Fox News political commentator Juan Williams appeared on a panel for Tuesday's "Good Morning America" to predict that a decrease of Republicans in the Senate could actually make the legislative body more contentious and that a "hard right" minority might be reined in by a defeated John McCain.
After mentioning the possible losses of Senators Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina, John Sununu of New Hampshire and Gordon Smith of Oregon, Williams asserted, "Those are moderate Republicans. And if they're gone, then, suddenly, you have a much more politicized and sort of, you know, antagonistic politics taking place in the Senate when people think, oh, this is an election where we have people coming to the middle." It's not clear who Williams is speaking of when he calls this an election about "coming to the middle." After all, Senator Barack Obama was the third most liberal senator in 2007. Secondly, John Sununu and Elizabeth Dole are not moderates. (The two have lifetime American Conservative Union Scores of 92 and 91, respectively.)
Williams later elaborated and predicted that John McCain, vanquished in the presidential race, could guard against radicals in the Senate. He claimed, "And I think John McCain, actually, you know, in that scenario that I described for you, where you have a hard right wing of the Republican Party, you know, in the Senate, he becomes a deal maker." According to Williams, McCain would do this because of his history of acting as a "icon of bipartisanship."
If Williams' scenario comes true, it will certainly be interesting to see if journalists who soured on McCain during his presidential run against Obama will reacquire their fondness for the Arizona senator.
Also on the panel, ABC reporter Cokie Roberts lauded the upside of an Obama victory: "But the other benefit is obviously a symbolic one that is a an important- an important symbol of an African-American being elected president in this country where race has been the sin staining America."
A partial transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:31am, follows:
CHRIS CUOMO: So, now, let's look at what this could mean. The perception of the potential upside and downside for each of these gentlemen if they win. When we look at Obama, what do you believe the perception is in terms of what the benefit could be and what the potential burden of a President Obama?
COKIE ROBERTS: The perception and the benefit obviously is change. I mean, that has been the mantra of this election. And that's what people seem to be quite ready for. But the other benefit is obviously a symbolic one that is a an important- an important symbol of an African-American being elected president in this country where race has been the sin staining America. And I think that that perception would certainly something that people would respond to.
CUOMO: And with McCain, what do we see there, Juan?
WILLIAMS: Well, I think it's all about leadership. And that's an issue or a theme that he tried to develop during the campaign. And it particularly applies to foreign policy. So, that you'd say in terms of that, you know, critical moment, 3:00 in the morning, who answers the phone. There's lots of people who would say, well, John McCain knows foreign policy. He's been around the block. He knows how Washington works. And in that sense, you have someone who would be a steady hand. And I think for lots of people, the downside would be, Chris, that John McCain can be a quick temper guy. And his ability to, maybe, fly off the handle, to get us int more conflict would be the downside of that administration.
CUOMO: And, Matt, what do you see?
DOWD: I think the interesting thing on either one of them getting elected, tomorrow morning they will be under immense pressure. Because I think the country will see them as the president because President Bush's job approval rating being so low. And the American public tuning him out. I actually think the first 100 days of the next administration, doesn't start on January 20th. It starts tomorrow morning. So, they're going to have to show immense movement on the economy. That's a pressure that no other candidate will have felt.
CUOMO: It's a unique time, obviously, because of the economy. It was interesting doing the research for this, the impact on the markets. What could this mean for the economy? Traditionally, the first year for all presidents, the Dow's been up 4.9 percent. For Democrats, actually up six percent. So, odd. But, these are unique times. And looking at it that way, coming out of the election, what could be the big surprise today, Cokie?
ROBERTS: The big surprise in terms of who-
CUOMO: Any way you want to look at it. Any surprise.
ROBERTS: Well, I think one surprise could be the Nebraska congressional district. We could have Nebraska casting a vote for a Democrat in this presidential race because they don't go winner-take-all.
CUOMO: Very interesting. Juan?
WILLIAMS: Well, I don't think it's a surprise. I think lots of people have said, you know what, the Democrats could gain control of the Senate. But what happens internally is going be a surprise. I think lots of the moderate Republicans are disappearing. People who are threatened today are people like John Sununu up in New Hampshire. You think of Gordon Smith out in Oregon. You think of people like Elizabeth Dole down in North Carolina. Those are moderate Republicans. And if they're gone, then, suddenly, you have a much more politicized and sort of, you know, antagonistic politics taking place in the Senate when people think, oh, this is an election where we have people coming to the middle.
CUOMO: Let me ask you a quick question to each of you to finish this. Start with you, Matt. If they lose, the two vice presidential candidates, what happens to each of them if they lose?
DOWD: Well, Joe Biden goes back to the Senate. Obviously, he's a pillar of the Senate. He's not going to ever run for president again. This is, sort of, his last time on the national stage in this way. So, he goes back to the Senate. And, you know, then discusses things with John McCain, as president. Sarah Palin, I think she's a big presence on the national stage because she's popular among part of the Republican base. I think she goes back to Alaska. She shows she can govern Alaska. And tries to expand her portfolio a little bit of substance. But she's going to be a player on the national stage.
CUOMO: If McCain loses, what does he do?
WILLIAMS: I think he goes back to the Senate. I don't think that he's going to retire. I don't think he's going to disappear into the Sedona, Arizona. Remember, Strom Thurmond was there to 100. And I think John McCain, actually, you know, in that scenario that I described for you, where you have a hard right wing of the Republican Party, you know, in the Senate, he becomes a deal maker. He's the guy that the Democrats have to go through. And he has a history of being that kind of, you know, icon of bipartisanship in the Senate.
CUOMO: And Obama, quickly?
ROBERTS: If Obama loses, he goes back to the Senate. But, he does not run for the presidency. This was his shot. And that's why he took it this year.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
You're all wet, Juan
November 4, 2008 - 16:36 ET by Scout FinchIf we are unable to drag McCain across the victory line today, he will become invisible in the Senate. This is his last chance today. I voted for him one hour ago.
All eyes will be on Sarah for 2012.
I agree that if we can't get McCain to the Oval Office
November 4, 2008 - 16:41 ET by katiejanehe will just return to the Senate and back to his "nice guy" habit of reaching across the aisle to the Dems who will like him once again if he goes back to sticking it to the Right.
The question though is will any on the Right pay him any attention once he does that?
" The question though is
November 4, 2008 - 16:57 ET by Chris Norman" The question though is will any on the Right pay him any attention once he does that?"
One just has to ask such preeminent and powerful Democratic party leaders like ex-candidates Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, and John Kerry
McNotObama '08
"It's not clear who
November 4, 2008 - 16:58 ET by Chris Norman"It's not clear who Williams is speaking of when he calls this an election about "coming to the middle." After all..."
Juan Williams is a liberal. To be a liberal means one can be liberal interpreting the facts so as to bolster your shaky point. Yeah, those nasty conservatives, standing in the way of the Obama People's Revolution, when everyone knows the Democrats acquiesed and cooperated with Republicans, when they were the ones out of power.
McNotObama '08
Yes Juan
November 4, 2008 - 16:58 ET by 10ksnookerThe right may even be as radical as the left has been for the last 7 years.
I'm sure no one in the
November 4, 2008 - 17:01 ET by Chris NormanI'm sure no one in the media will refer to an Obama victory as a "national temper tantrum". Only conservatives can be "angry, mean, and bitter".
McNotObama '08
Conservatives, who believe
November 4, 2008 - 17:14 ET by robert108Conservatives, who believe in the Constitution and the Founding Principles, aren't "radical". It's the RINOs who are the radicals.
This is more of the leftie redefinition game.
Since when is the Constitution "radical"? Is it "radical" to support individual independence and economic freedom?
Right on
November 4, 2008 - 21:29 ET by mbuelThe left has taken over the definition of radical. Believing in limited government and the free market is "radical"?
GARH!!
The reason McCain is losing is because he's trying to run like a slightly more right liberal. Obama succeeded (largely with the help of the media) in convincing America that he is mainstream.
The very THOUGHT that Obama is anywhere near "moderate" with his radical viewpoints is absolutely disgusting. The very thought that The Republicans thought they could win by running like Democrats and not following the principles of Reagan was ALSO idiotic. Reagan didn't win two elections by a large majority by running to the middle like a fricken pandering democrat. He ran with the truth, and spoke to the truth of individual freedoms and responsibility.
McCain losing will mean the failure of this idiotic wing of the republican party, but THEY WON'T GET IT. And the USA will get stuck with MORE Marxist policies that will NEVER be repealed and WILL NOT WORK.
If the New Deal was so great and successful, why do we need a "new new deal"? If the '48 housing project was so sucessful, why did we need the Great Society and then the CRA TWICE?
And NONE of these failing programs have ever been touched! When Obama and his fellow Marxist's institute MORE socialist policies on us, does anyone in here think that we'll EVER get back to where we are today? With pundits on Fox News declaring the free market is out of control and needs to be reigned in?
What we experienced was a failure in STATIST policy, not market policy. The answer to these voters is to interject MORE STATISM?
Why? Because Statism didn't fail, the PEOPLE IMPLEMENTING it did. With a better controller they can make it work.
And while they try to make Marxist philosophy work, they will break America.
IF AND WHEN BHO IS
November 4, 2008 - 17:22 ET by JIMMY1660IF AND WHEN BHO IS ELECTED:
"RACISM ENDS IN AMERICA "IS ABOVE THE FOLD ON THE WEDS NYT
"BLACK PANTHERS TO LEAD CIVILIAN FORCE"
WOW, DID YOU WISH FOR THAT. NOT I.GOOD LUCK AMERICA
allow me to Love America
Radical Ronald Reagan
November 4, 2008 - 18:33 ET by deerjerkydaveAnd as we all know, nobody was more radical than Ronald Reagan.
Sheesh.
This is precisely why conservatives and the Republican party cannot concede even an inch to the liberal socialists of this country. If you give them an inch, they will take a mile. And now we're to the point where Reagan-esque politics are labeled as "radical."
Hey Jaun:You should know
November 4, 2008 - 18:46 ET by stratmanHey Jaun:
Juan Williams: another guy
November 4, 2008 - 18:49 ET by NL207Juan Williams: another guy prematurely chicken counting. I wonder what else he is premature about?
Radical eh Juan?
November 4, 2008 - 20:56 ET by JPR1Where the hell should we start?
Guns, Religion or Greed?
According to all I read in the liberal press we conservatives are already over the top.
Give us some hints there will ya Juan. We need rejuvenation and "radical" seems to have broad appeal right now.
And those new Dem Senators
November 4, 2008 - 22:49 ET by bpjamAnd those new Dem Senators are 'moderates'???? Negro please (as the kids in the hood say).
Moderate Republicans get replaced by radical Democrats. If moderates were what the people in the state wanted, they wouldn't be trying to replace them with more radical, nastier, more partisan democrats.
It's nice of Cokehead Roberts to pretend that democrats being elected means the Senate will be moving to the 'center' when in fact they are moving further and further to the Left as evidenced by the freedom of Reid (another purported moderate) pushing enforced unionization, abortion on demand, etc.
"Moderate" is in the eye of the beholder - especially if your WANT the members on your side to be moderates to fit your view of appropriate behavior.
Fiction and moderates
November 4, 2008 - 23:09 ET by Sergeant ROCKModerates are a media created fiction like independents. By that I mean they're not that great in number. Kind of like the way they portray every other person is gay. Total fiction.
PALIN/McCain 2008
i totally agree
November 5, 2008 - 12:14 ET by mbuelThe reason Obama WON is because the Media helped portray him as a conservative! He has a family, goes to church, he's JUST LIKE YOU!
The media didn't reveal his radicalism, and anti-americanism, and McCAIN didn't TOUCH IT!
And just like I predicted last night:
http://michellemalki...
Some members of the GOP are viewing this as a sign that they need to veer the party FURTHER left!!!
Juan Williams - RACIST!
November 4, 2008 - 23:06 ET by Sergeant ROCKThere he goes... it's all about him being blcak. And here I thought it was suppose to be what you would be doing for the country?
PALIN/McCain 2008