Couric Insists Pope's 'Extremely Conservative,' 'Very Conservative'

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday's CBS Evening News, Katie Couric asked Father Thomas Williams (formerly an NBC expert) to comment on Pope Benedict's arrival in America. Couric, who fretted out loud in 2006 about Catholic orthodoxy "infringing on civil liberties" in a new Florida town, stressed to the priest that the Pope was "extremely conservative," and "very conservative," and at odds with "62 percent of Catholics" who say the church doesn't reflect their views. It's a little strange for an anchor to note someone else is "out of touch" with the public when their network is consistently dragging behind in third in the ratings.

After two generic questions about what the Pope is like, and whether succeeding John Paul II is a tough act to follow, like Gordon Brown replacing Tony Blair as British prime minister, Couric brought up Benedict's first two papal encyclicals, deep intellectual tracts that aren't easy to characterize for TV anchors:

COURIC: The feeling was that he was going to be extremely conservative, yet the two encyclicals he's issued so far, which really is sort of his philosophy, have belied that notion, haven't they?

WILLIAMS: Very much so. Everyone expected him to come down very hard either on some bioethical question or doctrinal orthodoxy, and he decided to write about love and about hope, which really surprised an awful lot of people. And it also opens up our minds and think, you know, "What's this guy really like?"

It should be said that writing about love and hope does not disqualify a pope or pundit from being a conservative. But Father Williams is suggesting that the Pope is pursuing a pontificate that's different from the "God's Rottweiler" cartoon drawn by his enemies in the church and in the media. But Couric wasn't letting go of her idea of the Pope as an extremist:

COURIC: Having said that, he is very conservative. And I know a recent poll says 62 percent of Catholics believe the church isn't reflective of their views. Does that mean entertaining issues like women as priests or use of birth control will be really off the table as long as he's Pope?

WILLIAMS: I think they will be off the table, Katie. I think the way he would respond to that is that the church is really called to challenge people and not so much to be a reflection of society as a challenge for society to be at its best. And I think that's the way he thinks of it.

It's fascinating to observe how anchors complain that subjects like women's ordination are not up for debate at the Vatican, and then they fail to debate them on their programs. Instead, they merely cite them as markers of progress the church is sadly failing to meet.

The other half of the six-question interview dwelled on the sex abuse scandal, and whether the church is doing enough to prevent it. (Father Williams could have mentioned that many American dioceses have grown quite thorough in prevention efforts over the last five years. In the local Diocese of Arlington, Virginia, anyone who teaches in their parish's religious education program has to be fingerprinted at the police station.) Couric suggested the church couldn't possibly be doing enough: 

COURIC: According to a recent poll, about three quarters of Catholics disapprove of how the church dealt with the sex abuse scandals. Even Pope Benedict said he was deeply ashamed. Is enough being done to prevent that from happening in the future?

WILLIAMS: Well, I think the Pope has done everything he could to reassure us right now that they're trying. And I think that he underscored one particular means, which is the screening of candidates for the priesthood. He said on the plane, better to have fewer priests but good priests than a lot of priests but allowing anything.

COURIC: What else can be done, though?

WILLIAMS: Well, the other thing that's being done is actually how to deal with the abusers themselves, the one-strike rule which says that once a priest has been found to have offended, instead of shuffling him around, giving him another chance, really he has to be removed from the priesthood.

COURIC: So you don't think we'll be hearing about these scandals well into the future?

WILLIAMS: Well, I hope not, Katie. I think that human nature is what it is, and sin will always be among us. But I think that they're doing everything to just nip this in the bud.

As Couric cited these poll numbers (from the Washington Post), she and Father Williams did not discuss one problem with the polls: that they include anyone telling the pollster they are Catholic, regardless of whether they attend church regularly -- or attend church at all. If you quit attending meetings of any other voluntary organization, would you still be considered a member?

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Is it me or is anyone

Is it me or is anyone shocked that the Pope is "extremely conservative" ?  I don't think I look to the head of the Catholic Church to be wishey washey on anything faith related.  It might me me, but when I think the of the Pope, progressive (ie liberal, gay marrage etc) does not come up. 

The sun is not set by a thermostat.....

Not shocked

What is galling (sp?) is the way the MSM conveys such beliefs as "extremely conservative". They are not. They are more mainstream than the MSM would have you believe. You cannot watch TV for more than a couple of hours without seeing guys kissing anymore. Gays are roughly 3-5% of the population, yet if you watch "normal" TV show, you would think we are all gay and just don't know it yet.

It is the left's "anything goes" lifestyle that is extreme.

Sad!

What is sad is that today, all of a sudden, being against gay marriage or abortion or out-of-wedlock sex is considered an "extreme right wing" philosophy.

 

 



"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara


AAAAWWWWW!

So sorry Katie. Why don't we all pray to the Lord that he will change to a more modern and politically correct God so that Katie and all the other liberals can feel more comfortable. I'm sure that God will comply.

Now, what this is, is the most common form of idolatry. People create, for themselves, a god that is more tolerant, liberal and conforming to THEIR ideas of what a god should be. They then feel more comfortable with THIS god.

The only thing left to do is for them to fashion a nice little statue, image of this god that they now feel comfortable with.

"Catholics" who do not

"Catholics" who do not adhere to the teaching office of the Church are free to leave, no one is stopping them.

rbosque

Then you believe a married couple that practices artificial birth control, feeling no compunction, should leave the Church?

♣ a seal

No one is saying they

No one is saying they should, only that they are free to so so if they choose. I doubt anyone would leave a church over just one issue, but if they find themselves at odds with a lot of the teachings, why wouldn't they leave and go to a church whose teachings they want to follow?

You said you are an ex-Catholic, so it would appear that's what you did. Others can make their own decisions on that matter.

Take it or leave it?

Clearly, many American Catholics disobey the stricture against artificial birth control. Even converts to Catholicism find that policy, restated by Pope Paul VI in Humanae Vitae, difficult to practice. Many parish priests and many religious education programs de-emphasize church teaching out of fear that it will cause dissension and departures. What's lacking for most Catholics is a real discussion as to why the church teaches what it does -- and now does it after all the Protestant denominations abandoned it.

One of the flaws that the media and pollsters teach Catholics is that you can disobey a pile of church teachings, fail to attend Mass, get a divorce, get a vasectomy, and still be a "good Catholic." It's a little like seeing vegetarians at the steak house cutting into a prime rib and expecting them to tell pollsters they're still "good vegetarians."

A church is a voluntary organization which you can join or leave, and even a secular reporter ought to understand that the same rules apply as to what a "good" organization member does, which is reasonably attend organization meetings and try to live by organization rules.

Many good and religious people find one or more church teachings disagreeable or hard to obey. What the media encourages (and some let-sleeping-dogs-lie parishes) is for church members to avoid contemplating the view they oppose. Do most Catholics understand why the Church (and formerly all of Christendom) teaches what it teaches?

Great post, Tim. You

Great post, Tim. You explained it much better than I did.

I'm reminded of Dan Rather calling President Clinton an "honest person" and saying "I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."

 

Jim Graham's two minutes

Thanks. This comes from a guy who had a good talking-to on this subject from his dad when I was in my teens. Back then, I was like any other churchgoer, wondering why the Pope would cling to this difficult viewpoint. My father (a father of six) calmly explained it to me. He could do a sharp two-minute commentary for Katie's show, but they canned the commentaries when she "lowered" herself to airing the opinions of Rush Limbaugh.

the media and pollsters

the media and pollsters teach Catholics is that you can disobey a pile of church teachings, fail to attend Mass, get a divorce, get a vasectomy, and still be a "good Catholic.  Sort of like when Satan asks Eve in the garden if God really said what He said and alludes that she too can be like God.  So teh moral of the story is Satan has been trying to lead the faithful astray since the begining and sometimes does.  So does that mean that the media is Satan?

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Duh!


Then you believe a married couple that practices artificial birth control, feeling no compunction, should leave the Church?

Uh... Yeah! If you don't believe in what the church is preachin', then you have no business belonging to that church, period! I don't buy what the Muslims preach, which is why I'm not a Muslim. Before you belong to a church, make sure you belong!

Now, with that said, don't go looking for a church that tells you what you want to hear. But Catholics have a habit of making up their own rules and interpreting the Bible in what many Protestants feel is odd. Read the Bible yourself and find a church with teachings closest to your own honest interpretation.

Sorry, but that was a dumbass question!



"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara


First of all there isn't

First of all there isn't really any need for it if the couple practices natural family planning. All it takes is education and a little abstinance and you can time the times a woman is fertile and infertile.

Second my folks are married and practiced birth control for a time before I came along but then realized the errors of their ways and were forgiven. I think if the couple feels remorse for what they did then they shouldn't leave. But if they continue...then the aren't following the teachings and committing a serious sin.

 

By justice a king gives stability to a land; but he who imposes heavy taxes ruins it. -Proverbs 29:4

NFP

I'm a Catholic married to a Protestant. She heard the Janet Smith speech "Contraception: Why Not?" and had her own reluctance to introduce additional hormones into her body. I'm really happy that she enthusiastically decided in favor of NFP. We've been married for almost three years now and NFP has been a blessing to us.

Oh yeah: NFP = Natural Family Planning. Part of the process is learning how to interpret the indications a woman's body gives when it is ovulating. This information is used to either encourage or avoid a pregnancy without resorting to artificial means.

     C'mon, it's just

     C'mon, it's just the Pope.  If you want to see respectful coverage you need a report on someone deserving of respectful coverage, someone like Castro.

Authority

"And I know a recent poll says 62 percent of Catholics believe the church isn't reflective of their views."

  • If you told Johnny Unitas that 62 percent of the punting unit thought he should try a sweep ... what do you think he would do?
  • If you told George S. Patton that 62 percent of his soldiers wanted him to postpone his advance and lay low for a while, what do you think he would do?
  • If you went into an operating room, and told the chief surgeon that 62 percent of the patients wanted him to use different scalpels, what do you think he would do?

If you don't know what the answers would be, you simply don't understand what "authority" is. The Pope is an authority, not a president.

Vicar of Christ

I like your last sentence.

Most folks I talk to look at the Pope as being free to make policy, somewhat like how a President is free to do. In reality, the Pope "rules" as a Vicar, that is "in place of" the Real Leader.

The Vicar is NOT free to change policy, but is bound to follow the doctrines that have been revealed.

For example, on the question of women priests, I read the Vatican's position being stated as "We have no authority to ordain women." When a person realizes where the Church sees itself coming from, this statement makes perfect sense.

My two cents (and worth even less) to a person who does not agree with Catholic doctrine:

(1) It's tough stuff, so I sympathize. But, it's supposed to be tough to accept. That's one of the aspects of Catholicism that appeals to me.
(2) I recommend trying to find out why the teachings are the way they are. "Because I toldyou so," is not sufficient, but whenever I've searched, I've always been impressed with and agreed to the reasons.
(3) If still dissatisfied, there are lots of other places that can be of genuine benefit.

62 %,

of America doesn't watch "The CBS Evening News With Katie Couric", and your ratings have been abysmal ever since you came on board, what do you think should be done KATIE!!!!

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER

This Pope is a very good man

This Pope is a very good man -- Thank God he is conservative!

Maybe,

But don't you think he kind of clings to religion? Perhaps he's been disappointed in the past and has become bitter and cynical.

poor Katie

Poor Katie, born without a rational thought in her head, then or now. First she says that The Feeling (of her crowd) was that the Pope was going to be extremely conservative, but that was contradicted or proven false (belie defined) by his writings. Then, despite that statement, she says "he is very conservative". She also must believe the papacy is like a political office here. When she wonders if "entertaining issues like women as priests or use
of birth control will be really off the table as long as he's Pope?",
I get the impression she has no concept of a congregation actually believing in the precepts of the church. Perhaps another Entertaining issue would be partial birth abortion. Entertaining my ass, which she is.

Jaywl's excellent points and those...

Jaywl's excellent points and those expressed by others confirm the profound lack of understanding among many in the press today. The Catholic Church is not Catholicism cafeteria style, and it isn't Catholicism by referendum. Of course, to understand this you must believe that good and evil exist in our world.

The Media's Double Standard Revealed...

The media's double standard:

Why does the media tell us it is okay for underage boys and girls to have sex with each other, and it is okay for teachers to have sex with underage students, but it is not okay for Priests to have sex with underage boys? Why don't they condemn all sex involving children?

And why is it okay for a US Congressman (D) to run a gay brothel out of his residence, but it is not okay for a US Senator (R) to tap his foot in a men's room? Why don't they condemn all homosex?

And why is it okay for a US President (D) to, sexually harass, and have sex with interns in his office, but it's not okay for a US Senator and Presidential Candidate to discuss policy matters behind closed doors with an attractive female lobbyist. Why don't they condemn all impropriety between the sexes in the workplace?

Answer: There can be only one reason, the media are WHORES for the Democrats. The sooner Republicans and Christians realize and accept this fact, the sooner we can put the whores out of business.

---
Communist vs. Statist '08

Q. Is Panamanian born John McCain a "Natural Born Citizen"

Father Williams made a

Father Williams made a great point when Couric asked if women priests and birth control are off the table:
I think the way he would respond to that is that the church is really
called to challenge people and not so much to be a reflection of
society as a challenge for society to be at its best.

Once again, the media miss the point: the Church's role is not to adjust to societal mores, but to set a standard.

He did make a good point

However, don't you wish he would have explained that these "issues" are not a matter of tradition but are doctrinal and will never be "on the table"?

Couric's question makes it seem as if Church doctrine is up to the whim of this or the next pope.  It most certainly is not and Fr. Williams should have pointed out that besides challenging society, it is supposed to proclaim the Word of God in and out of season (e.g., regardless of what the MSM or majority of American Catholics think). 

It would require actual journalism

So there's little chance of this actually happening. And I don't know how this Pope would feel about doing it, but I'd be fascinated if someone, somehow, could induce him to answer these 10 Yes/Maybe/No questions. His answers might also be funny in view of Katie's assumptions, depending on where he lands on the diamond.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

"Extremely conservative" = actually adhering to church teachings

"women and minorities hardest hit"

In other words...

 

Conservative = Having integrity

Liberal = Lacking integrity

---
Communist vs. Statist '08

Q. Is Panamanian born John McCain a "Natural Born Citizen"

intellectual?

Tim:

Love your posts. But somehow using the words "Katie Couric" and "intellectual tracts" in the same article doesn't seem right.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"