Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Mediaite: 'Does The BP Oil Spill Mark The Death Of The Tea Party Movement?'

By Noel Sheppard | June 02, 2010 | 18:54

Change font size:  A |  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

The senior editor of the liberal online publication Mediaite asked an astonishingly absurd question in a headline Tuesday:

"Does The BP Oil Spill Mark The Death Of The Tea Party Movement?"

Glynnis MacNicol's premise in her piece by that name: "The call for less government intervention into the lives of ‘regular' citizens that was so prevalent throughout last summer, and fall, and winter has gone nearly silent in the face of the Gulf disaster."

MacNicol's supporting evidence of the Tea Party's demise:

After months of non-stop Tea Party coverage, and endless speculation that the movement spelled certain doom for both Washington incumbents and possibly the Obama administration, it feels like talk of the Partiers has all but disappeared off the cable newser map. [...]

During the month of April, before the oil spill took place, the phrase "tea party" was mentioned nearly 3,000 times on cable television. This past month, as the oil spill has increasingly dominated headlines, that number dropped to 471. That's a precipitous drop considering how the movement managed to sustain its national headline prominence throughout the preceding months (the numbers are equally high Jan-March) and interesting coincides almost exactly with the BP oil spill gaining national attention.

Add it all up and MacNicol believes that since conservatives have been asking for the Obama administration to actually DO something about the oil spill, the Tea Party's call for smaller government is now out of favor on the right.

Let me offer an alternative likely far more logical explanation for why this movement has been out of the headlines the last six weeks or so.

The first quarter of 2010 began with Scott Brown winning Ted Kennedy's vacated Senate seat on January 19. In the subsequent weeks, media outlets focused a great deal of attention on the Tea Party and its possible impact on the November elections. 

By February, the big news story was the debate surrounding healthcare reform. As the Tea Party represented a huge force in the public discussion concerning this issue, the actions of its leaders and members were regularly reported.

Let's not forget all the coverage this movement got as a result of the as yet unproven racist and homophobic remarks supposedly made at a protest on Capitol Hill shortly before the final bill passed the House on March 21. This also acted to keep this movement in the headlines.

After that, the Tea Party geared up for huge rallies across the country to be held on April 15 which garnered additional news coverage.

Exactly eight days later, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed her state's anti-illegal immigration law. With Tax Day and ObamaCare now in the rearview mirror, America's press went apoplectic.

Or course, two days prior, the oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico beginning an environmental disaster that has yet to be rectified.

Is it any wonder that the confluence of Arizona's SB 1070 and the largest American oil spill in history have knocked the Tea Party out of the headlines?

Does the reduction in attention to this movement given these two HUGE news events in any way suggest its death?

Someone cue Mark Twain. 

Share this

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • 2010 Congressional
  • BP Gulf Oil Spill
  • Barack Obama
  • Glynnis MacNicol
  • Online Media
  • ObamaCare
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Right
    2 min 14 sec ago
  • What is your point, mapledrake?
    3 min 9 sec ago
  • Nutshell
    3 min 25 sec ago
  • Excuse the delay, Kramer...
    4 min 20 sec ago
  • The only logical reason she
    5 min 11 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.