Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike

Mark Shields: 'What the Hell is a Member of Congress Having Portraits of His Crotch Available for Distribution?'

By Noel Sheppard | June 04, 2011 | 10:03

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

While many liberal media members spent the week defending Congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), PBS's Mark Shields may have made the best comment about this sordid affair on Friday's "Inside Washington."

Shortly after NPR's Nina Totenberg said we really shouldn't care about this scandal because "it's a great lark of a diversion," Shields asked the definitive question, "What the hell is a member of Congress, who wants to be mayor of New York, having portrait galleries of his crotch available for distribution?" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

MARK SHIELDS, PBS: There are two great rules of scandals in Washington. The first is that it is never the act itself, it is always the cover-up. Rule two is everybody forgets rule one. And that’s exactly what’s happened with Anthony Weiner. I mean, he has been elusive. This is a man who, the most dangerous place in Washington is between Anthony Weiner and a camera and microphone.

[Laughter]

SHIELDS: I man, he loves cameras, he loves attention, and he gets on there he can’t shut up and he can’t explain. He can’t say, "Is that picture of your crotch?" He can’t say, “No?” I mean, and what the hell is a member of Congress, who wants to be mayor of New York, having portrait galleries of his crotch available for distribution?

Why indeed?

No matter how liberal one might be, you have to ask yourself that question.

We should hold our elected officials to some moral and ethical standards if we care at all about such things from ourselves, our children, and the society as a whole.

People like Totenberg and MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell might think this doesn't matter, but it has to if we want there to be some decency and morality in the culture.

This plummeted greatly after the Monica Lewinsky scandal aided and abetted by a media that saw the preservation of a president they loved as being more important than societal mores.

As a result, sexual activity has radically increased amongst our youth and at a steadily decreasing age.

The more the press brush off these sexual scandals as being unimportant, the lower we sink as a culture.

Fortunately, and for whatever the reason, there have been liberal press members like Shields that have taken a more conservative view of Weinergate.

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Sex Scandals
  • Anthony Weiner
  • Mark Shields
  • Inside Washington
  • NPR
  • PBS
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

The democrats are

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:24am.

The Party of Sleeze. Did anyone really not know that?

It's all good when they commit their lewd acts or didn't you get the memo? Consider that clinton, captain oval office bj artist is held in such high regard or the kennedy clan or edwards. The list would run many pages.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

I wonder if Breitbart has any more pics.

Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:42am.

I'm waiting for the other shoes to drop. I doubt it was one pic to one girl.

  • Login to post comments

Breitbart is expert in timing bomb drops.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:56am.

He handed Weiner the shovel, then Weiner dug himself 6 ft down. It wouldn't surprise me if Breitbart is just waiting to lower the grave cover into place.

  • Login to post comments

Yeah, Why hasn't the MSM questioned the girl?

Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:16am.

The thought just occurred to me. Why hasn't she been sought out for comment?

  • Login to post comments

sought for comment

Submitted by jon_torlin on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:30am.

I don't know that she's been sought for comment, but I read that the mother was extremely pissed about the whole thing(rightfully so too).  Here's the article:

Mother Furious

There are some comments, but it didn't really say if she made any official word on it other than trying to keep a low profile.  Unfortunately there's a picture of her there too.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Thanx for the info

Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:47am.

Gennette Cordova looks like a wannbe Snooki!

  • Login to post comments

Was a law broken?

Submitted by Red Bill on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:54am.

How is it the Weiner dictates whether a federal law enforcement agency investigates the sending and receiving of an unwanted lewd picture. If I sent one could I then say 'no - sorry it was a mistake' and the criminal investigation would stop? The law was made to protect victims so the investigation should begin with the reciept not the sending.

Red Bill
  • Login to post comments

Sex scandals don't matter

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:55am.

That's really all that needs to be said. And I'm bipartisan about it. Larry Craig (former Republican U.S. Senator from Idaho) and Mark Sanford (former Republican Governor of South Carolina)? They didn't really do anything THAT bad.

  • Login to post comments

Yeah, right.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:00am.

And what happened to them?

  • Login to post comments

They decided not to run again

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:05am.

What's your point?

And yeah, exactly right. Sure, sex scandals are funny, but they're not substantial indictments against pols beyond that. Unless one's the type of person who says, "Curse those role models and their victimless shenanigans".

  • Login to post comments

"They decided not to run" ....

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:11am.

And why was that? Could it be they were ashamed of themselves?

 

If that is indeed the case, it strongly suggests the Democrats simply have no shame.  Frank.  Studds. Rostenkowski.  Trafficant.   'Cold Cash' Jefferson.  These men all ran agian.   Shameless men should not be at the levers of power.  They know no limits to their own actions save those imposed on them by force and threats of force.

  • Login to post comments

"You had sex with somebody."

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:21am.

Not really something to be ashamed of oneself over. So, there is no problem with levers of power given to people who are shameless about something not that shameful.

But that's probably repetitive of what I first said in this comments sections: Sex scandals don't matter.

  • Login to post comments

Sex scandals show lack of good judgement...

Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:38am.

...and bring into question the character of people we trust to serve us.

  • Login to post comments

Even if that's true...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:47am.

...it's lack of good judgment and character about sex. Not sure how that can be taken to mean "judgment about all things overall".

  • Login to post comments

Only a myopic fool ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:54am.

believes that any man's poor judgment skills are limited to sex.

When a man is discovered cheating, the immediate question is 'what else is he cheating that I do not yet know about?"  Apparently your mental processes are incapable of sustaining this minimal level of inquiry.

  • Login to post comments

"Sex scandals are important...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:06pm.

...they show a lack of good judgment on other matters."

A relative sense of morality and an exaggerated sense of an infraction's meaningfulness? And if one doesn't believe that, they're myopic?

  • Login to post comments

You demonstrate

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:47pm.

a complete lack of any conceptual understanding of human nature. You are also completely ignoring the lying and cover-up Weiner is engaged in as he seeks to evade responsibility for his offense.  He is showing us he is completely dishonest in addition to being a sexual predator.  So .. you think blatant dishonesty is an acceptable quality in your congressman?

It is inconceivable that Weiner's personal psyche as demonstrated by this 'tweet' does operate at all other times and situations of his life including his role as an elected public. The only way it would not is if Weiner were suffering from one of the forms of mental illness that creates two or more disassociate personalities living in one body. In either case, Weiner has disqualified himself as a public servant and should go.

  • Login to post comments

That's a pretty long explanation for ...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:11pm.

...condemning a politician for engaging in a sex scandal. You have to stretch the assumptions pretty far. I like my position "sex scandals don't matter" better.

  • Login to post comments

I can understand why.

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:43pm.

The simple concept of individual integrity escapes your grasp. Therefore you are incapable of comprehending why Weiner is unsuitable to occupy a position of trust.

  • Login to post comments

~Human nature is not compartmentalized

Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:02pm.

Lack of judgment and character doesn't just apply to one thing. Someone who cheats on his wife won't have scruples about, say, cheating at cards, lying to his constituents, or falsifying his tax returns. Lack of honor is lack of honor. That's why it dangerous to convince yourself that "this little lie won't matter". Once you start numbing your conscience you open yourself up to doing anything. No one starts out doing really bad things, they start with the little things that seem relatively harmless. Next thing they know the only thing that they're worried about is getting caught.

If the only thing that stops you from doing something is the fear of getting caught at it, you've got no character whatsoever. You're a thief, a cheat, a liar, and an adulterer in all but opportunity.

Obama's WTF 2012 campaign slogan: "A dog in every pot"
  • Login to post comments

Right on the money

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:07pm.

Liberals lack any meaningful comprehension of human nature, even their own.

  • Login to post comments

Wrathful Brunette wrote:

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:12pm.

"Someone who cheats on his wife won't have scruples about, say, cheating at cards, lying to his constituents, or falsifying his tax returns."

I can say with certainty that ... I don't believe that.

  • Login to post comments

Of course you don't believe that.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:29pm.

Thanks for the real-life example of why liberals in general lack character. 

  • Login to post comments

Are you proud of those dubious premises?

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:35pm.

That is contained in that statement, that is.

  • Login to post comments

He's proud he correctly ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:51pm.

judged your character. You will excuse all manner of corruption if it furthers the aims of the left.

  • Login to post comments

Well, since we're passing so much judgment on...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:14pm.

...people's characters and all, I guess it's okay.

  • Login to post comments

Apparently ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:45pm.

You believe character is not a qualification to hold a public trust.  Do you also suppose child molesters should run summer youth camps?

  • Login to post comments

Your question:

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:14pm.

"Do you also suppose child molesters should run summer youth camps?"

Your Honor, I object to the question on the grounds of relevance.

A victimless sex scandal somehow involved statism AND child molesters running summer camps now?

  • Login to post comments

Victimless sex scandle??

Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:50pm.

What would his wife be....a victimless sex scandal victim? Victimless my a$$....seems you forgot the wife!!

"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"

Cicero

  • Login to post comments

This ignores the question ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 4:04pm.

of whether the recipient of this tweet was actually interested in receiving this image. If the recipient was unwilling, she too, is a victim.

 

Since the initial offense, Weiner has lied to his constituents about his responsibility.  He has falsely alleged a crime occurred and he has tried to cover up evidence of his misbehavior.  There are plenty of victims to go around including Icarus, who is a victim of his own stupidity.

  • Login to post comments

Hey Icy, arent you......

Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:10pm.

forgetting that this man is married??? What about the humiliation he is putting his wife through??? So it's cool with you that a married man is sending lewd photos of himself to some college bimbo?? It's called "character", or lack thereof, and it sure as hell reflects on the man as a whole. If his judgement is this BAD, what other BAD judgement's has he made. Ever hear of "black mail"?? That is what these clowns open themselves up to when trying to keep their peccadilloes secret.......Think about it!!!

"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"

Cicero

  • Login to post comments

It doesn't matter to me...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:20pm.

...in the sense that he's a politician. Adultery doesn't really affect how one does his or her job, unless one tries to make that wobbly case that there is a slippery slope in character failings where sex stuff leads to other failings, which I've been pretty clear about is unbelievable.

  • Login to post comments

Well then.......

Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:24pm.

I guess you just love dishonest cheats as your politicians. Character and morals dont matter to you I guess.....What a sad, misguided creature you are.....

"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"

Cicero

  • Login to post comments

As evidenced, of course,

Submitted by bkeyser on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:28pm.

by John Edwards.

  • Login to post comments

You have a short memory ?

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:06pm.

Studds had sex with a 17 year old. Some people call that statutory rape. Frank's boyfriend ran a call-boy operation out of his apartment and Frank actively fixed tickets for the 'johns' that used this service. Rostenkowski was stealing money and went to jail. Trafficant went to prison for racketeering. Jefferson was caught accepting bribes. NONE of them left office voluntarily over these issues. That scumbag, Frank, is STILL in office.

Sex scandals DO matter. Dishonorable men can always be counted upon to act dishonorably.

Weiner is lying about his twittering.  He has claimed his account was hacked and the hacker did this.  This is a false report of a crime and a lame attempt to affix blame on someone else.   If it were the benign event you claim, Weiner would not be lying, now would he? 

  • Login to post comments

You don't understand.

Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:02pm.

Look, for Democrats, this is a resume enhancement. With Weiner, he'll probably be re-elected in his district. They don't expect him to be honest, they expect him to provide benefits to his district and, if he's doing that, he could rape a nun and be convicted and still be re-elected. It's only Republicans who hold their politicians to any level of responsible behavior.

Vote Republican - Then you'll only be called a racist one more time.
  • Login to post comments

That's some righteous indignation...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:10pm.

...you have there. Rape a nun and be convicted? It's called hyperbole and we all do it, I know.

For most Democratic Party sympathizers, sex scandals don't really matter.

  • Login to post comments

Not having seen the evidence ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:37pm.

I can only speculate the kind of enhancement Weiner needs is not to his resume.

It is certainly clear he doesn't know a d*mn thing about women of any age if he thinks any of them will be positively influenced by that tweet.  This kind of ignorance is no less than I would expect from a statist fool like him.

  • Login to post comments

The only time ever...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:46pm.

...that views about government's proper role in society (statism) has been connected to a tweet pic of someone's crotch.

I love the punditry on NewsBusters.

  • Login to post comments

If a man is ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:03pm.

unable to understand his own role in society how is he to comprehend what the role of the state in a limited Republic should be?

Weiner cannot comprehend the bounds of decent public behavior.  He cannot comprehend individual responsibility.  He is unable to tell the truth when confronted with evidence of his own misconduct.  How does such a one judge the limits of state power when he is unable to correctly  scope the limits of his own behavior?

<PULL! >  I enjoy destroying the arguments of liberal mopes here on NB.  <Kablam!>  Come on back anytime.  <Pull!> ... <Kablam!>  You're welcome.

  • Login to post comments

So...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:20pm.

...you're still saying a crotch pic is relevant to the position in political theory known as statism.

  • Login to post comments

What we have here is a failure to communicate ...

Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:52pm.

So you don't think lying and dissembling are a problem? Refusing to accept responsibility... Weiner should get a pass on that too? Sending unsolicited pornographic material to a strange woman is responsible behavior?

You've been owned.

  • Login to post comments

All that stuff you just mentioned...

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:18pm.

...is covered in my previous statement "Sex scandals don't matter". So no, I'm not too terribly concerned about any of that, or whatever it supposedly means for his character or political theory positions.

  • Login to post comments

Ic, Then why did wiener flip flop regarding tweets.

Submitted by upcountrywater on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:45pm.

If its no big deal them why lie about it?
So here he is lying about tweets, what else is he lying about.

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

Icy.....just curious.......

Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:45pm.

are you married?

"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"

Cicero

  • Login to post comments

I still own your sorry ass.

Submitted by NL207 on Sun, 06/05/2011 - 10:46pm.

You should remember that the next time you show your ugly face here.

  • Login to post comments

Just a hack

Submitted by desert3030 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:02am.

Power player who got caught. If he doesn't know what his undies look like, now you have to ask...Who took the pictures for you? And store them for others to access? You sure are asking us to buy into a huge crap burger. But I have some jungle here in Phoenix I would like to sell you.

Desert3030
  • Login to post comments

Weiner???

Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:07pm.

You consider Weiner a power player? Weiner is little more than a poltical hack, sort of like a House community organizer, who they send out to create havoc and try and shame Republicans into voting the way the Democrats want them to vote. He's the typical hammer whose every problem is a nail. He doesn't know how to compromise, he doesn't know how to legislate, he doesn't know how to deal with the process, all he knows is, if his party is in control he votes the way they tell him to and demonizes the other side for not doing that. He's little more than a flunky. Power Player????? That is a joke, if I ever heard one.

Vote Republican - Then you'll only be called a racist one more time.
  • Login to post comments

Weiner in action

Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:12pm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O_GRkMZJn4

  • Login to post comments

It worked.

Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:58pm.

It stopped the media from concentrating on the dismal economy and Obama's failed policies. Oh yeh, the LSM hasn't concentrated on that anyway. Oh well, at least it was a diversion.

Vote Republican - Then you'll only be called a racist one more time.
  • Login to post comments

I thought this at one point too

Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:11pm.

"Anthony Weiner is talking about it so much because it's a Democratic strategy to distract critics from really substantial and meaningful critiques. The more time conservatives spend on Weinergate, the better for Democrats."

  • Login to post comments

@ Icarus, this politician's

Submitted by ncstevem on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 4:13pm.

@ Icarus, since this politician's sex scandal is no big deal to you would you be OK with your spouse sending sexually suggestive photos of (himself, herself) to others?

If not, why?

  • Login to post comments

Shields finally gets one right

Submitted by Galvanic on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:34pm.

Weiner's even managed to offend this MSM lib. 

SHIELDS: This is a man who, the most dangerous place in Washington is between Anthony Weiner and a camera and microphone.

Actually, the most dangerous place in Washington is between Anthony Weiner's ears.

 

  • Login to post comments

Hey CNN..

Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 8:13pm.

Spitzer probably needs a new partner for his show. They are both cut from the same cloth.
"Don't let the basatrds grind you down.

Red
  • Login to post comments

What say you now

Submitted by gailannr on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 3:55pm.

FOOLS!!!!!!!!!

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use