of getting AIDS are practically zero.  The homosexual community vectored it into the IV drug user community, and if don't engage with either homosexuals or IV drug users, you won't get it.  It's actually a lie to call that kind of intelligent discrimination about behavior and association "prejudice"; it's good sense that might well save your life.  You don't get it through the air or the water, you get it through specific behaviors.

Aids is a pandemic

Aids is a pandemic and it certainly won't be the the last pandemic. How are we going to nuance the next pandemic? I remember when AIDS was still thought to be a form of the legionaries disease. You remember that one right?

If you don't smoke, your chances of getting lung cancer are practically nil. Yet thousands of people who never smoke die of lung cancer every year and every year people have a skeptical look on their face when they hear Peggy never smoked.

This is probably the best advice I can give NewsBusters. Stay out of the medical realm or risk looking like an idiot. If they have a better way of educating people about disease, I'm all ears. But I'm not going to listen to idiocy painting the blood donation spread of aids as cloak and dagger malice. THATS STUPID. ****STUPID****

The disease of smoking is

The disease of smoking is emphysema, not lung cancer.  Almost all smokers have it to some degree, but it is rare among non smokers who don't work in a smoky environment.

AIDS is sourced in the homosexual population; that's a fact.  When they closed the bathhouses in SF, AIDS infection rate decreased significantly; when they opened them back up, the infection rate went back up.  It's a "cause and effect" thing.

In America

Aids is sourced in the homosexual population in America. But ignorance of how aids is spread can put young girls at risk. Believe it or not, another poster suggested a heterosexual woman was least likely to contract aids. Fact is a heterosexual woman is most likely to contact aids unknowingly, through heterosexual sex. To suggest educating people about aids is facilitating them to have promiscuous sex or is a smoke screen to forward some gay activist agenda, is ridiculous. Undeniably, the greatest cause for the decrease in aids infection has been education.

I'm not for one second disputing the fact that aids is predominantly a gay disease in western societies. But this blog and what it objects to is stupid. Just read through some of the comments here. After 25 or more years of education, some things said here are so wrong, its mind boggling.

Nwahs

"Murder is terrible. Do we have to nuance it?"

So, you are against hate crimes legislation too? Just wanted to get that out there.

Ryan White is not the subject of this thread. Is it media bias, or media ignorance, (and I am being polite using that term)? It is obvious that some segments of society are at greater risk. Cohen said so herself. So why deny that and act like it is just a homphobic reaction to say so?

Perhaps the blame for the lack of testing among gays and drug users rests at least as much on them as the stigma?  

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Yes I'm against hate crime legistlation.

Yes I'm against hate crime legislation. Assault is assault and murder is murder. Ryan White was brought up in the blog so he is indeed one of the subjects in this thread. More importantly , the manner in which he was infected and the hideous treatment he recieved is a subject of his thread. Instead of confronting the ignorance that caused that treatment ( calling a 13 year old a fag???) the blogger seeks some shadowy villain that purposely infected him. Thats STUPID. Ryan White's pain came mostly from medical incompetence, but a close second was due to ignorant bigotry.I remember it as it happened. I remember the demonstrations outside his school.

Yes ONE of the subjects, not THE subject

And I've seen neither Tim nor any poster here condone his treatment.  

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

No, but he stated the ephasis..

No but Tim stated some shadowy figure who infected Ryan White should be blamed instead of the obvious ignorance the report was railing against..

"But wait: Ryan White was a child who acquired AIDS through a blood transfusion. There was discrimination against him, but the media also turned him into a dramatic cause celebre against AIDS ignorance. The villain in his story should be the anonymous infected blood donor at least as much as anyone who made him feel rejected."

Oh yes, that stupid anonymous donor who purposely infected White, not the droves of idiots standing outside an elementary school calling a child a "faggot."

Rwahs,Needles vs Anal Sex

Here in Maine the press does the same thing, they bring up the needle connection and we can all envision how that happened. The bias is that the real culprit anal sex(google "sex is a homosexual disease") takes second place or in the Maine case it never was mentioned as a cause of aids.

Besides the number of cases in Maine in no way justifies the coverage the disease gets and the % of needle cases is even so low as to not register on the statistical scale, which should carry some importance when deciding what monies to dole out on research. Let Hormel and all the other billionaire democrats kick in, I mean they really do care about the health issue, yes? 

But you're wrong

The real culprit is monkeys. Reeses monkeys. Thats the culprit. Aids is a pandemic. Its a virus that jumped from monkeys to man. Its not the scourge of God. Its a monkey virus. Its no more politically connected or depraved than the bird flu. You wonder why that wouldn't come up in Tim's critique on how to educate people about disease. If fact his critique spouts no facts.

nwahs

Monkeys are NOT spreading the disease in America. The main culprit in the spread of aids is the homosexual lifestyle.

Yeah, man!  That AIDS

Yeah, man!  That AIDS virus, it just leaped off those monkeys and right onto those innocent, unsuspecting black people in Africa.

Give me a break, moron.  This plague wasn't spread by rats, fleas, ticks, mosquitoes or any other blood sucking vermin, not even lawyers.  It wasn't airborne.  Nobody got this from a toilet seat or a doorknob.  It wasn't in food.  It didn't come from casual contact or unclean surfaces.  This plague was spread one infection at a time by a collection of thoughtless, selfish hedonists whose only concern was their own personal pleasure.  The blame for this rest firmly with the amoral people who spread it:  Homosexuals, IV drug abusers, prostitutes and the promiscuous.

BTW:  Just how did this virus get from the monkeys to the men?  Any ideas, rocket scientist?   Or do we have to tattoo it on your forehead before you figure it out?

Its a pandemic

Aids is a pandemic. Thats exactly what happend. It jumped off of monkeys onto people. And don't call me a moron you web toed hick. Research pandemic instead.

 

I got a feeling its going to be a long road to get congress back :)

"Aids is a pandemic."  No,

"Aids is a pandemic."  No, it's not.  It is spread by very specific behavior, and if you avoid that behavior, you can't get it.  If the homosexual community had stepped up, instead of denying responsibility while people died, you might be admired today.  It is a disease that could be eliminated in one generation, if the true cause wasn't so politically incorrect.

Er yes it is

""Aids is a pandemic."  No, it's not. "

 

Er, yes it is.

 Notice the title of the census document

http://www.census.go...

"The aids pandemic in the 21st century"

Oh - lemme guess- its a biased document? 

Hmmm...  The US Census. 

Hmmm...  The US Census.  Aren't these the same government morons who can't figure out how many illegal aliens there are in the country?

The us census isn't even

The us census isn't even aware of the large rhesus population in Frisco.

Moreover, the Census is not

Moreover, the Census is not the correct government agency for authoritative information about epidemiology.   I would think that would be the Center for Disease Control.

good evening robert

Obviously pandemic is the word for today

Even being facetious doesn't work with this little girl. she doesn't know Reeses makes peanut butter cups not monkeys. I didn't have the heart to tell her that aids originated in rhesus monkeys. Since they are spreading the disease I suppose there is a large rhesus community in San Francisco.

The homosexual community

The homosexual community could not have prevented global spread of the virus by itself with more sesnsible behavior, because as has been clearly demonstrated in Subsaharan Africa, promiscuous heterosexual behavior will spread the disease as well, though maybe not as fast as the other.

However, without the homosexual community as a vector here in N. America, the virus' spread would have been neglible here compared to what it did do.

Yeah, those little aids

Yeah, those little aids viruses just evolved feet and wings and scooted off the monkeys and right onto the men, didn't they?  I sincerely hope you are not responsible for teaching anyone.

Demonstrate you are a moron and you will be called a moron.

Let's see....  Too bad for you I am old enough to have a classical education.  pan.  That come from Ancient Greek for 'all'.  demos.  Isn't that it?  The Ancient Greek work for people.  pandemic -->  all people.

So you are telling me that AIDS is Pandemic, that is, afflicting all people.  Certainly not here in the US.  As was noted earlier on this thread, 99% of US AIDS victims are homosexals, IV drug users and prostitutes.   Those statistics conflict with "all".  How come mongomous heterosexual women are not dying of AIDS in large numbers if the disease is indeed pandemic?

You lose.

Good evening NL

Too bad cartoons aren't real. We could reach through the telephone lines and slap some sense into this little girl.

Looks like its a target rich

Looks like its a target rich environment tonight, doesn't it?

maybe we should report

maybe we should report Reeses to the CDC for spreading disease in their peanut butter cups.

nwahs you obviously

don't live here in the New Orleans area. The vast majority of murders ARE drug related. Some unfortunately are innocent bystanders shot when the drug dealers begin shooting. It might be a good idea for the police to bring all the known drug suspects to the firing range for target practice. That way they could hit one another.

I guess I'm a coonass fool and some of my friends are redneck fools since we think homosexuals are the major cause of the spread of the aids virus. We are in good company though because the center for disease control has these figures on HIV infected people as of 2005:

  • Homosexuals 71%
  • heterosexuals 15%
  • drug users 13%
  • other 1%
  • What kind of fool are you? Or are you just an apprentice?

    Other 1%???

    What "other" is there?  

    "This
    liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
    basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

    Good evening Restless

    The CDC did not specify the makeup of the one percent. I took it to mean people like Ryan White, health care workers and others who contract the disease by means other than sex or drugs.

    Well if you think homosexualss propagated aids

    Well if you think homosexuals propagated aids, you are a fool.
    Monkeys did.

    nwahs you are the fool

    Are you calling the 71% of aids victims monkeys?

    No I'm saying Reeses monkeys propagated aids

    No I'm saying Reeses monkeys propagated aids, not man. Man is a poor carrier of aids. Reeses monkeys were much more effective in spreading the virus.

    What part of that do you disagree with? No need to be snide.

    Sorry nwahs

    Aids may have originated in Reeses monkeys but they are not spreading the disease in America.

    Why all the anger?

    Mr. Graham,

    I have noticed a trend on this website, a website which I agree with most of the time, to equate GLBT rights advocacy with liberal bias.  Where IS that coming from, Mr. Graham?

    Conservatives need to get past this and fast.  It's this sort of thing that can relegate the Republican Party to minority status for a long time to come.  Think about it, NewsBusters!

    Yea, this is weird

    Yea this is pretty weird. This is a matter of disease.

    I told the doctor

    "it hurts when I do this." He said," Don't do that!" This is a self-inflicted disease as are many others. Get thee to an SLA meeting and search for a "higher power" to help. Mine has a name, Jesus and he told the adulteress, "Go and sin no more." That is the real recompense of the "disease." Death, and you can quote Paul on that. Believe it or not.

    You're wrong

    Its not a "self-inflicted" disease. There is no such thing as a "self-inflicted" disease. Disease requires another organism. You can't make it. You can only catch it. And if you can purposely catch it, you can accidentally catch it. And if you can't, and its a virus, it will mutate to make sure you can accidentally catch it. Thats what viruses do. They survive.

    You conveniently

    SKIPPED OVER MY POINT, and probably made scientific sense. I am sure you know what I meant by self-inflicted and know that there is help for those who want to stop dangerous behavior, eg, smoking, drinking, et al. Some choose not to seek help or medical attention and that is their choice. No one is denied self-help not medical in the US.

    The chances of the the

    The chances of the the average westeners catching HIV "accidentally" are about as low as it gets. And if you are a female, it's infinitesimal.

    If you don't beeleive me, believe all those ads that used to run telling heterosexuals how it was impossible to catch HIV from "toilet seats," plates -- and other household items.

    You seem to be very confused on the subject. In fact, the figures for AIDS death in the US don't even make the top 15 of things you will likely die from.

    Yet the media coverage of AIDs and the research spending on AIDS, is obscenely out of all proportion to its effect on the general population. It's pretty disgusting actually, how much emphasis that is placed on this rare disease, compared to -- oh say heart disease, cancer, diabetes -- all things which kill the vast majority of  us -- eventually.

    I often wonder why. 

    If you can meet with triumph and disaster
    And treat those two imposters just the same...
    Yours is the earth and all that's in it...

    This is what ignorance is

    "The chances of the the average westeners catching HIV "accidentally"
    are about as low as it gets. And if you are a female, it's
    infinitesimal."

    Women are more likely to contract aids from heterosexual sex than men. Now are you one of those who should be blamed for "self-inflicting" yourself because you aren't educated about aids?

    NewBusters- don't play doctor - you aren't.

    http://www.niaid.nih...

    The chances of a non-drug

    The chances of a non-drug injecting, average heterosexual female who doesn't indulge in promiscuous high risk sexual behavior in the US catching HIV is just about ZERO.

    She is the least likely person  to develop AIDs. So what?  Oh -- I get it, you think she'll catch HIV "accidentally" -- where's that? From a toilet seat?

    If you can meet with triumph and disaster
    And treat those two imposters just the same...
    Yours is the earth and all that's in it...

    No, a MAN characterized as such is least likely

    No, a non-drug injecting, average heterosexual MALE who doesn't indulge in ... is the least likely person to develop aids. So what is, what you're saying is a factual error.

     

    "  Oh -- I get it, you think she'll catch HIV "accidentally" -- where's that? From a toilet seat?"

    No, she'll probably get it from that wrestling dude who is on the "down-low." 

     

     

    "No, she'll probably get it

    "No, she'll probably get it from that wrestling dude who is on the "down-low."

    Thanks for admitting the homosexual connection.

    Oh please, stop

    Oh please, stop embarrassing yourself.

    You have not quoted ONE statistic to refute anything I have written.  Or written one convincing opinion to counter anything I have opined upon.

    You'll have to do better. 

    If you can meet with triumph and disaster
    And treat those two imposters just the same...
    Yours is the earth and all that's in it...

    Good evening Jack

    Very well stated, I couldn't agree more. I envy the way you present so much so concisely. Writing never was my strong suit and some people on this site are willfully dense.

    I read your profile and it was indeed a pleasure to see Reagan, Thatcher and Churchill mentioned together. Churchill was a bit before my time, but I remember Margaret Thatcher well. What a leader she was.

    God bless.

    Thanks cocodrie. I

    Thanks cocodrie. I appreciate your comment.

    If you can meet with triumph and disaster
    And treat those two imposters just the same...
    Yours is the earth and all that's in it...

    "Where IS that coming from,

    "Where IS that coming from, Mr. Graham?
    "

    It's coming from leftie identity politics, as usual.  Homosexuals are a "protected group" on the leftie plantation.

    ANTRON RESHAUD, HIV

    ANTRON RESHAUD, HIV POSITIVE: I found out that I was HIV positive, it was around 2004. When my mother found out it was one of the reasons why she decided to put me out.

    Sorry -- but a 20 YEAR OLD MAN was "put out" by his mother? TWENTY?

    And being HIV positive was "one of reasons."

    Mmmm, so a mother kicks out of the house her ADULT son? Wow. 

    How heartless of her. Of couse, we don't get her side of the story.

    Not that she has to really apologize. It's not like he was TEN years old and a child.

    If you can meet with triumph and disaster
    And treat those two imposters just the same...
    Yours is the earth and all that's in it...

    Nice points Tim, but.......

    Tim:

     

    Great indictment of the media bias here!  Liberals want blacks to believe it is still 1965.  Liberals want gays to believe it's still 1985.   The only way activists can justify increases in funding which may be unnecessary (due to winning the fight against AIDS) is to scare people.  They are still recycling the same talking points from over 20 years ago. 

    In 1985, when almost nothing was known about AIDS, those fears seemed more justified.  Since then,  many advances against the disease have been made.  Transmission of the disease is down.   Treatment of the disease is cheaper and more effective than in 1985.  BUT if many people realize that,  they may not be scared into voting for Democrats.

    My problem is when you say AIDS is caused by behavior. That may be true. (I don't think blood transfusions are risky anymore.)   It seems though you are saying that people with AIDS deserve to get it.  Is it God's Curse for being gay or using drugs?  As for those unknowingly getting the disease (ie heterosexual women who don't use drugs),  should their transmission of the disease necessarily be traced back to some "evil gay"  ?

    You seem to be implying that.   Many comments are implying much worse.

    All people with AIDS are victims.  It's not poetic justice or God's Curse. 

     

      

     

     

     

     

    No, I think you are


    No, I think you are making the same leap.  To say that something is caused by a behavior is not necessarily a condemnation of the behavior.  But to deny that a certain behavior results in a certain consequence puts people at risk.