"1600 Pennsylvania Avenue" host David Shuster on Thursday intensified his obsession with former top Bush aide Karl Rove and made, for the fourth time, the political operative the subject of his "Hypocrisy Watch" segment. He also continued his habit of pointing out that Rove is now a paid contributor of Fox News. After noting that the ex-White House aide attacked Barack Obama in an op-ed for the "extremely conservative" Wall Street Journal, the MSNBC host attacked, "Karl, I appreciate that it may be difficult for you to wake up each day, given what you and your Bush administration colleagues did to this country." (Rove earned Shuster's ire for suggesting in the WSJ piece that Obama has been disingenuous in how he's argued for his economic policies. The MSNBC host mostly ignored the context of Rove's article.)
Shuster once was a serious, supposedly straight journalist who, from 2002 through 2008, reported for the "NBC Nightly News" and "Today," among other programs. However, since taking over hosting duties for "1600" in December, his tone has morphed into that of almost every other extremely liberal host on MSNBC. On March 6, he lashed out at Rove for criticizing the Obama administration over the Rush Limbaugh controversy. Placing Rove in the "Hypocrisy Watch," a segment supposedly designed to go after any hypocritical politician or public figure, Shuster derided, "Karl, you've spent your entire career putting politics ahead of everything else. When you now complain about the Obama White House playing politics with the GOP, your whining is hypocrisy and it's wrong."
Another obsession of Shuster is Fox News, which, considering the fact that he worked at the network from 1996 to 2002, is somewhat intriguing. During the March 26 "Hypocrisy Watch" segment, he began the segment by observing, "Karl Rove a.k.a. 'Bush's Brain' is paid to give commentary on Fox News." On March 9, he again pointed out, "Karl Rove is a paid commentator on Fox News." And in that same commentary, he highlighted, "I appreciate that Karl Rove, who helped sell the Iraq war, is now trying to rehabilitate his reputation by giving commentary on Fox News."
The timing of the latest "Hypocrisy Watch" is also interesting. The Democratic National Committee this week released a new web ad slamming Rove for calling the President "arrogant." The spot then attempts to imply that Rove himself his guilty of this and is being a hypocrite. Repeatedly calling Rove a hypocrite sounds very much like David Shuster and his style.
Shuster even took his Rove fixation to the social networking sight Twitter. As reported in a NewsBusters posting on March 18, he questioned Rove's manhood. Regarding a comment by Rove left on Shuster's Twitter page about why he won't come on the show, Shuster retorted, "Next time, try defending yourself 'like a man,' - mano y mano as I've repeatedly invited you to do."
The transcript of the March 26 "Hypocrisy Watch" segment follows:
DAVID SHUSTER: Former Bush 43 advisor Karl Rove is again criticizing President Obama's approach to the economic crisis. Furthermore, Rove is accusing the President of misleading people. And that takes us to tonight's "Hypocrisy Watch." First, the background. Karl Rove a.k.a. 'Bush's Brain' is paid to give commentary on Fox News. He also writes a regular column for the extremely conservative Wall Street Journal editorial page. In his latest column, Rove criticizes President Obama on several fronts and describes the president as, quote, "One who seems to think that repeating that repeating a false argument will make it true." Well, that's interesting because repeating a false argument was a key strategy in the Bush White House, especially in the runup to the Iraq war. Remember that little adventure? Before the war, Bush officials led by Karl Rove formed a team known as the White House Iraq Study Group. Their job was to craft a message that would sell the Iraq war to the American public. And one of the most effective talking points was the claim that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons.
DICK CHENEY: There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
GEORGE W. BUSH: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
CHENEY: We believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.
SHUSTER: All of those claims were false. No doubt about WMDs? Even Bush officials had doubts. Uranium from Africa? The administration knew that was false. Reconstituted nuclear weapons? There was no evidence. But the Bush-Cheney-Rove team repeated the claims over and over. Karl, I appreciate that it may be difficult for you to wake up each day, given what you and your Bush administration colleagues did to this country. Nonetheless, Karl, when you accuse President Obama of misleading the American public, that's hypocrisy. And it's wrong.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Schuster
March 27, 2009 - 11:53 ET by merlin61Another NBC loser.
MSNBC
March 27, 2009 - 11:56 ET by MemphiselephantHow the heck is MSNBC still in business. I used to hate CNN, but now its clear that MSNBC if the front running "jock-sniffers" for Liberalism. Their reporters don't do their homework, their only excuse is to blame everything on Bush and Co., and now they can't take the heat for the "golden child" taking some heat and not living up to his 'messianic' type promises. I admit Bush wasn't the best, but he isn't even in the same ballpark of the "Hypocrisy" thats presently in the WH now
schiester is describing
March 27, 2009 - 12:04 ET by TruthMongerschiester is describing himself not Rove
schiester has my pity
who's worst prez ever now?!!
another day, another Shyster attack piece - {yawn}
March 27, 2009 - 12:04 ET by SickofLibsIf Rove is 'Bush's Brain', Shyster is 'Olbermann's Dick.'
(If there is such a thing, which I seriously doubt)
Shuster-Sanchez
March 27, 2009 - 12:10 ET by TexndocHow many times does it need to be stated MSNBC stooge Shuster and CNN stooge Sanchez are practically salivating for viewers and are using their show and the internet to quite literally smear a Karl Rove or an Ann Coulter to their show? Especially funny is Rick Sanchez's "people afraid to be on my show" list on his web page - saw it once. Very amusing.
Sanchez needs to wake up to
March 27, 2009 - 13:26 ET by SeashellSanchez needs to wake up to the fact that he is a loser who no one takes seriously, and they just don't want to do his show.
People Afraid of Rick Sanchez
March 27, 2009 - 13:38 ET by Texndoc...according to Rick's latest CNN page:
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Joe the Plumber, Dick Cheney and Governor Sarah Palin.
Told you it was funny.
Boy, this idiot really really wants Rove to mention him
March 27, 2009 - 12:13 ET by JTPso his life will have some meaning and maybe show up in the ratings just a little.
"I need more cowbell!" SNL
Mr. Lispy is just mad
March 27, 2009 - 12:14 ET by ArminiusBecause the Fox News baseball team would not allow him to be its cheerleader.
If it wasn't
March 27, 2009 - 12:25 ET by sam12663for Newsbusters, would ANYONE be watching MSNBC?
President Obama is nothing more than a empty suit; a Hollywood style special effects smoke and mirrors show that has shown itself to be a total fraud.
WAKE UP AMERICA! SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION!
hmmm... excellent point,
March 27, 2009 - 12:56 ET by SickofLibshmmm... excellent point, Sam
whatever ratings they have need to broken down into the two main categories:
1) I'm a certified moonbat, and I only watch hate-filled, redundant shows with the same 'guests' constantly recirculated, hosted by totally unlikable personalities; or
2) I'm only monitoring it to see what crazed sh*t will be presented today.
I suspect the breakdown would be 20%/80%
Have you watched Shuster, Matthews, and Olberman?
March 27, 2009 - 12:27 ET by jdripperOr as the rest of the planet calls them. Larry, Moe and Curly?
Jack
"If at age 20 you are a conservative then you have no heart. If at age 30 you are a liberal then you have no brains." Sir Winston Churchill
Hypocrisy???
March 27, 2009 - 12:32 ET by capavHe can highlight Olbermann and that interview with Howard Dean Newsbusters highlighted. Dean obviously didn't read up on Olby's past. I laughed my head off when I saw that clip. C'mon David.... I dare you!
Shuster has made several
March 27, 2009 - 13:14 ET by nicksmith112Shuster has made several references to the "Howard Stern Show" on his show and while filling in for Olberloon.
Howard plays these shout-out clips during his show. Davey-boy is no doubt trying cull some new fans from the Stern audience.
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
David Shyster is
March 27, 2009 - 13:15 ET by Gat New YorkDavid Shyster is a Joker
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2008/01/24/amd_jackjoker.jpg
petit jean
March 27, 2009 - 13:36 ET by petitjeanpetitjean : I recall President Clinton and Al Gore stating that Saddam definitely had WMDs. Leftists have conveniently short memories. By the way, the discussion about British Intelligence focused on the yellow cake uranium that Iraq was seeking. I wish Mr. Shuster would explain how, if the information was false, did we find over 500 tons of yellow cake in Iraq and send it to Canada to be processed into reactor fuel.
I am also old enough to recall when newscasters on radio or TV simply read the news rather than editorializing on every story. There was less chit chat among talking heads and less eye candy and that is fine by me. I actually used a stopwatch once to determine how much of a one hour "newscast" was actual news and how much was commercials and commentary and personal chit chat. It may not be a representative sample and probably isn't but out of that hour only eight minutes and forty-one seconds were actual news.
I have watched Shuster and Olbermann and Matthews for an entire broadcast each and sampled others. They can't honestly be called journalists in my opinion. They more closely resemble Julius Streicher of the "Volkischer Beobachter" who worked with Dr. Goebbels. I find myself wondering about the identity of todays equivalent to Dr. Goebbels. Who is she or he?
We have already had repeated imitations of Leni Riefenstahl's "Triumph of the Will" courtesy of the ongoing politial campaign. It is true they weren't as artfull staged as Riefenstahl's propaganda masterpiece but the intent is the same.
Hey Shuster, Rachel already
March 27, 2009 - 13:55 ET by EugeniaHey Shuster, Rachel already has the role of Olbermann's little brother.
Shuster vies with Olbermann
March 27, 2009 - 15:12 ET by kit9Shuster vies with Olbermann for biggest Douchebag on tv. Yesterday, Shuster had some GOP spokesman on and he asked her a question and before she answered he said, sarcastically, 'go ahead, you can say no', and when she did he actually started clapping condescendingly. It was off the charts, even for a staggering dickhead like Shuster. 1600 is now completely unwatchable. Cannot believe this is a show once hosted by Gregory.
Bush/Rove did not push Nuclear weapons..
March 27, 2009 - 16:22 ET by Gary HallShuster can lie all he wants to:
However, for the record, the Bush administration did not push the claim that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons. The Bush administration, as had the Clinton administration before it, pushed the consensus (see - consensus is OK for politics - not for science) view that Saddam had, and was seeking to develop nuclear weapons, and would be a threat to the region, our allies and to the US should they obtain this ability.
On the other hand, on Nov. 7th, 2005, right smack there on MSNBC's Harball with Chris Matthews, Sen. Carl Levin (D) of Michigan, a member of the Intelligence Committee, was very concise and clear, on the subject:
Hypocrisy abounds; however, Shuster need look no further than at him self and his comrades.
Sen. Levin, for the record, had long been deeply concerned (long before Rove was there) about Saddam and the nuclear threat:
Sen. Levin 4 months before the Bush State of the Union speech:
Bam ! (;~> gary