George Stephanopoulos Pesters Rove: How Can Republicans 'Blow' Election?
Despite all the bad news for Barack Obama, George Stephanopoulos on Wednesday eagerly wondered just how the Republican Party can "blow" the 2012 election. The former Democratic operative turned journalist probed front-runner Rick Perry for limitations, wondering if the candidate will have to "disavow" parts of his 2010 book.
Talking to GOP strategist Karl Rove, Stephanopoulos quizzed, "You've also said President Obama is likely to lose next year and I guess my question is, how could the Republican Party blow it?"
[See video below. MP3 audio here.]
Playing up ths supposed controversial nature of Perry's book Fed Up, Stephanopoulos recounted, " And I think he's gotten the most attention for what he said about Social Security, calling it a Ponzi scheme. Compares it to a bad disease, something that's been imposed on us for 70 years."
Pushing Rove to proclaim the Texas Governor outside the mainstream, he added, "You know how much trouble that can be for a Republican candidate in a general election. So, how does he handle it and must he disavow some of these statements in the book?"
Of course, Stephanopoulos wasn't always so eager for politicians to be called on controversial issues. For instance, on March 18, 2008, he lauded then-candidate Obama's failure to separate himself from Reverend Jeremiah Wright: "By refusing to renounce Reverend Wright, that was in many ways an act of honor for Senator Obama."
Additionally, when the ABC anchor declared Obama the winner of every presidential debate in 2008, he didn't seem interested in how the Democrats could "blow" the election.
A transcript of the September 07 segment can be found below:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓7:10am EDT
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Let's get more on this now from a man who may know more about politics than anyone with the country. He is Fox News' contributor Karl Rove, of course President George W. Bush's top political strategist. He's also had a long relationship with fellow Texan Rick Perry. And I do I want to talk to about Rick Perry, Karl, but good morning to you. But, first, let's pick up on those Palin comments from your Fox colleagues last night. You suggested about a month ago that you thought she was getting in the race. Took a little heat from her for that, but you also said the tease can't get on- go on for so long. What is going on? Is she getting in or not?
KARL ROVE: You know, if you keep going to Iowa, and you keep going to New Hampshire and you keep making speeches like she's been making, you have to think that she's, you know, that she's going to get in. And, as I said, I wouldn't bet the ranch on it. I put a little more money that she's going to get in than she's not. But, it really is inexplicable for her to continue this as long as she has. If she wants to be a king-maker, there's a different way to go about doing it. And the longer she looks like a candidate and if she doesn't become a candidate, the weaker she will emerge out of this politically.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Let's talk about the candidates who are in the race right now. You heard John there. A new poll shows Rick Perry at the top of the Republican field right now and one of the most fascinating numbers in the poll for me, I want to show it, is that among Republican voters, 30 percent now believe that Perry has the best chance to beat President Obama. He's vaulted ahead of Mitt Romney, up at 20 percent. Michele Bachmann way down at four percent. Now, that runs exactly contrary to what the Obama campaign thinks. They believe that Romney would be the tougher candidate. What do you think?
ROVE: Well, look. I think we don't know yet. I love how we're trying to come to, you know, a conclusion at the beginning of the process. This, really, tonight, is going to be taking the Republican presidential sweepstakes to a new level. I remind you at this point four years ago, it was a two-man race as well. 30 percent of Republican primary voters supported Rudy Giuliani and 27 percent supported Fred Thompson. So, I mean, we are still relatively early in the process. We have got five months until people start voting and all kinds of things can and will happen.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And a lot of questions about how Rick Perry will handle this test. So much talk about his books and what he's written in his books, Fed Up. Questioning the 16th Amendment, which imposed the income tax. The 17th Amendment, direct election of senators. And I think he's gotten the most attention for what he said about Social Security, calling it a Ponzi scheme. Compares it to a bad disease, something that's been imposed on us for 70 years. You know how much trouble that can be for a Republican candidate in a general election. So, how does he handle it and must he disavow some of these statements in the book?
ROVE: What they've done thus far is, I think, inadequate, which is to basically say, "Look, we didn't write the book with the presidential campaign in mind." Well, okay, fine. But, they are going to have to find a way to deal with these things. 'Cause, as you say, they are toxic in a general election environment and they are also toxic in a Republican primary. I mean, if you say Social Security is a failure and ought to be replaced by a state-level program, then people are going to say, what do you mean by that and make a judgment based on your answer to it. So, each candidate has strengths. Each candidate also has challenges. This, for Governor Perry is his challenge. Now he's got some formidable strengths, but this is his biggest challenge.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You've also said President Obama is likely to lose next year and I guess my question is, how could the Republican Party blow it?
ROVE: Well, they could blow it by having a candidate who could not appeal to the swing voters in this election, who are, who are conservative-minded independents, Latinos, white working class voters, the same kind of people that gave us a huge margin in the 2010 congressional election. The primary has to be a process by which our candidate is strengthened, not weakened and emerges at the end of it ready to conduct a general election campaign for the voters who are up for grabs in this election.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay. Karl Rove, thanks so much for joining us this morning.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments






GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Let's get more on this now from a man who may know more about politics than anyone with the country. He is Fox News' contributor Karl Rove, of course President George W. Bush's top political strategist. He's also had a long relationship with fellow Texan Rick Perry. And I do I want to talk to about Rick Perry, Karl, but good morning to you. But, first, let's pick up on those Palin comments from your Fox colleagues last night. You suggested about a month ago that you thought she was getting in the race. Took a little heat from her for that, but you also said the tease can't get on- go on for so long. What is going on? Is she getting in or not?









Comments
For once, I'm taking the high road.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 11:51am.
"No comment."
I can't resist it, Sicko.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 11:56am.
Suffalofagus should ask an expert, like Barney Fwank, I bewieve.
You take the high road if ya
Submitted by Rowane on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 11:55am.
You take the high road if ya want... Republicans can blow this election by letting the mediots pick the candidate, a la, McCain '08.
You've got to stand for something, or you'll fall for anything. (Aaron Tippin)
No, not THAT high road...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:01pm.
the one Newsbubba alluded to!
That's right
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:24pm.
I suggested back in 2010 after the election that the GOP had some serious thinking to do regarding its primary system, over which it has remarkably nominal control. Back in 1996, that system picked Dole and the vulnerable Clinton got re-elected. That same system exists in 2012. Will the GOP pick another Dole?
At this point Obama would like nothing more than for the GOP to have control of both houses of the Congress, thus setting himself up as the populist knight in the Oval Office vetoing barbarian (Biden's term) legislation aimed at killing the middle class, starving babies and puppies, and destroying the American dream. And as Obamacare fails, he and his faithful true believers will credit the GOP with inhibiting Obamacare's cure-all potential.
Only in that way can Obama create any kind of a positive legacy.
the way things are going...
Submitted by Jnoble on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:14pm.
..the only way the Republicans "blow" this election is by the nominee abrupty quitting the day before the election and/or refusing to hold office. Other than that, O-Blame-o is finished. Kaput. Done. Fini.
Aside from the relief of having a real leader in the WH, I'm going to completely and throughly enjoy watching the MSM collectivly cry, stomp their feet, openly pout, throw tempter tantrums, and sadly wonder what went wrong with His Majesty the night of the landslide and after.
I agree, J. I think Elmer Fudd could win.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:18pm.
What I can't wait to see is how all of Bambi's problems were caused by the NEXT president!
It all depends on the GOP nominee
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:32pm.
I don't think Bachmann, Paul, Gingrich, or Huntsman beat Obama, but their campaigns are already fading. If Palin jumps into the race, I don't think she wins either; I know a lot of independents and conservatives who rightly or wrongly think she's an idiot, and that's not a good sign. She can be more effective staying out and forcing the GOP nominee to address her "base."
Romney and Perry? They appear to be the front runners and they can beat him, but I don't consider them shoe-ins. Add Marco Rubio to the ticket and I think they beat Obama, carrying Florida and much Latino vote. (I'd love to see Rubio in debate with Biden.)
And I still think there's another candidate out there who hasn't made intentions known yet, but I don't know who it might be.
Heh, it might even be worth
Submitted by Rowane on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:44pm.
Heh, it might even be worth it to watch "Tingles" half-assed show after Obombus' fall.
You've got to stand for something, or you'll fall for anything. (Aaron Tippin)
Stephanopoulos - Democrat Cheerleader
Submitted by rwnewsnut on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:22pm.
George is still working as the Democrat's head cheerleader. Look at the following question he posed to President Obama during the Debt Ceiling debacle. Notice how he posed a question and also helps direct Obama to the answer. How many more other votes were political vs. what was best for the country?
Also, why is it conservative authors have to go through a cross-examination with George and with Matt Lauer?
****************************************************************************************************
Stephanopoulos: "You've got to extend the debt limit by May. And your job is a lot tougher because of your vote in the Senate against extending the debt limit. When did you realize that vote was a mistake?"
Obama: "I think that it's important to understand the vantage point of a senator versus the vantage point of a president. When you're a senator, traditionally what's happened is, this is always a lousy vote. Nobody likes to be tagged as having increased the debt limit - for the United States by a trillion dollars. As president, you start realizing, you know what, we, we can't play around with this stuff. This is the full faith and credit of the United States. And so that was just an example of a new senator making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country. And I'm the first one to acknowledge it."
how could the Republican Party blow it?
Submitted by CarlosS on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:25pm.
What Snuffaluffelagas meant to say
"How could the Republican Party blow it? We're completely out of ideas on how to prop THE ONE up. You're a smart guy, Karl, help us out here".
Rove is a Beltway insider
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 1:06pm.
Rove is both angered and puzzled by the rise of the Tea Party. On the one hand, he fears the potential of a grass roots organization steering the GOP in a direction that the GOP elites (like Rove) believe is unwinnable; he was visibly angry at Tea Party favorites Christine O'Donnell and Sharon Angle (sp?) losing Senate races in Delaware and Nevada, respectively -- seats that Rove thought were in the bag had the GOp put up more traditonal candidates. On the other hand, he really doesn't understand how to win their support. He rhetorically repeats their message, but from a practical standpoint, he doesn't think they can govern.
Rove is the political mastermind who thinks strategically and tactically about how to win elections. That's why he's so good at illustrating the math of elections district by district.
But at another level, he can't cope with the Tea Party, because Rove is more about winning elections than pushing big ideas.
The music is playing Mr. Rove, time to exit stage left
Submitted by Lipton on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:52pm.
thanks for your incompetence during the Bush administration we have had a complete socialist takeover of our health care, financial and every other institution. Why should anyone listen to you?
Which side is Karl on again?
Submitted by snowshooze on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 12:58pm.
He says he thinks the GOP should lean to the moderates and independants? In order to win?
Remember McCain?
I concur
Submitted by Conservator on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 2:01pm.
Rove's opinion about Gov. Perry seems to have more to do with what network he's appearing on. I watched him on FOX where he was trying to dispel any notion that he doesn't dislike Perry. In fact, he brag that he was the one who got Perry to switch party affiliation and become a Republican.
Michael J Fox is a hack............................
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 2:44pm.
I still think that at the end it will be Romney-Rubio on the ticket.
Just going with my gut indication.
It is comical how the Republican and their every action since they popped out of their Mommy is looked into, the gutless fraud in office now, notasomuch to say the LEAST.
All the current GOP
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 3:05pm.
All the current GOP candidates, including former candidate Tim Pawlenty and Sarah Palin, could beat Obama if the election were held today (and a Donald Trump wasn't in it as a third-party candidate to muck things up). Having said that, a guy like Hunstman would probably be only a one-termer because he's too damn moderate. Therefore, we as Republicans need to make sure we nominate a true conservative and not a milquetoast one.
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
How Can Republicans 'Blow' Election?
Submitted by CT on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 4:28pm.
Never underestimate the power of the media to dumb down the electorate.