Because I can't spend my time watching these dolts.

I appreciate that someone can and tells us about it.

These MSM dolts only care about the worst president ever "winning" this fight. This isn't an effing football game - it's a huge portion of our economy and something that will affect every American and future generations to come in an extremely harmful way, and all they can say is he must "win." 

And they wonder why they have so few viewers. 

Funny, three losers talking about their man having to win...

 "Now that he has made the call and he sunk his teeth into this and his feet into this."

Welp, he made the call, but to win he'll first have to get his head out of his arse and then remove both feet from his mouth. This idiot the libs think is so brilliant has managed, in just over a year, to lead them into a lose-lose situation, to the point that even if they win they lose. Now that's somethin to grin about.!!~~!!

(grins) kilrod

If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,?? 

He had to shove this down our throats now before even the stupid people who voted for him would catch on that he's a true blue Marxist.

   I disagree.  Obama's timing was not off.  When obama first pushed healthcare the country was behind him, he had a super-majority in congress and unemployment was not recognized as the huge problem that we know it is now.  But what was wrong with obama's healthcare plan?  There was no plan.  He left the plan up to congress.  They had no healthcare plan.  Neither of them to this day have a workable healthcare plan.  If the President or congress worked in the medical field they could be sued for malpractice.

1) They're covering their butts as they see a political tsunami coming this November.

2) "They" have to "win" because now it's simply a Democrat v. Republican issue and to Hell with the actual consequences for the country.

 metaphorsbwithu

MY RESPONSE TO A KOOK LIAR

This published Letter To Editor is my March 8th reply to a kook liberal LTE last Wed in the Natchez, Ms. paper (The Natchez Democrat)…
I replied to each of his misguided points:
========
DEMONS, DISTRACTIONS AND FACTS
(paper changed this to “Democrats Telling Fantasy Stories”.

I read with amazement at the faulty information found in the long letter of 3.3.10 concerning Health Care.
Does the writer know that not once in his poitical life has Obama ever ACTUALLY extended his arm to those he opposes?
He was the rated MOST liberal (aka secular socialist) human in the U. S. Senate for a reason.

Where was this writer when the Democrats were the “Party of No” just a few years ago? Was that okay?
All we heard then was the constant chatter about “the rights of the minority”.

I ask who took our Social Security megabillions and put them into the General Fund? (Democrats) Who broke the tie vote to TAX our Social Security checks? (Gore) Who signed the bill to TAX our Social Security? (Clinton) Which Party exempts themselves from this expensive takeover of our Heath Care and rejected Republican attempts to include everyone? (Democrats)
Which Party exempted the 1.8 million unionized gov-meant workers from this wonderful bill? (Democrats)

Some REAL reasons Health Care costs are way above what they should be are: Democrats refuse to allow us to shop for a Plan nationwide like we can do for car insurance. Why not have 1,300 companies to pick from?
Democrats refuse to allow lawsuit (tort) reform like the successful Texas model because the trial lawyers are big democrat contributors. Doctors pay 2-4 thousand a month thanks to democrats blocking tort reform.
Democrats refuse to allow Portability so we can take our Plan from one job to another or at least keep the same Plan for a year between jobs.

Democrats ALWAYS hurt the poor by their wrong-minded policies that lay off the little guys first. The Party that has controlled Congress since Jan. 2007 has the nerve to blame others for putting us all $13 trillion in debt AND doubling the jobless.

The voters have told the controlling Party for a year they do NOT WANT socialized medicine and 2 trillion more of
debt. They do not want to be fined because they do not buy insurance. They do not want over 100 boards and panels
to run their personal health care. Democrats do not need any Republicans to pass this but only to share the blame.
The misguided have drank the smiling socialist kool-aid again.

J. Carter Obama is clueless but the average American is not fooled by the daily lies. Voters will send a message to
the arrogant they will not forget. If this bill is sooo wonderful, why are the Democrats telling us they are willing to risk
huge defeats in the next election? Why will they lose if its so wonderful?

America is jobless, broke and hurting. It is not the time to tell us fantasy stories about strawman demons.

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish

Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish

The scary thing is that, had Obama succeeded in turning the economy around sooner (and I realize presidents only have a limited capacity to do that, but they are the ones who take most of the credit or blame for the economy), he would have been given a blank check to do whatever he wanted.  Let's face it, the media has already pretty much given him that based on nothing more than a cult of personality effect.  What I fear is that the economy will, temporarily, turn around and Obama will be given full credit for knowing what he's doing and even more of this socialist nonsense will be foisted upon us all.

I have been wondering about this reconciliation thing--it requires both houses to pass an identical bill, the president to sign it, then bring in amendments. What if those amendments don't, you know, get brought in...or if they fail the 51 votes, or any number of other things. What does the pres say: "Ha, ha, got ya, suckers?" I mean---"folks." The WSJ editorial today wonders this, too--would the Dems have to suck it up and just go along for their "legacy"?