Chris Matthews: Newt Gingrich's Popularity Due to Time on Fox News
Chris Matthews has a theory as to why Newt Gingrich is suddenly soaring in the Republican presidential polls.
As he discussed with his panelists on the syndicated program bearing his name this weekend, it's all because of the former House Speaker's time as a contributor to Fox News (video follows with transcript and commentary):
CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Welcome back. Earlier this week my MSNBC colleague Joe Scarborough had a fascinating view of why Newt Gingrich is a hit with Republican voters.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
JOE SCARBOROUGH: He's been on Fox News, as Mark said, for such a long time, and Fox News drives primary voters, Republican primary voters, because they all watch it.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MATTHEWS: Simply put. As a matter of fact, this week's New York Times/CBS poll has 37 percent of likely Iowa caucus-goers saying they get most of their news from Fox. What they've seen is, well, hundreds of hits like this.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich says President Obama is making the biggest power grab in American history.
NEWT GINGRICH: But what you're seeing is a rush to try to radically change America before the American people have a say in it.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MATTHEWS: Well there you have it, Kelly. Coming off as a bit of an oracle, a thoughtful man. He doesn't have to fight with anybody in particular, just speak his intellectual firepower there.
KELLY O’DONNELL, NBC NEWS: And he's had this great forum for a long time where he can work out some of these ideas. There's a comfortability with those voters who are not necessarily thinking of all of those data points in his career that didn't go so well. They've had a chance to, in a much more intimate way, spend time with him. When Romney has not been in that same forum. Just recently the other day he said, “You'll see me more on Fox News” because that's important to Republican primary voters.
MATTHEWS: Okay, hard-working guys and women come home in Iowa and places like that after they go to work, they don't watch entertainment shows, "American Idol," they watch the hard-nosed, right-wing stuff. Newt’s on as one of their advisors. That’s pretty intimate.
GLORIA BORGER, CNN: Right, and Newt didn't disappear. Let me recall one other person from history that was sort of interesting in his relationship with television and that's Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan, a salesman for General Electric, who then took his story on the road politically. They already knew him from television. They liked him. He had been in their living room. Forget the movie stuff. He had been in their living room and then could take his politics on the road.
MATTHEWS: And then became a commentator and columnist all those years after he lost in ’76.
BORGER: Exactly.
Readers first have to giggle about Matthews getting this idea from the supposedly conservative MSNBC host Joe Scarborough. When liberal MSNBC commentators are starting to cite you, it doesn't help your right-wing bona fides.
That said, isn't it interesting that neither Matthews nor his guests realized the obvious flaw in this theory: Gingrich hasn't been a Fox News contributor since May when the network dropped him and Rick Santorum due to their respective candidacies.
The frontrunners since that point have been Mitt Romney, Donald Trump, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, and until quite recently, Herman Cain.
Until just a few weeks ago, Gingrich was in single digits in most polls. If his popularity were due to his contributions to Fox News, wouldn't the polls have reflected it months ago?
Oddly, nobody on the panel noticed this obvious glitch.
As hard as it might be for liberal journalists to understand this, Gingrich's rise in popularity the past four weeks has been a function of all the anything but Romney candidates falling by the wayside for a variety of reasons.
But more importantly, he has been performing extremely well in debate after debate, a point that the Media Research Center's Brent Bozell and I made back in August.
Might the many appearances on Fox News have helped Gingrich's surge?
Sure, but it's likely minor by comparison to the steady-handed competence and command of the subject matter he's been exhibiting in these debates.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Well, Chrissie, that just
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 2:22pm.
Well, Chrissie, that just proves that, despite your best efforts, Fox News has more influence than you and MSNBC!
Ouch!
Submitted by Blonde on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 2:23pm.
mb scores the "meow" of the day. :)
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Reality
Submitted by m1xram on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 5:57pm.
It is so refreshing to have Chris finally admit reality. Now even he knows that people don't watch his network much.
The opposite of Left is Freedom.
Chris Matthews makes as much sense as Rosie O'Donnell
Submitted by Blonde on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 2:23pm.
Zero.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
all of you guys
Submitted by jimtrees on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 2:46pm.
Everyone at msnbc should pool their money, and help out the blueberry faced Al pay some taxes. Oh, i forgot, them things don't apply to you guys. Or maybe you can borrow some from Bill O'Reilly, who makes more than all of you combined. Dead-beat Al should be his new name.
Speaking of the blueberry-faced Sharpton...
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 3:20pm.
and since there's no OT today, I'll put this here:
SNL Finally Roasts Sharpton
Let me get this straight......
Submitted by GregE on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 3:16pm.
This was actually said by one of the biggest defenders of all things Obama in the lamestream media, which actually GOT obama elected?
Alrighty then.
BTW, It's about time for "Meet the Press" to change its name...
Submitted by krendler on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 3:27pm.
...to "Let's Bash and Snipe at Newt Gingrich for 60 Minutes"
Nothing but - start to finish - this morning.
NBC and the rest of the lib media dweebs are terrified of the guy.
Love it.
Avoid the gorilla in the room
Submitted by upcountrywater on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 3:39pm.
Talk radio.
You Didn't Build That.
Bravo Noel!!!
Submitted by Conservator on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 4:22pm.
When you penned, "Readers first have to giggle about Matthews getting this idea from the supposedly conservative MSNBC host Joe Scarborough," you nailed it.
I would add that I'm amazed that Crissy would suggest that Fox News is so powerful for conservatives that it drowns-out the voices of leftist media at ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, the Washington Post, etcetera. As a conservative, I read and watch the lefty loons in all of these news outlets no matter how painful. It's important to know what your opponents' views are before debating any political issue. BTW, Joey and Crissy left-out that Fox News does quite well among Democrats based on the ratings among viewers.
REpublican voters are responding positively to Newt Gingrich
Submitted by Paarl on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 6:46pm.
simply because he is speaking to the issues with great clarity and command and is directing his fire towards Obama. Love him or hate him...in Newt we finally have a politician who has command of the issues bases in facts and reality....there is no maudlin Clintonesque language or the sound bites of Reagan on campaign...this guys knows the issues right down to the granularity.....
He has faults..he talks too much...he is a walking hand grenade (witness the maybe true but unnecessary statement about the Palestinians)...
He can take the battle of ideas to Obama in a very direct and understandable fashion....hate to say it but he is Churchillian in the way he is able to frame the issues. (I hate to say it because Newt will say it about himself)
Santorum and Bachmann are much the same but Newt is newt and the kleig lights wont melt him...he is Dennis the Menace right down to the smirky smile but he's our Dennis the Menace...
Paarl of Rhodesia
PS..I have read Reagans books and reagan's writings...he was a very deep thinker and really quite brilliant but in the day to day of his campaign he did not or could not discuss the issues with the deeply ingrained command that Newt does....
PSS Newt would shine in the British House of Commons during 'questions' sessions
Walking hand grenade
Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 12/12/2011 - 12:12pm.
That's a rather unfortunate statement but not in the way you might think.
Ever hear of Ross Perot? He was described the same way and look what happened to him.
-Jon
So What?
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 10:55pm.
Fox has MORE VIEWERS. Why waste your time going on M.S.S.R. (MSLSD) when their 7 viewers hate Newt anyways?
There you [MSNBC] go again.
Submitted by needle on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 11:33pm.
From my fairly extensive monitoring of FOX I would say there are more people on FOX leaning (by the issues they bring up and the way they handle them) towards Romney than towards Newt.
That statement – lacking statistical facts to back it up – may not be a first class example of objectivity, but it runs circles around Chris Matthew’s objectivity, which is a first class oxymoron.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Matthews Is Right Let Us All Thank Fox.
Submitted by Avitar on Mon, 12/12/2011 - 3:58am.
Before Gingrich was Speaker he couldn't buy time on the networks and nobody published his actual words. The MSM disapproved of giving the American People an even break and made sure that only the leaks like CSPAN were the only place Gingrich could be heard.
When he became Speaker no matter how well he did they published the lies about him and he was given no chance of responding. It is my understanding that more negative adswere bought against Speaker Gingrich than during the Goldwater slaughter of 1964, that the total ran just short of a 100,000 commercials.
With the growth of Fox News and the Alternative media everyone now knows that the Speaker was acquitted of all of the false ethic charges Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the unethical ethics Committee entertained. Now they can no longer silence their target when they are smearing him.
They cannot silence people pointing out that Newt's period as Speaker was the best period since 1928.
Baloney...Gingrich was all over the networks before he was
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 12/12/2011 - 4:04am.
Speaker. I saw him and heard him numerous times, and his actual words were a matter of public record.
Jer