Snarky Jake Tapper: 'The Devil Made' Obama Agree to Deal With GOP
Good Morning America's Jake Tapper on Tuesday spun Barack Obama's reaction to a tax deal with Republicans this way: "The devil made him do it..." The devil, apparently, being GOP representatives.
Picking an easy target as an example, Tapper asserted that, as a result of tax rates staying the same, the "family of the average Wall Street banker [who] paid more than $300,000 last year, will keep more than $9300 of it."
Co-host Robin Roberts and news anchor Juju Chang both made sure to highlight Democratic unhappiness over the deal. In an 8am news brief, Chang noted that Joe Biden will be dispatched to lobby Democratic support. She worried, "Many are outraged that the President has agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for all Americans, including the wealthy."
Roberts pointed out that there was "a lot of criticism from Senate and House Democrats, feeling the President should have fought more." On November 30, GMA's George Stephanopoulos lobbied Republicans to "move the President's way" on "tax cuts for millionaires."
Yet, on Tuesday, Roberts was more cheery. Recounting Obama's plan for a payroll tax holiday, she trumpeted, "We break down the numbers, the numbers that will cut payroll taxes for every American worker."
A transcript of the December 7 segment can be found below:
7am tease
ROBIN ROBERTS: It's a deal. The President and Republican leaders hammer out an agreement to extend the Bush tax cuts. We break down the numbers, the numbers that will cut payroll taxes for every American worker.
7:04
ROBERTS: The President announced a deal with top Republicans on a extending the Bush tax cuts. And in a strange twist, Republicans may be more onboard with the President than Democrats are. Jake Tapper has the latest. Joins us, as always, from the White House. Good morning, Jake.
ABC GRAPHIC: Tax Cut Deal: What It Means for You
JAKE TAPPER: Good morning, Robin. That's exactly right. President Obama is under fire from congressional Democrats for agreeing to extend those Bush tax cuts for wealthier Americans. A part of the deal, a key part of the deal, even though President Obama has spent years campaigning against those very tax cuts. The devil made him do it, the President said.
BARACK OBAMA: Republicans will block a permanent tax cut for the middle class, unless they also get a permanent tax cut for the wealthiest Americans.
TAPPER: So, he backed down and cut a deal to extend the Bush tax cuts for everyone, for two more years.
OBAMA: I'm not willing to let working families across this country become collateral damage for political warfare here in Washington.
TAPPER: The President did get some concessions from Republicans. Extending unemployment insurance benefits for an additional 13 months for approximately nine million Americans. Without it, two million jobless workers would have lost their benefits over the holidays. Extending several tax credits for working families, including for college tuition and children. And a two percent payroll tax holiday for every American. So, what will this deal mean for you? The average U.S. household, with an income just below $50,000, keeps that Bush tax cut of $2,124. And gets almost $1,000 from the lower payroll tax. Plus a $1,000 credit per child. And a partially refundable charge of up to $2500 for college tuition.
OBAMA: I have no doubt that everyone will find something in this compromise that they don't like. In fact, there are things that I don't like.
TAPPER: The things that the President does not like includes continuing the Bush tax cuts for income over $250,000 a year. Meaning the family of the average Wall Street banker paid more than $300,000 last year, will keep more than $9300 of it. $1,306 more than Obama wanted them to keep.
ROBERTS: And, Jake, as you told us, a lot of criticism from Senate and House Democrats, feeling the President should have fought more. How is the White House responding?
TAPPER: Well, they make two points, Robin. First of all, as you heard in that piece, the President wasn't willing to gamble. Wasn't willing to throw middle class voters under the bus. Their taxes would have gone up as of January 1st, just to make a political point. That's one. And the second point is, they say President Obama wanted a fight on this issue for months before the midterms, he was talking about it. But Democrats in Congress wouldn't vote. Said one senior White House official, "Democrats wouldn't throw a punch. It was like having the Jets versus the Sharks. Except, there were no Jets." They're befuddled by the criticism because they say, where was the congressional Democrats when they wanted this fight?
ROBERTS: Hey, don't talk about the Jets this morning after what happened last night. Too soon for that. All right, Jake. Thanks so much.
— Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
What a wuss!
Submitted by ThisnThat on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 1:40pm.
obama can't stand up to anyone, apparantly...not the Wikileaks a$$hole, not the GOP, not the Olympic committee, nor the World Cup committee, and now not even the Devil. He can't bowl more than 39, and he even gets hit by elbows in basketball games. And we expect him to deal with Iran? What a joke.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Is it just me...
Submitted by ontheright on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 1:43pm.
...or are these jounalist posers economically ignorant, or just plain stupid?
Because the tax rates will remain the same this year; it only means that everyone who pays taxes (income taxes, that is) will pay the same tax rate they paid last year and keep the same amount of money they kept last year, when all things are considered equal.
This canard that the "rich" will somehow keep more, save more or will be paying less in income taxes is as ludicrous as calling these tax rate extensions "the Obama tax cuts". This shows these moronic journalists for what they are - incompetent fools and liars.
Those of us who pay attention see this for what it is - the extension of the Bush era tax rates - nothing more, nothing less. They damn sure aren't Obama tax cuts, by any stretch of the imagination.
Perhaps obama really does
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 1:56pm.
Perhaps obama really does have enough common sense for self preservation after all. The more obama hangs with the Republicans the more likely he will be re-elected in 2012. The Leftist dems are doomed anyway because the country has utterly rejected their methods and proposals for governing.
All that obama has to do is take some time off, play some golf and let the new congress come up with some new and more effective solutions to our economic problems and his popularity will rebound.
I'll do ya one better,
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 1:56pm.
I'll do ya one better, Jake............Obama's on the same team as the Devil!!!!
Had a thought
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 2:23pm.
I had a thought over lunch about this apparent agreement to the tax cut extension as they call it.
This might sound way up there, but these days, especially with the TSA crap, you never really know.
So what about this: We know that there's some question(more than others) about the legitimacy of the bogus potus as to his origins, IE not American at all. If that were to come out that he is indeed illegitimate, everything he's signed into law MUST be rendered null and void.
What if it comes out after he signs the so-called extension that he is indeed illegitimate, then the "tax cut extension" becomes null and void and will cause problems for this country. Hell, he's already got this country to its knees already, it's been over 2 years and even if anything and everything was rendered null and void, the damage has been done and will take a LONG time to recover. As a communist, damaging this country was his goal and he's got it.
I know it's a bit out there, but is it really?
-Jon
I' m wichya, Jonny!!!! I've
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 1:48am.
I' m wichya, Jonny!!!! I've got your back, to use the well worn phrase!!! I was thinking of the post above mine, about Boy Blunder just letting the conservatives and Republicans do some must-need damage control.........and staying 'above it'.....and then trying to ride it into the next election.
I think that we CAN'T forget what this guy REALLY IS!!! I don't care if the economy is hummin' and comin' in 2012.........it WON'T be because Boy Blunder wanted it to happen that way!!! Hell, he had to HATE what he did yesterday..........and I'm not so sure how 'good' the whole deal was anyway - look at the post below us!!! The guy is NOT 'pragmatic' or a 'centrist' or possessing any 'common sense' or anything like that..............a leapord does NOT change it's spots!!!!
So.............in my humble opinion........regardless of which direction our economy goes in - whether Boy Blunder gets in the way or stays on the sidelines - I am personally NOT going to forget the kind of guy he is , and I WANT HIM TO FAIL!!!!!
Hey libs..................any questions???? I 'm here!!!
WHY THE TAX DEAL SUX!
Submitted by reelman46 on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 2:21pm.
Highlights of the proposed bipartisan tax cutting agreement announced Monday by President Barack Obama. _ Extends all tax rates approved under President Bush for two more years for all taxpayers. Republicans wanted a permanent extension. Obama wanted to extend the current tax rates only to households earning less than $250,000. ***this 1-2 year stuff must stop...its never going to be long enough for a strong lasting recovery and the dems know that...so they can point to it as a failure by late 2011...an issue to run on of course...the economy is such that only a permanent lower rate can work...so this is problem #1*** _ Applies a 35 percent tax for two years on estates worth more than $5 million. The Obama administration had proposed a 45 percent rate with a $3.5 million threshold. ***the voters want less gov-meant and the death tax is odious, simply odious and nothing less than a permanent zero is really American or constitutional...its not the government's money*** _ Extends unemployment insurance for 13 months, providing benefits to two million long-term unemployed workers in December and seven million over the next year. ***this is hush money welfare that means more borrowed billions for a broke America...wrong on all levels*** _ Cuts payroll taxes by 2 percentage points for 2011 for a total of $120 billion. That means employees will pay 4.2 percent to Social Security instead of 6.2 percent. A worker who earns $40,000 a year would get $800 over the year; a worker who makes $70,000 would get $1,400. ***once again this 1-2 year baloney must stop, make this permanent, stop the teasing with about $75 a month which won't fill your truck gas tank by the summer thanks to blocking the drilling, will the $120 billion be made up from budget cuts or STIM leftovers?...NOT*** _ Extends increases in the Earned Income Tax Credit, the child credit and tuition credits adopted in the 2009 economic stimulus package that were set to expire. ***instead of this, permanently cut income taxes 5%...its past time to be bold or we will not recover in this decade...the U6 number is about 16%, that means 1/6 are jobless...which is intolerable*** _ Allows businesses to write off 100 percent of their capital investments for tax purposes during 2011. The current write-off is 50 percent. ***another short term for show only move by the demo-socialsts instead of 5 years needed to launch a recovery...same ole baloney half measures that history and economic law tells us work if given a lot more time, more up-and-down guaranteed failure*** The bottom line here is simply more rope-a-dope by the socialist Party that will not give America the robust long term jolts that history proves work. Now the heavy lifting, the FEDERAL 2011 cuts and freezes required to save a bankrupt America 13 trillion in the red thanks to 4 years of democrats spending our tax money lDoug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish<
It amazes me
Submitted by octavioj on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 4:31pm.
These people really think people's own money is the government's to decide whether they should keep it or not. The sentence: "Meaning the family of the average Wall Street banker paid more than $300,000 last year, will keep more than $9300 of it. $1,306 more than Obama wanted them to keep. " Who do we think we are to decide how much someone should keep of the fruits of their own labor? Are they overpaid? That is the Wall Street bank's problem, not mine, not the government's. It is their money and they should be able to keep as much of it as possible to do with it whatever they want. If they want to squander it all, their prerogative, just do not come back to daddy government asking for assistance.
shame
Submitted by GW on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 4:36pm.
Tapper is often listed on this site for being fair.
Get ready for Face Slap #2
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 5:50pm.
Reid and Pelosi haven't come onbaord just yet.
If Obama can't persuade Pelosi and Reid to get the compromise through the Congress before its break for the holidays, he's going to appear even more useless.
Foreign leaders are watching this play out very closely. It reveals much regarding how much control and how much backbone our President actually has.
What happened to Jake Tapper,
Submitted by 3strikes on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 7:08pm.
During the election campaign, you knew this guy was Liberal, but at least he was one of the more objective reporters. So, objective, that at one time he lost his seat on Obama's campaign plane.
Now, it seems like every time he opens his mouth, its the same old Liberal garbage.
3strikes---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 12:57am.
iveseenitall, I believe, is the regular poster whose tag line is "Never, ever, trust a liberal".
Words to live by.
MD