Queen Latifah Makes Racist Remark on Late Show: 'Hammered or a White Girl, Whichever You Prefer'
Actress and singer Queen Latifah made a racially-insensitive remark on CBS's Late Show Tuesday that might raise a few eyebrows.
Talking about the pool at her house, she said there's a section for people to go "If you can’t swim, or if you’re hammer-wasted...Hammered or a white girl, whichever you prefer” (video follows with transcribed highlights and commentary):
Latifah and host David Letterman were discussing Fourth of July parties when she began talking about the great pool she has at her home.
“I literally took the pool from the Delano Hotel in Miami,” Latifah said. “It’s really like this small in the beginning. You can sit at a table and stuff.”
“My pool is like eight inches so babies can sit in there and stuff,” she continued. “And then it goes four feet. Got a basketball court in that section.”
“If you can’t swim, or if you’re hammer-wasted,” Latifah said, “go there.”
After laughing at this, Latifah added, “Hammered or a white girl, whichever you prefer.”
Latifah laughed again, gave too thumbs up to the crowd, and said, “Good times. Summer time.”
Was she suggesting that white girls are all "hammer-wasted," or that they're only allowed in that section of her pool?
Regardless, imagine for a moment a white entertainer saying he or she has a section in his or her pool if you’re “hammered or a black girl.”
I don’t imagine Letterman and his audience would have laughed, and the resulting outrage would have been huge.
Will this incident bring any negative attention on the woman starring in the new animated film "Ice Age: Continental Drift?"
Stay tuned.
To receive my articles hot off the presses follow me on Twitter ow.ly/btalc and Facebook ow.ly/btald.
— Noel Sheppard (@NoelSheppard) June 9, 2012
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Silly me...
Submitted by poseA on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:22am.
here I was thinking this wench was a decent human being.
No more "Ice Age" for my son :(
Ice Age is just too good
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:54am.
Try to ignore the voice of the female mammoth.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
It seems she was saying that
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:31am.
It seems she was saying that all the white women are hammered. But nonetheless, let's get outraged!
You don't find that outrageous, bal?
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 12:57pm.
How about if it seems that I say all black chicks are crack hos. Would that be outrageous?
That's hardly the same thing
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 1:04pm.
That's hardly the same thing that she was doing.
bal, even allowing for your liberal bent, your latest ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 6:36pm.
comment is horseshit.
MD
Hey Matthew*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 6:58pm.
Dont be so hard on Balboa. Take a look at the BS on the disqus level....lol
I concur, caj, as Disqus ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 7:28pm.
has opened up a whole new source for NBers to 'experience' the slings and arrows that lib trolls use in place of intelligent conversation.
That said, I zinged bal because I am sickened by the efforts of liberals in giving the melanin-enhanced (or the nasterisks, h/t newsbubba) a smarmy ideological pass when they exhibit THEIR racist toro-merde.
But even though, IMO, Disqus suqs overall compared to the way NBs was; it is a good venue for observing a far greater number of the crazies in one place.
MD
Care to explain how? Or is
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 7:39pm.
Care to explain how? Or is that too much to ask.
Here Balboa*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 7:51pm.
It is the same thing...racist. Reverse the remarks by Latifeh to a white person speaking and it would be deemed racist. See, matthew's point is that only whites are racists, never blacks, according to the double standards of liberals.
Making some vague reference
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 8:55pm.
Making some vague reference to white chicks as also being the hammered people at a party is hardly the same thing as saying all black women are "hoes." it's not the same thing at all.
Who are YOU to determine
Submitted by bretzysdude on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:37pm.
Who are YOU to determine THAT?
Explain 'how', to what end, balboa? That you would even ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 8:14pm.
have to ask for an explanation pretty much precludes any possibility of understanding on your part as to where I am coming from.
Your liberal existence on these threads, as I have pointed out before, is quite innocuous in that you never get nasty with anyone; but at the same time, if it weren't for recognizing that you are just being your typical lib self, it would seem your vapidness has to be a put on.
MD
How convenient.
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 8:57pm.
How convenient.
Unbelievable.
Then again, bal, being vapid might just be ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 9:20pm.
in your personal DNA, irrespective of whether or not you are a liberal.
Your choice of words in a three word reply is a good example of why that may be.
MD
I made my point. I actually
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 10:40pm.
I made my point. I actually explained my view. You can't even be bothered, reduced to attacking from your entrenched POV, head down. You know I talk with a lot of people on this site that don't share my views, which is completely OK, but at least they are part of the give and take.
In your dreams, bal,---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:19pm.
in your dreams.
You made no point, and I saw no "explanation" from you.
The majority of the posters on this site don't share your view --- so what, exactly is the 'point' you are trying to give birth to now?
Everyone who posts a comment or replies to one is part of the "give and take"; or are you suggesting that through some type of liberal mojo that you have made my posts invisible?
So I attack from an entrenched POV, eh?
Are you implying that as a lefty lib you maintain only the highest of righteous ideals and gentlest of methods in promoting them?
That is a laugher.
Or do you actually expect, when you post liberals bs phrased in simple-minded verbiage - whether declarative or interrogative - on a conservative site, to be praised rather than debated? That is even funnier. Who on these threads does NOT have an entrenched point of view? Leave it to a liberal to claim he is being 'attacked' after invading the oppositions turf.
Do you have a persecution complex, bal; or are you just a pantywaist?
MD
You were debating with me?
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 9:55am.
You were debating with me? Ohhhhh...huh.
"Invading"?
I don't claim any high ground. I obviously snark around. But when someone asks me a serious question that isn't a set-up, I try to respond honestly.
No, bal, I was not 'debating' you; ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 9:27pm.
as the following - "Or do you actually expect, when you post liberals bs phrased in simple-minded verbiage - whether declarative or interrogative - on a conservative site, to be praised rather than debated? " - was a question to you; not a declarative statement in furtherance of a back and forth, give and take type proposition wherein we engage in trading ideological jabs.
"Invading", reference liberals on a conservative site; h-mm, perhaps "infesting" would be more accurate.
Do you determine whether or not a 'serious' question is a "set-up" in the same way you divine what it was that Latifah meant with her words?
One's opinion is not exactly an infallible determinant factor in assessing what the intent or meaning behind another person's words actually is.
MD
And your eloquent posts, Blaboa,
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 9:32pm.
put you in the shallow end of the discussion pool. Your last one is a prime example, if you take away the header, you're back to being the one word wonder.
Replying to you, not her
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 9:58am.
You said "all", and I said "all". Where's the difference.
All the white women at the
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:09am.
All the white women at the party, not on the planet.
women at the party
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:27am.
it was a general statement about white women and what they could do at her party - not just the white women at her party.
I think there is a lot of positive about Queen Latifah and they way she has handled her career so I don't see getting upset about this one misstatement. However, if would only take one statement like this from a conservative of any color to have the media making queries like, "How much will this hurt her? or "What impact will such disparaging remarks have upon her fans?".
Not what you said, Bal
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:34am.
It seems she was saying that all the white women are hammered.
Don't see no "at the party" in there.
Not what she said either.
“Hammered or a white girl, whichever you prefer.”
Going off of context, she is saying all white girls on the planet.
However, by your parsing, you have answered my original question. Your selective outrage is evident for all to see. Thanks.
Yeah, didn't really think it
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:51am.
Yeah, didn't really think it was necessary. I thought that was implied. Since she was talking about her party, the context, then I interpreted it to mean at her party.
Focus here Bal
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 12:22pm.
She was talking about the party, before going off on a tangent about her pool. In that context, she was talking about white girls in general.
Hell, she made sure to go back and iterate that she was talking about white girls.
Not the way I heard it.
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 12:43pm.
Not the way I heard it.
Gosh, that's good to know.
Submitted by NC Cop on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:54pm.
Gosh, that's good to know.
You're welcome.
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 11:07pm.
You're welcome.
He didn't say thank you, and
Submitted by bretzysdude on Thu, 07/19/2012 - 8:06am.
He didn't say thank you, and you don't deserve even a hint of gratitude.
OK!
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/19/2012 - 12:00pm.
OK!
the white-lib double-standard is alive and well
Submitted by lotr on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 1:10pm.
<laughter> <applause>
Actually, it's not completely clear to me what "it seems she was saying" -- it's kind of ambiguous, especially with her follow-up comments "whichever your prefer..." and "good times"... which should indeed lead to "raised eyebrows" for the racially sensitive.
Even if balboa's interpretation is the right one (which I don't fully buy), the question remains: What kind of comment is that? That "all the white women are hammered"? Is she implying that "white women" are a bunch of drunks? What if it were the other way around? What if she referred to "Native Americans" instead this way?
It is a weird comment. But I
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 3:44pm.
It is a weird comment. But I don't think she intended any malice.
That may be. I'm not aware
Submitted by lotr on Fri, 07/13/2012 - 12:53pm.
That may be. I'm not aware of her being racist in the past, so certainly I can give her the benefit of the doubt. I think the point of this NB piece, however, is to call attention to the media double standard on "race sensitivity."
Just another example of who
Submitted by Bruzilla on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:33am.
Just another example of who the real racists are.
I would expect nothing greater from her.
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 11:56am.
After realizing that she wasted a chance to be racist, she went back and corrected herself.
It's cool to bash white people now just like it's cool to bash christians.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
I don't get what she means
Submitted by Tatfreak79 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 12:28pm.
Who cares anyway?
That's ok....
Submitted by James3 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 12:44pm.
I might let her serve me a drink and towel me off after a swim, but she's not allowed in the pool....;^)
What do you expect from
Submitted by ant on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 3:56pm.
What do you expect from people who can't have grown-up names?
Lets add this one also....
Submitted by CommieJuice on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 6:00pm.
The pool is right next to her mud hut or nappy hoz, whichever you prefer.
*Deuces up on both hands to the crowd*
"Fish don't fry in the kitchen, beans don't burn on the grill."
I wonder if a white woman,,
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 10:30pm.
..said about her pool that a black woman could swim in it if they knew how! Imagine the clamor that would have gone on about it, esp if she was a-gasp-Republican? Double standard much?
And a female mammoth is a perfect role for her, if you can believe the female part! Shes also quite a lesbo-not that theres anything wrong with it-but no one can ever mention that, because shes the QUEEN! Conceited much?
The Queen disappoints
Submitted by Charlie2Base on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:13pm.
So sad. I think the Queen is a talented, beautiful woman. Now she's gone and spoiled me dreams with all this white girl in the pool talk. And the dumb old white folks just pat her on the head and say that's ok, Queenie, you be black and therefore not responsible for your words or your actions. Man, if I was a black person, I'd be p-o'd at all this nonsense. It's like when Mom and Dad go away for a weekend and the kids are left to do whatever they damn well please. Naturally, they go on their worst behavior. Maybe if we had a mature adult leading the country, the kiddies might have a role model to look up to.
At worst, what do you suppose
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 10:44pm.
At worst, what do you suppose she was actually saying?