A story that mildly resembles today's McCain "scoop" came four years ago, the charge that young AP reporter Alexandra Polier may have had an affair with John Kerry. No proof emerged. How did the New York Times cover that charge?
On February 17, 2004, on page A-19, the Times ran a 434-word piece by reporter Jim Rutenberg, one of the four reporters on the McCain story today. The rumor had a "vibrant life on the Internet," but not in the New York Times. Here it is:
The woman at the center of unsubstantiated rumors that Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts had an extramarital affair released a statement on Monday in which she denied any romantic involvement with him. ''I have never had a relationship with Senator Kerry, and the rumors in the press are completely false,'' the woman, Alexandra Polier, 27, said in the statement. ''Whoever is spreading these rumors and allegations does not know me, but should know the pain they have caused me and my family.''
Ms. Polier, a freelance journalist, submitted the statement to The Associated Press from the suburbs of Nairobi, Kenya, where she has been staying since fall with the parents of her fiance. She once worked for The Associated Press as an editorial assistant.
Mr. Kerry's campaign aides were of mixed emotions on Monday. Clearly hopeful the statement would end days of what they considered unwarranted speculation, they said they were frustrated with having to address the subject again.
''The issues facing this country are far too serious for the press to be marketing in these types of rumors,'' Stephanie Cutter, Mr. Kerry's press secretary, said in a statement.
While there was no independent evidence to support it, the rumor has had a vibrant life on the Internet, on talk radio, and in the foreign news media, especially in Australia and England, since it was first reported Thursday by the Drudge Report Web site. It has received far less attention in the mainstream American news media.
Denials from Mr. Kerry on the radio program of Don Imus on Friday, and later during a session with reporters, were reported by some American television news organizations and newspapers, including The New York Times, in most cases without identifying Ms. Polier.
In her statement yesterday, Ms. Polier said she came forward after days of silence because she was frustrated by the attention the rumor was continuing to receive. ''Because these stories were false, I assumed the media would ignore them,'' she wrote. ''It seems that efforts to peddle these lies continue, so I feel compelled to address them.''
Apparently addressing a report in The Sun of London last week in which Ms. Polier's father, Terry, was quoted as criticizing Mr. Kerry, he and Ms. Polier's mother, Donna, also released a statement yesterday. It read: ''We have spoken to our daughter and the allegations that have been made regarding her are completely false and unsubstantiated.'' The Poliers, of Malvern, Pa., added that they intended to vote for Mr. Kerry for president.
That's it. The Times never touched the story again as you can see in the paper's archive.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Leave the Country
February 21, 2008 - 12:00 ET by allanfDidn't the young woman in question quickly leave the country and become unavailable for the rest of the compaign. There was not printable story for the New York Times here. Kerry was not a Republican.
allanf... Excellent
February 21, 2008 - 12:06 ET by bigtimerallanf...
Excellent memory and post regarding Kerry being democrat...we all know that is all that matters most times with the sleaze machines...agenda and all. Plus I think while she left the country she eventually denied the affair so that was the end of that with the leftist msm.
As to McCain, I want to know about the lobbyist angle, not the possibility of an affair as that is not suppose to matter to us anymore...via the Clinton machine and the msm.
Not exactly. You can read
February 21, 2008 - 14:33 ET by HarvestOnVinylNot exactly.
You can read her first-hand account via the New Yorker -- published in May of 2004.
http://nymag.com/nym...
Lesson: The media are locusts, no matter their political leanings.
If the New York Times was looking to make a splash and appease liberals by attacking McCain, it hasn't worked and it won't work. It may elicit a shrug, at best. Yawn.
But yeah, the bigger issue
February 21, 2008 - 14:37 ET by HarvestOnVinylBut yeah, the bigger issue is the lobbyist angle. Kerry's story was about a freelance journo -- big difference.
The Monica Moment
February 21, 2008 - 12:34 ET by Lame CherryI remember Donna Rice actually made some money off of her outing, but these women now days must be so well paid off that none of them even come out in Playboy. McCain came out today denying it all, so I guess they had a bit pow wow and got the same story out to wow as the chica is on board.
Monica sure screwed it up for all these power climbing women. In the good olde days they could be on Opray, be in Playboy for a million dollars and be the popular girls at the Letterman cocktail parties..........now pretty Tai Collins with Chuck Robb and Eliz Gracen are just memories.........as all the chicks are paid off so much and made such pariahs that the New York Times is left with sleaze but no slap and tickle videos.
They are going to have to instead publish Billary's combo videos.........why is it no one is asking that gal Hillary was wrastlin' with........if she was the one who resigned.........if she was having a Monica Moment.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
This story is easy to
February 21, 2008 - 13:27 ET by Hunter12This story is easy to substantiate as false. Just google "Polier Fortune" and you don't find a connection to this girl and anyone with money.
Just a gigolo
everywhere I go
people know the part
I'm playing
Paid for every dance
selling each romance
every night some heart
be traying
There will come a day
youth will pass away
then what will they say
about me
When the end comes I know
they'll say just a gigolo
as life goes on
without me
"Louie Prima"
Wasn't John Edwards accused
February 21, 2008 - 13:34 ET by dscottWasn't John Edwards accused of playing the field as well? How did the NYT handle that?
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jason-aslinger/2007/10/10/ann-coulter-refers-tabloid-report-john-edwards-affair-will-msm-pursu
All the news fit to print, what a sick joke. There is only one way to restore any credibility to the NYT, fire all the editors and sack Sultzberger from the BOD. Failing such a confidence building move, the NYT has now fallen to the level of the National Enquirer.
Just for giggles let's look at the National Enquirer. http://www.nationalenquirer.com/ What's that I DON'T see, no article on John McCain. It's official folks, The NYT doesn't even rate the level of the National Enquirer! HOW PATHETIC IS THAT?
Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008 Long Live the Empire! Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.
So Lauer and the rest of the
February 21, 2008 - 13:55 ET by rbosqueSo Lauer and the rest of the MSM are afraid of Republican "swift boat attacks"? Why should they when they have institutionalized hit-'n-run slander machines already set up against conservatives?
I can't help but wonder how
February 21, 2008 - 14:05 ET by danboI can't help but wonder how they handled Juanita Broddrick. Anyone know?
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Plus the MSM is definitely
February 21, 2008 - 20:03 ET by wiwfPlus the MSM is definitely not reporting on Larry Sinclair and what he and Barack Hussein Obama did.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy