Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'

Gregory Asks LaHood: 'Do You Really Think Americans Think Government Can't Tighten Up a Bit?'

By Noel Sheppard | February 24, 2013 | 15:12

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

As NewsBusters has been reporting this weekend, some media members have been surprisingly breaking ranks with President Obama concerning administration claims that the world will come to an end if budget sequestration goes ahead this coming Friday.

NBC's David Gregory also appears to be feeling the White House's position is overblown and asked Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on Sunday's Meet the Press, "Do you really think Americans think that government can't tighten up a bit?" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

DAVID GREGORY, HOST: Here’s the reality. This is two percent of your budget. A billion dollars is a lot of money to anybody, right, but relative to the federal budget, it's relatively small. Why instead of worrying about dire consequences aren't you and your managers coming up with the best way to make these cuts that protect essential services?

Good question. Here was LaHood's answer:

RAY LAHOOD, TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY: We are going to protect essential services and we're going to look at all of our contracts. We're going to look at all non-personnel items that we can. But in the end, the largest amount of money is in the personnel area, and our controllers represent 15,000 of the 47,000 people at FAA. And the point is that the sequester doesn't allow us to move money around. That's the difference here. If we could shift money around, certainly we would do that. These are very tough decisions. But they have to be made. But it can all be brought to a halt when the Congress comes back this week and Republicans and Democrats do what they’ve been able to do in the past, talk to one another, work with one another, compromise with the president who’s put a plan on the table.

GREGORY: But Republicans, your former colleagues, former Republican members of Congress, are saying, wait a minute, Mr. Secretary, this is a bit overblown. This is a transportation committee putting out a statement that reads in part the following, "We're disappointed by the administration creating alarm about sequestration's impact on aviation…Prematurely outlining the potential impacts before identifying other savings is not helpful. ..Today's exaggerations are not backed up by any real financial data. The agency is well positioned to absorb spending reductions without compromising the safety or efficiency of the national airspace system.”

They go on to point out that FAA has received significant funding increases in recent years. Over the last ten years the FAA’s annual budget has increased almost $3 billion or 41 percent. Do you really think Americans think that government can't tighten up a bit, even if it's a pretty clumsy way of doing it with the sequester?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Great questions.

Much as CNN's Candy Crowley did with LaHood earlier in the day, Gregory actually used real budget figures to point out just how absurd the administration's position is on this matter.

The question is why have media members waited until now to ask such questions?

How much different would the public's awareness of the truth regarding this matter be if folks like Gregory, Crowley, and the Washington Post's Bob Woodward had been pounding the table about this for months?

Why did they all wait until after the election and after Obama's second inauguration to start presenting some inconvenient truths to the American people?

On the other hand, Gregory did spend a good amount of time Sunday pushing for Republicans to give in to the President's demands for higher taxes. This despite taxes having just been raised at the beginning of the year.

As such, irrespective of this surprising clarity regarding the administration's fearmongering, Gregory still wants your taxes to go up.

What a shock, huh?

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Bailouts
  • Budget
  • Economy
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Media: Obama Down But Not Out
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use