For years, NewsBusters has reported on the absurdity of the global warming "solution" known as biofuel whereby agricultural products such as corn are converted into a gasoline additive supposedly to reduce the usage of oil.
As predicted, grain costs are skyrocketing around the world causing so much political and social unrest that the British Telegraph published a headline Tuesday declaring "Global Warming Rage Lets Global Hunger Grow" (picture courtesy AP).
Contrary to Nobel Laureate Al Gore's depiction of this energy panacea in his film "An Inconvenient Truth," as well as his investments in companies responsible for such processes, the Telegraph viewed biofuel as a growing international calamity (emphasis added throughout):
We drive, they starve. The mass diversion of the North American grain harvest into ethanol plants for fuel is reaching its political and moral limits.
"The reality is that people are dying already," said Jacques Diouf, of the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). "Naturally people won't be sitting dying of starvation, they will react," he said.
The UN says it takes 232kg of corn to fill a 50-litre car tank with ethanol. That is enough to feed a child for a year. Last week, the UN predicted "massacres" unless the biofuel policy is halted.
Nice. Think this will be headline/lead story news in the States?
The world food situation is very serious: we have seen riots in Egypt, Cameroon, Haiti and Burkina Faso," said Mr Diouf. "There is a risk that this unrest will spread in countries where 50pc to 60pc of income goes to food," he said.
Haiti's government fell over the weekend following rice and bean riots. Five died.
The global food bill has risen 57pc in the last year. Soaring freight rates make it worse. The cost of food "on the table" has jumped by 74pc in poor countries that rely on imports, according to the FAO.
Roughly 100m people are tipping over the survival line. The import ratio for grains is: Eritrea (88pc), Sierra Leone (85pc), Niger (81pc), Liberia (75pc), Botswana (72pc), Haiti (67pc), and Bangladesh (65pc).
And here was the fabulous conclusion:
The world intelligentsia has been asleep at the wheel. While we rage over global warming, global hunger has swept in under the radar screen.
Darned right.
In the end, biofuel policy around the world is an absolute disaster stoked in the past several years by climate alarmists. Sadly, this appears to have become a new third rail in American politics, for few politicians dare point fingers at this problem.
After all, this has been sold for years by politicians on both sides of the aisle as the solution to oil dependence. And, recently, this has been strongly advocated by virtually every Democrat as a key to solving global warming.
As political leaders will likely continue to punt this issue down the field, the fate of the nation might rest on media representatives depicting a more accurate picture of this crisis raising a pivotal question: can press outlets drop their green fascination in time to stop the world from burning all its food?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Another legacy of "the law
April 15, 2008 - 11:43 ET by motherbeltAnother legacy of "the law of unintended consequences."
But....but....but....they meant well!! They had good intentions!!! That's what matters!!
At least they TRIED!!!!!
Very good point MB but
April 15, 2008 - 15:26 ET by red_dragon311Very good point MB
but the double standard reers it's ugl;y head.....wasn't the war for good intentions....freeing Iraqi's, removing Sadam H-word from power...but BDS i guess trumps right wing good intentions
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
No, no, no....that's what
April 15, 2008 - 15:32 ET by motherbeltNo, no, no....that's what they said, but everyone knows it was really for oil, to make Bush's oil buddies and Cheney's Halliburton friends even richer than they are!!!
<sarc off>
Yes motherbelt. It's been
April 15, 2008 - 15:39 ET by QueenMumYes motherbelt. It's been rumored that Cheney has all his Iraq oil profits in cash and hidden in an undisclosed secure location somewhere in the hills of West Virginia. I hope Robert Byrd doesn't find out.
I am the exotic Queen Mum, and I approved this message.
OH YEA now i rememeber
April 15, 2008 - 16:02 ET by red_dragon311OH YEA
now i rememeber Thanks for setting me right
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
Once again, the programs
April 15, 2008 - 11:44 ET by mattmOnce again, the programs and ideas pushed by the Left result in utter failure, disaster and death. It's time the Left starts paying for their crimes, but they never do.
Once APGW is tossed on the ash heap of history along with Soviet communism, the Left will find something else to demagogue and use to attain political power no matter how much misery they cause.
The socialists/progressives perfect plan...
April 15, 2008 - 11:45 ET by Karma...enrage the hungry populace of the world, disarm US citizens and open the border. Great, just great.
Global warming and biofuels
April 15, 2008 - 11:50 ET by merlin61We can't take our food supply and use it for fuel.
God didn't give us food for this purpose, he gave
us oil. More exploration needs to be done and
yesterday on Fox News, discovery has been made
in North Dakota of huge supplies of oil under a
lake. Lets get the oil companies to start drilling
and get this oil into our supply and let the Arab
countries stick their oil up their butts.
Let them use theirs first
April 15, 2008 - 11:54 ET by PolazerusWhen they run out and we need it again. We still have our own.
God didn't give us food for
April 15, 2008 - 12:20 ET by Dan The Man 2God didn't give us food for this purpose, he gave us oil ... actually he gave us nuclear power. Much cleaner in tehlong run and if we put resources to work we can find a better way to dispose of teh spent fuel. Or we can make fusion work.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Fusion is the ultimate
April 15, 2008 - 13:44 ET by DarkCurrentFusion is the ultimate ecologically sound, sustainable and safe energy source. If the "greenies" were really interested in these things I would expect to see a much bigger push for serious investment in the research necessary to make it practical. Why is it that we don't see that? Instead we get relentless hype for ridiculous and clearly impractical "solutions" like solar and wind turbines. Could it be that the ultimate aim is not to make our civilization ecologically sound, sustainable and safe for the long term, but rather to undermine and destroy it?
The problem is that "investment"
April 15, 2008 - 13:55 ET by sarcasmoMeans taxing and spending, under current conditions. Besides, with fission there's a simple and practical solution that seems relatively safe and pretty cheap. I'd say we should wait until private enterprise is able to do it, rather than trying to force fusion to happen on the backs of what will inevitably be USA taxpayers.
Sure, there's radioactive waste with pebble bed reactors, but there's a LOT of space for that waste. The question we should-be but won't be asking Presidential candidates this time is: "Why are South Africa & China working on this promising new technology, while the USA is not?" I very much doubt Obama, Clinton, or McCain will hear that question between now & the election, but I'd love it if someone somehow proved me wrong.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Actually, McCain has talked
April 15, 2008 - 14:32 ET by dscottActually, McCain has talked about nuclear power: http://neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com/2007/08/senator-john-mccain-on-nuclear-energy.html He is for it, but he is also for cap and trade and wants that to apply it to nuclear as a credit. He's a mixed bag to say the least.
Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008 Long Live the Empire! Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.
Hell, even the founder of Greenpeace is for it.
April 15, 2008 - 15:43 ET by sarcasmoI just like the pebble bed idea because it seems to be the most idiot proof. People need to get used to the idea of new designs for these power plants.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world
Simple answer why we are not using Nuclear Power
April 15, 2008 - 15:59 ET by PopularTechObviously because the 104 - 30-year old Nuclear Reactors currently operating in the United States are much safer than any modern ones we could build or are being built in China and India. Makes perfect sense to me!
- 104 commercial Nuclear Reactors are operating in the United States (EIA)
- China plans to build 30 more Nuclear Reactors by 2020 (USA Today)
- Russia plans to build 4 more Nuclear Reactors in India (RIA Novosti)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
My lib nieghbor and I were
April 15, 2008 - 15:38 ET by red_dragon311My lib nieghbor and I were having one of our beer induced political debates, and he brought up the point that what happens to the space that the oil in the ground leaves......big empty caves in the ground. we are killing out planet
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
Hey, we'll be needing those
April 15, 2008 - 15:48 ET by QueenMumHey, we'll be needing those caves when the libs get done turning the clock back on the Industrial Revolution.
I am the exotic Queen Mum, and I approved this message.
that's easy...
April 15, 2008 - 19:08 ET by wizardjrJust fill them up with excrement. He's a lib. He should be able to contribute quite alot.
Leftist ideologues and
April 15, 2008 - 11:51 ET by Jack BauerLeftist ideologues and their crazy sub-literate ideologies never tire of killing millions with the evil, mendacity and stupidity of their ideas.
You'd think they'd be happy with the tens of millions who have died thanks to the anti-DDT efforts!
But no... now these poor benighted people are going to be starved to death so some Calif. jerk can "feel" good about his creepy fake green life.
Enough to make ya puke forever.
Green Jet Setters
April 15, 2008 - 15:56 ET by nofate"You'd think they'd be happy with the tens of millions who have died thanks to the anti-DDT efforts! "
And the millions more who have been made dependent on the state due to the Great Society, i.e. fatherless families, soaring crime & imprisonment.
"But no... now these poor benighted people are going to be starved to death so some Calif. jerk can "feel" good about his creepy fake green life."
While they jet to and fro around the world. They have to warn us to use less fuel, less toilet paper, less electricity, less everything. Have you seen that idiot "footprint" thing on National Geographic channel? This whole thing appears to me like it is going to be hard to turn around. There are at least two whole generations, maybe a third, thoroughly indoctrinated with this crap. It is going to be like turning an iceberg in the opposite direction. I just got into an absurd discussion last night at work among usually generally conservative leaning co-workers. They were fretting over some aspect of the APGW crisis, and I stated that the whole thing is a hoax perpetrated by rich politicians and ex-communists out to line their pockets and increase their political power. You could have heard a pin drop. Suffice to say the general opinion was I'm a little over the edge on this subject. I've run across this before, but I thought there would be some agreement in a more non-liberal setting. Some of them were people who like to follow the political scene too. Hope Noel's doing better in the circles's he runs with.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Blaming Capitalism
April 15, 2008 - 11:52 ET by Polazerus"Capitalism must police itself, or be policed."
Can anybody say Marxism at it's best?
The autor shows his true colors with this statement. It was a good article until I got that part. I don't think the left will ever get it. They refuse to look in the mirror.
As long as children here in
April 15, 2008 - 11:55 ET by dscottAs long as children here in the US aren't hungry, the MSM and AGW people will play stupid on the issue or minimize it to claim we're insensitive to the larger problem that will hurt the Third World worse (that's their position btw, the loons actually posted it on another forum.)
In fact, didn't the AGW people come out and advocate for reducing the earth's population? I'm sure they wouldn't publicly advocate starvation since the public then would just blow off the whole AGW movement, but how did anyone think the population would be reduced for the shrill time line they advocate? These people are long on schmaltz but short on coming clean on how they plan to actually impliment their ideas.
Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008 Long Live the Empire! Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.
They never learn
April 15, 2008 - 12:12 ET by dboAnd what will be the solution to big government gone awry? More big government.
I'm sticking to it
April 15, 2008 - 12:47 ET by FranksamCold, heartless, selfish unloving and anything else you want to call me is fine. People who would kill us and our children might starve. That does save the whales, so to speak, as well as ammunition.
The IMF and the UN are already blaming us (read me) for the food crisis. I'm not assuming any guilt this time. Drill ANWR, drill the Gulf of Mexico, and now, I guess, drill North Dakota, too. Canada has not yet asserted that we stole North Dakota from them, have they?
Today's tee shirt - Al Gore's children
April 15, 2008 - 12:47 ET by Gary HallToday's tee shirt, Noel.
The Telegraph article is an important piece, Noel. We're seeing, bit by bit, a little more interest from some in the press in looking at the disaster that is being created right in front of our eyes because of this blind rush into the immediate misdirected address of this illusionist's world of global warming alarmism.
However in the end, the MSM and the leftists (I know, it's one in the same) will blame President Bush for the food crisis.
Debate on?
April 15, 2008 - 12:54 ET by acumenSo does this mean the debate is back on again?
morbid liberal plan
April 15, 2008 - 12:57 ET by LionKingMost liberals think that population is a problem anyways...they favor things like abortion and euthanasia for a reason.
Remember the liberal mindset...starvation is not a crisis, it is dying of natural causes [remember Terri Schiavo].
Ethanol is such a waste. It does not perform as well so you have to use MORE fuel to do the same as 100% gasoline.
Asleep at the wheel?? More like ignoring the "DUH-file."
April 15, 2008 - 12:58 ET by sarcasmoAntilibertarian bias has been actively keeping eyes away from what intelligensia types in 2006 (and then even Fidel Castro in 2007) have been saying about this subject. The Telegraph may have come up with a new article about it, but the idea that "biofuels suck for poor people" is not even close to a new insight.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
All I can say, is all of us
April 15, 2008 - 13:12 ET by Sick-n-TiredAll I can say, is all of us here at Newsbusters must be modern day prophets!!! How long have been saying this was going to be case with ethanol???!!!! It takes more energy to create than it supplies; more trees are cut down (eliminating carbon sinks) to supply land for corn; and food supplies and costs suffer. I don't understand who COULDN'T see this coming!!!
"Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat's dream. If you control carbon, you control life," Richard Lindzen - March 2007.
MSM might pick it up but,
April 15, 2008 - 13:15 ET by TjexciteThe American MSM might pickup this story But, they will not blame the uses of food for fuel. They will blame the floods and droughts that AGW is causing the crops to fail, not that they where not planted or went in the gas tank.
BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!! "Control
April 15, 2008 - 13:35 ET by Sick-n-TiredBINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat's dream. If you control carbon, you control life," Richard Lindzen - March 2007.
When You
April 15, 2008 - 13:38 ET by dwillmoreWhen you rob Peter to pay Paul...Peter gets pissed and Paul gets a fraction of what he is owed.
The difference between us
April 15, 2008 - 14:09 ET by danboThe difference between us and climate alarmist. We want to raise the carbon foot print of people in the third world. To give them a better life. Climate alarmist won't be happy till the whole world has the carbon footprint of the average Hatian or Somolian.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Noel, I agree with you strongly, 90%
April 15, 2008 - 14:40 ET by BlindSightBut of course plenty of Republicans also promoted ethanol, and the real story here ISN'T partisan, but about how Washington keeps giving our money away to big corporations that provide big contributions, and keep finding smooth ways to sell it to voters.
I agree with you that the media hasn't been particularly vigilant, and I have no interest in defending them. However, they are starting to pick up the story:
http://www.nytimes.c...
Pres. Bush: Our guiding principle is clear. We must lead the world to produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions and we must do it in a way that does not undermine economic growth or prevent nations from delivering greater prosperity for their people.
Not all Republicans are Conservatives
April 15, 2008 - 15:52 ET by PopularTechNot all Republicans are Conservatives and there are not "plenty" promoting ethanol but rather congressmen in corn growing states, from both parties.
Hillary was right about Ethanol back in 2002!
"There is no sound public policy reason for mandating the use of ethanol." - Hillary Clinton, 2002
Subsidies - Ethanol Keeps ADM Drunk On Tax Dollars (Cato Institute)
Subsidies - Ethanol Subsidies: New Ways to Waste Money (CNSNews)
Subsidies - Germany Ends Biofuel Subsidies (Energy Publisher)
Subsidies - OECD Warns Against Biofuels Subsidies (Financial Times, UK)
Subsidies - Push Ethanol Off the Dole (Cato Institute)
Subsidies - The Ethanol Subsidy is Worse Than You Can Imagine (Slate Magazine)
Subsidies - U.S. Biofuels Subsidies: Not for Farmers, but for Europeans (The Wall Street Journal)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
There's a Difference???
April 15, 2008 - 16:07 ET by nofate"Not all Republicans are Conservatives"
That is such a mouthfull! A point that is lost on the press, most of the public, and apparently most politicians, although some, like Billary Inc. and Soros see it and use it to divide the mass of Republicans. Unfortunately most of the public, thanks to years of indoctrination (and general lying), thinks that Republican and conservative are the same thing. Ipso facto, McCain is a Reagan Conservative! 1984 is a little late, but it's coming. Orwell was only off by two or three decades.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
nofate, Now you said it
April 15, 2008 - 16:20 ET by bigtimernofate,
Now you said it all...
Orwell was only off by two or three decades.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
It's time to speak up!
April 15, 2008 - 23:23 ET by pbthinkerNot that this President has been much of a communicator, but his speech, on climate change, would be a great time to speak about this. Tell the public that the biofuels industry has been created by and pushed by the liberal elites attempting to force their global warming theories down our throats, before the proof is in.
He could point out that, because of Democrats, the price of gas is up, the price of food is up, people are going hungry in the world, and all because of their politics.
Let's face it, investors know the U.S. won't be drilling for oil, building refineries, or constructing nuclear power plants with the Democrats running Congress. It's a great time for them to exploit the situation, get some good money for the farmers in this biofuels scheme, and make up for the times they weren't making the big bucks. If it weren't for the policies of our Democrats, this wouldn't be possible.
Someone needs to hold them to account for what they've done and the results (this is only the beginning since rice is being affected by this also) they're achieving. It's obvious the media won't so we're left with the President, finally utilizing the "bully pulpit" to put all this in perspective.
I won't be holding my breath waiting for this to happen.
Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.