Rush Limbaugh: Media Are 'Hoping Some Sort of Kent State-type Massacre Is Gonna Take Place' at OWS
By Noel Sheppard | October 28, 2011 | 11:45
Taking a page from Donny Deutsch, Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday said the media are "hoping some sort of Kent State-type massacre is gonna take place" at an Occupy protest rally.
The conservative talk show host also used a video created by the Media Research Center to illustrate his point about how crazy some of these demonstrators are (video follows with transcript and commentary):
RUSH LIMBAUGH: Now, a couple days ago, might have even been yesterday, our buddies at the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell, they sent a guy down to Ground Zero, the Occupy Wall Street. By the way, folks, let me ask you something. I don't know about you. I'm getting Occupy Wall Street fatigue. I've had it since Day One. That's not a problem for the media. They're hanging on the every action that the Occupy Wall Street people are taking, and I'm convinced that the media is hanging on here hoping and praying that we get the equivalent of a car wreck. They're hoping some sort of Kent State-type massacre is gonna take place. They are hoping that there's going to be some kind of civil disobedience. They are hoping that general unrest is gonna take place, the riot is gonna start, the cops are gonna go in there to try to quell the riot. I think that's what they're hoping for. This is the chaos that everybody is looking for.
Have you seen the photos? Have you seen the photos of these parks after the occupation protests have been forced, to de-occupy 'em so people can go in there and clean 'em up? Where's all the recycling? Where is all the saving the environment? Where's all the organic stuff? Where's whatever these people claim is necessary to save the planet? I can't tell if these are pictures from Occupy Wall Street or from that earthquake in Turkey. These people are pigs! They're leaving their places an absolute mess -- and there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of recycling going on, unless you count recycling bunch of hippie nonsense from the sixties in terms of attitude and behavior. I thought these are the people that love Gaia. I thought these are the people that love Mother Earth. I thought these are the people that didn't like any pollution, didn't like any trash, didn't like any garbage. Look at the mess they're making wherever they are, and you didn't see these kind of messes following Tea Party rallies.
Anyway, the people at Media Research Center sent one of their reporters down there yesterday (Dan Joseph is his name) and he went around and asked them a simple question: "Who do you think is more dangerous to American society, Rush Limbaugh or Al-Qaeda?" And here's what he got.
(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)
DAN JOSEPH, MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: Who do you think is more dangerous to American society, Rush Limbaugh or Al-Qaeda?
WOMAN: Both.
JOSEPH: Both, equally?
WOMAN: (giggling)
MAN: Both.
JOSEPH: Both equally?
MAN: Yes.
JOSEPH: Wow. Rush Limbaugh or Al-Qaeda?
MAN: What's the difference?
MAN 2: Rush Limbaugh.
JOSEPH: Okay. Al-Qaeda or Rush Limbaugh?
WOMAN: Probably Rush Limbaugh.
JOSEPH: Why Rush Limbaugh?
WOMAN: Because he has a greater effect. He's on TV every day speaking to us. Al-Qaeda's not.
(END AUDIO CLIP)
LIMBAUGH: This... (laughing) I don't know. (laughing) (interruption) You mean about being on TV every day? I am on TV every day! I am on TV practically every day. There are snippets. (interruption) No, no. She didn't specify that. There are snippets from the Dittocam taken every day, and they are played all over cable news networks. I am on television every day. I'm not being paid for it (and of course not doing any extra work for it, either), but I am on television every day. I'm probably the most recognizable radio person ever, 'cause I am on television every day. So these people... You know, I went back and forth about whether to even play this or not because it's silly, "Rush Limbaugh or Al-Qaeda?" But I wanted you to hear this one woman: "Limbaugh is worse," and there's another bite here, one more, I think.
(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)
WOMAN: That's a hard question.
MAN: It's tricky.
WOMAN: Very.
JOSEPH: Think about it.
MAN: They both inspire hated, so, ahhh, Al-Qaeda's sliding its way out; Rush Limbaugh seems to be going up in popularity.
MAN 2: He's an instigata.
JOSEPH: He's an instigator?
WOMAN: Yeah.
JOSEPH: Okay.
MAN 3: We see things such as Fox News and CNN but we're not seeing what's going on in the world and in fact we're the terrorists going to other countries such as Iraq and Iran and overthrowing their governments to institute a -- a -- a -- a democracy, so to speak, and something that can obviously be not be worked with, at least at the level that they're at. So, ultimately, Americans are the terrorists.
(END AUDIO CLIP)
LIMBAUGH: Right out of the thought process of Jeremiah Wright: "So, ultimately, the Americans are the terrorists." I decided to go ahead and air this once again just to illustrate in their own words who these people are, how utterly dumb they are, how purely stupid they are. And they're products of their education. They've been taught this. They believe it.
Readers are reminded that on October 14, Donny Deutsch said on MSNBC's Morning Joe the OWS movement needs a Kent State moment "to articulate this clash."
Did that happen in Oakland this week or is the worst still to come?
Assuming the latter, rather than act to quell what appears to be inevitable, America's media are fanning the flames of discontent by continuing to provide the public with one-sided reports about income inequality as they blame all that ails the nation on Wall Street and the most successful members of our society.
If and when a real clash happens between these protesters and police that God forbid results in casualties, the press will be equally to blame for their shameful behavior regarding this movement.
(H/T Daily Rushbo via Fox Nation)
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
That photo is a fake.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 11:51am.
Here is the real one.
Actually ...
Submitted by Fredy on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 1:49pm.
That photo was STAGED many years ago! That is NOT of someone shot at Kent State. It is a protester, after the fact, laying on the ground faking an injury! The shooting at Kent State was at night. No one left a body lying there for days.
Todays claim, made by the protesters and the media, regarding the STAGED OWS injury are equally absurd. Go look at the video. What is clear is that the fellow with the black backpack and mask walked to the group holding something. He then squatted down and showed it to the group. The group then started moving away BEFORE it went off! The backpack person then left EMPTY handed.
the protesters have always been a minority
Submitted by MidAmerica on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:02pm.
Back during the Kent State affair the majority sentiment went with the National Guard. People were very tired of the riots and student takeovers of colleges by hooligans. In 1972 Richard Nixon won in a landslide against George McGovern, a man who represented the views of the protesters and had their support.
That's what I intended to point out, MidAmerica...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:03pm.
If OWS "needs it" [a Kent State moment] as Deutsch claims, or the media "wants it" as Rush asserts, it certainly isn't for the purpose of enhancing Obama's re-election prospects.
Both McGovern's trouncing by Nixon a year and a half after Kent State, and Humphrey's loss to Nixon in the aftermath of the Chicago rioting in 1968 are testaments to the absolute asininity of any suggestion that protests resulting in violence would somehow inure to the benefit of Democrats.
Jer
Jer, maybe it's the old saw about history?
Submitted by UpNorth on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:20pm.
Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it?
They can't help themselves, the dems have hitched their wagon to the occuturds, they're stuck with them.
Yes, but no one ever said the
Submitted by BD on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:25am.
Yes, but no one ever said the left either knew history, nor could analyze the facts and situation.
THose on the left of my generation have this weird fuzzy glow concerning the lefts actions of 1968-70.
No matter how much the facts say the protest movement of that period was populated by vapid, childlike morons, the left somehow grants superior status to them and their actions.
Blowing up and burning buildings? Welll.........
Harassing returning soldiers? Well.........
Rampant drug use? Well......
Really, BD...Well, I'm saying the left in general knows as much
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:51pm.
history and are just as capable of analyzing historical events as are those on the right.
Being part of the first wave of Baby Boomers, it was my experience and it is still my view that the right--moreso than the left--tended to mindlessly accept and toe the government line during the years which witnessed the metastasis of the anti-war movement. [Granted, there were numerous exceptions on both sides.] Whatever nostalgia the left may feel for those times, I assure you the overwhelming majority--who abhorred the acts of destruction--rejected the nihilistic and counterproductive violence at the time and have no fond remembrances of it now.
Even a single incident of harassing soldiers is inexcusable, and I don't doubt there were episodes of it, but I believe it was not quite as pervasive as has been portrayed. I was in uniform [Army Reserves] frequently during that era, and I was never once taunted or treated disrespectfully.
Re the drug use: Agreed that it was pretty rampant, but the usage didn't appear to me to have a political correlation.
Jer
So did the Left abhore the
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 1:59am.
So did the Left abhore the acts of Jane Fonda running supplies to the North Vietnamese? Supplies intended to help those who were killing US soldiers? I don't seem to remember any boughts of condemnation by the left against her actions or those of her colleagues. It seems to me nostalgia is the act of deliberately forgetting the wrongful actions or the less than ideal and just remembering the anti-government protest agenda that so typified those times.
I can remember the anger of some of my teachers in the 70s that were very bitter over the destruction of property by the "peace loving beatniks" protesting the war. It ceases to be irony when you are on the receiving end of the hypocrisy. As a young person I didn't have much sympathy for the anti-war protesters. And it's not like I wasn't personally touched by death in Vietnam, I knew a kid I played with who lost his dad in the conflict, I remember his mother being consoled by the adults at the time. We knew who did this thing, the Communists (whom the left still adores by excusing their monsterous butchery of millions in the Ukraine and in China). My conservatism comes from the experience of my own family fleeing the Communists at the end of WWII. As long as the left/progressives continue to condone and defend the monsterous behavior of the Communists there can be no compromise or acceptance of the liberal agenda because it ends in Bill Ayers vision of mass murder.
dscott...A definition of terms is in order...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 2:03pm.
particularly with regard to the "Left" and of whom and by what you believe it is comprised. There will always be some diehard factions who insist on the innocence of Sacco and Vanzetti, the Rosenbergs, Hiss, etc. and deny or justify the atrocities of Stalin and Mao, and excuse the anti-war violence of the 60's/70's. But "some" is not "all", nor the "majority", nor necessarily a "significant number".
You'll need to paint with more measured strokes before we can find common ground.
Jer
Jer, common ground
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 2:18pm.
My assumption, right or wrong, is that when conservative web sites use the general terms of 'left', Progressives or whatever is the defining term of the day - it is in reference to the people holding the bull horn in representation of that group. In this case, it is the media who continue to turn a blind eye to the effects of socialist regimes and forgive the trespasses of their 'heroes'. Do they represent all or even a majority of the left? I doubt it; but, because they are the ones with the bullhorn and they own most of the ink - they will be forever linked as the people who speak for the left and are thereby representative of all the left.
I agree in part, Agnostic...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 4:51pm.
but let me pull just one sentence out of dscott's post:
We knew who did this thing, the Communists (whom the left still adores by excusing their monsterous butchery of millions in the Ukraine and in China). [my emphasis]
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/10/28/rush-limbaugh-medi...
I don't believe even the Mother Jones and The Nation bullhorns of the far[ther] left are adoring apologists for Stalin (and certainly not his butchery), much less the more mainstream liberal media.
Jer
Bullhorns for the far left
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 9:36am.
Perhaps not, can't say that I've read enough out of either publication to say with any authority they are apologist but what I can say is that in general exposure to the articles via the occasional visits to websites and running across articles on-line that neither publication that issues such as you highlighted are not on their radar. Which in itself is fine because it is not incumbent on the left to constantly to constantly defend the actions of their most damaging policies. However, Timothy McVeigh, the Inquisition and Fascism are still routinely used against the right while you almost never here what happened in Viet Nam after the Congress forced pull out of troops - I know it wasn't even in my history books when I went back to college just a decade ago. Neither publication has covered the annual protest at the NYT for accepting a Pulitzer for their coverage of Stalin.
I know it isn't fair to say that their willingness to ignore almost meaningless stories in the context of time (these are more current events style publications) but some of the articles seem to lack perspective, especially when going after Conservatives, and much of that lack of perspective is due to the fact that they use hyperbole to attack and ignore the history of the opponents of Conservatism.
Most recently The Nation used a Catholic Church publication to attack Ryan and Fiscal Conservatives because of the social concern the Church has for 'free-markets'. Once again it a legitimate question to pose and the members of Congress professing to be Catholics should be questioned as to how this effects their monetary goals. However, their is no context for the type of centralized control and no context for the difference in how monetary funds are used in a centralized religion and how that would or would not relate to a centralized world market. It is in fact a hit piece using a source that I find it difficult to believe that many of the staff at The Nation truly respect to use against a fiscal Conservative.
We have many examples in history of what will happen under the reign of a socialistic centralized government. There is no examples from history of a responsible fiscally conservative government (of any size) - perhaps that is why all forms of government have eventually failed.
Point the finger
Submitted by Dave81 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:05pm.
The media is basically pumping flamable gas into a room with a growing flame, and then everything goes boom they're going to blame the guys that built the house for not making it strong enough, blame the fire fighters for not putting the flame out in time, blame the owners of the house for letting the fire get started in the first place...basically blame everyone except those that started the fire and themselves for proving the fuel.
It's not just the media
Submitted by kata on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:17pm.
If you've ever tuned into the GlobalRevolution livestream you can see that their off-air videos are replays of clashes with the police (some of them years old and replete with anti-police propaganda) or other videos that "agitate".
The media has a wish list.
Submitted by NeoKong on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:18pm.
They pray for it every night.
They want it so bad that when they can't find it they just make it up just so they can rail against it.
They want a Tea Party terrorist. They are weary of having to reach back twenty years to Timothy McVeigh who was at best ambiguously a right-winger.
Every time they hear of a terror plot being busted they hope to themselves "Please please please let this be an Iraq war vet who voted belongs to a militia"
They want a prominent Republican or Conservative caught shouting out the n-word on camera.
They tried to push that story that Tea Partiers called John Lewis the n-word but sadly once again...no video.
They want a bonified, documented incident of gay bashing. Preferably by Christian activists. They desperately try to label Republicans as gay bashers but once again....no proof.
They want a prominent right-winger caught up in a tax cheating scheme but the only ones getting caught lately are Democrats. They can't use it.
Also they would love...absolutely love a genuine decorated war hero who supports left-wing politics and is against the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Bonus points if he is gay.
Good morning Neo
Submitted by cocodrie on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:31pm.
They almost had it in the People's Republic of California some time back. A homosexual almost sprained his wrist when he pushed a nun to the ground.
I'm surprised she wasn't charged with a hate crime because her rosary was visible.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
do not put the Police in harms way-
Submitted by JIMMY1660 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:25pm.
use the new orange flexible fence-put up a perimeter-keep the OWS inside the fence-and let them do what ever-video the event. and lets show it once the 2012 elections get into full swing.
These OWS folks-S H I T where they eat and sleep-they will eat each other.
I would surely hate to be one
Submitted by ThePickle on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:26pm.
I would surely hate to be one of the police responders to any kind of OWS riot as regardless of how by the book you conduct yourself you are going to vilified, mostly likely by not only the media but by a sizable chunk of the political hacks and commentators out there.
I would also hate to be a member of the OWS crowd that has been bamboozled into fighting for the rights of Union thugs to higher pay for less work, for the Welfare sect that want bigger checks for doing nothing, for the hippie free love crowd looking for a reenactment of Woodstock and especially for the Communist/Marxist crowd that would crush them under the heels of their Nazi sympathizing anti-semetic jack boots for daring to engage this type of protest if they were in charge.
All in all the only winners will be the media who have pumped this up with false and misleading reporting and has set up a clash between the lawful and the lawless and have characterized it as the 1% of the evil authoritarians and greedy bankers against the 99% that despite their criminal behavior, public defecation and rock throwing tendencies are still being reported to be "peaceful protesters". And when the shiite hits the fan the media will be there to get it all down on film, splash it all over their news shows and pray for higher ratings for broadcasting their own personal "snuff films".
just worried
Submitted by cy_babe on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 12:44pm.
Everything I see, everyting I hear... I just worry BO will be re-elected
(btw: luv the 'real' photo from sicoflibs)
The Fleabaggers don't keep
Submitted by Minarchian on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 1:29pm.
The Fleabaggers don't keep the place clean because they have been trained that someone else will do it for them.
Bingo!
Submitted by MacWell on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 2:57am.
Give that man a cigar.
You've hit the nail on the head.
The more I see and read about the state of America, the more I worry that it's going to take at least 3 or 4 election cycles to repair the damage the Marxists have done to her.
We the people will NEVER win the battle until we refurbish our educational system. In the 60's, mainly 66-68, I was marching in Golden Gate Park with the rest of the young people. We were marching and protesting because frankly? we didn't know any better. We were young and spoiled because most of our parents went through the great depression and wanted to spare us the hard lives many of them had to live. My father, (God rest his soul), had the best of intentions, his life was hard as a child. Being the oldest of 5 siblings, it was HIS responsibility to provide coal to heat the house and cook, he was 8 or 9 years old at the time. He had to grow up, quickly. I wasn't required to develop self discipline as he was. Then, still at a young age, he went to war and probably saw things that made his hair turn grey. The thing that changed my life was when I first saw that tiny little head poking out, yelling at me and her mother for removing her from her warm life inside mom. There was a tiny little human with my dna that would be totally dependent on me for some time to come. That's a wake up call not too many people can ignore.
Now I see the same mindset of the people at ows. They are spoiled, they've been sold a bill of goods by the universities that stole their parents money.
Want a degree in diaper changing?
No problem.
How about angry women's studies?
Sure.
You name it, we'll give you a degree.
Of course the professors who allow such nonsense never tell the kids that these degrees are as worthless as a fart in the wind, they'll never get paid for them. That is unless they get a phd and become phony professors themselves, bilking more parents of their hard earned money.
We the people have a long hard road ahead of us. It took 50 years for the liberals to destroy America, and it's going to take some time to fix it.
I'm afraid America won't last another 50 years unless we the people start to clean house in 2012.
We MUST rid America of career politicians. These congress critters who've built the frankenstien's monster we call congress will not go away easily, they MUST be thrown out, er voted out.
just sayin
As I said before obama wants
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 2:30pm.
As I said before obama wants a riot so he can declare martial and then profess to be some sort of hero/savior/messiah /tough guy in order to boost his campaign. He can't afford to waste this crisis.
I don't agree with Rush on
Submitted by TerryWest on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 3:00pm.
I don't agree with Rush on some issues, statements and opinions but his opinion that the media and Obama admin wants / needs to see violence, tension and drama I do.
His reasoning that the media are trying to munipulate American's into resonating and sympathizing with the protesters is evident, that Americans are not and the so called movement is not as large nor effective as its being projected is also evident.
You can always tell when they are failing to fullfill an agenda, they stop reporting on issues and begin shuffling the victim deck of cards.
The liberal media wants to munipulate the end game sense one cannot be found.
How can you listen
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:07am.
to Rush and say that the media is trying to manipulate America into supporting OWS? Isn't Rush a part of the media? How about Fox? The most listened to and watched media spend all their coverage of OWS insulting and doing everything they can think of to manipulate Americans into opposing the movement.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Hey plugged nickel - you've
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:14am.
Hey plugged nickel - you've actually swerved into an accurate statement again, for at least the third time this week, so I have to give you credit for that. Rush IS a 'part of the media', and so is Fox News. However, they are a small percentage of news outlets, regardless of their views on anything, and they purport to give their listeners (as Paul Harvey used to say) 'the rest ofthe story....................or more of the story, or a different take of the story, or whatever other phrase you want to come up with. And i'm not so sure that Fox even does that a lot of the time.........they have their own libs and Democrats on there. I do listen to Rush when I can, but I don't watch too much of Fox, so I can't speak for their own reporting, or lack of it, of the Our Welfare State bowel movements. And I think that the alphabet channels probably have a larger audience during their evening newscasts than anywhere else - although that is just a guess on my part.
I look at a variety of news, and I'd have to say that most of the MSM is hyping and pumping and pushing the OWS scam, and giving it as much positive, or slanted, coverage as they possibly can..............without reporting who is behind it, or who endorses it (unless it is some politician that they want to give coverage to), or the negative aspects that are taking place at these 'rallies'. Now, compare that to ANY MSM coverage of ANY TEA Party gathering - NONE of which had any activity CLOSE to what is going on at these OWS bowel movements. If you were some dope who just landed here from Uranus (well, maybe you are), and you watched a comparison of these two 'movements' on any MSM outlet - you'd come away thinking that the TEA Party people were the criminals, troublemakers, tresspassers, racists, Nazis, terrorists, and whatever else they were called............and that the OWS crowd were the 'good guys'.
Rent a mobs are expensive
Submitted by lrgon on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 3:33pm.
so we need to watch that Soros doesn't try to use them as a deduction.
In many ways the mobs at the various Occupy protest events have the approval of the US congress.
*Both political parties vote to fund Planned Parenthood who has a presense at OWS events
*Both Parties in congress have bent over backwards to give unions everything they demanded over the years with some exceptions in 1947 when Republican Senator Robert Taft, and a mostly conservative and constitutionally atuned congress passed Right To Work (Taft/ Hartley Act) over Truman's veto. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft_Hartley_Act
The OWS is a creation of the government in Washington. The problems stem from bogus polices that hurt the economy from funding every conceivable unconstitutional program from housing to creating a huge bureaucracy that stifles productivity.
From the GOP we get mealy-mouthed remarks and more false solutions like a balanced budget amendment and more militarism overseas; from the Dems we get the usual support for more of the same anti- free market programs and inflationary big spending policies that plagues the nation and pushes us toward the Keynesian abyss.
Are you ok lrgon?
Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 10/30/2011 - 12:38pm.
We heard you got into a big fight yesterday. Please respond hurry let us know.
Socialists
Submitted by JustAl on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 5:26pm.
have always set great store in using martyrs to advance the cause, something prominent socialists who become impotent in advancing the cause should keep in mind.
Anyone can be thrown under the bus. And there's always someone willing to do the throwing:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/10/hillary-lea...
Hussein best be careful if he doesn't want to end up a speed bump and campaign prop.
This manufactured outrage is
Submitted by dscott on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 5:26pm.
This manufactured outrage is Pelosi's astroturf.
Great historical perspective on OWS and the TP
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 12:10am.
FBI head J. Edgar Hoover was wary of the increasing influence of banks, stating in 1955: “Banks are an almost irresistible attraction for that element of our society which seeks unearned money.”
http://www.salon.com/topic/occupy_wall_street/
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
coin of the realm LIES again.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 12:33am.
There is nothing in his linked article about Hoover, the banks, 1955, or the quotation.
His linked article is about Iran.
Go away little boy. You are annoying the adults.
Ahhhhhhhhh Vet..........you
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 3:50am.
Ahhhhhhhhh Vet..........you shouldn't be too hard on 'out of this realm', you know?? He's probably sitting down there in one of these OWS (Our Welfare State) bowel movements............reeking of pot smoke and dried urine..........using his 'anti-corporation' computer and cellphone..........eating free food from some damn capitalist...........maybe trying to keep his girlfriend ( if he's not gay) from having her feet smelled, or being raped, by some other classy OWS demonstrators........and using his credit card or his debit card (from those EVIL capitalist Wall Street types) to pay his bills or get some money to buy pot or coke or ice.......
and sometimes he sneaks away to go back to his upper-middle class house,so that he can take a shower and watch his co-horts on TV and get away from the stench and the filth and the thievery and the drugs and the thugs and the absolute phoniness of the whole scam.
But, having said that..........he STILL hasn't written a damn thing here that is beyond rookie ball - as compared to the big leagues. But this guy is too delusional and ignorant and self-absorbed (kinda like his man-crush, Boy Barry) to even KNOW that he's a lightweight of epic proportions.
Scroll down the page, the title is:
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 4:59am.
Fighting greedy bankers, an American tradition
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
No troll.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:03am.
You don't give orders around here. You got a valid quote. Bring it here and link back. We don't follow troll links, just to click on another link, and then another, and then another, until finally we get to the page where scooby finds the scooby snacks.
How many times do you have to be told to stop acting like a little boy and act like you have been around adults at one time in your life?
Here, sir.
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:09am.
http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/28/fighting_greedy_bankers_an_american...
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Gotta suck huh?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:12am.
Don't care about you or your link. Must suck the suck suck being the sucktroll that you are.
Next time you want to write a check, make a deposit, borrow...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 2:51am.
money for some purpose, just remember that you hate banks and you should find yourself another place to go in order to make those transactions.
I love banks
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:00am.
I hate corruption and unbridled greed without accountability.
Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, strongly opposed the legality of what became known as the First Bank of the United States, which was majority (and later wholly) owned by private investors. Among his many statements against the bank, Jefferson warned: “[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution.”
This bank is now called the Fed.
In what became know as the Bank War, Jackson vetoed renewing the charter in 1832, stating that “some of the powers and privileges possessed by the existing bank are unauthorized by the Constitution, subversive of the rights of the States, and dangerous to the liberties of the people.”
Our founding fathers have a lot in common with the OWS crowd it seems.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
No one cares troll.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:09am.
Take a long walk off a short pier. You want respect here, act like an adult and stop with the constant lies, antithetical bull, and childish rants.
What lies?
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:17am.
What rants? It seems to me that you rant against my arguments, which may be incorrect, but they are not at odds with the facts.
Should I dish out insults and sound bites that have nothing to do with the issue to gain respect?
How's this: you sound like an old, bitter curmudgeon who just can't face the facts that he is a failure and so he attacks and blames others in a desperate attempt to to feel better about himself and avoid truth. Truth that will further destroy his already failed life by taking away his last vestige of dignity--his understanding of the world.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Aw look boys and girls.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:25am.
Another troll that has magical mystical ESP powers. It knows exactly how old, how bitter, how failing, how blamey, how desperate, how feely I am. WowZee Zipper Dee Doo.
Shut up plagiarising THIEF. You lost what vestige of respect you had.
Here is one...
Submitted by sentry_99 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:23am.
That you have "truth" and "facts". What you usually post is liberal opinions from the likes of salon.com.
OWS has alot in common with the founding fathers? Riiiight. I'm sure our founding fathers believed in free education (pre-school to grad school), free healthcare and wealth redistribution. I think if you really looked, our founding fathers would have been more like the 1 percenters of early America. Did a few distrust banks? Maybe but the enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.
Ignore the trolls !!
Submitted by creekrat on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 9:14am.
You will never get them to see anything but thier own view, a la Jer, Coin, and others. They come to this site to try and convince us ? I just ignore them !
creekrat..unlike a good many conservatives I know, I have always
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:04pm.
believed I could learn something from being exposed to views spanning the entire ideological spectrum. It's the reason whenever I picked up an issue of The New Republic I always made it a point to grab a copy of the National Review. It's why Bill Buckley's Firing Line was my favorite politically-oriented program. And it's one of the reasons I have been posting--and spending the vast majority of my online time--at this conservative website for the past four years.
I would recommend that you open up your mind in a similar manner. If you already do so, then good for you.
But if you have concluded I'm a troll, there is probably nothing I can do to convince you otherwise. As far as ignoring my comments, however, I certainly have no problem with that.
Jer
"I hate corruption and unbridled greed without accountability"?
Submitted by Phryj1 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:19am.
And yet you support Democrats?
Interesting contradiction.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Why do you assume
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:40am.
I support the Democrats?
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Your tagline.
Submitted by Phryj1 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:00am.
Why would a non-Dem use that Stephen Colbert quote?
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Your tagline.
Submitted by Phryj1 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:00am.
Why would a non-Dem use that Stephen Colbert quote?
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Because it is
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:07am.
funny and he had the cojones to say it directly to Bush as a satirical insult. Remember, the best satire is that which is the closest to reality.
Did you watch that roast? If not, do so. It is very interesting to see the reactions of the president and the crowd of elites as they try to grasp the insults and decide if they should laugh or be insulted.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
So the lying plagiarist troll theif admits to more plagiarism.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:10am.
Now the little boy admits to stealing the quote that is in his tagline as well.
Way to go thief, not your day is it?
Hey, out of the realm - do
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:00am.
Hey, out of the realm - do you actually think that George W. Bush - who has been called every name in the book (and then some) and accused of every crime in the book (and then some) - would actually be insulted by some fantasy phrase coming out of the mouth of a shallow lightweight like Stephen Colbert??? Yeah, I'll bet ol' W was REALLY thunderstruck when he heard that - he might have been fighing back tears, having to endure such a savage attack!!!
Coin of the realm is out of the realm of reality................a quote from the Killa.
Now the troll is PLAGIARIZING.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:19am.
Now you are stealing material without attributing it you snot nosed rat of a troll.
The troll took the above unattributed unquoted material from this page.
Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, strongly opposed the legality of what became known as the First Bank of the United States, which was majority (and later wholly) owned by private investors. Among his many statements against the bank, Jefferson warned: “[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution.”
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL AND LOSE THEIR JOBS FOR STEALING OTHERS MATERIAL.
The troll STOLE this from another website -
Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, strongly opposed the legality of what became known as the First Bank of the United States, which was majority (and later wholly) owned by private investors. Among his many statements against the bank, Jefferson warned: “[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution.”
yea
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:38am.
it's from the article i linked posted as a teaser to maybe get your interest up in actually reading it and giving it a few moments of consideration.
It worked I see as you looked at it and found the text--even if you did it just to further attack me and discredit me in an attempt to keep thee focus on the messenger and not the message. Right?
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
You did not say that in your post did you THIEF?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:48am.
You stole a paragraph from an article, failed to link, attribute, or otherwise indicate the words were not yours.
So shut up YOU LYING THIEF.
I knew you were too stupid to come up with that paragraph so I ran it through google and turned up the article YOU STOLE FROM.
WRONG AGAIN little lying thief. Still can't understand the adults in the room.
So what about the
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:10am.
quotes content and the point of the article?
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
You really don't have the brains to be using the internet.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:15am.
Now I am going to have a happy sitdown with a lying thief? How deep does the Stupid run in you?
Also
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:39am.
They're both the same quote from the same article. I guess you didn't read it that closely.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Shut up plagiarist troll THIEF.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:45am.
Both of what are what? Now you try to use stupid to cover up your thieving of others material.
You posted
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:13am.
the same quote twice. That is, both of the quotes you posted in your campaign to have me discredited where exactly the same. The 2 quotes are identical.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Oh stupid. Knock. Knock. Knock. Any brains in there?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:34am.
You must have missed this part ------>
The troll STOLE this from another website -
Having problems with English again?
this : 1a (1) : the person, thing, or idea that is present or near in place, time, or thought or that has just been mentioned <these are my hands> (2) : what is stated in the following phrase, clause, or discourse <I can only say this: it wasn't here yesterday>
I pulled the quote FROM THE WEBSITE as indicated by the ORANGE LINKY LETTERS.
And I pulled your quote FROM YOUR POST. as indicated by my sentence ---->
The troll STOLE this from another website -
Yes. They are identical.
You stole a paragraph from a website and then mixed it in with your words and tried to present them all as YOUR OWN.
Of course they are identical. YOU ARE A THIEF.
the quote re-posted herein
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:25am.
that I posted before without proper attribution Is from:
Fighting greedy bankers, an American tradition
Long before OWS, celebrated patriots from Jefferson to Lincoln battled powerful, corrupting financiers
By Mitchell Anderson, The Tyee
Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, strongly opposed the legality of what became known as the First Bank of the United States, which was majority (and later wholly) owned by private investors. Among his many statements against the bank, Jefferson warned: “[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution.”
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
The plagiarist troll thief's post reposted herein ---
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:57am.
The bolded parts (my bold) are STOLEN from a website and PRESENTED AS HIS OWN WORDS
++++
I love banks
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:00am.
I hate corruption and unbridled greed without accountability.
Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, strongly opposed the legality of what became known as the First Bank of the United States, which was majority (and later wholly) owned by private investors. Among his many statements against the bank, Jefferson warned: “[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution.”
This bank is now called the Fed.
In what became know as the Bank War, Jackson vetoed renewing the charter in 1832, stating that “some of the powers and privileges possessed by the existing bank are unauthorized by the Constitution, subversive of the rights of the States, and dangerous to the liberties of the people.”
Our founding fathers have a lot in common with the OWS crowd it seems.
++++
Oh plagiarist troll thief, where did you go?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 7:11am.
You gonna own up to stealing the second paragraph now and repost that as well?
Fail little boy troll. This is just not your day.
Incorrect
Submitted by JustAl on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:29am.
Plagiarized or not, the supposition presented is simply not factual. Perhaps the poster should go to remedial troll school?
The bank Jefferson opposed was eliminated completely, under the Jackson administration I think. So for a large portion of the nation's history, we didn't have a "national bank".
The "Fed" of today is an entirely different creature (monster) spawned from the socialist administration of FDR. Through this and the unconstitutional monster known a social security, FDR succeeded in doing more long term damage to the US than Hitler and Tojo combined. We are still suffering the effects of the "new deal"
So you're saying that the
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:42am.
So you're saying that the 'new deal' was a 'bad deal', and not really a 'big deal', and should've been a 'no deal', because the 'real deal' has given us a 'poor deal'????
Close
Submitted by JustAl on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:46am.
It was a "real,big, bad deal" but, there wasn't much "new" about it, politicians have been buying votes with taxpayer money for a very long time.
I just hope there's still time to "deal" with it, as it should have been "dealt with" to begin with.
You're wheelin' and dealin',
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 2:40pm.
You're wheelin' and dealin', Al..................
Sorry, I didn't link directly
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:03am.
http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/28/fighting_greedy_bankers_an_american...
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
No you didn't, now did you troll.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:11am.
Thank heavens stupidity is not viral.
And now you think we will click on your link. Still acting the little child expecting the adults in the room to give in to your every childish demand.
Pack sand. Pack it hard. Pack it tight. Leave it smooth.
Anything to avoid the issue and reality
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:34am.
right?
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Plagiarist troll thief sez what?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:36am.
Stupid, lying and now a thief. Figures. Words are the only thing a troll can steal on the internet. So they figure, "why not?".
Great present day perspective on OWS
Submitted by Phryj1 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:14am.
http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/2011/10/28/occupywallstreet-the-rap-sh...
Looks like these creeps, Marxists, and spoiled trust-fund brats aren't much like the founding fathers at all.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
So you think that rap sheet
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:30am.
outlining arrests and various crimes is a solid statistical sample which captures the movement's members? You think that the piece is a logical and well presented analysis that supports your insulting labels and generalizations?
How does it compare in substance and quality to the article I linked?
Please explain to me how an international movement that is large and growing and supported by people from all walks of life--including some of the very bankers being brought to account--can logically be what you describe, based on the data of the article you linked. Do that and I will rethink.
What if you are wrong and the points made in the article I linked are more accurate? do you think that you have the ability to accept such a conclusion? Or will you just dismiss it with a few insults and congratulatory comments from fellow posters? Are you averse to facts?
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Plagiarist troll thief sez what?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:34am.
Sorry, you were saying something about stealing the material of others and presenting them as your own words? You never did finish that thought.
Stealing?
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:51am.
I linked the article you looked at only to try and find something to accuse me of. Perhaps I should have attributed it in addition to the link but I do these posts in a rapid fire fashion so that I can get back to reading other posts, different blogs and watching clips. I also know that if I attributed it noone here would bother to read it or the article since the basic ethos of some of the posters is based on a pure ideological view, which precludes any input that doesn't first pass the ideology sniff test.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Plagiarist troll thief sez what?
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:57am.
Don't care thief. Now go off and steal from someone else.
Plagiarist troll thief: Honest mister, I just got confused, first I say I deliberately stole the material as a teaser and now I say it was a big accident due to the rapid firing fur fasion industry. I juz can't make up my mind which lie to use today.
What?
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:02am.
I said that I probably should have attributed it but I didn't in my haste. You seem to have some cognitive handicap.
Anyway, your point about me not properly attributing the material is a good point.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Settle on one LIE first then present it.
Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:09am.
Make up your mind LYING PLAGIARIST TROLL THIEF. Did you deliberately present it as a teaser or did you just forget in your haste?
Fail troll. You can't even lie right.
Yes little lying plagiarist troll, it is just a point. Just a little tiny point. Let's all play down your STEALING and LYING and play the red herring game.
Pack sand THIEF, LIAR, PLAGIARIST, TROLL.
Rejecting Reality?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:43am.
But...but...reality has a liberal bias. HAHAHA. The article he linked to has many links to REALITY. Actual events that show this movement to be all the things he says it is. You're article was an opinion piece. So...for a guy who tosses the words "truth", "facts" and "reality" around, you sure don't seem to like them.
Right
Submitted by coin of the realm on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 5:52am.
it is an opinion that is based on factual data. Get it? It is not an opinion based on a theory.
Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild
This is sad coin
Submitted by sentry_99 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 6:24am.
Go to bed. It's just getting really, really pathetic on your end and I think you need some sleep.
Why, yes, we do, now that you ask.
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:13am.
Thanks for asking. That article outlines exactly what the occuturds, or Flea Baggers if you prefer, are.
And, no, anyone who cites Salon as having "substance and quality" is not to be taken seriously.
Yeah, UpNorth...........but
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:19am.
Yeah, UpNorth...........but out of the realm (of reality) has also quoted Joan Walsh and Stephen Colbert - two shining examples of gravitas and superior knowledge.
OH, damn, Killa.
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 10:49am.
I stand corrected then. I missed those references by small change. I'd bet that somewhere he's also quoted Keith Olbermann and Horseface Maddow.
What kind of progeny would
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 2:38pm.
What kind of progeny would result if we mated Donkeyface Maher and Horseface Madcow??? Of course, I know that it's a physical impossibility..........but it's an interesting thought. Like I've said many times before - I'm all FOR abortion, especially in cases like this!!!
Too horrible to contemplate, Killa.
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 3:15pm.
Doctors could use the progeny to start hearts that have stopped, to shock amnesiacs back to normal, or to populate occuturd rallies.
True story..............and I
Submitted by killa37 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 3:40pm.
True story..............and I know that the scientific community is waiting for Keef Richards to finally die (although he has been dead many times in the past), so that they can examine his liver and replicate it as a nose-cone shield for our space ships when they re-enter the atmosphere, since it has been proven to be an indestructable material!!!
Oh, I forgot...........we DON'T have a space program anymore!!!
Once again Rush is right. If something doesn't break, then...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 2:45am.
it is not news. Peaceful demonstrations are yawners for reporters unless they can report something bad about the "Tea Party" demonstrators, which beyond making stuff up, is very difficult for them to do. .