Lawrence O'Donnell Takes Conservative Boston Herald's Side Over Obama's
If you looked out your window at roughly 8:50 Wednesday evening, you may have seen pigs flying.
At that moment, MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell was actually taking the side of a conservative newspaper in a dispute with - wait for it - President Obama (video follows with transcript and commentary):
LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: In "The Rewrite" tonight, Boston’s conservative-leaning newspaper the Boston Herald is accusing the White House of playing favorites with the local media. The President is in Boston for fund-raising events today and tonight and the Herald says its reporters were not given full access because of an op-ed written by Mitt Romney that the Herald published on its front page back in March. That op-ed entitled “Obama Misery Index hits a Record High” ran on the same day President Obama was in Boston for a previous fund-raiser.
For more details on this matter, please see "White House Threatens Boston Herald's Press Access for Not Being Favorable Enough to Obama." But I digress:
O'DONNELL: The Herald says it made a request to send a pool reporter to today’s events. Pool reporters provide information to the rest of the media when there's limited access at a press event. The Herald said in turning down their request, White House spokesman Matt Lehrich mentioned the Romney op-ed from the last time President Obama was in town. Lehrich’s email to the Herald said in broken English, “I tend to consider the degree to which papers have demonstrated to covering the White House regularly and fairly in determining local pool reporters.” Good luck trying to diagram that sentence. “My point about the op-ed was not that you ran it but that it was the full front page which excluded any coverage of the visit of a sitting President of the United States to Boston. I think that raises a fair question about whether the paper is unbiased in its coverage of the President's visits.”
Okay, White House, let's get something straight here: The Boston Herald is not unbiased. Let's get something else straight: The Boston Globe is not unbiased. The New York Times is not unbiased. The Washington Post is not unbiased. There are now maybe no more than ten cities left in America that have more than one newspaper. Boston is one of those lucky cities. The Boston Globe, the dominant paper in the region, likes you guys in the Obama White House. The Boston Herald doesn't like you. Get used to it. And understand that the Herald can do you no harm. You won Massachusetts by nearly 26 points. You are going to win Massachusetts again no matter what the Herald says about you. If the Herald had the power to change minds in Massachusetts, John Kerry would not be a senator and Deval Patrick would not be a governor.
The faithful adherents to the Herald's view of politics did not vote for Barack Obama and will not vote for Barack Obama, but they deserve to read firsthand accounts of Obama events as seen through the biased eyes of Boston Herald reporters and editors.
And if you think Mitt Romney’s Herald front page op-ed was a little tough on President Obama, you got to read the Herald more often. You should have seen what they used to do to Teddy Kennedy day in and day out. Senator Kennedy didn't like the Herald, but he didn't try to hide from it. He knew the Herald had a job to do and they were going to do a job on him. Teddy was always tough enough and good-natured enough to take it. He joked with me many times about Herald stories that hit him hard.
The headline for Mitt Romney’s piece about president Obama was "Why He's Failing and How to Get it Right." If that's the worst headline Barack Obama gets in the Boston Herald, he will be very, very lucky. When Senator Kennedy made the mistake of causing trouble for the Herald by simply trying to enforce an FCC rule against the same ownership of a broadcast station and a newspaper in the same city, the Herald put its star columnist Howie Carr on the front page where Howie Carr began his column with the glaring headline "Was it Something I Said Fat Boy?"
Now, in fairness to O'Donnell, he was born and raised in Boston and obviously has a deep affection as well as knowledge of his hometown.
But taking the Herald's side over Obama?
Makes you want to go out and buy a bunch of lottery tickets, doesn't it?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Okay.
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 10:45pm.
It's come to the point where I can't stand this guy so much that even when he says something remotely sensible it doesn't make any difference to me whatsoever. He's still a creep...
Even a
Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 10:44pm.
blind squirrel will eventually find a nut.
BK,
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 10:48pm.
...or a blind nut will eventually find a squirrel? :)
Yep
Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 10:49pm.
definitely a more accurate description.
...or a stopped watch...
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 6:29am.
...twice a day...
whoa....
Submitted by jon_torlin on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 11:09pm.
I saw this here and I have to agree with the pigs flying part, actually looked for some.
My reaction was to shake my head and say "wait......what??"
Damn, libs are a weird bunch. LOD's still scum. I will say this though, Noel, there's definitely something to admire of his pride in his home state as you showed us.
-Jon
*
Submitted by Zippy on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 11:40pm.
*
Wow! I am surprised. Shocked
Submitted by Zippy on Wed, 05/18/2011 - 11:41pm.
Wow! I am surprised. Shocked really......
This guy does have an original thought.
"Conservative leaning" Boston Herald ????
Submitted by Texndoc on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 12:52am.
Why? Because Larry says so?
They absolutely are not. Ask Senator Brown.
Well, it's conservative in
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 6:26am.
Well, it's conservative in comparison to the Globe.
And Larry had to stick up for them, since he pretends to be a journalist....
Conservative Boston Herald
Submitted by stunned on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 10:38am.
By Mass standards it is..don't ever forget it. Mitt Romney won in that state by being one of the most liberal Republican Gov. in history. Heck a lot of southern Dems are more conservative than he is which is the reason I will never vote for him and don"t tell me he would be no worse that Obama, he would just allow all Obama's policies stay in place and tweek them so they become Republican policies.
Even Mass citizens get it, the Herald is middle of the road paper, and that the WH declaring war on it has produced a firestorm up there and a lot of libs like Larry have come out condemning them. Mass folks on all sides are real hardliners when it comes to censorship. In a chance conversation with a moderaltely lib friend up there got me an earful on how stupid this WH (not Obama, he's not there yet) is.
tired of liberal lies
What's More Shocking
Submitted by Bourbeau on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 7:08am.
What's more shocking, what Lawence said, or the fact that he thinks the White House would even listen to anything he says. Too funny.
Maybe he goes to the White House like Fareed.
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 7:20am.
Then again maybe.......? I am sure Larry is important to the less than 1/3 of 1% of America that watch him.
MSNBC
Submitted by John21 on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 7:42am.
MSNBC executives are being attended to by the paramedics. When you think about it, it makes sense, the media protecting its own rights and ensuring that the rest of America loses thiers.
Like others on the Left, O'Donnell is deeply disappointed . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 9:07am.
. . . in Obama's uber-sensitivity to rough criticism and the heavy-handed WH tactics. O'Donnell merely wants Obama to man-up before the 2012 campaign gets into full swing.
What is with the way they film O'Donnell?
Submitted by Darogr on Thu, 05/19/2011 - 9:06am.
I realize having the man on television, especially HD must present many, many challenges, but why the weird camera angle?
It's like a porn and he's waiting for the $ shot to the face.