Fareed Zakaria on War on Terror: 'We Look Like Scared, Fearful Losers'
While President Obama and his adoring media did a victory lap on the one year anniversary of Osama bin Laden's assassination, Fareed Zakaria had a completely different take about how the War on Terror is going.
On CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS Sunday, the host said, "We don't look like people who have won a war. We look like scared, fearful losers" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
FAREED ZAKARIA: Whatever you thought of President Obama's speech on Afghanistan this week, it is now increasingly clear that the United States is winding down its massive military commitments to the two wars of the last decade.
We are out of Iraq and we will soon be largely out of Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden is dead, and al Qaeda is a shadow of its former self. Threats remain but these are being handled using special forces and intelligence. So, finally, after a decade, we seem to be right-sizing the threat from terrorist groups.
Or are we?
While we will leave the battlefields of the greater Middle East, we are firmly committed to the war on terror at home. What do I mean by that? Well, look at the expansion of federal bureaucracies to tackle this war.
Since September 11, 2001, the U.S. government has created or reconfigured at least 263 organizations to tackle some aspect of the war on terror. Thirty-three new building complexes have been built for the intelligence bureaucracies alone, occupying 17 million square feet – the equivalent of 22 U.S. Capitols or three Pentagons. The largest bureaucracy after the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs is now the Department of Homeland Security, which has a workforce of 230,000 people.
The rise of this national security state has entailed a vast expansion in the government's powers that now touch every aspect of American life, even when seemingly unrelated to terrorism. Some 30,000 people, for example, are now employed exclusively to listen in on phone conversations and other communications within the United States.
In the past, the U.S. government has built up for wars, assumed emergency authority and sometimes abused that power, yet always demobilized after the war. But this is, of course, a war without end.
So we continue to stand in absurd airport lines. We continue to turn down the visa applications of hundreds of thousands of tourists, businessmen, artists and performers who simply want to visit America and spend money here, and become ambassadors of good will for this country. We continue to treat even those visitors who arrive with visas as hostile aliens - checking, searching and deporting people at will. We continue to place new procedures and rules to monitor everything that comes in and out of the country, making doing business in America less attractive and more burdensome than in most Western countries.
We don't look like people who have won a war. We look like scared, fearful losers.
Clearly, there's a lot to take issue with here.
First off, with regard to terrorism, what war have we "won"?
Has al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hamas, or Hezbollah signed an unconditional surrender laying down all of their weapons promising to never attack innocent civilians again?
I hadn't heard about that. Have you?
Osama bin Laden is dead. Hip, hip hooray. But the War on Terror is far from victorious.
If America at this point were to drop its guard and stop behaving like terrorists are trying to repeat another 9/11 type attack on us, it will surely happen.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, America foolishly thought international conflict was over and peace would be a permanent condition on this planet forever.
That was a mistake, and thousands of innocent civilians perished one gorgeous Tuesday ten Septembers ago leading to at least three wars.
The one in Iraq has wound down, and the Afghanistan incursion is as well although with what appears to be far less success.
But despite the death of Osama bin Laden, the global War on Terror continues.
The moment we errantly take a posture that it has ended will certainly cost more American lives.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Zakaria's conclusion lacks substance because he . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 11:52am.
. . . he contradicts himself. While he credits the US with killing bin Laden and defanging AQ, he suggests that the re-organization of government agencies and money expended on doing presents an image of "scared losers."
Zakaria appears to have a short attention span. He's grown impatient with our counterterrorism measures we've undertaken because he finds them inconvenient. But the worldly Zakaria, who tries to "educate" us weekly as to the ways of the rest of the planet, forgets or ignores the nature of the threat.
What's this "we" crap...
Submitted by CobraMan on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 12:11pm.
What's this "we" crap, Fareed? You got a mouse in your pocket? Do you think that America is the only country in the world that has a security system, that doesn't do things like deny a travel permit, that doesn't have airport security, that doesn't protect itself of attacks? Think again! The world is a dangerous place, and, because of this, it contains some VERY dangerous people. You my think that we don't need to protect ourselves from those dangerous people, but 2,000 people who died on 9/11 would say otherwise.
By the way, we're did you come up with this bogus claim that "30,000" people are listening into other people's cell-phone conversations? Are you just making this crap up as you go? It looks to me that you are. For, if that many people really were doing what you claim they are doing, there wouldn't be any terrorists left in the world, let alone America. Nor thieves, rapists, drug dealers, or just about any other criminal activity you can think of.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
There is nothing more
Submitted by DEEBEE on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 12:10pm.
There is nothing more unseemly than a journalist using "we" to refer to hinself /sarc
to himself and his president
Submitted by needle on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 6:16am.
to himself and his president
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Gee, who wants to called
Submitted by ant on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 12:34pm.
Gee, who wants to called 'scared and fearful'? Especially by those on the left that I have SO much respect for? We must disprove this right away by giving Iran nuclear weapons as we dismantle our own...only then can we prove ourselves victorious and 'fair'. Funny though, I always thought we were 'imperialistic, racist, arrogant oppressors'.
When the Soviet Imperialist Empire was falling . .
Submitted by Gary Hall on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 12:57pm.
Noel noted:
After the fall of the Soviet Union, America foolishly thought international conflict was over and peace would be a permanent condition on this planet forever.
At some point during the progress of Gorbechev's perestroika, I was reading a small little news brief in the paper which indicated that the "change," was almost a done deal - the USSR was opening up. I looked at my wife and noted that everything would be different in the world; excepting China, it would no longer be us against them. This was not gong to be cakewalk. It's certainly good, but every alliance will be tested.
Not that we want to go back.
(;~/ gary
obviously
Submitted by grammajane on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 1:35pm.
no respect for the American Military or actions/policies set by Pres. Bush to protect this great country. This guy is so uneducated about keeping people safe from terrorists and seems to forget about the killings done daily by by these radicals. Who cares about your personal opinion? "We" don't.
Fareed
Submitted by HudsonRiverGirl on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 1:43pm.
Sounding a lot like Holder ridiculing NYers for not wanting the KSM trial in NYC.
Yup, we're all cowards. It's not as if there are people out there who would behead us in a heartbeat. People who think nothing of planting bombs in subways or bridges. We're just making this stuff up because we're racist against islamic jihadists.
Do I really need a sarcasm tag?
What's a madda, Freek?
Submitted by Newsbubba on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 1:45pm.
Your buddies having a tough time trying to penetrate our defenses?
Get your boy, Obama, reelected and he can fix all of that, no sweat!
Fareed Zakaria needs to go
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 5:14pm.
Fareed Zakaria needs to go back to where he came from. He might be a terrorist himself. We need friends not enemies.