Looming Threat of Social Security Implosion Results in Just 72 Seconds of Network Coverage
Over a combined total of nine and a half hours of programming, CBS, NBC and ABC allowed a mere 72 seconds of coverage to the news, Monday, that Social Security will go bankrupt three years earlier than previously expected. ABC's World News and NBC's Nightly News skipped the subject entirely.
The same networks that offered copious amounts of stories to a vague threat of future global warming disaster, found little interest in the coming problems of Social Security. Scott Pelley briefly explained on Monday's Evening News: "Medicare will run out of money in 2024. Social Security retirement benefits run out in 2033. But Social Security disability benefits will be exhausted long before that, in 2016."
2016 is before the end of the next presidential term, so perhaps there's a reason why the big three networks showed little interest.
Good Morning America donated one news brief and 16 seconds to the story. News reader Josh Elliott explained the new bankruptcy date as a result of "the flood of retiring baby-boomers, longer life expectancy and the ongoing fiscal crisis."
On CBS, Charlie Rose allowed 13 seconds. Monday's Evening News had the most, 28 seconds. NBC's Today also spared time for just one news brief, a scant 15 seconds.
In 2005, a Media Research Center study looked at how journalists covered President Bush's efforts to reform Social Security:
The Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute studied 125 Social Security stories on CNN’s “Inside Politics,” “CBS Evening News,” “NBC Nightly News,” ABC’s “World News Tonight” and Fox News’ “Special Report with Brit Hume” between Nov. 15, 2004, and March 15, 2005. This time included Bush’s call for reform shortly after his re-election into his “60 stops in 60 days” campaign. Among the findings:
CBS and CNN Most Biased: On “CBS Evening News,” 56 percent of stories were liberal with just 20 percent conservative. CBS reports were loaded with extreme examples that played up liberal points.
The entirety of Monday and Tuesday's coverage can be found below:
GMA
04/24/12
7:05
16 seconds
JOSH ELLIOTT: Meanwhile, some new warnings about your retirement. The government now says Social Security will run out of money in the year 2033, three years sooner than expected. Thanks to the flood of retiring baby-boomers, longer life expectancy and the ongoing fiscal crisis.
CBS This Morning
04/24/12
7:17
13 seconds
CHARLIE ROSE: The Wall Street Journal reports the Social Security trust fund will run dry by 2033, according to a new government report. That's three years earlier than previous estimates. The government blames the bad economy and high energy costs.
CBS Evening News
04/23/12
6:33
28 seconds
SCOTT PELLEY: Here's another economic story. When will Medicare and Social Security hit empty? We got a new estimate today. The government said that if something isn't done to shore up the trust funds, Medicare will run out of money in 2024. Social Security retirement benefits run out in 2035. But Social Security disability benefits will be exhausted long before that, in 2016.
Today
04/23/12
7:06
15 seconds
NATALIE MORALES: Rising energy prices and a weak economy are hitting the Social Security program hard. The government says the program's trust funds are now set to run dry in 2033. That is three years earlier than previously expected.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments






SCOTT PELLEY: Here's another economic story. When will Medicare and Social Security hit empty? We got a new estimate today. The government said that if something isn't done to shore up the trust funds, Medicare will run out of money in 2024. Social Security retirement benefits run out in 2035. But Social Security disability benefits will be exhausted long before that, in 2016.









Comments
Social Security
Submitted by mmilesll on Tue, 04/24/2012 - 1:23pm.
Why would the LSM say anything about problems with Social Security or Medicare? The dumocrats say their is no problem, so why would the idiots of the LSM say anything. The LSM knows not to say anything bad about nobama or the dumocrats until they are told to say something.
yep
Submitted by KornKing on Tue, 04/24/2012 - 1:43pm.
Heads in the sand, except when they get to blab about GOPers throwing grandma out in the street. Also just heard Rush talking about how the NY Times is trying to end it's defined benefit pension plan, do you suppose they'll call Scott Walker for advice?
smoke and mirrors
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 04/24/2012 - 2:00pm.
SS is in deep trouble with the boomers on their way and Obama just got $8 billion in re-election cash to help get the elderly vote.
http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/an_billion_trick_ImTBFfz7MeuZLJY7JzXEIJ
"Call it President Obama’s Committee for the Re-Election of the President — a political slush fund at the Health and Human Services Department.
Only this isn’t some little fund from shadowy private sources; this is taxpayer money, redirected to help Obama win another term. A massive amount of it, too — $8.3 billion. Yes, that’s billion, with a B"
Liberals
Submitted by GregE on Tue, 04/24/2012 - 9:41pm.
dont care if it implodes. Literally, they don't care. As long as they can politically hit Republicans with the blame, they're pretty much fine with anything detrimental to any American or the nation as a whole. And as long as with that, they can be the saviors of the day, via tyrannical means, they want it.
I'm convinced, they want it. I'm convinced they want national implosion. They want Americans on their knees begging to be saved from the chaos and hardships that would ensue, and they opine for that overarching all-encompassing parental power. They want to destroy American, plain and simple. I'm convinced.
"Rising energy prices and a weak economy are ...
Submitted by Jayke on Wed, 04/25/2012 - 6:04am.
... hitting the Social Security program hard."
Isn't the "PAYROLL TAX CUT" aimed directly at causing this? I think I heard Rush talk about this months ago. BARRY AND THE DIMS are killing Social Security on purpose in order to blame Republicans or something.
This is old news:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/04/24/more-bad-news-for-social-security...