On the face of it, this Hartford (Conn.) Courant editorial about Fred Thompson's long-awaited entry into the presidential race seems fair. Or is it?
Initially, the editorial tries to give Thompson the benefit of the doubt when it comes to some of the more popular charges against him:
He has some baggage, too. He carries a reputation, deserved or not, of being a bit lazy. (So did Ronald Reagan, and it didn't hurt him.) And back when Mr. Thompson was minority counsel on the Senate Watergate Committee investigating the Nixon White House, the paranoid occupant of the Oval Office was said to have considered Mr. Thompson none too bright. (Critics said the same thing about Mr. Reagan, but that didn't hurt him either, and besides, it wasn't true.)
When I first read this, I was surprised. I thought, "Hey, they're trying to give Thompson a chance." But look at it a second time: the paper says Reagan's "laziness" and perceived stupidity didn't hurt him. Does that mean that Thompson is lazy and seems stupid but it won't hurt him? If so, why? Because he's a television star? Or because Republicans don't know any better? Your guess is as good as mine.
The editorial goes on to say that Thompson "has as much substance as any of the other candidates (although not as much practical experience as some)." I may swoon! But the following gives a better view of how the paper probably feels about Thompson and the Republicans:
He's a standard-issue, Southern-fried conservative who wants, among other things, to abolish abortion rights, squash gay rights, lower taxes and continue the war in Iraq.
He seems a solid fit with the Republican base, and with his Reaganesque persona seems as good a bet for the party's nomination as anyone. The question is whether that agenda sells in a general election.
"Standard-issue, Southern-fried conservative" brings to mind rednecks and pickup trucks, doesn't it?
I realize that newspaper editorials are all about printing the opinion of the editorial staff on the top news stories of the day. But it's one thing to question a candidate's views and policies -- it's another to use negative stereotypes and innuendo regarding the candidate's willingness to work hard and his mental acuity.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
As opposed to...
September 7, 2007 - 12:26 ET by mattm...a standard - issue, Left-Coast 1960's Trotskyite commie-Lib Democrat?
Gimme some o'dat southern cookin' anyday!
The left are afraid....
September 7, 2007 - 12:29 ET by bigtimerThe left are afraid.... very very afraid...
The long knives are out now in full force and won't be put away until Thompson is inaugurated...
....then they will continue on as they have with Pres. Bush...
Poor babies...they really don't have a clue..they are to filled with hatred.
Fred's a moderate, people
September 7, 2007 - 14:08 ET by TruthMongerFred's a moderate, people - almost a RINO - I have a memory:)...
Protest Craig's conservative abandonment - vote Democrat in 08'
Fearmonger...
September 7, 2007 - 14:12 ET by c5thenFred is so far from being RINO as to make Arlen Specter look like a liberal
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
Thank you c5... I have a
September 7, 2007 - 14:15 ET by bigtimerThank you c5...
I have a memory too.
Suit thyself
September 7, 2007 - 14:23 ET by TruthMongerSuit thyself people:)
Protest Craig's conservative abandonment - vote Democrat in 08'
Thanks TM... You
September 7, 2007 - 14:26 ET by bigtimerThanks TM...
You too!
It is fun debating about our choices though.
It is to me anyway.
Have a good day...
:) bt! Protest Craig's
September 7, 2007 - 14:30 ET by TruthMonger:) bt!
Protest Craig's conservative abandonment - vote Democrat in 08'
Standard-issue, Southern-fried conservative
September 7, 2007 - 12:35 ET by ricklailThat's me summed up in a few words!
A bonafided and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.
Well no wonder...
September 7, 2007 - 12:41 ET by c5thenIf he's got that many similarities to Ronald Reagan, the best president in the last 40 years or so, it's no wonder they are so affraid of him.
Welcome to the party Fred, no go kick some A**!!!
Southern-fried style, ofcourse.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
"If he's got that many
September 7, 2007 - 13:35 ET by Chris Norman"If he's got that many similarities to Ronald Reagan,..."
They're probably poring through their "How We Bashed Reagan" manuals...
Libs
September 7, 2007 - 12:44 ET by Felicity RandI thought Libs didn't stereotype! Hmm.
Fred needs to take all this as a compliment. They're very worried re: his popularity.
Southern Fried to be Conservative?
September 7, 2007 - 13:08 ET by PSPCplWhat makes the article truly irritating is the implication that you have to be from the South, lazy, and dumb to be considered a true conservative and that no one from the North could or would fall into that catagory. I live in Pennsatucky and Mr. Thompson and I happen to share a great deal of the same beliefs. I will be watching and listening very closely to what he has to say. If nothing else, Mr. Thompson will force the other Republicans to put up or shut up about how conservatice they are,
One has to wonder how they
September 7, 2007 - 13:10 ET by ur-conOne has to wonder how they would characterize former Pres. Clinton's standard southern-fried liberal credentials. I guess not...
Squash gay rights?
September 7, 2007 - 13:15 ET by Hero SquadTranslation: Liberal speak regarding a conservative who believes that homosexuals should be treated as equals and without special treatment because of their sexual orientation.
Yes, my "I'm with Fred" bumper sticker is about ready to go from its temporary posting on my back windshield to a more permanent bumper location. (Actually, I was waiting to put the sticker on until I had my bumper repaired following a minor fender-bender, but since I had to shell out hundreds of $$$ to get my emissions up to #%!&* environmental code, those funds are now being diverted away from the bumper. I'll just strategically stick the sticker over the inflicted areas. I may need two.)
*****
"Why would the library ban a book like The Six Bunny-Wunnies Freak Out?" - Linus Van Pelt
Standard-issue,
September 7, 2007 - 13:47 ET by KimberlyStandard-issue, Southern-fried conservative? Way cool. Love southern cooking.
Seriously, go Fred. I haven't been this excited about a candidate in...well, never.
It has been said...
September 7, 2007 - 13:56 ET by HelenSIt's been said that during the 2nd World War, an American soldier could be spotted just by his walk. There was a lazy easiness to it.
I'd rather have a slow-talking, thoughtful, easy-going giant who will keep going in the right direction than some frenetic animated weather-vane.
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
Oh NO...Not the Dumber than Bush syndrome....
September 7, 2007 - 13:57 ET by JayTeeBush was dumb too, for 8 years he was so stupid....so hey, go with this for Fred too, it has proven not to work.
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
.....Nixon White House, the
September 7, 2007 - 14:17 ET by MidAmerica.....Nixon White House, the paranoid occupant of the Oval Office ...
Nixon wasn't paranoid. He really did have enemies everywhere. Look at the constant barage against President Bush.
...and let's see, who was it that blamed their troubles on a 'vast right wing conspiricy'?
Who's saying I'm paranoid?...I want their names...
September 7, 2007 - 14:37 ET by mattmHere's another perfect example of Libs accusing others of what they themselves are guilty!
The "Vast Right-Wing conspiracy" accusation, and the FBI Files at the Clinton Whore House are two examples that immediately leap to mind... Must be from all that "not inhaling" back in the 60's...
Actually, Nixon WAS paranoid
September 7, 2007 - 14:54 ET by RJYes, he had "enemies", but that didn't prove he wasn't paranoid. If anything, having enemies intensified his sense of paranoia.
para·noia (n)
September 7, 2007 - 15:17 ET by mattm1 : a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
2 : a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others
Has RMN ever been diagnosed by a qualified professional, or is this just an ad hominem insult?
If it's the latter, I'd have to say that The Clintons, Algore, John Kerry and tons of media elitists fit that description better than Nixon ever did.
Nixon officially diagnosed with paranoia? Who knows?
September 7, 2007 - 15:36 ET by RJBut his behavior fit the description of "excessive suspiciousness and distrustfulness," It's pretty clear that his paranoia drove him into the Watergate fiasco in order to find out what his "enemies" were planning.
As for the "delusions of grandeur", are you old enough to remember the ornate, imperial palace-style uniforms he commissioned for the White House Guards? (they didn't last long)
...
September 7, 2007 - 16:15 ET by mattmThen it's the latter...I'm not defending Nixon. I'm just pointing out that those who like to point him out as a paranoid manic ought to look in the mirror once in a while...
What does that mean mattm?
September 7, 2007 - 18:23 ET by RJ"It's the latter" isn't clear.
...and "look in the mirror?" What is that? I'm rubber, you're glue? Are we back in the schoolyard?
Well I still like 'ol
September 7, 2007 - 16:29 ET by MidAmericaWell I still like 'ol Tricky Dick. He was a strong President for that time. He loved to do battle with his opponents and that is what got him in trouble.
He didn't bite his lower lip and tear up on command because he was a man, an adult male. After he realized the political position he was in he resigned, took it like a man.
As far as his motives for having such 'regal' guard uniforms all I can say is we, the public, were wearing plaid polyester bell bottoms so I'm not going to criticize him for his fashion sense.
MidAmerica, you're arguing against a phantom beast
September 7, 2007 - 18:28 ET by RJ...of your own creation.
I haven't said Nixon wasn't a strong, effective President. He was.
I'm just pointing out something about his personality. Are you trying to tell me the man was a saint?
And comparing the public's dress habits with Nixon's over-the-top Palace Guard uniforms is not even close. Particularly when you add in the new spiked helmets on the band (discontinued by President Ford), and trumpets to announce the entrance of the President....overall, quite a royal presentation.
I made the point in response to mattm's post that mentioned "delusions of grandeur." I think it fits.....
Oh I know he wasn't a
September 7, 2007 - 20:52 ET by MidAmericaOh I know he wasn't a saint. Didn't care. LBJ and JFK weren't saints either so that wasn't a requirement. I supported him because I thought if the commies tried to do us ill he'd not blink and would pull the trigger.
and the polyester pants thing, that's just humor. I remember when his new uniforms were first worn. I don't think the guard even wanted to be seen in them. I believe they were all sold to Michael Jackson. (that's more humor)
" In fact, it's YOU who
September 7, 2007 - 14:33 ET by Sonny Lykos" In fact, it's YOU who should balance your news diet, with slanted reporting from the opposing side of the political spectrum."
He's right!
As long as the antelopes continue to just bleat and run, the lions will continue to kill and eat them. '06 proves that lying, manipulating and distorting the truth works, and very well.
Never, NEVER, trust the Democrats or MSM. Sleaze don't change. They just get worse, as they have also proven over the last couple of years.
And if it still gets worse, we'll need to start a revolution and start killing them - the enemy with in. Extreme enough?
When I behold Fred Thompson
September 7, 2007 - 14:54 ET by Lame CherryThe term southern never comes to mind when I think of Fred Thompson, of course everything in the east coast not around the Hamptons it southern to the elitists.
When I behold Fred though, I will be honest in saying using western compliments with no insults to his heritage..........but he is a tough SOB you know you can't bluff and the kind of guy in a bar fight who you know you will watch your back.
I know hundreds of these types from Idaho to Arizona to the north Florida hills up into the Pennsylvania backwoods and they are what hold those communities together. They show up when they are supposed to show up, don't stick their noses in your business and will flatten a loud mouth with one hand. They mean what they say and say what they mean.
The current occupant of the White House is of this Texas type and liberals never have figured him out, because he doesn't lie and does what he says.
Now I may if I was his wife, dress him in more handsome shades of blue lustre suits like Reagan, with those accented pressed white shirts and silk ties to frame him better........but even Thompson's suits look like the guys I see who wear them to Church and funerals.
I know W mixed it up with the locals, but Thompson is like Reagan in being a local. I certainly would never fear him nor more than I would be afraid of Ruger ranch rifle like a liberal would. I find him comforting like the Old Man was and still is in his guiding this wonderful shinging star on a hill American vision Graced by God.
But let the pompous elitists of the coasts keep referring to him as a redneck as I appreciate them turning the entire "south" from Ohio down to Florida over to Texas into GOP hands as all of those fly over people just so enjoy being called that by Democrats.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
The Hartford Courant is an openly far-left liberal rag.
September 7, 2007 - 15:17 ET by RJThat is seen most clearly in it's editorial board and in virtually all of its columnists. Even the TV reviewer, who "accidently" left Thompson's name off Leno's guest list, and the movie reviewers openly fly the far-left flag.
In today's edition, where this Thompson editorial appeared, there is a movie review of "No End in Sight." The movie is another hit-piece documentary that attacks President Bush and his administration. The Courant reviewer, Susan Dunne, has an obvious case of BDS. She spends as much time blasting Bush with her own opinion as she does reviewing the movie, which she gives FIVE stars.
Here's a typical line from Dunne's poison pen: "When people holding the reins of power have no capacity for despair, empathy or concern for their fellow man, there truly is no end in sight to the layers and layers of calamity they construct."
And: "...good people have moral standards that stop them from doing bad irreparable damage. Bad people don't."
The entire review consists of more of the same vicious ranting. And there, in a nutshell, you have the Hartford Courant.
Ditto For Their Reporters
September 7, 2007 - 16:23 ET by Del DolemonteTheir reporters are left wing as well.
Del, you must be in Courant territory, too
September 7, 2007 - 19:51 ET by RJYou're right about the Courant reporters. They slant the news to the left in virtually every story.
I think the Courant can, at times, be more liberal than the more famous leftist newspapers. I think it comes from being in a state that is often more liberal than those on the West Coast. For just one example, we beat San Francisco in giving out I.D. cards to illegals.
RJ... I know you weren't
September 7, 2007 - 20:02 ET by bigtimerRJ...
I know you weren't talking to me...
All I can say is wow!
SF?
That is bad, really really bad... I have kept up to an extent and know the east coast in the little states are really going big time ballistic with allowing the illegals in...but I didn't realize it was that bad.
Just wanted to throw in my two cents.
Hey, just 'cause you're
September 7, 2007 - 16:37 ET by dmacmurrayHey, just 'cause you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1
Never read something
September 7, 2007 - 17:13 ET by TENever read something calling itself the Hartford Courant, but I suspect that those kooks actually "think" that militant leftists like Hillary Rodham, Barack Hussein Obama and Girl Edwards are "moderates".
I wish/hope that Thompson
September 7, 2007 - 17:59 ET by mostlymoderateI wish/hope that Thompson IS a "Standard Issue, Southern fried-conservative." I would like to see the Republican party return to its roots as "right-wing" on ALL issues. No more of this uber-conservative crap that supports illegal immigration for the benefit of a few. No more "wish-washiness" on the gay marriage or the abortion issue. In other words, no more Schwarzenegger Republicans like in California. (yes, I live in California and most of you probably don't know what a twit Schwarzennegger has turned out to be. So forgive me if I am a little weary of anyone coming out of Hollywood).
MM... As an ardent Fred
September 7, 2007 - 18:29 ET by Clear thinkerMM...
As an ardent Fred supporter I can tell you that Fred is the conservative he claims to be.
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
mm and Ct... Here is
September 7, 2007 - 18:40 ET by bigtimermm and Ct...
Here is another great Thompson site...
Just scroll sown to the right and click...
You don't have to join...I haven't had time yet but am going to... a lot of info/links/video for anybody.
Ct it may be the same one you are at...don't know for sure.
bt... Yep, same
September 7, 2007 - 18:42 ET by Clear thinkerbt...
Yep, same site.
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
Meh, Arnie's still
September 7, 2007 - 19:24 ET by KhyrisMeh, Arnie's still infinitely superior to anyone else who ran... sure there were more conservative bids for the nomination, but be honest, they didn't have a prayer for the general election in THIS state. At least he's actually a FISCAL conservative, and kept the super scary Dems out if nothing else.
Khyris
September 7, 2007 - 19:44 ET bysuperior to McClintock?
(i'd agree superior to anybody who had more than a snowballs chance of winning)
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
botg... Bulls-Eye
September 7, 2007 - 19:49 ET by bigtimerbotg...
Bulls-Eye
unfortunately
September 7, 2007 - 20:04 ET byTom can't overcome
1) the LA Times and SF Chron lies
2)the enabling hand-outs votes that go to Big Sister
the two sink holes (LA and SF) suck the resources from the rest of the state
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
And yes, I did mean Arnie
September 8, 2007 - 17:39 ET by KhyrisAnd yes, I did mean Arnie was the best choice of those who had a snowball's chance
Actually, Sacramento is far worse than L.A....
At least in L.A. we have Orange Country to balance out Hollywood.
The media doesn't pay them any attention because they're not "famous," but they do get out and vote enough to keep the Hollywood set form being COMPLETELY dominant in SoCal.
has it gotten so bad Khyris
September 8, 2007 - 17:49 ET bythat a fiscal conservative like Tom has no chance?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.