ABC: Romney is Looking to 'Drive a Stake' Through Gingrich's Heart
So, Newt Gingrich is a vampire? Over the course of two segments on Monday's Good Morning America, ABC's journalists goaded Gingrich to repeat his attacks on the "dishonest" Mitt Romney, while suggesting that the former Massachusetts governor is getting ready to "drive a stake" through the ex-Speaker's heart.
Playing up the fight between the two candidates, George Stephanopoulos pushed Gingrich, "You've made it clear again and again and again that you think Mitt Romney is a dishonest man... Will you still pledge to endorse him if he defeats you, and can you be effective, an effective campaigner for the ticket after what you said about him?"
The GMA co-anchor also highlighted gloom in the Gingrich campaign, noting, "But, what a difference a week makes. Last Monday, you were on this program surging, coming out of South Carolina. This week, you come in plunging in Florida. Is it too late for you to recover and win Florida?"
In a previous segment, reporter Jon Karl used unusually harsh language in describing the inter-party battle, declaring, "...No matter what happens in tomorrow's primary, Romney will continue hammering away at Gingrich until he's driven a stake through the heart of the Gingrich campaign."
A partial transcript of the January 30 Stephanopoulos segment, which aired at 7:09am EST, follows:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Front page of USA Today this morning shows that Romney is doing much better than you against President Obama. He's basically tied with President Obama in the key swing states. But President Obama opens up a seven-point lead over Rick Santorum, a seven-point lead over Ron Paul. And a 14-point lead over you. Why should a Republican on the fence look at you and say I may like Newt Gingrich I may even agree with him on many things, but he can't beat President Obama?
GINGRICH: For the same reason in 1980 when Ronald Reagan was down 30 point against Jimmy Carter. Conservatives looked and said, "you know, I'd rather have a guy that can go into the debate with a clear position than some guy who can't even distinguish between Romneycare and Obamacare. I think it's going to be very hard for Mitt Romney with funding from Goldman Sachs, with the statement today from George Soros, how is he going to explain to the country that he's going to be different? I think the fact is that a liberal- we nominated a moderate in 1996. He got beaten badly. We nominated a moderate in 2008. He got beaten badly. I know the establishment would love to nominate Romney and they want to make him electable, so that they can beat him in the fall. But, I think the record of 1996 and 2008, you better have a conservative who can really draw a wide gap.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Mr- Mr. Speaker-
GINGRICH: And Romneycare and Obamacare are really about this far apart.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Mr. Speaker, you've made it clear again and again and again that you think Mitt Romney is a dishonest man. You think he's lied about you and your record in this campaign, has lied about you and your record. Will you still pledge to endorse him if he defeats you, and can be effective, an effective campaigner for the ticket after what you said about him?
GINGRICH: George, he misled the country which the debate on his own voting pattern. He mislead the country on a whole range of things. We just found out he had 23 foreign assets he didn't even list in disclosure forms. I mean, go down the list. I'm not talking about me. I'm saying the same thing that Mike Huckabee said. The same thing that John McCain said the last time. The same thingle Rudy Giuliani said this fall. I think he has a real challenge-
STEPHANOPOULOS: So, will that keep you from endorsing him in the fall if he wins? Will that keep you from endorsing him if he wins?
GINGRICH: -of being candid and direct. That's a problem. No, I think re-electing Obama is a disaster. But I certainly endorse the Republican nominee. But I think Mitt Romney will have a very, very hard time trying to differentiate himself. And I think that's what the George Soros message is this morning. Speaker, thank you for your time
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments






GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Front page of USA Today this morning shows that Romney is doing much better than you against President Obama. He's basically tied with President Obama in the key swing states. But President Obama opens up a seven-point lead over Rick Santorum, a seven-point lead over Ron Paul. And a 14-point lead over you. Why should a Republican on the fence look at you and say I may like Newt Gingrich I may even agree with him on many things, but he can't beat President Obama?









Comments
Driving in the stake.
Submitted by creative_destruction on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 2:09pm.
Well, I live in Michigan and just mailed my absentee ballot for Mitt Romney. So I guess I have my hand on the hammer....
Steve
Imagine the response from the
Submitted by HelloDare on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 2:10pm.
Imagine the response from the Congressional Black Caucus, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, et al, if somebody on FOX made a comment about driving a stake through President Obama's heart?
Blacula?
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 2:35pm.
More exploitation? Someone call Lucas!
Mitt vs Newt
Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 2:40pm.
It's like being asked to vote for one's favorite Menendez brother.
Newt is a unelectible buffoon
Submitted by cbeyer on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 2:56pm.
Newt is the one who put capitalism on trial with his bashing of Mitt's highly successful years at Bain capital. He also supported Cap and Trade and favors a form of amnesty for illegals.
I can assure you that if Newt were to become the nominee he would be trounced by Obama. Newt is a supreme egotist and it comes accross in his self-absorbed meglomaniac personality. He has so much baggage and would clearly be the object of SEVERAL October surprises. As such, he would be the issue in the campaign....not Obama...and his disasterous record!
Now let's see
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 4:23pm.
you're either a Mitskyite or a PaulBot.
Like him or not, Newt eclipses Romulus in intellect and if Romulus did not resort to the same tactics as Du Bummer does and will do, that is out and out lying about his opponent instead of telling you about himself, he would be on his way home to pick up more of those special shorts he wears.
The media theme of harsh debates
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 3:00pm.
CNN made light of harsh comments from candidates back in 2008 by offering an historic examples of the well know antics between Jefferson and Adams. Vulture Capitalist pales by comparison.
If you want a liberal in the
Submitted by okie-pastor on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 3:34pm.
If you want a liberal in the white house.
You have a win win situation If Mitt Obamney is the nominee
Mitt is no liberal
Submitted by cbeyer on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 3:59pm.
Common...man. Get your head out of.................. Romney is no liberal and is not remotely comparable to Obama. Romney is a strident advocate of business and the free enterprise system. The ultimate opposite of Obama.
Liar!
Submitted by goodone91 on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 6:00pm.
Liar!
goodone91---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 10:05pm.
good one !
Like.
MD
strategy
Submitted by giatn on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 3:50pm.
It would be pretty stupid not to change tactics if one is not working. Obama tap dances
every time a new poll comes out. His current pretense of being in favor of "all of the above"
sources of energy is preposterous. His EPA, Energy and Interior Departments work diligently to
impede fossil fuel expansion while showering impractical "green" projects with taxpayer funds.
Anything that gets an unethical, egomaniacal, undisciplined twit like Gingrich off the stage is
a worthy endeavor. At the moment the only viable choice is between Romney and Obama
like it or not.
Tap Dancing
Submitted by Schofield Kid on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 4:52pm.
That's a racist comment! Everyone knows black people will "tap dance" at the drop of a hat!
Why any conservative would
Submitted by okie-pastor on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 3:50pm.
Why any conservative would vote for Romney is beyond me.
Supports gun control
Raised taxes
Implemented Government run health care at state level but will repeal it at national level. Good luck selling that one mitt.
Is pro choice and then pro life but if he finds himself in presence of fellow liberals he will be pro choice again
Even if his "electability" gets him in the white house what have we won?
We just replace one big government liberal politician for another one. It's John McCain all over again. Ugggg.
Republican Establishment 1
Tea Party 0
The more things change the more they stay the same
Well I'm going to give this one a pass.
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 3:59pm.
I like Newt. I'm not sure if he's electable, (way too much political baggage) but I do see him as more conservative than Romney. I especially am fascinated with the way he keeps resurrecting himself and his campaign so many times during this cycle.
After all, no matter what your feelings about Newt, you just have to admire the way he keeps coming back. How would you refer to a nemesis that's been written off as 'dead' so many times -- even by the 'hammer' -- only to be reinvigorated and brought back to life? Romney has to be wondering what he has to do to keep Newt dead, hence the vampire reference.
I will double-down on a statement I made earlier: If Romney wins the nomination, you will have 4 more years of the Big Owe! I just don't trust him when he claims he's a conservative. It's just a feeling I have. I can't justify it, so don't ask me to. I could very well be wrong.
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Mitt will be our nominee
Submitted by cbeyer on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 4:04pm.
and if you think he is no different than Obama....and others follow your mind numbed thought process...we will have four more years.
There are HUGE policy differences between Obama and Romney. Pro capitalist Romney would represent a huge change versus the anti business/capitalism/socialist Obama.
You are absolutely right.
Submitted by okie-pastor on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 4:10pm.
You are absolutely right. The advisors of Romneycare actually helped develop Obamacare
Precisely, O-P
Submitted by deadeyedan on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 4:07pm.
The lessons of 1992, 1996 and 2008 have yet to register with some "Republican" voters. We need someone who can most directly ATTACK The One on the core issues, not just "campaign" on the issues as McCain did.
Newt has had the intestinal fortitude to make a political comeback despite the thrashing he took as Speaker, even from his own party; and has done so by, among other things, attacking that leftist wing of the Democratic Party we know as the mainstream media.
Rather than being a sound-bite, talking-point, spin-doctoring master of focus groups Newt has demonstrated that he is a master of substance and that is the main reason he was able to stage a resurgence when three months ago all the pundits had given him up for dead while showing all the poll numbers back then.
LIBERALISM - government of the people by the theories and for the ideologists
Yep. And sadly he has the
Submitted by okie-pastor on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 4:19pm.
Yep. And sadly he has the megaphone of Fox and Drudge.
I will take Palin, Levin, Limbaugh, Fred Thompson, Art Laffer, Herman Cain, and Michael Reagans brand of conservatism as opposed to John McCain, Chris Christie and Joe Scarboroughs any day!!!
Newt right when he mentions Reagan was down to Carter big time.
Romney would be a good candiate if everything Obama implemented was working he could just hitchhike along and say I can do what he did but better.
The Soros endorsement is the kiss of death.
why so surprised?
Submitted by rinohunter on Tue, 01/31/2012 - 1:39am.
Does anyone think this is surprising? Newt knows full well what the media is going to ask him. Surely you've all seen his kosher accusation by now. Apparently I'm 'establishment' because I'm not supporting the candidate that is pandering and employing left wing premises in his accusations against that 'establishment candidate' Mitt Romney. Get a clue, people that are voting against Newt AREN'T doing it because they love Romney so much.
Soros wants Gingrich to win the nomination because he knows he can't win in the general.