Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun
  • New Liberal Study 'Lends Credence to Conservative Charges' of Bias; Dramatic Media Tilt Toward 'Gay Marriage'
  • Senate Amnesty Supporters Boast Marco Rubio ‘Neutralized’ Limbaugh, Fox News

MSNBC's Chris Matthews Smears Tea Partiers: Only Interested in Cutting Spending on the Poor

By Scott Whitlock | April 21, 2011 | 12:51

A  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

According to MSNBC's Chris Matthews, "the only cuts that [Tea Partiers] seem to want are the cuts for the poor people." The Hardball host smeared the conservative protesters on Thursday while discussing planned reforms to Medicare and Medicaid.       
                                       
Guest Jonathan Alter laughed at Matthews' attack, prompting the anchor to mock, "You're laughing because you know how right-wingers think."

Citing a Washington Post poll showing 52 percent of Tea Partiers support cutting Medicaid, he prompted the former Newsweek editor, "...Strong, zealous Tea Party people have brought themselves to willingness to cut poor people. That doesn't surprise me, but your thoughts."

 

Alter predicted doom for the Republicans who supported Paul Ryan's reform plan, hyperbolically asserting, "A lot of them slit their own throats by voting this bill."
 
A partial transcript of the April 20 segment, which aired at 5:38pm EDT, follows:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let's take a look at the Tea Party numbers. The Washington Post/ABC poll found that only 43 percent of Tea Partiers are strong supporters, a majority of them against it, and 30 percent of general Tea Partiers want to cut Medicare. But you look at these numbers on the other side, 69 percent of Tea Partiers against these cuts in Medicare. It's so interesting. I was thinking- what do you think of this, the Tea Partiers?

SUSAN PAGE: Well, it means that they're just like everybody else, right? They do want a smaller government. They want cuts in federal spending. The deficit and the debt are the things that really sparked the Tea Party movement, big government. But when it comes down to a program that just about every family in America benefits from, they don`t want anything done to it.

MATTHEWS: Well, the only cuts that they seem to want are the cuts for the poor people. And you have a modest majority, 52- [Alter laughs.] You're laughing because you know how right-wingers think.

JONATHAN ALTER: Well-

MATTHEWS: They don't mind cutting the poor people who get Medicaid.

ALTER: But what's so interesting about this-

MATTHEWS: If you- Look at that- 52 percent-

ALTER: Yes.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

MATTHEWS: -a modest majority of Tea Partiers, strong, zealous Tea Party people, have brought themselves to willingness to cut poor people. That doesn't surprise me, but your thoughts.

ALTER: Well, I think what's interesting about that is they assume that those are poor people who are not seniors, or I don't know who they think those poor people are.

MATTHEWS: Well, you know, a lot of them are on long-term care.

ALTER: But a lot of them- a lot of them are their parents.

MATTHEWS: Yes, on long-term care.

ALTER: Because the way it works in this country is that, yes, when you get old, you draw down your- your net worth, so that you're eligible for Medicaid, and it will pay for the nursing home. So if the Ryan plan, what is now the Republican plan, if that were to become the law of the land, and you block-granted Medicaid, which would essentially gut Medicaid, under this Republican program, what you would have is large numbers of seniors who would move- move from the nursing home into their children's home, into the den-

MATTHEWS: Yeah.

ALTER: -maybe one of their kids' bedrooms, because there wouldn't be the money anymore to have them have nursing home care. So, these are some of the implications of this bill that was passed in this ideological frenzy that people have not yet fully understood. And I think once the details filter down, the implications of the Ryan plan filter down, you're going to see real hell to pay for Republicans in swing districts. A lot of them slit their own throats by voting this bill.

MATTHEWS: Susan?

PAGE: And, you know, Jonathan says people aren't yet aware about all the details in the Ryan plan.

MATTHEWS: Seniors are, I think.

PAGE: But they will when they're in a re-election campaign.

ALTER: Right.

MATTHEWS: I think a 65-year-old person or people are aware of the fact that the reason they like Medicare, and everybody likes it, Republican, right, left and center is one it, likes it, because it means for the first time in your life, somebody is paying the bills for you. And you can't afford to pay them when you get older.

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Medicare
  • Economy
  • Hardball
  • MSNBC
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Rush Limbaugh - Caller - There Wasn't Even Food Stamps Until

Submitted by im41 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 2:02pm.

1977

 

Rush catches Mr. Courageous Obama in another lie!

  • Login to post comments

Obfuscating as usual, why

Submitted by dscott on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 3:46pm.

Obfuscating as usual, why would one need food stamps, etc, if you liberals weren't so busy causing people to lose their jobs and more importantly NOT create any new ones. 7 million people lost their jobs and STILL can't find work and all you MSM types continue to blame the unemployed by claiming they GAVE UP looking. Dirtbags!

Stop opposing oil and natural gas drilling and thousands of thousands of high paying jobs will be immediately created thus causing tax revenues to increase. NO! but you insist on raising taxes on those left with jobs instead of creating new jobs.

By Obama's own admission there are billions in government waste, fraud and abuse and YET you insist we the taxpayer pay MORE to compensate for his own laziness in not stopping it, yet you turds will NOT address the issue but blame the Tea Party for refusing to fork over more money to waste.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
  • Login to post comments

The "poor' do not lack the

Submitted by TerryWest on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:02pm.

The "poor' do not lack the ability to foresee how the current administrations fiscal failures and counter productive policy's will effect them in the future, and has brought mass unemployment and cuts over the last few years.

This is where this clueless little man insults the poor, he believes they are so dense due to their income level or lack of that they can be manipulated into believing what is not truth, and have not the ability to comprehend or figure out cause and effect.
The almost 50 million on food stamps today, dose he believe they all are uneducated and unaware?
Matthews swings around the poor as if they were some unintelligent product in need of his phony guardianship .

Perhaps had the Tea Party not been tuned out and shot down as the enemy their message now echoed by many would have prevented the poor from having to welcome even more poor among them, further stretching already limited benefits and resources.
Instead Matthews like most of his media have an unquestioned child like awe and thrill in advocating, cheerleading policys and a administration that breeds poverty then claim it's everyone elses fault the country can't afford to take care of them all.

  • Login to post comments

So Obama says Paul Ryan's

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:21pm.

So Obama says Paul Ryan's budget "isn't particularly courageous."

Really???? Does the president have the courage to tackle exploding entitlement programs?

No, he doesn't.  He'd rather keep insisting  that we can solve this messand no one will have to sacrifiec,  if we just  increase taxes on the rich.

Because he really doesn't care about anything but his re-election.  He can't see any further than November 2012.

  • Login to post comments

Is it just me or are

Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:22pm.

Is it just me or are Matthews' lies becoming more blatant and outlandish?

  • Login to post comments

All the MSNBCers

Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:15pm.

are getting worse. Comcast is going to take that company in a new direction. Chrissi, Mr. Ed, Richard Maddow and their ilk are going to become (gasp) irrelevent!

  • Login to post comments

Irrelevent AND unemployed

Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 10:27am.

Irrelevent AND unemployed hopefully. They [the on-air talent] are doing their part for achieving irrelevency. It's up to Comcast to make them unemployed.

  • Login to post comments

Melania Trump Takes On CNN's Joy Behar - 4/20/2011

Submitted by im41 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:36pm.

Tip

Melania Trump Takes On CNN's Joy Behar - 4/20/2011

http://conservativeblogscentral.blogspot.com/2011/04/melania-trump-takes...

  • Login to post comments

Yes, Chrissie...

Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 4:58pm.

conservatives want to cut all entitlements. We want the poor to work and pay their own way instead of selling their votes for a welfare check and food stamps.

  • Login to post comments

Work and Provide for Oneself

Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:38pm.

The key to happiness.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama

  • Login to post comments

This is what happens when you

Submitted by robert108 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:04pm.

This is what happens when you let the liar in the WH get away with calling tax rate reductions "spending in the tax code". Now, they can conflate cutting welfare spending with tax rate reductions as "spending", and continue the lie that supports their class warfare agenda.

  • Login to post comments

Exactly

Submitted by Kingfish17 on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 6:13pm.

Food Stamps and Rent Assistance = Investments

Reducing a tax rate from 35% to 28% = Government Spending

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama

  • Login to post comments

Poverty Pimps

Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:10pm.

Mathews and Company are surpassing the Jesse Jerkson - Al Sharkton business, Poverty Pimps Inc.

  • Login to post comments

It was democrats who cut

Submitted by buddyc on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:16pm.

It was democrats who cut spending for the food programs to the teachers unions and to make one more installment on the 2010 election contributions. Did they care about the poor?

We are now spending our great grandchildren's money. We have gone through our money and our children's money. Who is going to speak for our starving grand children. The government will be broke.

Take a look at California to see how the democrats care about the poor. They are cutting programs right and left so that they can keep making public employee union payroll, benefit and retirement payments. Schools are closing, parks are closing. Welfare programs are being cut. Food and health programs cut. Do California liberals care about the poor?

Matthews is ignorant. The only people the democrats care about are the people who contribute the money to get them elected. They own the blacks and don't care about them (See elimination of vouchers in DC and refusal to fire incompetent teachers), they don't care about hispanics (see immigration reform) and they don't care about the young (see cut backs to education and failure to deal with the cause of education failure).

  • Login to post comments

Oh, STFU Matthews

Submitted by ConservaSerb on Thu, 04/21/2011 - 5:32pm.

Who gave the billions to foreign banks? Who gave billions to FRIENDS on Wall Street? Who has pissed away billions on GM and GE? How routinely gives out $100 million grants for "green jobs" to companies who have about 100 employees?



A wise & frugal government, which shall leave men free 2 regulate their own pursuits of industry & improvement, & shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. T. Jefferson
  • Login to post comments

Just who is poor?

Submitted by big.league.slider on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 12:12am.

"...30% of Tea Partiers support cutting Medicare"

 

And more than 50% of Tea Partiers are seniors on Medicare.  If Matthews had a clue, he'd understand that what these Tea Party seniors want is less spending, so that their grandchildren won't be saddled with massive debt.

 

The most effective approach the GOP can take in the 2012 elections would be to keep pointing out the fact that Obama and the Dems are racking up trillions in debt that America's youth will have to pay for.  The GOP needs to lay this debt issue out in terms that even any 18 year old can comprehend:  Your share of Obama's debt is XX hundreds of thousands of dollars.  You'll never be able to retire, buy a house, or even buy a car.  Your share of the federal debt will be so massive you'll never be able to pay it off.

30 percent of general Tea Partiers want to cut Medicare

  • Login to post comments

Mathews and the TEA Party

Submitted by NVRAT on Fri, 04/22/2011 - 11:16am.

Great Joy, if Obama made Tinkles wet one leg I`m glad to see that the TEA Party is making him Piss down both legs. Hopefully Comcast will see the light and fire the little twit.

NVRAT
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • Rand Paul: ‘I Want to Go From 5% of the African-American Vote to At Least 20-25%’
  • Chris Cuomo Claims He’s ‘Completely Divorced From Ideology’ While Talking Up ‘Advocacy Journalism’
  • CNN 'New Day' Review: Chris Cuomo 'Can Make a Lost-Kitten Story Sound Like a Mass Murder'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use