Daily Kos's Markos Moulitsas came up with a new nickname and logo for Republicans on Wednesday: Goposaurs.
With that in mind, and Arlen Specter's defection this week, the following WSJ column by Peggy Noonan is an absolute must-read (h/t my dear friend David Tochterman):
I am wondering once again if Republicans in Washington fully understand what they are up against.
They have had a hard week. Someday years hence, when books are written about the Republican comeback, they may well begin with this low moment, and the bolting of Arlen Specter to the Democrats. It is fine to dismiss Mr. Specter as an opportunist, but opportunists tell you something: which side is winning. That's the side they want to be on.
Noonan provocatively continued:
A great party needs give. It must be expansive and summoning. It needs to say, "Join me."
A party that is huge, vital and national, that is truly the expression of the views of a huge and varied nation, will, by definition, contain within it those who are more to the right, and more to the left, and more to the middle. This creates a constant tension, a constant fight, but no matter. As Ronald Reagan said in China, in front of students at Fudan University, we are "a great disputatious nation."
Great parties are coalitions, and coalitions contain disparate and sometimes warring pieces. FDR's coalition contained Southern Democrats from Birmingham and socialists from the Bronx. They didn't agree on much, but they agreed on some essentials, such as "the New Deal is good" and "government should be harnessed to help the little guy." It was imperfect and in time evolved but its success demonstrated that a great party needs give. [...]
Can the party, having accurately ascertained its position, and recognizing shifting terrain, institute a renewed and highly practical tolerance for the many flavors of Republican? Can it live happily and productively with all its natural if sometimes warring constituent groups?
It must.
Noonan moved to an explosive crescendo:
A great party cannot live by constantly subtracting, by removing or shunning those who are not faithful to every aspect of its beliefs, or who don't accept every pole, or who are just barely fitting under the tent. Room should be made for them. Especially in those cases when Republican incumbents and candidates are attempting to succeed in increasingly liberal states, a certain practical sympathy is in order.
In the party now there is too much ferocity, and bloody-mindedness. The other day Sen. Jim DeMint said he'd rather have 30 good and reliable conservative senators than 60 unreliable Republicans. Really? Good luck stopping an agenda you call socialist with 30 hardy votes. "Shrink to win": I've never heard of that as a political slogan.
Is it fully mature, and truly protective toward America, to be so politically exclusionary? [...]
The ground is shifting. It's hard to get your footing in an earthquake. As Republicans on the Hill try, they must also try to steady their party. It needs a greater sense of realism about its predicament. It needs less enforcement and more encouragement. It needs to inspire the young and the politically unformed not with bloodlust but with ideas.
A great party allows everyone in, and allows prospective members to self-define. If they say they're Republicans, they should be welcomed and helped to find a place where they fit. A great party has a lot of such places. A great party is expansive. A great party has give.
Read the whole marvelous piece and offer your thoughts.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"It is fine to dismiss Mr.
May 2, 2009 - 11:04 ET by Chris Norman"It is fine to dismiss Mr. Specter as an opportunist, but opportunists tell you something: which side is winning. That's the side they want to be on."
Ms. Noonan mischaracterizes Specter's opportunism. His isn't based on which side is winning - but on which side he can win the primary.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Chris
May 2, 2009 - 11:13 ET by Noel SheppardChris,
I agree with you on that point. Specter wouldn't be defecting if Toomey wasn't kicking his butt in the polls. This isn't about moving to the winning side; it's about saving his political hide. As such, on this point Noonan was clearly wrong. ns
Noel, Yeah, I can't
May 2, 2009 - 11:20 ET by Chris NormanNoel,
Yeah, I can't imagine that at his age Specter has much of a future in the Democratic Party. He may get a goody or two for moving over, but I think his influence on them will be minimal. His move was clearly based on short term survival.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Moderates go with the Winner
May 2, 2009 - 12:51 ET by allanfPeggy has quite a bit of pom pom girl in her. She is more interested in social status than substance. She wants to date the winning quaterback in the big game.
She will come back when the Republicans start winning. Moderates just go with the winner. They will be moderate liberals or moderate conservatives. They just go wit the winning party.
allanf... Precisely. Not
May 2, 2009 - 21:47 ET by bigtimerallanf...
Precisely.
Nothing more...nothing less.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
regarding these opportunist
May 3, 2009 - 00:01 ET by TruthMongerregarding these opportunist moderates that blow with the wind - is it better to be on the side who wins in the short term - or THE LONG TERM...?
history is well on our side
this is what these dkos-type crowds - tragically - do not understand what they are up against...
it's the end of their world as we know it and i feel pretty damn good:)
government is the communists capitalism
Chris...Specter may have a surprise...
May 2, 2009 - 13:53 ET by PrairieSkywaiting for him from his new political compartiots in the Dem party...A number of Dem senators have said (off the record) that regardless of what "arrangements" were made between Specter and Obama and/or Specter and Reid about any special consideration for committee chairmanships, etc., they have no intention of moving over and making room for him. So, as you said, it is very likely that his influence, if any, will indeed be short term and minimal. Time will tell...
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
Couldn't Happen to a Nicer Guy
May 2, 2009 - 14:16 ET by allanfIf that happens it would be well deserved.
allanf...Ditto...Specter may find out...
May 2, 2009 - 21:53 ET by PrairieSkythat the grass isn't always greener on the other side of the fence...Sometimes, the other side of the fence is full of weeds...
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
Noonan has been wrong to
May 3, 2009 - 09:56 ET by nadadhimmiNoonan has been wrong to frequently lately. She has become liberal. She must be getting her ego stroked at liberal Manhattan and DC cocktail parties and she seems to like it. I saw a headline on Yahoo that said Jeb Bush was going to revive the GOP. Jesus, are these people that much out of touch with reality?? No established pol will revive anything if they are members of the Oligarchy
I am late to the game because I was overseas for so many years.
May 2, 2009 - 11:10 ET by JWFWho is Peggy Noonan again?
I coulda swore we brought all the disputatious commitees of the Republican party together into a consensus and we said as one voice - that spendulus thing is nothing but a huge money giveaway to all the faithful democrat factions.
We were very together on that. Except for Specter the Defecter
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
an Eternal Champion after many exhausting trials and tribulations in the endless war between Law and Chaos
JWF~
May 2, 2009 - 14:37 ET by Georgia GirlNoonan is best known (to me anyway) as Reagan's speechwriter. Here is a little blip on her:
Peggy Noonan (born Margaret Ellen Noonan on September 7, 1950, in Brooklyn, New York) is an author of seven books on politics, religion and culture, a weekly columnist for The Wall Street Journal, and was a primary speech writer and Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan. She is considered a political conservative.
Wrong
May 2, 2009 - 11:19 ET by The ButcherI see what is occurring not as "shrinking" the party, but purging the fakes and phoney charlatans to make room for real conservatives. We are smoking them out one by one. I say good riddance.
That's correct Butcher
May 3, 2009 - 07:09 ET by Mr. MikeThat's correct Butcher there's a slow purge happening right now. We need to clean house before 2010 and especially 2012. The real conservatives need to step forward and lead this party.
The idea of a Big Tent needs to be dropped. Remember, the only thing you find under a Big Tent is a bunch of clowns and loads of dung!
Darkness at Noonan. Let there be blight.
May 2, 2009 - 11:42 ET by Jack BauerIt would a lot easier to take Noonan seriously, if she and her wing of the Republican party hadn't gotten everything they wanted, culminating in the selection of John McCain.
You remember McCain, Peggy?
He was the hopeless utterly politically unprincipled boob, just creamed by the most radically left Democrat candidate ever.
The only thing which energized his campaign and prvented an even bigger gap than 52/47 was a conservative woman called Sarah Palin.
You trashed her, I believe. And you continue to trash her.
It appears that while you want a Republican party of candidates so vast it encompasses Democrats like Specter -- but not vast enough to cover a mainstream conservative like Palin, who is beyond the pale to you and your oh so DC claque.
The Curious Case Of Peggy Noonan -- the older she gets the more childishly incoherent she becomes.
Jack, Although I used to
May 2, 2009 - 12:07 ET by Chris NormanJack,
Although I used to really enjoy reading Peggy Noonan waxing poetic, I fear she has waxed poetic so much she has come to waxing whacky on many occasions. I'm not sure what she exactly what she wants any longer. I don't get her hostility towards Sarah Palin and others in the GOP. Maybe she's always been sort of a snob and I didn't realize it.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Chris -- Noonan constructs
May 2, 2009 - 12:23 ET by Jack BauerChris -- Noonan constructs a simplistic stawman argument using circular logic. She accepts NO responsibility for HER FAILURES as a spokesparrot. It's a complex series of events which led us to here.
9/11 and the next five to six years of military struggle forced cvonservatives to defend Bush on all issues, for what they rightly grasped was the sake of the United States survival.
To adopt her simplistic analysis, Noonan's idea of a broad Republican tent seems to be to to encompass big government "ideas" that are not recognizably "Republican". Conservatives ideas of a broad tent encompasses principles that attract all-comers. Like Reagan did.
Maybe she could set an example for inclusiveness and PRAISE PALIN as an important element in a Rep revival. Or is that expecting too much for her and McCain? Apparently it is.
Jack,
May 2, 2009 - 12:52 ET by Chris NormanJack,
Yeah, Ms. Noonan does seem to have a tendency of talking down to conservatives as if we are unruly children and she a wise and calm matriarch. I also detect some snobbery and elitism in who she chooses to admonish - although, as a child herself of the Reagan Revolution, she should know better. Perhaps she has become so old blue blood establishment, that tea parties, Sarah Palin, etc. alarm her. Whatever, she is losing many readers who used to admire her.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Why is Peggy Hostile to Sarah ???
May 2, 2009 - 12:53 ET by allanfThat's easy. The New York elitists Peggy covets don't like Palin. The gender based feminists who Peggy fears, dispise Palin.
Noonan
May 2, 2009 - 13:41 ET by KC MulvilleI've soured on Peggy Noonan myself lately. Remember, she was a speechwriter for Bush the Elder, which means that she comes from the old style GOP; content to be a loyal minority party. That brand of Republican called Reagan a boob who believed in voodoo economics, right up until they saw that Reagan was going to win, and succeed as president. They assured us that they would never raise taxes, and then did precisely that. Their brand of Republicanism is distinctly a product of Washington.
The ridiculous thing here is that an opportunistic hack of a senator, who voted with the Democrats whenever it mattered, admitted that he was leaving the party for purely selfish reasons ... and the spin is that the conservatives were the ones who bugged out on the party! Since Ronald Reagan won in 1980, the Republican party has stood fast with the Michels, Doles, McCains, Specters, Powells, Snowes, Collinses, and even the Lincoln Chaffees of the party. Specter ought to know: his last victory came precisely because the GOP bailed him out. Ric Santorum supported Specter!
And now Specter is trying to sell the idea that conservatives are pushing him out and being intolerant? During the last three decades, the conservatives didn't throw anyone out. The only ones who left the party were the compromisers who fled the political battlefield at the first sign of trouble.
The spin is that the conservatives are purging the party. The conservatives aren't doing a damned thing. It's the milquetoast country club Republican weasels who are doing all the moving. The conservatives haven't moved an inch.
KC, I hear some commentators
May 2, 2009 - 15:06 ET by Chris NormanKC,
I hear some commentators decrying the fact that there are very few Republican congressional office holders left from the Northeast states. I submit that the population and demographics of that area have shifted so much that there's no one left there to vote for the preppy Republicans who used to run - like Henry Cabot Lodge & Margaret Chase Smith - you know - people with three names. It's almost pointless trying to compete with Democrats there - Republicans can't "out-liberal" 'em - even though Collins and Snowe still try. I think we have a problem in competing in urban areas and the more a state gets urbanized the more weak Republicans there become. Take Colorado - as Denver grows, the vote in the rest of the state weakens. It's gone from a Republican state to a Democratic one. I hope we can get it back
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
The question in reverse
May 2, 2009 - 18:01 ET by KC MulvilleExcellent observation, Chris.
Why don't the media reverse that question? Why don't they ask what's wrong with the Northeast? After all, they have no hesitation asking what's wrong with Kansas, remember?
Republicans should become Democrats so they can win???
May 2, 2009 - 12:05 ET by JaykeThat makes a lot of sense. If I hold to my conservative values to my death then I WIN! Just because the lemmings jump over the cliff doesn't mean I have to. Unfortunately, I'm on the same boat that the dems are sinking but at least I'll be able to say "I TOLD YOU SO, YOU DUMBASSES!"
http://www.youtube.c...
http://www.youtube.c...
http://www.youtube.c...
Um, Jakye
May 2, 2009 - 12:08 ET by BlondeRepublicans should become Democrats so they can win???
Therein lies the point...and I sincerely hope that this rediculous false premise is resoundingly disproved...as much Arlen Specter thinks not!
I hope his defeat in the democrat primary will put him, and this stupid theme, down for good.
Your shout of anguish there, should be the GOP war chant....and I think Michael Steele heard you. Thx!
I hope he fails, too.
→ Arlen Sphincter
May 2, 2009 - 12:18 ET by Cool ArrowI'm convinced it is our duty as conservatives to be as far removed from the economic rape of our children as we can possibly be.
At some point we need to find ways to transfer our wealth quietly to them with an honest apology for everything our generation has done to them in order that we could live large in the here and now.
It's sick and it's sad, but our society sneers at its industrious members.
It's hard to talk when you're teabagging - Anderson Cooper
Dear Ms. Noonan:
May 2, 2009 - 11:38 ET by dervishI believe the reason that the Republicans have been fading is precisely
because they've been acting like Democrats. Anyone who'd been in a
coma the past eight years, looking back at the legislation produced in
that time frame, would probably think that Gore won in 2000 and again
in 2004
If you don't see a reason to maintain a general party philosophy, and exclude people who agree more with the other guys than with you, what exactly is the point of having more than one party? Obama's chickens are inevitably coming home to roost in the next couple of years, and if the Republicans aren't poised to be an alternative to Obamaism, it won't help them at all.
.
→ Just shoot me
May 2, 2009 - 11:38 ET by Cool ArrowI feel sorry for Peggy Noonan. She used to have some great ideas. She was an unparalleled wordsmith when she wrote for Reagan.
Now her brain is drained and she wants us all to be Democrats now that the Democrats are all Socialist.
It's hard to talk when you're teabagging - Anderson Cooper
Yeah. I always admired
May 2, 2009 - 11:40 ET by QueenMumYeah. I always admired Noonan for her command of the English language and her cool delivery. Don't understand what happened.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
→ My mom
May 2, 2009 - 12:09 ET by Cool ArrowMy mom is 88. I just went over to visit her and dad. Mom sits at the table writing letters to right-wing leech organizations who try to convince her a donation will stop the Clintons, or Obama, or save property rights. Alas, she's broke, or surely the check would be in the mail.
My mom is confused about some things, but she isn't so addled that she believes the tripe Peggy Noonan has sunk to.
It's hard to talk when you're teabagging - Anderson Cooper
I believe in a big tent
May 2, 2009 - 11:39 ET by Dan The Man 2I believe in a big tent also, but like all places it too has rules. And there is a point where the rules are transgressed and the offered must make ammends and restitution. I look to Christian churches and denominations for examples
I see slot of the bigger dominations losing thief way because they do not stick by thier doctrines and theology or they change it to suit the new make up of the body. Afterwards they are changed and some seem like they are nor Christian
So I want the repulican party to stay by it's roots and not change. If that means fewer people then so be it.
It's the Voters!
May 2, 2009 - 11:39 ET by slickwillie2001Notice that the meme being created on the left is that Specter was somehow rejected by the Republican Congress, that he was pushed out by those mean Republicans. Specter may have been irritating and unreliable, but there was no movement in Congress to get rid of him. He could have stayed in the Republican Party and Congress for the rest of his life. All of his problems originated with voters in Pennsylvania, which the liberals are a little more hesitant to disparage.
Other moderate Republicans like the fair ladies of Maine are welcome to stay in the Republican Party. If Republican voters in Maine are unhappy with them, let them field candidates in the primaries. That has to be done at the local level. If we are not willing to do the work necessary to put together a primary challenge, let's not moan and whine after the fact.
PS: Specter on Elena Kagan, one near the top of the Bamster's SCOTUS list: "Earlier this year, Specter came out strongly against the nomination of Elena Kagan, Obama’s pick for the post of Solicitor General. Kagan is one of several people who’s being talked about as a potential Supreme Court pick for Obama." (Ref)
Specter was unreliable at times for the Republicans in the Senate, I expect he will be just as unreliable for the democratics.
Noonan
May 2, 2009 - 11:48 ET by BlondeThere was really only one point of hers with which I absolutely agreed:
Unfortunately, we have the RINO's and other pseudo-conservatives (and former conservatives, whom the media delights in calling ultra-right), like Noonan, who buy into this warped notion, and even further the argument that success for the GOP can only be achieved by moderating our core principals.
Moderation be damned. That's what got us into this mess.
P.S. Good riddance Arlen Specter.
I hope he fails, too.
It is Einstein's fault (relatively speaking)
May 2, 2009 - 14:54 ET by ahusserAs the Democrats have unceasingly moved to the extreme left all the while calling themselves moderates, progressives etc. They always seem to frame the dialogue and we are almost always playing catch up or reacting. Somehow, conservatives, have to shunt the criticism aside and tell the truth plainly and simply to reach those we can.
We, without even moving, are now the "extreme" right compared to them. They have moved over not us. That being said we still need to be inclusive and let many into the party. If we get too exclusive we will purge ourselves out of seats. No one agrees on all points the demonising the left is doing to us is damaging and has to be counter-acted politically. The tea parties were action in the right direction IMO. Somehow we squandered our majority in the house and senate and there were more reasons than just Iraq.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
A great party takes a stand
May 2, 2009 - 12:02 ET by nkviking75A great party puts forth a set of proven and persuades people to try them. A great party can point to great leaders like Ronald Reagan, who orchestrated an amazing change in our economy in the '80's. A great party can also point out the folly of the new socialists masquerading as the Democrat party.
Instead of pandering to minorities, Republicans need to show them that conservatism works as well for them as for suburban whites.
As country singer Aaron Tippen put it in one of his hits a few years back, "You've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything." The Church of Obamism is the best evidence there is for that statement.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
"A great party allows
May 2, 2009 - 12:15 ET by ckc1227"A great party allows everyone in, and allows prospective members to self-define."
If we have to become Democrats to win, what's the point? A party that believes in everything believes in nothing.
"The other day Sen. Jim DeMint said he'd rather have 30 good and reliable conservative senators than 60 unreliable Republicans. Really? Good luck stopping an agenda you call socialist with 30 hardy votes. "
I guess you haven't exactly been paying attention lately, have you? Democrats who call themselves Republicans but vote Democrat aren't helping to stop the socialist agenda they believe in.
Maybe it's time for you to move on along to the other side too, Ms. Peggy. The fewer posers we have, the better off my side will be. We're not interested in becoming liberals just so we can say we won.
Self-marginalizing Noonan
May 2, 2009 - 12:17 ET by RogerCfromSDSelf-marginalizing Noonan is still harping on this non-issue?
Heads up, Liberals and PaleoRINOs, we don't give a crap what you think about our Party. It's our Party.Worry about your own.
A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.
Peggy Noonan as a thoughtful analyst? Not....
May 2, 2009 - 12:28 ET by jdripperI know that Peggy has for some time believed herself to be the sage of the Repbulican party. I know that without her Ronald Reagan would have been nothing.
I know that she took credit for the work of many others and what is that word that was used by her co-workers? Opportunist?
Ms Noonan I refer you to that great war criminal Harry Truman (paraphrasing here) "when the people are give the choice of voting for a Democrat or a Democrat they will always choose the Democrat."
Jack
"If at age 20 you are a conservative then you have no heart. If at age 30 you are a liberal then you have no brains." Sir Winston Churchill
Noonan is a no-no
May 2, 2009 - 12:35 ET by nolotrippenLet's try an analogy. You want your roses to grow. You want them to stand out. The Noonan method is to to let the rose bush be like any other plant: no dead-heading, no pruning, no weeding around the base, fertilizer all over instead of where it belongs.
How is this a winning strategy? It isn't.
The Dinocrats and Rinos tell us the way to grow prize winning roses is to grow them like any common weed. After all, the common weeds are winning aren't they?
Weeds will always be a threat. They must always be dealt with. They must never be allowed to overrun.
If the Republicans offer roses and not weeds, it's the roses that will win.
Noonan, Queen of the
May 2, 2009 - 12:46 ET by maxvoltNoonan,
Queen of the closet liberals...I think its time Noonan realize, the conservatives are cleaning house and we have already DUMPED her. so Peggy, STFU!
Peggy Who?
May 2, 2009 - 13:16 ET by Edward CropperNoonan lost most conservatives with her trashing of Palin and her self-righteous elitism.
What she and most other closet wimps can't get in their head is that a lot of us are not interested in saving the Republican Party. Screw the Republican Party as an institution.
I would just as soon vote for a Democrat, an Independent or a Libertarian who espoused my political convictions as I would any Republican.
It is not the saving of a party Peggy it is the saving of a Nation.
It was liberal and moderate
May 2, 2009 - 13:23 ET by Chris NormanIt was liberal and moderate Republican politicians like Specter, Hagel, Snowe, and Collins and establishment "conservatives" like Hatch and Lugar who helped send the GOP down the path to destruction from 2001 - 2006. They diluted the conservative message and their leadership caused the House and Senate Republicans to lose focus and overspend like the Democrats. By having their own liberal agenda, they muddled any chance of a coherent message from the GOP. If all the liberals left the GOP tomorrow, it would weaken our numbers alarmingly in the short term, but at this point, we're so far down, does it even matter? If the party can come back, as it did in 1980, at least it's elected politicians would be speaking from the same page - at least for awhile. My biggest concern is the fact that there doesn't seem to be a strong conservative and charismatic leader, like Reagan, to take the party's reins and guide it.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Repugs and Demonrats
May 2, 2009 - 13:31 ET by Joe CamelI dropped my affiliation with the Republican party just before the 2004 election cycle. I became very concerned every time I saw another spending bill, tax, or social program being signed by Bush. When they would send me mailers or calls asking me to help stop this or that, I would just tell them that "they" need to stop it first. Much like the NRA, which I have belonged to since I was 18 years old. They could not assure I got my magazine, answered my questions or took care of their membership; but always about more money, expanding..in the end, alienating those who put them where they are. I give to my local politicians and other movements, but, I won't give money to either of the exisiting parties out there.
My opinion, term limits, new rules of the house and senate that rewards this type of behavior, and an age limit of 69 years old to serve, then, forced out. This would include any and all elected offices, Supreme Court justices, and court appointments..all government jobs. As long as we continue down this road, we will continue to reap what those
Think how cool it would be to set a limit on income to be elected; say anyone who is worth more than $250,000 is not allowed to run for office as they don't understand the "little" people they are supposed to watch out for. Imagine us, the little people saying to those "power" people, we got your back...then watch them squirm like most of us do daily to get by. They just don't get it. I worked my whole life, overtime, back to school, learning on my own time to get where I have, Now, as I looked at my check, I noticed the ceiling on SS has been raised, thus putting the top at $106,000..and here I thought I had finally made it..go figure. Now, I see it won't ever end..Throw them all out and let's start over. Can't hurt.
There is nothing "marvelous"
May 2, 2009 - 13:35 ET byThere is nothing "marvelous" about this piece Mr Shephard. Peggy Noonan is a long winded blow hard who sold her principles for popularity long ago. Actually just the OPPOSITE of her postulate is true. The only way for you to win is for you to CLEARLY DEFINE what you are for and against then those that agree will join. Period.
If Ms Noonan's theoretical house is not built on sifting sand, riddle me this: Why do liberals INSIST on making it illegal for conservative groups, churches, Boy Scouts, or Student Associations, to EXCLUDE those that they don't agree with? If this is the road to RUIN as Ms Noonan suggests, surely the liberals would be all for your continued demise, right? So how come they sue in court for the right of Atheists to join RELIGIOUS GROUPS?Why do they want homosexuals allowed to hold office in groups that are OPPOSED TO HOMOSEXUALS?
Because liberals know that the quickest way for you to LOSE ALL OF YOUR PRINCIPLES is for you to be LED by those who DON'T AGREE WITH YOU! Look around the evidence is all over. They want homo's in the Boy Scouts a Christian group so that overtime it loses it's "Christian-ish" ways and becomes more "butthole friendly". LOL.
PEGGY NOONAN is PART OF THE PROBLEM! Soft assed nothings that urged us to take on the idiot Bush who almost NO ONE had ever heard of, because he is a "compassionate conservative". Well, that worked out just fine didn't it. Leaving apart the war, Bush put more sodomites and lesbians to work than GLAD! Bush spent money like a sailor on shore leave, CLEARLY helping us define ourselves as preferring "smaller government". NOT.
Did the civil right's movement allow Klansmen to march with them? Would the Apartheid movement have allowed those who only wanted to SLIGHTLY free the blacks from oppression? There were plenty of Dutch folk who didn't want blacks to be EQUAL but didn't want to "hurt or enslave" them! Think they'd be welcome at a Mandela rally? Did the woman's movement allow men who claimed their rightful place as the HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD, to become members?! DUH. How about the abortion movement? How's PLANNED PARENTHOOD doing with their "Pro-life" membership drive? Why is it that the very notion of that seems ridiculous to you? There wasn't even room in that satanic party for ONE Joe Lieberman! One!
But it's only YOU, who seek to maintain Judeo Christian values, that "PUNDITS" say will "benefit" by the membership of your enemy within your ranks!
If you can't convince the populace that conservative values are BETTER then you deserve to lose. The problem is that all who say the are conservative aren't all that "convinced" themselves. Exhibit A: PEGGY NOONAN.
→ Acts
May 2, 2009 - 13:54 ET by Cool ArrowI remember her column following Bush-v-Gore. Brilliant, with the crowd outside shouting to Gore "Get out of Cheney's house".
Then there was the masterpiece she wrote in the WSJ following 9/11. A truly moving tribute to the firefighters who went up the stairs while everyone else was going down the stairs.
I credit her for a lot of good work, I don't think this is the same woman who wrote those inspirational pieces.
It's hard to talk when you're teabagging - Anderson Cooper
Acts
May 2, 2009 - 13:56 ET by Noel SheppardActs et al,
This is indeed a marvelous article because it's evoking needed thought. You don't have to 100 percent agree with something for it to be marvelous if it makes you think, and this piece certainly has done that.
The Republican Party is currently in a total state of disarray. Do you disagree? With that in mind, we need all voices within this Party to be offering ideas and solutions. I think that's what Peggy did here, although like you I don't completely agree with her...but that's the point: should the GOP be a small tent only accepting those that are in total lockstep with the far-right? Do you really believe that's a winning strategy for us? Honestly?
After two straight horrible election cycles, we need to do some serious self-examination, and though I don't always agree with Peggy -- and don't always agree with ANYONE!!! -- I think we need her opinion along with any other serious members of this Party regardless of how possibly wrong it might be. JMHO. ns
I totally agree Noel
May 2, 2009 - 14:14 ET by shawn228I'm not saying the GOP has to move left, but I agree that the party is in disarray.
Arlen Specter leaving gives Dems more to gloat about, and will gloat even more when Al Franken gets seated. Several members of the Republican comittee are miffed at Newt Gingrich for calling them a bunch of egomaniacs and needed to be coddled by the chairman
John McCain, Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindal, Eric Cantor are creating something like a Outreach effort for a New America? Does this mean they are going more to the left? I'm not sure what it means maybe someone can explain it to me.
So I believe for now it is for the Dems to lose and not for GOP to win. The Dem screwups have to be major for the GOP to gain seats in 2010
He had my vote
→ Shawn
May 2, 2009 - 14:20 ET by Cool ArrowPlease tell me what McCain has to offer in this outreach.
Remember, he's the one who halted his campaign for a photo-op with the President, fearing he might be on the wrong side of a President he should have been distancing himself from?
It's hard to talk when you're teabagging - Anderson Cooper
I don't know Cool Arrow.
May 2, 2009 - 14:39 ET by shawn228You tell me :-)
He had my vote
→ Same as Noonan
May 2, 2009 - 14:45 ET by Cool ArrowHe can put on his clown paint, ride around in his clown car, and shout "Look! I'm a Liberal too"
It's hard to talk when you're teabagging - Anderson Cooper
Sorry Noel But I beg to
May 2, 2009 - 14:54 ET bySorry Noel
But I beg to differ. The republican party doesn't need ANY voices telling it to become an ABORTION PARTY. It doesn't need ANY voices telling it to become the HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE supporting party. Similar to when Republicans try to play the "entitlements" give away game with the liberals. YOU WILL ALWAYS LOSE. No matter HOW MUCH Bush spent, even though it was more than Clinton, he didn't get credited by liberals for all of his big spending ways. If you allow abortion, it will be with "limits", WELL THE OTHER PARTY DOESN'T WANT ANY LIMITS so you'll STILL be an "extremist" in the mind of some sick liberal like Obama that thinks even BABIES THAT SURVIVE ABORTIONS SHOULD BE EXECUTED!!!!
Unless you're contemplating becoming an adjunct of the Democrat Party, you'll still be the "odd man" out! Not to mention the fact that each degree to which you move towards their positions, takes you away from yours. So sorry Noel, much as I like you, I just don't agree that all voices are "worthy". ANY voice that calls for LEAVENING THE LOAF is from satan NOT GOD.
Think about it man, we have the biggest homosexual onslaught against traditional values since SODOM! How the h-e- double hockey sticks, can you beat them BY BECOMING THEM???
The abortion lovers are growing bolder by the day. Time was when electing a BEAST like Obama, a man so vile he voted to murder babies that SURVIVE abortion, WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE. Even among Liberals! But not today. Why is that? Because the children of satan that Jesus spoke so passionately about in Matt 13:36-43 have been nothing if not CONSISTENT. They have NEVER taken a backwards step and now they've got a blood fanged monster who PRETENDS TO WORSHIP JESUS, in the W.H! Imagine what world you are living in when a man can look at a baby on a shelf, a baby that has survived an abortion and say, LET IT DIE. And then imagine that this same beast can get people to believe that he worships the same Jesus you do! Satans children have been zealous in their efforts to enlarge THEIR fathers kingdom, when are we going to be about OUR fathers business?
They have given No Quarter, no concessions. When their people even APPEAR to be considering your point of view, like Clinton with DOMA, they accept it with a WINK and a NOD, KNOWING that he doesn't mean it. KNOWING that if he had the votes he'd cut your throat. And they give him leeway, just like they're giving Obama on the Marriage deal. They aren't picketing him because they know he's a god forsaken LIAR who would marry homosexuals HIMSELF if he could get away with it.
And before someone objects to the "god forsaken liar" bit, Obama himself has described the bibles teachings on homosexuality as being "OBSCURE". He referred to the book of Romans chapter 1 which expressly condemns homosexuality as being an obscure book. Well, this is what the bible says about Obama and those like him, who find biblical teaching "obscure".
2 Corinthians 4
1Therefore seeing we have this ministry, as we have received mercy, we faint not;
2But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.
3But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
4In whom the god of this world ( satan) hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
And this gospel is INDEED "obscure" to Obama.
We need to FIGHT. With every core and fibre of our being because the enemy is truly at the GATE and they will not stop UNTIL YOU BOW DOWN TO BAAL.
Look at the furor which erupted when a Beauty Queen said EXACTLY what the PRESIDENT SAID!!!! The only difference is that the DEMON which motivates the hearts and minds of liberalism KNOWS that OBama is his servant and it KNOWS that CARRIE PREJEAN for her PUBLIC stance HAS BEEN COMMENDED BY CHRIST IN HEAVEN! Matthew 10:32
Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.
But they HATE HER. They give her NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR THOUGHT. News anchors, reporters, politicians all banding against a woman who simply said what EVERY POLL shows the majority of Americans to agree with and you people want to ENTERTAIN THE IDEAS of weak willed wishy washy NOTHINGS that HAVE NEVER STOOD FOR CHRIST????!
Not I, my friend, Not I. As the song says, "As for me and my house, we shall serve the LORD".
GO RICKY HATTON!
Acts 2_38--you're spot on!!
May 3, 2009 - 12:51 ET by SvenActs 2_38--you're spot on!! Excellent analysis!!
I think the assertion that we "must listen all voices within the party..." blah...blah...balh, is what got us into this mess in the first place!
I alsoo firmly believe that while the GOP is in disarray (thank you Moderates and RINO's), THE CONSERVATIVES ARE NOT!! Again, it was this tripe about: "Listening to all voices within the party that git us into this mess!
Do the Dems listen to all the voices in their party? HE!! NO!
Again, Great analysis!
The democrat party was in
May 2, 2009 - 15:09 ET by MrSnugglesThe democrat party was in total dissaray after 9/11, yet they went even further to the left than ever before and have won two consecutive elections and the white house.
Yet now that the republicans are in that same position, they have to move to the left and not further to the right?
It is fine to dismiss Mr.
May 2, 2009 - 14:14 ET by fitzfongIt is fine to dismiss Mr. Specter as an opportunist
I don't dismiss Mr. Specter as an opportunist. I dismiss him as a non-entity. If becoming a majority or even a competitive party means having to carry the likes of Arlen Specter, the party is better off in the minority. "Moderates" aren't going to become Republicans because the Party softens towards the left on some popular social issues or because the Party backs off opposing Obama. "Moderates" are going to become Conservatives when the reckless policies that this irresponsible administration and Congress ram down our throats drives the economy into the ground...it seems that they have to learn from their mistakes. Peggy Noonan is a smug, elitist, self-promoting nobody. You can just imagine her closing her eyes while writing this trash, gathering up all the phony sincerity to do it.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Specter is a jerk but there is a PROBLEM.
May 2, 2009 - 14:40 ET by Gat New YorkRegarding Specter, the man started his career as a Democrat and changed to the GOP only because it was the only way for him to win. Sound familiar?
Regarding Noonan's comments, the GOP does have a major problem - its is not their issues - it is their attitude and their strategy.
If you were a BMW dealer salesman and a potential customer came in who drove a Cadillac, would you offer him a test drive in the BMW before buying or would you demand that he first buy the BMW before you allow him to drive it?
The problem with the Republican approach of "we only want people who already agree with us" is that you exclude most Americans who are on the fence.
Basic marketing is that you do whatever you can to get a potential customer to try your brand, and once engaged you try to convert them. But you cannot convert a potential new customer without first getting them to try you.
Republicans need to create a strategy that attracts as many people as possible - tries to convert as many of them as possible.
Unlike what former Republican Noonan said, you don't change your brand to try and include everyone - you try and change everyone to be included in your brand.
Peggy left the party a long time ago
May 2, 2009 - 14:41 ET by TheHistorianPeggy, you left the party a long time ago. Why don't you just admit it and go? They probably need a replacement for Keith Olbermann at MSNBC. Maybe you could double the watchers to two.
Don't let the door hit you in the backside. Just GO!!!
"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."
G. W. F. Hegel
Anyone else remember the
May 2, 2009 - 15:20 ET by Chris NormanAnyone else remember the "Atari Democrats" of the 1980s? Guys like Tim Wirth and Bob Kerry? They were supposed to be the moderate hi-tech business-savvy Dem pols who would replace the old time labor liberal demo-saurs and lead the Dems to the promised land. Now, they're as extinct as - well - Atari - but you never hear the the pundits bemoan them.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Dear Peggy:
May 2, 2009 - 15:32 ET by redmikeSometimes you can cure cancer with a scalpel.
I think Peggy Noonan and Charles Johnson are drinking...
May 2, 2009 - 17:14 ET by R D Helm...the same bong water.
-Dave
This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.
New Symbol
May 2, 2009 - 17:23 ET by someloudthunderI wouldn't be against a dinosaur as the new GOP symbol. Don't get me wrong, elephant is cool and all but a dinosaur would be awesome. Stomping Democrat house bills!
Noonan is going in the wrong direction
May 2, 2009 - 18:02 ET by Jman449Her suggestion to repair the Republican Party is to build on the John McCain "campaign" and become the Democrat Right. Why would people want Communism Lite when they can just have the real thing?
She did make one good point. Republicans need patience. How did the Democrat Party get where they are now? Over the last forty years, they have taken control of the media, education and the culture. We have a generation that has been tought to think like Communists and, guess what, they are voting like Communists.
How are the Republicans of today going about reversing those gains? They aren't. Who in the so-called Conservative movement is talking about taking the money spent to try to elect a quasi-enemy of Conservatism like McCain and instead re-directing those resources towards developing Conservative media and schools?
Look at the power of a single media outlet perceived as Conservative-friendly in Fox News. They have destroyed CNN, who at one time had a brand name in cable news as powerful as Coca-Cola or Xerox. Imagine having Conservative-friendly newspapers (print and online), entertainment networks and sports channels. How about Conservative charter schools and universities?
Conservatism needs to think bigger than the next election. We have a huge advantage over Communism. Our ideas have been proven right over time. Communism is a proven failure, and for good reason. Communism acts against human nature, while capitalism embraces human nature.
Noonan
May 2, 2009 - 20:49 ET by doug1950I have had an unfavorable opinion of Peggy Noonan for quite some time now. Whenever I have watched her on television she always comes off as condescending and just barely able to tolerate those whom she sees as inferior. She smiles and nods slowly as if to say, "You poor silly ignorant peasants, how long must I suffer with and guide you."
Do not confuse one's ability to write well with being right about issues. I believe she is truely in love with herself as much as her craft and allows that to cloud her ability to reason logically. She sees herself as above all this annoying display of hard knuckly politics. She is after all an "artist". Someone said earlier said she was smug. I agree and think she like so many others fails prey to and has begun to believe her own press. She has never run for office or won any elections like so many of the talking heads, they can all tell you what a candidate did wrong or predict the outcome of an election. How many times have they been wrong as hell? Peggy does not know anymore and probably less than the average poster on this board. She is just one more elitest, blue blood country club republican who is embarrassed and annoyed by the common folks and all the fuss they are making. Everything I read in her article said We need to just compromise, go along to get along and hell, just let anyone in who wants in. Her and her ilk is why we are where we are now.
I say good riddance to Arlen, Lincoln Chaffee and any of the other RINOs that have left and let's keep up the pressure so the rest of the weak kneed, luke-warm fence sitting parasites bail out too.
Doug... Amen...Amen...and
May 2, 2009 - 21:57 ET by bigtimerDoug...
Amen...Amen...and Amen.
She and her elitist ilk are the problem...not the solution.
Period.
Nobody, but nobody is going to try to talk me into voting for any so-called moderate ever again...with the excuse but look what will happen if 'you don't'.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Coalition
May 2, 2009 - 21:24 ET by pgrossjrYour coalition isn't good for much if you can't rely on its members to hold the line in critical votes. The stimulus for example. The reason the Republicans do not have 60 votes is not that the party has not been inclusive over the past 8 years, it is precisely because it has. The attempt to steal the Democrats thunder by abandoning Reagan's principle that "government is the problem" is the proximate cause of their loss of control. Why vote for someone who is pretending to be a Democrat, vote for the real one! I still believe we lost the last election because the base was not enthused and the Democrat base was. Despite the turnout, I think many republicans stayed home rather than vote for McCain. His daughters ramblings since have done nothing to make them regret it.
I could not disagree with
May 2, 2009 - 22:12 ET by Ryan Mc.I could not disagree with Peggy Noonan more as has been the case a lot the last few years. The republican's lost the last two elections because of the "big tent" republicans who thought ideology wasn't important but buying votes like a democrat was the way to go. The gang of 14, immagration, spending were all by those "big tent" "RINOs" that Peggy wants back in. I agree with Sen. DeMint. I'll take 30 "pure" republicans who follow the conservative agenda than 60 Olympia Snows. Why "win" an election just to lose you're agenda and have only you're own party to blame.
Conservatism wins every time its tried. The Republican party needs a litmous test for congressional candidates. You must be for tax cuts, against abortion, for boarder security, strong national defense, and against big gov't activity. (Dept of Education, EPA, Dept. of Energy). We can argue around the corners about how best to achieve our goals but we must share the same goals or why even have a party? If the government grows whoever wins than I no longer care who wins. Big tents are for directionless parties that do nothing. The Democrats never feel the need to let in pro-life, tax-cutting, boarder security conscious, pro-military members, and they manage to win and push their leftist agenda. They don't nominate Justice Souter's. I am sick of Peggy's (and people like her) arguement. Republican's need to look the other way and accept liberals into the party and stop worrying about silly ideology. When the democrats start nominating Clarence Thomas types I'm willing to listen.
The shrinking strawman
May 2, 2009 - 23:26 ET by americaneagleThe idea that the GOP is adopting a "shrink to win" strategy is a total straw man argument and has to be exposed as such. No one in the GOP is advocating a narrowing of the Party, but many of the voters have decided that they are done supporting candidates who represent very few of their actual views and positions. That is the stark reality that Arlen Specter faced as he toured hhis state and looked at the polls, and saw that Pat Toomey was going to take his precious position as the GOP candidate away from him in the next election...so he took a run-out powder and switched sides.
One of my friends at Town Hall posted an essay on his blog that touched on just the attitude that Peggy Noonan, and seemingly Noel as well, are advocating (and I blogged about it a year or so ago) and put it thus: The way the GOP is attempting to draw 'moderates' into the party now is like trying to herd stray cats under an umbrella in the rain. No matter how much you chase them around the yard, you can never get them all under the umbrella. It is therefore better to anchor your unbrella in one spot, keep it there, and allow the cats to come to you in order to stay dry. Basically he was saying that if the GOP wants to get moderates under the umbrella, the GOP has to have a consistent set of core beliefs and principles and allow those 'moderates' who want to come in to do so, but that the party cannot abandon what it is supposed to be in order to make them feel comfortable.
It seems that Noonan and others like her would rather see the GOP completely abandon any pretense of conservatism in order to win elections, but what is the point of winning if you stand for nothing? The GOP abandoned its core starting with the decision of George HW Bush to raise taxes, continued it with their free spending ways under GW Bush, and reached a crescendo with the nomination of the ulimate Republican anti-conservative John McCain to carry the GOP banner in the '08 election. And what did that get us? A party that lost the White House, saw the Democrats gain a stranglehold in the House, and a net gain in the Senate. And in order to combat this Noonan suggests that we move even futher towards the Democrats in order to expand the party numbers, even though such a move would further alienate a base that rebelled against the national party in the last election cycle, and wants nothing less than a return to the conservative principles that used to define the GOP.
While Ms. Noonan's piece may be thought provoking, it is simply a restatement by a pseudoconservative voice, living off of the fact that she was once a Reagan speechwriter, of the same tired advice that all manner of media figures and Democratic pundits offer the GOP: become us and you can win again! Only, if we continue to become them we will find ourselves in a position of the permanent minority since Democratic voters are going to vote for authentic Democrats all the time, and not a watered down Republican.
As my friend at Town Hall said, I would rather 'die', in the political sense, on my feet than live as a slave to the government on my knees. And following the advice that Noonan and her media pals are dispensing would only serve to cast the GOP into the political wilderness once again, and that I cannot abide. If Noonan and her ilk want to capitulate, then fine...join Specter in the Democratic Party and you can be part of the big tent that you so admire. But as for me, I am never going to give in to the idea that electoral wins are more important than living by the principles that I hold dear in my heart and spirit.
Wow ae... Thank you...you
May 2, 2009 - 23:43 ET by bigtimerWow ae...
Thank you...you have my gratitude for the words you wrote in your post...you spoke volumes for me.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
The party didn't push him out
May 3, 2009 - 11:05 ET by freecitizenThe party didn't push him out his constituents did. Why does nobody recognize this? Is the will of the voters so irrelevent? THE PARTY WAS BACKING HIM! More lies from the self-appointed arbiters of truth.
Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.
Exactly right,
May 3, 2009 - 14:55 ET by mattmExactly right, Freecitizen! What these D.C. insiders and RINOs either don't get, or refuse to acknowledge is that the losing strategy for the GOP is their abandonment of their own constituents and the betrayal of the platform of their own party. Noonan's attitude is a perfect example of why the GOP is reeling. The solution is to do the opposite of what these people are saying.
Weed them all out!
May 3, 2009 - 15:47 ET by watchful eyesDuring the first 6 GW years, the media kept hyping the Republican Congress while the party was stuffed with RINOs who kept voting with the Dems. It made me crazy. I got angry when my RNC donations might have gone to Chuckie Hagel, etc. When Specter, Snow and Collins voted for the stimulous bill, the media did make a big deal out of it (Of course, as the only sensible GOP senators!), but the media stayed silent when they were sabotaging the GOP agenda in the early Bush years. The media was able to use that to convince the public that the GOP did not stick to its values. The likes of Lindsay Graham and John McCain (We got stuck with him because of Noonan-like thinking!) still make me cringe remembering their love of "bipartisanship". Of course, the media loves it and public doesn't learn that it only goes one way. It's time we purge all of the RINOs so the GOP can do the job we expect of them.
NOONAN DOESN'T WANT TO BE LEFT OFF THE DC PARTY LIST
May 3, 2009 - 19:06 ET by BeanerECMOThe republicant (sic) 'stars' at the gathering in NOVA are becoming more
stupid as time goes on. The republicants have to realize that the
liberals don't care one wit about conservative principles as long as
conservatives compromise. Where has anyone seen that liberals have
compromised? If GOP would stay with conservative values that have been
delineated in the Constitution as amended, they would win. Both parties
have moved so far to the left toward a totalitarian state, the founding
fathers would not recognize us. We are swiftly moving down the
Alinsky-aligned, Chomsky blessed Marxist, Leninist, Maoist social
welfare collectivist path that recovery may not be possible.
Individualism and initiative are being crushed by both parties. Look
what the $11 trillion (since the mid '60s) for welfare programs have
brought the ones for whom the programs were to help - more abject
failure, depression and dependence on handouts. We must all get off the
government dole.
-----------------------------
I was a liberal until I learned to read, got a job and was mugged by tax and spend politicians.