Did you think listening to President Obama give his address before Congress on Tuesday evening was "like sex?"
Republican strategist and CNN contributor Alex Castellanos did, or at least that's what he admitted to John King on Sunday's "State of the Union" a friend said:
I think, as a friend told me once, that -- listening to Barack Obama give a speech is like sex. The worse there ever was, was excellent.
Honestly, when GOP strategists in the media begin talking this way, one has to wonder where the balance is going to come from in the coming years (video embedded below the fold with CNN produced transcript, h/t NB reader Greg477, file photo):
Video available here for Internet Explorer users.
JOHN KING, HOST: This week, we saw the president standing before a joint session of Congress, then before Marines who will soon be sent off to a very difficult mission in Afghanistan. He offered the Congress and the country a budget he says will change the status quo in Washington, and he offered surprising praise of the mission in Iraq, even as he vowed to bring those troops home.
Plenty to dissect and debate in our Sunday conversation with the best political team on television. Joining us now, veteran Democratic activist Hilary Rosen, Republican strategist Alex Castellanos.
I want to start there with the theater, because, again, 30-plus days, we're still learning a lot about this new president. His first time standing up there in the House of Representatives before a joint session of Congress and then, some might say more importantly, his first time standing on a military base eyeball to eyeball with the men and women he will send into harm's way. Hilary, let me just start with that. Impressions of him as the -- speaking to the nation and as a commander-in-chief?
HILARY ROSEN, DEMOCRAT ACTIVIST: Well, you know, I think the speech to the nation was critically important. We saw what the statistics were. I thought the more important speech to Congress was when he was engaging one on one on television and we saw that with the fiscal responsibility summit.
The troops, though, are such an interesting story. We saw during the campaign, when -- when candidate Obama went to Iraq, the troops surrounded him. They loved him. You know, and then they saw him play basketball and even loved him even more. So there was a real connection, I think, and a real enthusiasm for this commander-in- chief.
And I think, when he went there and said, "We finally know our mission and that's to get out," because these guys have been wondering what their mission was for the last six years. And he said, "We understand it, and now we're going to take care of you." I think that meant a lot.
KING: More on -- more on that in a second, but I know you disagree with the policy, but as a performer?
ALEX CASTELLANOS, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: Well, I think, as a friend told me once, that -- listening to Barack Obama give a speech is like sex. The worse there ever was, was excellent. He -- it's just terrific performance.
KING: It's 9:35 in the morning.
CASTELLANOS: On a Sunday. And it's a terrific performance. He's -- he's reassuring. He demonstrates strength. You can see that he's gotten stronger and more confident in the job.
But the problem, of course, is the split personality disorder. He gives a speech to Congress in which he talks about, "We don't want to spend, we want conservative government." He touches all right-of- center chords while proposing just the opposite.
So, at some point, there's just an inherent conflict between what he says and what he does, same thing with the military speech. I mean, it was really stunning in a way to see him say that, gosh, these troops succeeded beyond all expectations. Well, actually, no, succeeded beyond his expectations.
KING: Well, let's -- let's jump in on that point.
CASTELLANOS: Bush thought he would.
KING: But let's jump in on that point, because being president is very different from running for president. Every president learns this -- Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative -- the job is different than you think it might be when you're campaigning.
So let's listen to a little taste of Barack Obama then as the anti-war candidate and now as the commander-in-chief. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
OBAMA: I have always believed that our invasion of Iraq was a strategic blunder for all of the reasons I've talked about, distracting us from Afghanistan, the enormous costs in blood and treasure.
You have borne an enormous burden for your fellow citizens while extending a precious opportunity to the people of Iraq. Under tough circumstances, the men and women of the United States military have served with honor and succeeded beyond any expectation.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
KING: Hilary Rosen, did the anti-war Democrats who thought he was the better nominee because he was saying it was a strategic blunder, is that what they voted for, a guy who says you went in and gave a precious opportunity to the people of Iraq and you have succeeded beyond anyone's expectations?
ROSEN: There is a little irony in that, but I don't need to go there.
KING: Just a little?
ROSEN: Because we've already processed that. I -- I think what you saw, though, on these two speeches wasn't so inconsistent. What he said early on was, it was a mistake to go into Iraq. And what he said yesterday was, we know that the people, the men and women of the Armed Forces who served there have done the best they can.
But, look, the reason we're getting out is because this has never been good and he was right all along and right today. We -- we still don't have political reconciliation between the Shia and the Sunni. We still don't have an agreement on the oil revenues. We've spent a trillion dollars. Alex is freaking out about the deficit? That trillion dollars...
KING: Then why not get out now? Why wait until 2011?
ROSEN: ... would have helped a lot. Because what he did say all along during the campaign was he was going to listen to the commanders on the ground about the best way to get out. And that's the critical difference. George Bush never had a strategy there; Barack Obama's strategy is to get out safely.
CASTELLANOS: I'm sorry. I'm having trouble processing that. What he should have said is, the reason we're able to do this is because George Bush was right and I was wrong. I kept...
KING: How about John McCain?
CASTELLANOS: I kept -- and John McCain was right.
KING: When it comes to the surge, how about John McCain?
(CROSSTALK)
CASTELLANOS: It worked. Our troops did their job. That's why I kept the generals, George Bush's generals. That's why I kept his secretary of defense. He should have said, "George Bush was right. I was wrong. Mission accomplished, George Bush. Thank you."
KING: I don't think you're going to get that.
CASTELLANOS: No.
KING: But let's -- we only have about a minute left. I want to focus on the budget. And since we only have a short time left, let me just ask you each to sort of define for me where you see the pressure points in this debate. As you know, Republicans say, "Where are the tough choices, Mr. President? Those are huge deficits." And as you know, you guys don't have the votes.
So let's start with you, Hilary. Where's the pressure point in the budget battle?
ROSEN: I think the significant pressure points are going to be on the revenue side, because Barack Obama has made it clear -- and the Democrats in Congress believe this -- that they were elected to make change, to make investment in health care, to make investment in education, to make investment in energy. Those things will pay off for this economy over the long term. How do you pay for it? You do it the way that he promised all along. Two years from now, we're going to let those Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest expire. We've given a middle-class tax cut to 95 percent of Americans. This economy is going to be built back up on the -- on the backs of working men and women the way prosperity has always happened.
KING: A 30-second rebuttal?
CASTELLANOS: Pressure point is spending. This -- this budget is five times the deficit that -- of the -- I guess each of the previous five years here. And it's -- it's stunning spending. It's indebting the next generations.
And what you're going to see Republicans do is push -- see how they made the sausage, pull out, open it up, look at every little bit of spending in there, and take that to the Democrats for the next two years.
ROSEN: George Bush never promised to cut the deficit in half.
KING: We're out of time. We'll continue this conversation. I suspect it's going -- this debate is going to live for a while. Alex Castellanos, Hilary Rosen, thanks for joining us.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Strange analogy. Listening
March 1, 2009 - 19:35 ET by rbosqueStrange analogy. Listening to Miss November is more like it.
Hitler had a nack for doing
March 2, 2009 - 07:33 ET by 10ksnookerHitler had a nack for doing ths as well. And look where that got him.
Ignorant people are easily lied to and don't eve seem to know it.
Alex...I'll take Brown-Nose
March 1, 2009 - 19:44 ET by bigtimerAlex...I'll take Brown-Nose Bull for a $1,000.
WHO?
March 1, 2009 - 19:50 ET by totalkaosdaveTotalKaosDave
Who makes these people "Republican Strategists"? Are these people who just claim they're republican strategists, or is the Republican party actually paying and listening to these "strategists"?
Who makes these people
March 1, 2009 - 22:45 ET by Dan The Man 2Who makes these people "Republican Strategists"?
Sorta like a consultant is anyone 50 miles from home. I think they are chosen by the nets. The way tehy should be chosen is like Rush is chosen.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
listening to Obama
March 1, 2009 - 19:58 ET by lnthompMy first thought when hearing an Obama speech is "...a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
Lee T / USN(ret) / Oregon City, OR
When responsible people make mistakes, responsible people bear the burden. When irresponsible people make mistakes, responsible people bear the burden. -- UserFriendly.org, 2/12/2009
My first thought
March 1, 2009 - 22:00 ET by KC MulvilleFrankly, my first thought is to wonder
That's the reason the "GOP"
March 1, 2009 - 20:00 ET by hbestThat's the reason the "GOP" is out of power. We listen to these so called "GOP" "Strategists".
Sad
March 2, 2009 - 07:43 ET by nadadhimmiI was so sad to see Peggy Noonan become infatuated with Obama. A previously sensible woman fell for a street thug, gave up her "family" for him, and is in reality, reviled by him. All over this country, motels near prisons are filled with these poor deluded women just waiting for Mr. Wonderful to be released, or to be just NEAR HIM. I can never listen to another word she says.
Noonan
March 2, 2009 - 12:35 ET by slickwillie2001I have to agree; I used to enjoy reading Noonan. Now if I try, it's near impossible to get past the first paragraph. Insipid.
Squishy republicans
March 2, 2009 - 12:44 ET by BlondeWhat absolutely infuriates me about Noonan and the other squishy republicans is that they are now pointed to with great glee by the libsters as "representing the right".
It's the typical liberal leaping illogic..."Peggy Noonan, a well known conservative, agrees......" therefore all conservatives do too.
Maddening.
I hope he fails, too.
Benedict Arnold HEARTS Peggy Noonan
March 2, 2009 - 23:55 ET by BigDumbApeThe problem with Peggy Noonan is that she's obviously shifted her political beliefs. However, because she worked under Reagan, she'll milk (oops, I meant to say "wear") a Republican badge for life, and thus she'll try to pimp (oops, I meant to say "parlay") her White House resume into perpetual TV appearances or book deals or recurring editorial columns or whatever else will line her pocket with some coin.
And here's the bottom line about Peggy Noonan. In life and over time, people change their political beliefs. And that's fine; I have no problem with that. This is America, it's a free country, and you're free to believe in whatever you want. If there's some sort of event that happens in the world or occurs in your personal life and it makes you rethink certain things, that's fine, too. Hey, go for it. Be happy in your newfound beliefs.
But what I can't stand is when the news media wants to take someone like Noonan and wants to play off her newfound political beliefs and NOT tell you that. Which means they DON'T want ask her any hard questions, and they DON'T want to grill her about the things she'll now say, simply because that would ruin their whole idea of using her as a stage prop and mouthpiece to achieve their own agenda.
At this point, it's clear that Noonan has been bought and sold. She knows she's going to be put on TV, courtesy of her friends at MSNBC, with a subtitle that will read "Peggy Noonan, Republican and Ronald Reagan speechwriter". However, operating under her changed political beliefs, this is when Noonan recognizes this is her big chance to bag ON Republicans and play her part as a stealth weapon to do as much damage as she can. Because as is often the case in politics, the ends justifies the means. So, if that means Noonan goes on TV and declares she is a Republican, but then spends the whole time praising and kissing Obama's tush, so be it.
And personally, I've gotten sick and tired of Noonan being rammed down the public's throat with the token label of being a Reagan lover or supporter. And of course what I completely resent is that somehow Noonan has been anointed to represent ALL Reagan Republicans that are out there. I mean, hey, she actually worked under Ronny, right? She actually knew him, right? Well, since she actually rubbed elbows with the guy, she must clearly represent ALL of Ronny's personal views, right?
The problem is that NO ONE ever seems willing to confront Noonan about her Obama love...no one seems willing to seriously get in her face and challenge her...with the most obvious and direct questions of all. I'm talking about questions that even a freshman student taking Journalism 101 in High School would know to ask. So, just once I'd love to see her on a show like MORNING JOE or whatever, and for some kind of responsible journalist to simply say...
TV Host: Peggy, let me ask you a question. Do you think Obama shares a gifted charisma that Reagan had?
Noonan: Oh, most definitely. He is truly Reaganesque in the way people just take to him.
TV Host: Well, do you think Obama is like Reagan, "The Great Communicator", because of the way he gives speeches?
Noonan: Oh, most definitely. Like Reagan he touches people. Speaking as a former speech writer for Reagan, how could I not be enthralled by Obama's command of the English language? How could you not love his use of words? Again, speaking as a speechwriter to Reagan, you have to admire Obama's speeches.
TV Host: So, all in all, you think Reagan and Obama are alike?
Noonan: Oh, most definitely. They're cut from the same cloth. I'm sure if he were alive today, Reagan would love Obama.
TV Host: Really! So you think Reagan and his vision of America where government isn't the solution to a problem, it IS the problem, who believed in a SMALLER government, whose vision of economic growth centered on TAX CUTS for people who had worked hard and played by the rules to make something of themselves...
...You're telling us that Reagan would admire a guy who believes the exact OPPOSITE completely and totally across the political board? You're saying Reagan would get behind a guy who wants to RAISE TAXES and whose economic views have literally caused the stock market to crash 3,000 points since his Inauguration, whose whole economic dream centers on EXPANDING government and RAISING entitlements to the absolute MAX?
Peggy, let me be blunt. Given his beliefs and convictions that he always acted on or vocally stood by, don't you think Reagan would actually be pretty PISSED OFF about what Obama is doing, since it flies in the face of literally EVERYTHING that Reagan personally believed in?
Noonan (shifting her eyes left and right nervously): Uh...did I mention Obama has a great command of the English language? And he can give a great speech like Reagan did?
So, amidst today's economic chaos, I hope Peggy Noonan enjoys cashing the checks she now collects from her pals at MSNBC. Then again, during the American Revolution, I'm sure Benedict Arnold really loved the little bags of gold coins that he was being handed by the British, too.
*blink*
March 1, 2009 - 20:01 ET by katainkentI'm speechless.
me too!
March 1, 2009 - 20:07 ET by clinging to my guns and my religion< really, really rapid shaking of the head!! >
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." Edmund Burke
Sick...Just Sick!
March 1, 2009 - 20:08 ET by SkipperMLMThe only thing sexual about it is, there is a lot of raping going on. And the only kissing going on is guys like this and Chris Matthews, Olbermann...Steffie. I wonder if Larry Flint is getting that orgy on tape. The films name? "Thrill up the leg".
Good Grief
March 1, 2009 - 20:10 ET by SterlingWhere do I even begin? Mr. Sheppard you once again have taken a remark and bludgeoned it out of context. I am really starting to get upset. Mr. Castellanos made the sex remark with humor, and then he went on to rip Obama’s Domestic and Foreign policy to shreds. What does a Republican on CNN have to do for you Mr. Sheppard to say he is not in the tank for Obama? Does he have to lie and say that Obama cannot give a speech? Come on even the most right-winged pundits (I.E. Rush Limbaugh) have stated Mr. Obama’s keen ability to give a speech.
Finally to even insinuate that he was comparing sex to Obama’s oratory is a falsehood. In fact, Castellanos ripped the substance of the speech in the State of the Union and to the troops.
Shame on you, for leading people astray with this post. I think you sir should make an apology.
Sterling... I have
March 1, 2009 - 20:15 ET by bigtimerSterling...
I have watched Castellanos slip further and further into the lap of the likes of David Brookes over the years...before you know it they are going to be long-lost-lip-locked-kissing-cousins.
BT, Sterling is a faux
March 2, 2009 - 07:50 ET by NewsbusterbrownBT, Sterling is a faux conservative. When you bash your side more than the other, then you're not really one of us.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Really?
March 2, 2009 - 07:55 ET by Sergeant ROCKHe bashed the 'other side'? I must've been at work or something.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
He bashed the 'other side'?
March 2, 2009 - 10:26 ET by NewsbusterbrownHe bashed the 'other side'? I must've been at work or something.
Good point, Sarge (loved your comic as a kid, BTW ;-). I don't think I have ever seen a post by him that actually attacked the Left.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
If this Castellanos clown
March 1, 2009 - 20:31 ET by R D HelmIf this Castellanos clown actually is getting paid as a stratagest for the Republican Party, its time for Chairman Steele to give him his walking papers.
Hopefully before he has an on-screen Obamagasm. :-O
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
UGH.....!!!
March 1, 2009 - 20:38 ET by Dont_Like_TheBluesWell it's clear that turner is enforcing his own "fairness" policy and turning my stomach inside out at the same time.
These jokers [banking industry] don't even know what's in their own self-interest, much less yours. Trusting them with your money is like trusting Bill Clinton to babysit your underage niece - Ann Coulter
I am sure Alex ment to
March 1, 2009 - 20:47 ET by JAJTI am sure Alex ment to make a joke about the media love affair with Obama, but it comes off weak.
we really need to see more strong conservatives on air giving good points and examples, the kind that makes people stop and think and say "i got that, that's what i want too!".
Obama is inconsistent
March 1, 2009 - 20:53 ET by Miket53Miket53 http://mtaricani.blogspot.com/
I disagree. Obama didn't say all along "he would listen to ground commanders". I believe he changed his tune after the surge worked and realized we could win. Originally he was "get out asap" without a plan.
Obama's speech is like
March 1, 2009 - 21:05 ET by midnight cowboyObama's speech is like having sex.
Because whenever Obama talks, we all get f*ck*d.
Obama's speech
March 2, 2009 - 00:02 ET by merlin61All right midnight cowboy!!!!! You hit the nail
on the head.
midnight cowboy...
March 2, 2009 - 00:14 ET by bigtimer...ROFLMAO!
I Second merlin's motion or notion...that was hilarious!
Because whenever Obama
March 2, 2009 - 00:56 ET by Dan The Man 2Because whenever Obama talks, we all get *****.
Cowboy, I realize we are for the most part adults and understand what letters are starred and what teh word means, however I have noticed a slight downward slide to vulgarity on this blog. I don't like it and this is not just to you but everyone including myself .... We need o watch our posts and police ourselves.
We need to use the dictionary and use words more kosher, words you would feel comfortable using in front of small children. I have no power and I did not complain, I just wanted to vent a bit and you were chosen.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Dan, I agree with you in
March 2, 2009 - 01:15 ET by JerDan,
I agree with you in principle, but I think it's a little unfair to target m c. He not only was using it as part of a joke--and a pretty funny one at that--but he bleeped out two of the letters.
In contrast, the word has been used here recently as a malicious expletive and completely spelled out. Those cases would make far better examples for your otherwise appropriate objections.
Anyway, that's just my opinion, FWIW.
Jer
Jer
March 2, 2009 - 06:36 ET by cheesegraterSince you brought it up... Your opinion, as always, is worth what we pay for it.
Here's one "one" who doesn't wonder about balance . . .
March 1, 2009 - 21:08 ET by CKA in Red State USA. . . because there hasn't been for a long time, is not now and won't be for the foreseeable future anything remotely resemble balanced news coverage from the advocacy/adversary media.
BTW: Anyone calling himself a Republican strategist is suspect, given how poorly the elephants fared.
Further, anyone such creature who's part of CNN is doubly suspect.
Creepy
March 1, 2009 - 21:34 ET by slickwillie2001What is it with this homo-eroticism creeping into news coverage of Obammy? I can understand it from guys like Anderson Cooper and Shemp Smith, but people like Chris Matthews and now this guy too. It's really disturbing.
And these same people
March 1, 2009 - 22:59 ET by lnthompAnd these same people accuse any man who praises Reagan of homo-erotic fantasies. I can't recall anyone ever saying (in anything published, at least) that Reagan gave them "a thrill up my leg" or that his speeches were like sex.
Lee T / USN(ret) / Oregon City, OR
When responsible people make mistakes, responsible people bear the burden. When irresponsible people make mistakes, responsible people bear the burden. -- UserFriendly.org, 2/12/2009
Excapee from a mental facility....
March 1, 2009 - 21:48 ET by ScrapironThat guys mugshot should be in the dictionary as an example of what to look for in an excapee from a facility for the criminally insane. Yes, insanity does show on the face, especially in the eyes of the insane. I wouldn't buy a used car from him.
Old, Retired and glad of it.
He's not saying an Obama
March 1, 2009 - 21:58 ET by motherbeltHe's not saying an Obama speech is like having sex. He is using an analogy: the feeling about an Obama speech is like the way people feel about sex. Even lousy sex is good. So is even a lousy Obama speech. In other words, there IS no lousy Obama speech.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
I think I will disagree...
March 1, 2009 - 22:02 ET by sherylsimsI have had lousy sex a time or two in my life. And it was lousy. I have also heard that there is no way to give (or get) a bad massage. But that isn't true either. (Not disagreeing with you MB, just disagreeing with the concept that no sex is bad.) SOMEBODY had to say it.
mb
March 1, 2009 - 22:16 ET by Noel Sheppardmb,
I know that. That's why the entire relevant quote is above the fold.
That said, I must agree with Sheryl: not all sex is excellent. Not even close. And, as Sheryl pointed out, I've had bad massages, too. REALLY bad!
What this says to me about Alex's observation is that since he doesn't know when sex is bad, he clearly can't distinguish a bad Obama speech.
After all, Obama doesn't always knock it out of the park. I thought he was just okay on Tuesday, and just okay in Denver when he accepted the nomination.
To suggest he's always excellent is...well...akin to saying sex always is. :-) ns
Also, Noel
March 1, 2009 - 22:18 ET by sherylsimsIf you don't know the sex is bad, I guarantee, SHE does.
Sheryl
March 1, 2009 - 22:26 ET by Noel SheppardSheryl,
Well, that's a bit sexist, isn't it? :-)
Would you grant that a man might find sex bad while the female participant enjoyed it? Or do you think when it's bad, it's got to be bad for the woman? ns
My bad
March 1, 2009 - 22:36 ET by sherylsimsI should have said HE/SHE rather than just "She" I can't really speak for a man though since I have never had sex as one.
Well...you could always ask
March 2, 2009 - 00:40 ET by JerWell...you could always ask Rosie O'Donnell.
Jer
Sorry Noel
March 2, 2009 - 00:09 ET by BlondeSheryl just smoked ya.
I hope he fails, too.
~I've got to ask
March 2, 2009 - 09:01 ET by choselife3xHow on earth can a man find sex 'bad' if the woman is enjoying it?! I was under the impression that driving a woman wild is quite...pleasing to a man.
Hope and Change=
Despair and Socialism
ROSEN: George Bush never
March 1, 2009 - 22:04 ET by exLibROSEN: George Bush never promised to cut the deficit in half.
Of course he did. After the Iraq war was under way he promised to reduce the budget at least by half from some 500 billion to around 250-300 billion.
Remember how the democrats were wailing and moaning about the horrible 500 billion deficit? That's chump-change compared to where these Democrats have us now.
OMG! Newt
March 1, 2009 - 22:08 ET by Clear thinkerOMG!
Newt vs Rush
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
For me, listening to an Obama speech...
March 1, 2009 - 22:19 ET by OxyCon...is more like another bodily function. A #2 to be precise, especially considering that the Dali Obama knows when he's done talking, everyone needs to dig themselves out with a shovel.
Obama reminds me.....
March 1, 2009 - 22:50 ET by mbmonahan.....of any virgin kid doing it for the first time. He THINKS he's pretty good, but really doesn't know what he's doing at all.
Listening to Barack Obama give a speech is like sex.
March 2, 2009 - 02:35 ET by ExToledoanObama worship - a derangement syndrome beginning with tingling up one's leg, followed by irreversible permanent adoration with inability to focus on reality. Most attempts to rehabilitate are futile. Some affected individuals are rewarded with TV emcee positions on MSM network, while others are instructed to wait for entitlements. The majority, however, are instructed to keep on working to support those who are not.
Pardon, I'm Going to Puke
March 2, 2009 - 02:47 ET by RogerCfromSDWhat the hell is wrong with these so-called Adults in the media? They act and talk like adolescents. Even the men on these shows speak as if they'd like to give Obama a hummer. Disgusting.
A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.
Sexy Least
March 2, 2009 - 08:08 ET by Jack BauerYou see there's the problem right there. Millions of women are going to disagree profoundly. Am I right ladies, or am I right? I do believe in this area I know what women want. It's not like they haven't made themselves loud and clear.
And it ain't "the worse sex ever is still great"
In fact, has Mr Wham-Bam, Thank You Ma'am, Now Turn Into a PIzza and Beer just missed the last 50 years?
But now I do see the problem with liberals of either sex (and RINOs like Castellanos) -- no matter what economic, social and political gibberish Obama utters, the Obamaniacs have an Obamagasm.
Funny I thought the speech
March 2, 2009 - 08:53 ET by eaglewingz08Funny I thought the speech was more like one you'd get from a slick used car salesman or from someone pitching snake oil.
One's sex life would have to be preetttty bad to consider that speech to be on a par with sex. Maybe battered woman sex?
Jack Bauer
March 2, 2009 - 09:10 ET by sherylsims" In fact, has Mr Wham-Bam, Thank You Ma'am, Now Turn Into a PIzza and Beer just missed the last 50 years?"
ROFL!!! That is the funniest line I have ever read here! (Or maybe it is because I just woke up, but it really did make me laugh out loud!)
sheryl -- thanks! Glad you
March 2, 2009 - 12:55 ET by Jack Bauersheryl -- thanks! Glad you liked.
I have to wonder...
March 2, 2009 - 08:54 ET by OBQuietIf Obama's speeches are like sex, does that mean every time he speaks, we get screwed?
That Can't be CASTELLANOS...
March 2, 2009 - 09:54 ET by AMR1960It's CHRISSY Matthews wearing a mustache....
__________________________
Long Live...THE REPUBLIC !
Because it is like sex...
March 2, 2009 - 11:28 ET by StarAZYou need to use protection--always. You never know what wacky notion you could catch--some intellectual herpes bug.
Once you black you never go
March 2, 2009 - 12:29 ET by wiwfOnce you black you never go back?
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
I don't get what makes
March 2, 2009 - 17:49 ET by RR GOPI don't get what makes these talking heads 'strategists' from either party? Do they actually partake in party strategy? Or was that a once upon a time scenario, and now they just write books and work for TV networks, maybe writing a piece now and then for a newspaper or magazine?
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
You know, there is
March 2, 2009 - 19:10 ET by GregEYou know, there is something that, though true, would get you funny looks or possibly under-the-breath insults...........and it is if you told people......."Hitler was was an absolutely great and very influential speaker. I get a chill up my leg listening to his speeches." Or something to that effect. I'm sure it can be worded in a way that's exactly as someone describing Obama, and the politically correct crowd would go off the deep end criticizing you for saying it, calling you whatever names they could think of. You can say it about the messiah, but don't dare say it about Hitler.
There's no difference in saying Hitler was a great speaker, and saying Obama is. As a speaker, purely, context aside, Obama does well, yes, in delivery. Hitler, the same, context aside. I disagree with both of them on context, but as a speaker and as someone who many people look to as a great speaker, they both are that to many people.
Now, if I were Rush Limbaugh and had a huge radio show and huge influence that liberals were jealous of and wanted to silence, my name would be plastered all over as someone who said Hitler was a great speaker. The end, no elaboration, no context of my statement would be provided.
And I'm sure that if a liberal blogger ran across my post, it would serve as fodder on a Leftist website as a "see, look what these right-wingers think."
Castellanos got off to a bad start, but he seems to have
March 3, 2009 - 03:03 ET by Rush Fanregained his Republican strategists footing for the rest of the show. He is one of the better Republican representatives on TV, if you compare him to "Republicans" like Michael Smerconish or Republican political consultant Michael Murphy, both who appear on NBC/MSNBC quite often.
BUT CAMPBELL BROWN: NO BIAS, NO BULL had a young newcomer representing conservatives named Jason Mattera of the Young America's Foundation, a group of young conservative activists. He was absolutely TERRIFIC!
Roland Martin was substituting for Campbell Brown, who I believe is on maternity leave. Here is a portion of what was said:
Roland Martin: Well, let's ask tonight's panel, author Frank Schaeffer, a conservative who voted for President Barack Obama -- his memoir of the early days of the religious right is "Called Crazy For God" -- Jason Mattera of the Young America's Foundation, a group of young conservative activists, and April Ryan, White House correspondent for American Urban Radio Networks.
And, folks, I have got to say, it's amazing to sit here and watch this battle back and forth between Rush Limbaugh and the Republican Party.
Jason, let's start with you. What in the heck is going on with the GOP?
(LAUGHTER)
JASON MATTERA, YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: Well, first of all, did you just introduce someone as a conservative who voted for Barack Obama? I must have missed that.
(CROSSTALK)
MARTIN: Well, some did, now. Let's just be honest. Some did.
MATTERA: I don't know that's possible.
But, listen, Rush Limbaugh is not the de facto leader of the GOP. And if he were, as he said on his radio show today, he would be embarrassed, because the GOP lost overwhelmingly in 2006, had an awful candidate in John McCain, who couldn't articulate any type of conservative idea.
Rush Limbaugh is not the GOP de facto leader. He's a conservative radio host who has actually been moving the conservative movement, having it on his back for the last two decades. And I wish the GOP -- I wish Rush Limbaugh was the de facto head, because we wouldn't be in the mess we're in today. I wish, please.
-------------------------------------------
Wow! Hopefully, we will see more of Jason Mattera on the tube representing conservatives. If young conservatives are anything like Jason Mattera, the conservative movement is in good hands.
--------------------------------------------------------------
“The left -- you people, you Democrats -- you are creating a monster that you will not be able to control forever. You will ultimately regret what you are doing just like the media will ultimately regret its sacrifice of reason, its abandonment of its primary purpose.” ~ Rush Limbaugh