Martin Bashir Cheers Obama's Fundraising, Bashes GOP PAC Money
MSNBC's Martin Bashir on Thursday perfectly demonstrated the liberal media's hypocrisy concerning campaign finances.
After beginning his program gushing and fawning over all the money Barack Obama raised in the fourth quarter, Bashir proceeded to carp and whine about the funds GOP PACs are spending, even calling for campaign finance reform to curb it (video follows with transcript and commentary):
After the teaser, the show began with Bashir saying, "And we begin with President Obama fired up, ready to go, honing his reelection message, and with a formidable warchest to fight the Republican machine. New figures just out today showing that the President raked in $68 million in the last three months of the year."
With the graphic on the right proudly displayed, Bashir continued, "42 million for his campaign, 24 million for the DNC, and another cool mill for the Swing State Victory Fund that targets battleground states."
"The President's closest rival in the money race," said Bashir, "millionaire Mitt Romney raised just 24 million in the fourth quarter. Sorry, Mitt, but the President raised about a tenth of that just last night. Indeed, President Obama hit up Chicago for a little hometown love last night reminding his supporters of what the country faces from his Republican challengers."
As you can see, Bashir thinks Obama raising millions of dollars for his reelection and that of Democrats is just fine. He even chided Romney for not raising as much.
This was a consistent theme in Thursday's program, as he addressed this later in the show saying after a break, "The President is back in Washington today after a whirlwind trip to his hometown of Chicago swinging through three fundraisers and coming back $2 million the richer as his reelection fight draws near."
He elaborated minutes later to his guest, "Now the President raked in about 2 million last night with a fiery speech in Chicago...Is this him now really, fully engaging in the campaign?"
So fundraising is "fully engaging in the campaign" and is therefore a good thing - for Obama.
But that clearly wasn't the sentiment pertaining to Republican donors.
"Isn't the GOP as a whole really making an argument for campaign finance reform because of all that what's happened with Citizens United and the vast amounts of money that's being spent in this GOP primary season?" Bashir asked guest Ana Marie Cox in a later segment.
This was followed by Bashir saying to another guest minutes later, "Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Jon Huntsman each have a billionaire indirectly backing them. Hasn't the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling ushered this period of what we might call wealthy puppet masters?"
Speaking of puppet masters, Bashir chose not to inform his viewers about precisely how Obama quickly raised $2 million in Chicago this week. The Chicago Tribune did:
The president preached patience again at a $35,800 per couple dinner at the North Side home of campaign bundler, prominent Democratic donor and media mogul Fred Eychaner, the head of Newsweb Corp. [...]
A later reception scheduled for the Hyde Park home of Stuart Taylor, who heads the investment firm The Taylor Group, cost $7,500 per ticket.
Should people willing to spend $35,800 for dinner with the President or $7,500 to meet him be considered "wealthy puppet masters?"
Apparently not if that President is a Democrat.
And this is going to be the theme with the liberal media for the next ten months: Democrat fundraising is fine, but Republican fundraising is immoral, unethical and must be stopped.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
can Solyndra still give
Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 12:19pm.
The bankrupt company has petitioned to pay out bonuses to some of its remaining employees. I wonder to which party they donate - rhetorical.
So the champions of liberal
Submitted by Benson on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 12:22pm.
So the champions of liberal media are Matthews, Bashir, Schultz and Maddow? I have no idea how any democrats can remain democrats when they are presented with these clowns as beacons of their truth. So sad.
MSNBC is of by and for
Submitted by Smartypants on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 12:40pm.
MSNBC is of by and for liberals.
a nasty little man
Submitted by ohio granny on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 12:48pm.
Bashir is a nasty little man on a nasty little network. Who really cares what he has to say on a network no one cares too watch.
Main stream media
Submitted by Curly on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 12:56pm.
The U.S. main stream media is worse than PRAVDA or TASS! Bought and paid for by the Democrat party, George Soros and every sick, twisted, libtard out there.
How can anyone with half a
Submitted by ant on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 1:05pm.
How can anyone with half a brain not pick up on their own hypocrisy like this? How is it possible? It's not Fair!! Anyone running against our Democrat overlords shouldn't have more that ten dollars and a half a pack of smokes. !! Not fair!!
Fun with headlines!
Submitted by Roger the Shrubber on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 2:11pm.
Apparently the headline of "Obama Raises $68 million" did not achieve the proper respect and awe yesterday, so the USA Today had to up the ante: "Obama, DNC amass $240 million campaign war chest"
Sounds MUCH more impressive, does it not?
Meanwhile, the GOP was much less impressive: "GOP raises $27 million in 4th quarter"
Yawn.
What? That total does not include ANY money raised by the presidential candidates? Oh. At least it mentions that the RNC out raised the DNC in 4Q2011.
The article does mention that total does not include the millions raised by those eveeeel Republican-only super PACs.
You never hear about the Democrat super PACs, do you? You know, ones like American Bridge 21st Century, founded by Media Matters' favorite son, David Brock, and loaded with former John Edwards campaign staff. But shhhhh! Super PACs are all eveeeel Republicans!
Bashir has the audacity to speak about the GOP...
Submitted by Conservator on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 2:35pm.
...and his delusional theory that Republicans are making an argument for the need of campaign finance reform is remarkably ignorant, especially after fawning over Obama's ability to raise cash. I would remind the mean spirited wimp the first time a presidential candidate turned down federal matching funds in the general election was Barack Obama in 2008.
BTW, while Bashir was proving he's just another leftist in the media who's a toady and sycophant for Obama, he failed to mention that his messiah is raising far less money compared to 2008.