Mark Shields: 'What the Hell is a Member of Congress Having Portraits of His Crotch Available for Distribution?'
While many liberal media members spent the week defending Congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), PBS's Mark Shields may have made the best comment about this sordid affair on Friday's "Inside Washington."
Shortly after NPR's Nina Totenberg said we really shouldn't care about this scandal because "it's a great lark of a diversion," Shields asked the definitive question, "What the hell is a member of Congress, who wants to be mayor of New York, having portrait galleries of his crotch available for distribution?" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
MARK SHIELDS, PBS: There are two great rules of scandals in Washington. The first is that it is never the act itself, it is always the cover-up. Rule two is everybody forgets rule one. And that’s exactly what’s happened with Anthony Weiner. I mean, he has been elusive. This is a man who, the most dangerous place in Washington is between Anthony Weiner and a camera and microphone.
[Laughter]
SHIELDS: I man, he loves cameras, he loves attention, and he gets on there he can’t shut up and he can’t explain. He can’t say, "Is that picture of your crotch?" He can’t say, “No?” I mean, and what the hell is a member of Congress, who wants to be mayor of New York, having portrait galleries of his crotch available for distribution?
Why indeed?
No matter how liberal one might be, you have to ask yourself that question.
We should hold our elected officials to some moral and ethical standards if we care at all about such things from ourselves, our children, and the society as a whole.
People like Totenberg and MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell might think this doesn't matter, but it has to if we want there to be some decency and morality in the culture.
This plummeted greatly after the Monica Lewinsky scandal aided and abetted by a media that saw the preservation of a president they loved as being more important than societal mores.
As a result, sexual activity has radically increased amongst our youth and at a steadily decreasing age.
The more the press brush off these sexual scandals as being unimportant, the lower we sink as a culture.
Fortunately, and for whatever the reason, there have been liberal press members like Shields that have taken a more conservative view of Weinergate.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
The democrats are
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:24am.
The Party of Sleeze. Did anyone really not know that?
It's all good when they commit their lewd acts or didn't you get the memo? Consider that clinton, captain oval office bj artist is held in such high regard or the kennedy clan or edwards. The list would run many pages.
I wonder if Breitbart has any more pics.
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:42am.
I'm waiting for the other shoes to drop. I doubt it was one pic to one girl.
Breitbart is expert in timing bomb drops.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:56am.
He handed Weiner the shovel, then Weiner dug himself 6 ft down. It wouldn't surprise me if Breitbart is just waiting to lower the grave cover into place.
Yeah, Why hasn't the MSM questioned the girl?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:16am.
The thought just occurred to me. Why hasn't she been sought out for comment?
sought for comment
Submitted by jon_torlin on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:30am.
I don't know that she's been sought for comment, but I read that the mother was extremely pissed about the whole thing(rightfully so too). Here's the article:
Mother Furious
There are some comments, but it didn't really say if she made any official word on it other than trying to keep a low profile. Unfortunately there's a picture of her there too.
-Jon
Thanx for the info
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:47am.
Gennette Cordova looks like a wannbe Snooki!
Was a law broken?
Submitted by Red Bill on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:54am.
How is it the Weiner dictates whether a federal law enforcement agency investigates the sending and receiving of an unwanted lewd picture. If I sent one could I then say 'no - sorry it was a mistake' and the criminal investigation would stop? The law was made to protect victims so the investigation should begin with the reciept not the sending.
Sex scandals don't matter
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 10:55am.
That's really all that needs to be said. And I'm bipartisan about it. Larry Craig (former Republican U.S. Senator from Idaho) and Mark Sanford (former Republican Governor of South Carolina)? They didn't really do anything THAT bad.
Yeah, right.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:00am.
And what happened to them?
They decided not to run again
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:05am.
What's your point?
And yeah, exactly right. Sure, sex scandals are funny, but they're not substantial indictments against pols beyond that. Unless one's the type of person who says, "Curse those role models and their victimless shenanigans".
"They decided not to run" ....
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:11am.
And why was that? Could it be they were ashamed of themselves?
If that is indeed the case, it strongly suggests the Democrats simply have no shame. Frank. Studds. Rostenkowski. Trafficant. 'Cold Cash' Jefferson. These men all ran agian. Shameless men should not be at the levers of power. They know no limits to their own actions save those imposed on them by force and threats of force.
"You had sex with somebody."
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:21am.
Not really something to be ashamed of oneself over. So, there is no problem with levers of power given to people who are shameless about something not that shameful.
But that's probably repetitive of what I first said in this comments sections: Sex scandals don't matter.
Sex scandals show lack of good judgement...
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:38am.
...and bring into question the character of people we trust to serve us.
Even if that's true...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:47am.
...it's lack of good judgment and character about sex. Not sure how that can be taken to mean "judgment about all things overall".
Only a myopic fool ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:54am.
believes that any man's poor judgment skills are limited to sex.
When a man is discovered cheating, the immediate question is 'what else is he cheating that I do not yet know about?" Apparently your mental processes are incapable of sustaining this minimal level of inquiry.
"Sex scandals are important...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:06pm.
...they show a lack of good judgment on other matters."
A relative sense of morality and an exaggerated sense of an infraction's meaningfulness? And if one doesn't believe that, they're myopic?
You demonstrate
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:47pm.
a complete lack of any conceptual understanding of human nature. You are also completely ignoring the lying and cover-up Weiner is engaged in as he seeks to evade responsibility for his offense. He is showing us he is completely dishonest in addition to being a sexual predator. So .. you think blatant dishonesty is an acceptable quality in your congressman?
It is inconceivable that Weiner's personal psyche as demonstrated by this 'tweet' does operate at all other times and situations of his life including his role as an elected public. The only way it would not is if Weiner were suffering from one of the forms of mental illness that creates two or more disassociate personalities living in one body. In either case, Weiner has disqualified himself as a public servant and should go.
That's a pretty long explanation for ...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:11pm.
...condemning a politician for engaging in a sex scandal. You have to stretch the assumptions pretty far. I like my position "sex scandals don't matter" better.
I can understand why.
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:43pm.
The simple concept of individual integrity escapes your grasp. Therefore you are incapable of comprehending why Weiner is unsuitable to occupy a position of trust.
~Human nature is not compartmentalized
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:02pm.
Lack of judgment and character doesn't just apply to one thing. Someone who cheats on his wife won't have scruples about, say, cheating at cards, lying to his constituents, or falsifying his tax returns. Lack of honor is lack of honor. That's why it dangerous to convince yourself that "this little lie won't matter". Once you start numbing your conscience you open yourself up to doing anything. No one starts out doing really bad things, they start with the little things that seem relatively harmless. Next thing they know the only thing that they're worried about is getting caught.
If the only thing that stops you from doing something is the fear of getting caught at it, you've got no character whatsoever. You're a thief, a cheat, a liar, and an adulterer in all but opportunity.
Right on the money
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:07pm.
Liberals lack any meaningful comprehension of human nature, even their own.
Wrathful Brunette wrote:
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:12pm.
"Someone who cheats on his wife won't have scruples about, say, cheating at cards, lying to his constituents, or falsifying his tax returns."
I can say with certainty that ... I don't believe that.
Of course you don't believe that.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:29pm.
Thanks for the real-life example of why liberals in general lack character.
Are you proud of those dubious premises?
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:35pm.
That is contained in that statement, that is.
He's proud he correctly ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:51pm.
judged your character. You will excuse all manner of corruption if it furthers the aims of the left.
Well, since we're passing so much judgment on...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:14pm.
...people's characters and all, I guess it's okay.
Apparently ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:45pm.
You believe character is not a qualification to hold a public trust. Do you also suppose child molesters should run summer youth camps?
Your question:
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:14pm.
"Do you also suppose child molesters should run summer youth camps?"
Your Honor, I object to the question on the grounds of relevance.
A victimless sex scandal somehow involved statism AND child molesters running summer camps now?
Victimless sex scandle??
Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:50pm.
What would his wife be....a victimless sex scandal victim? Victimless my a$$....seems you forgot the wife!!
"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"
Cicero
This ignores the question ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 4:04pm.
of whether the recipient of this tweet was actually interested in receiving this image. If the recipient was unwilling, she too, is a victim.
Since the initial offense, Weiner has lied to his constituents about his responsibility. He has falsely alleged a crime occurred and he has tried to cover up evidence of his misbehavior. There are plenty of victims to go around including Icarus, who is a victim of his own stupidity.
Hey Icy, arent you......
Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:10pm.
forgetting that this man is married??? What about the humiliation he is putting his wife through??? So it's cool with you that a married man is sending lewd photos of himself to some college bimbo?? It's called "character", or lack thereof, and it sure as hell reflects on the man as a whole. If his judgement is this BAD, what other BAD judgement's has he made. Ever hear of "black mail"?? That is what these clowns open themselves up to when trying to keep their peccadilloes secret.......Think about it!!!
"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"
Cicero
It doesn't matter to me...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:20pm.
...in the sense that he's a politician. Adultery doesn't really affect how one does his or her job, unless one tries to make that wobbly case that there is a slippery slope in character failings where sex stuff leads to other failings, which I've been pretty clear about is unbelievable.
Well then.......
Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:24pm.
I guess you just love dishonest cheats as your politicians. Character and morals dont matter to you I guess.....What a sad, misguided creature you are.....
"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"
Cicero
As evidenced, of course,
Submitted by bkeyser on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:28pm.
by John Edwards.
You have a short memory ?
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:06pm.
Studds had sex with a 17 year old. Some people call that statutory rape. Frank's boyfriend ran a call-boy operation out of his apartment and Frank actively fixed tickets for the 'johns' that used this service. Rostenkowski was stealing money and went to jail. Trafficant went to prison for racketeering. Jefferson was caught accepting bribes. NONE of them left office voluntarily over these issues. That scumbag, Frank, is STILL in office.
Sex scandals DO matter. Dishonorable men can always be counted upon to act dishonorably.
Weiner is lying about his twittering. He has claimed his account was hacked and the hacker did this. This is a false report of a crime and a lame attempt to affix blame on someone else. If it were the benign event you claim, Weiner would not be lying, now would he?
You don't understand.
Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:02pm.
Look, for Democrats, this is a resume enhancement. With Weiner, he'll probably be re-elected in his district. They don't expect him to be honest, they expect him to provide benefits to his district and, if he's doing that, he could rape a nun and be convicted and still be re-elected. It's only Republicans who hold their politicians to any level of responsible behavior.
That's some righteous indignation...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:10pm.
...you have there. Rape a nun and be convicted? It's called hyperbole and we all do it, I know.
For most Democratic Party sympathizers, sex scandals don't really matter.
Not having seen the evidence ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:37pm.
I can only speculate the kind of enhancement Weiner needs is not to his resume.
It is certainly clear he doesn't know a d*mn thing about women of any age if he thinks any of them will be positively influenced by that tweet. This kind of ignorance is no less than I would expect from a statist fool like him.
The only time ever...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:46pm.
...that views about government's proper role in society (statism) has been connected to a tweet pic of someone's crotch.
I love the punditry on NewsBusters.
If a man is ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:03pm.
unable to understand his own role in society how is he to comprehend what the role of the state in a limited Republic should be?
Weiner cannot comprehend the bounds of decent public behavior. He cannot comprehend individual responsibility. He is unable to tell the truth when confronted with evidence of his own misconduct. How does such a one judge the limits of state power when he is unable to correctly scope the limits of his own behavior?
<PULL! > I enjoy destroying the arguments of liberal mopes here on NB. <Kablam!> Come on back anytime. <Pull!> ... <Kablam!> You're welcome.
So...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:20pm.
...you're still saying a crotch pic is relevant to the position in political theory known as statism.
What we have here is a failure to communicate ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 2:52pm.
So you don't think lying and dissembling are a problem? Refusing to accept responsibility... Weiner should get a pass on that too? Sending unsolicited pornographic material to a strange woman is responsible behavior?
You've been owned.
All that stuff you just mentioned...
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:18pm.
...is covered in my previous statement "Sex scandals don't matter". So no, I'm not too terribly concerned about any of that, or whatever it supposedly means for his character or political theory positions.
Ic, Then why did wiener flip flop regarding tweets.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:45pm.
If its no big deal them why lie about it?
So here he is lying about tweets, what else is he lying about.
You Didn't Build That.
Icy.....just curious.......
Submitted by BEGRUNT on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 3:45pm.
are you married?
"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"
Cicero
I still own your sorry ass.
Submitted by NL207 on Sun, 06/05/2011 - 10:46pm.
You should remember that the next time you show your ugly face here.
Just a hack
Submitted by desert3030 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 11:02am.
Power player who got caught. If he doesn't know what his undies look like, now you have to ask...Who took the pictures for you? And store them for others to access? You sure are asking us to buy into a huge crap burger. But I have some jungle here in Phoenix I would like to sell you.
Weiner???
Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:07pm.
You consider Weiner a power player? Weiner is little more than a poltical hack, sort of like a House community organizer, who they send out to create havoc and try and shame Republicans into voting the way the Democrats want them to vote. He's the typical hammer whose every problem is a nail. He doesn't know how to compromise, he doesn't know how to legislate, he doesn't know how to deal with the process, all he knows is, if his party is in control he votes the way they tell him to and demonizes the other side for not doing that. He's little more than a flunky. Power Player????? That is a joke, if I ever heard one.
Weiner in action
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:12pm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O_GRkMZJn4
It worked.
Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:58pm.
It stopped the media from concentrating on the dismal economy and Obama's failed policies. Oh yeh, the LSM hasn't concentrated on that anyway. Oh well, at least it was a diversion.
I thought this at one point too
Submitted by Icarus on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:11pm.
"Anthony Weiner is talking about it so much because it's a Democratic strategy to distract critics from really substantial and meaningful critiques. The more time conservatives spend on Weinergate, the better for Democrats."
@ Icarus, this politician's
Submitted by ncstevem on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 4:13pm.
@ Icarus, since this politician's sex scandal is no big deal to you would you be OK with your spouse sending sexually suggestive photos of (himself, herself) to others?
If not, why?
Shields finally gets one right
Submitted by Galvanic on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 1:34pm.
Weiner's even managed to offend this MSM lib.
SHIELDS: This is a man who, the most dangerous place in Washington is between Anthony Weiner and a camera and microphone.
Actually, the most dangerous place in Washington is between Anthony Weiner's ears.
Hey CNN..
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 8:13pm.
Spitzer probably needs a new partner for his show. They are both cut from the same cloth.
"Don't let the basatrds grind you down.
What say you now
Submitted by gailannr on Mon, 06/06/2011 - 3:55pm.
FOOLS!!!!!!!!!