Bill Kristol: 'Two Biggest Speculators That Have Damaged The Economy Are Obama and Bernanke'
As oil and gas prices head to new highs, we're hearing more calls from the President and his media minions about how this is all the fault of Wall Street investors.
On "Fox News Sunday," the Weekly Standard's Bill Kristol said the two biggest speculators who have damaged the U.S. economy are President Obama and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke (video follows with transcript and commentary):
MARA LIASSON, NPR: The Republicans are seen as better able to handle the deficit. The deficit has been a Republican issue. Now the president is playing on their turf and trying to reframe the debate, not from how much do you cut the deficit, but how do you go about cutting the deficit?
And I think that one of the reasons that people's pessimism about the economy and the overall right track/wrong track numbers are so bad is because the deficit is the definition of pessimism about the future.The long-term outlook for the country, Standard & Poor's came out this week and showed they were pessimistic. You've got Warren Buffett saying don't invest in long-term dollar-based assets. I mean, that is part of why people are so pessimistic.
BILL KRISTOL, WEEKLY STANDARD: Juan mentioned speculators before. The two biggest speculators who have damaged the U.S. economy are Barack Obama, who speculated on the huge stimulus package, which has boomed the deficit. We now have $3.6 trillion of deficit under Obama, which has really created a huge fiscal problem for us. And Ben Bernanke, who did quantitative easing, a second quantitative easing with $600 billion.
CHRIS WALLACE, HOST: And explain what that is.
KRISTOL: And that was buying up government bonds, government paper, to try to stimulate the stock market, which he did a little bit with a little bit of a --
WALLACE: And lowered interest rates.
KRISTOL: And he's kept interest rates at zero percent.
So, we have had a wildly stimulative fiscal policy and monetary policy. Growth is slowing down anyway. It has been a total failure.
I think the key for Republicans, in my view, is to run comprehensively against the Obama/Geithner/Bernanke policy -- fiscal and monetary policy -- and say the whole Keynesian model has failed. This has been a perfect test of it, this is what --
WALLACE: So that's the bumper sticker, "Keynes was wrong"?
KRISTOL: Yes. Obama and the Washington establishment was wrong, including, incidentally -- I think with Geithner and Bernanke, who were holdovers from Bush, a populist Republican running against the entire establishment, understanding that more government spending and unbelievably cheap money depreciating, debasing the dollar, that that is the way to make America strong, that is the wrong model. And I think Republicans need to articulate an alternative model, as Reagan did, to come back to this, in 1979.
I don't completely agree with Kristol when it comes to monetary policy. Low interest rates are essential until job growth signficantly rebounds.
However, quantitative easing has clearly failed to stimulate the economy while adding further to the dollar's decline as well as driving commodity prices and inflation higher.
Obama's Keynesian spending has also been a disaster. What's worse is history has consistently shown this concept to be a failure, and it should have never been tried again.
Not only didn't it work in the '30s during the Great Depression, but America's best economic periods in the modern era have been when government restrained spending rather than exploded it with reckless abandon.
Sadly, Americans continue to repeat failed history rather than learn from it.
Why is that?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Why is that? Simple.
Submitted by bkeyser on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 10:40pm.
Why is that? Simple. Democrats fiscal policy is the same as that of a crack dealer; sell it cheap, get 'em hooked, and demagogue those who try to help 'em get clean.
It works because being high on crack apparently feels good, and you don't have to work hard to feel that way.
Kristol's speculation does some damage too.
Submitted by Ashrak on Mon, 04/25/2011 - 9:34am.
He got behind Sarah, but when he realized she is the real deal, one who will energize this nation by cleaning up the Beltway Corruption ( political and media) by shining the light of day on the party politics and calling it what it is, he got scared and joined the opposition to her.
Americans try the same failed policies, not just economics either, over and over because wafflers like Kristol are held up as some kind of oracles and they pay no real price for their endless waffles. It is time for them to pay the price - just like John Kerry, the waffle King, did in 2004. It is time they are dismissed as the childlike whiners that they are.
I no longer listen to or believe anything Kristol says. His #1 goal is to protect the status quo party politics. He latched onto Sarah when he thought his progressive buddy John McCain could win on Sarah's shoulders. He abandoned her instantly when it wasn't enough to overcome the media cabal he is a part of. Kristol's Establishment Media and Party politics and Big Media speculation is among the top tier problems in this country today. I would argue it surpasses the speculation done on Wall Street - as it has less accountability than the Casino, errr, Stock Market.
To me, Kristol has about as much credibility as Krugman. In some ways, Krugman has more. At least Krugman sticks with his utter nonsense most of the time, while Kristol makes more waffles than IHOP.
Defeatist
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 04/25/2011 - 2:25pm.
Bill Kristol, above all, is a total defeatist.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
"Sadly, Americans continue to
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 04/25/2011 - 12:50pm.
"Sadly, Americans continue to repeat failed history rather than learn from it.
Why is that?"