Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'
  • Tea Partiers Confront Comcast CEO: Why Would a Conservative Want Their Money to Pay Al Sharpton's Salary?
  • Bob Schieffer Spins Obama Scandals: White House Not Like Nixon's, Which Had Burglars and Bomb Plots

Howard Kurtz: Media Scrutiny of Romney Increased Because Press Now Think He Can Win

By Noel Sheppard | June 10, 2012 | 15:05

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

Howard Kurtz spoke an inconvenient truth on Sunday that should be extremely embarrassing to the entire Obama-loving media.

At the end of a lengthy segment about the coverage of the presidential campaign, the host of CNN's Reliable Sources said, "The reason that Romney is getting so much scrutiny right now is because the press belatedly, in my view, has finally come around to the view that he may win this election" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

HOWARD KURTZ: I would just make the closing point that I think the reason that Romney is getting so much scrutiny right now is because the press belatedly, in my view, has finally come around to the view that he may win this election.

I think, a month ago, the conventional wisdom was the president is going to skate in. And now, with the polls being tight, with Romney outraising him in the latest period and the economy having that bad jobs report, there is a sense that this is going to be a very close election and we could possibly be looking at a Romney administration. And that's the reason that the scrutiny I think has jumped up a notch.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

In some sense Kurtz is right, as there's no question that recent polls, Obama campaign missteps, and bad unemployment numbers are causing angst in the liberal media leading to more scrutiny of his opponent.

However, as NewsBusters has been reporting since last year, the press have been attacking all of the Republican presidential candidates since the GOP debates began.

That the scrutiny of Romney has suddenly increased is likely more a function of him being the presumptive nominee as well as all the other targets disappearing.

However, now that it has become clear that the former Massachusetts governor does indeed have a chance at winning in November, the attacks on him and his wife have become more numerous, more petty, and more personal.

Athough this can't possibly be a surprise to NewsBusters readers - we've been predicting for almost two years the eventual GOP nominee would face such scrutiny! - it is never the less appreciated Kurtz would accurately point his finger at his colleagues.

If only it would do some good beyond giving folks on the right a sense of vindication.

To receive my articles hot off the presses follow me on Twitter ow.ly/btalc and Facebook ow.ly/btald.

— Noel Sheppard (@NoelSheppard) June 9, 2012

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Barack Obama
  • Howard Kurtz
  • Mitt Romney
  • CNN
  • Reliable Sources
  • Video
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Ha Ha Ha!! Really!?!?!?!?

Submitted by Blonde on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 3:09pm.

That's funny, NS. Truly, hilariously funny.

Idiots.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Kurtz

Submitted by HudsonRiverGirl on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 7:19am.

Kurtz spent a lot of time in the pretzel position defending the private economy is fine statement by the empty suit.

  • Login to post comments

Being a credible candidate for POTUS is enough for scrutiny?

Submitted by CO2Maker on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 3:23pm.

Well, what about being president? 

Or for that matter, why does having a credible chance to win earn you press scrutiny in 2012 but it didn't back in 2008, when no one gave McCain a betting chance to win, even after he decided to soup up his chances with a Shelby turbocharged VP candidate?

  • Login to post comments

Because we all know the MSM

Submitted by Bluesman on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 4:02pm.

Because we all know the MSM and their beloved "Da One" may be gone come this November.

We also know the MSM did not fully Vet Da one in 2008 and probably this election year as well. Double standard CO2Maker

  • Login to post comments

Just because the MSM realizes that Obama can lose...

Submitted by KyWriter on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 3:48pm.

...doesn't mean it will not continue to shill for him to the very last moment.

  • Login to post comments

It's been a lot longer than that.

Submitted by CobraMan on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 4:06pm.

"However, as NewsBusters has been reporting since last year, the press have been attacking all of the Republican presidential candidates since the GOP debates began."

It's been a lot longer than that. I remember them doing this when Nixon ran in the 70's. They've been dong it ever since. Just look how they treated Sarah Palin in in 2008. "One heartbeat away," wasn't that the MSM mantra?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

That's funny!

Submitted by OxyCon on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 4:35pm.

That's the same reason why the media DIDN'T scrutinize Obama in 2008..."because they thought he could win" and they didn't want to blow it for him by revealing his sketchy past and radical associations.

  • Login to post comments

I suppose we should perhaps thank the media...

Submitted by The_Barrel_Guy on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 9:33pm.

If the libtard media had done their job properly in 2007 and 2008, we would likely be facing a nearly unbeatable incumbent President Hillary Clinton...

Whether we like it or not, there is a certain pragmatism to our governance... The Clintons understand it... 0bama does not... McCain was a lightweight, is a lightweight and will forever be a lightweight... He would have lost to either Clinton or 0bama...

Hillary would surely have done things we did not like and gotten laws passed that we thought were awful... But I doubt she would have even tried -- and then surely unsuccessfully -- to hijack the whole healthcare system in this country... She would have tried for liberal goals, but I doubt she would have tried for an obvious socialist agenda...

More than anything Hillary does not get either her supporters nor her detractors super energized... That would lead to a lazy election cycle which she would likely win absent a fiery Republican... Instead what now shapes up is likely to be really exciting... According to Rasmussen, 40% of the voters "Strongly" disapprove of 0bama... That is a great base to build on... We really do have a good chance of taking this thing...

So... In a backhanded sort of way... "Thank you" to the idiot media...

We must fight to win every battle for liberty... The enemy needs only win once!
  • Login to post comments

Here we are 3 1/2 years into the screw, and Howie and his...

Submitted by Dave. on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 4:49pm.

...Marxist State Media cohorts still haven't vetted a so-called president that is very rapidly driving this nation right over the cliff.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

The NYT has an explanation why Romney may win ...

Submitted by MelvinBonzarelli on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 7:21pm.

See today's (Sunday's) NY Times web site (I don't buy the paper, so I don't know if this story was also in the print edition) at: http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/09/how-racist-are-we-ask-...

The Times is already explaining away a possible Romney victory by 'proving' via Google searches that most Americans are rabid racists and would vote for Romney only because they don't want a black man in the White House.

The excuses are already flying.

Hopefully Romney and company will grow a pair in enough time before election day to take these clowns to the cleaners.

  • Login to post comments

Sublimely played!

Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 1:25am.

This is the first and biggest (bunch of bs) we are going to hear once the election rhetoric gets ramped up.

"Google Insights to Racism".....O.M.G! Check out this idiocy:

Add up the totals throughout the country, and racial animus cost Mr. Obama three to five percentage points of the popular vote. In other words, racial prejudice gave John McCain the equivalent of a home-state advantage nationally.

It gets worse from there.

I hope one of the big wigs here reads your link....because it is, as they say...

SIGNED, SEALED, DELIVERED evidence of media bias.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

1 Year

Submitted by Jerry Mack on Sun, 06/10/2012 - 10:39pm.

It has been almost or about a year since I last watched Reliable Sources. Too much lieing about cable news ratings and Obama smoozing. The last straw was when left wing hack David Shuster was introduced as a guest contributor. I turned it off and it will probably be a year or so before I watch it again. As for his comments on Romney scrunity, Kurtz wants people to believe that he is the person living under a rock in the insurance commercials. Or maybe he believes that we have.

  • Login to post comments

They have names

Submitted by gwalt on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 7:48am.

The "press" have names. Let's use their names and faces--- against them out in the public arena.

 "A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered".             Ronald Reagan                                                           

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
  • ABC Drama Warns of ‘Conservative Overlords’ Bringing Anti-Black ‘Salem Witch Trials’ to DC
  • Gay NBA Player’s Twin Brother Gets ‘I’m The Straight One’ T-shirt From Jimmy Kimmel
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use