Google Blacks Out Homepage During 'Earth Hour' to 'Combat Climate Change'

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

Want some more proof of Google's political leanings.

Well, consider that the websearch giant is participating in Earth Hour, "a global event created to symbolize that each one of us, working together, can make a positive impact on climate change - no matter who we are or where we live."

Here's what Google displayed at its website moments ago (h/t NBer Wilbur747, emphasis added):

Google users in the United States will notice today that we "turned the lights out" on the Google.com homepage as a gesture to raise awareness of a worldwide energy conservation effort called Earth Hour. As to why we don't do this permanently - it saves no energy; modern displays use the same amount of power regardless of what they display. However, you can do something to reduce the energy consumption of your home PC by joining the Climate Savers Computing Initiative. [...]

Given our company's commitment to environmental awareness and energy efficiency, we strongly support the Earth Hour campaign, and have darkened our homepage today to help spread awareness of what we hope will be a highly successful global event.

Why did Google choose this specific organization?
We believe in doing our part to help combat climate change, and found the Earth Hour initiative to be a timely, important event. Further, we think the "lights out" idea's individual-centered nature is something that millions of people worldwide can participate in. In short, we really like it. So we did something about it.

Isn't it comforting to know that the leading search engine in the world believes in manmade global warming, and is willing to use its influence to focus attention on this as yet unproven climate theory?

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Do you think they realize...

...that this makes them look like a pack of pandering moonbats, reduces their credibility and makes a portion of the population far less likely to use their services, accept their proposals or support them when politicians get around to regulating their goofy butts?

They lost me with the Veteran's Day thing...

 

heldmyw, In this instance a GAGGLE is more fitting than a "pack"

"..that this makes them look like a pack of pandering moonbats,"

A gaggle of pandering moonbats.

Good one hmw LMAO

<wake up>SAVVVE The Whales N' Earth; conserve N' recycle !

IranianUranium<sleep>Infrastructure/repair?/ROFLMAO

 

Al Gore is a Google Senior Advisor

I am not surprised by Google being in on the AGW hysteria considering they take advantage of the Goracle's "services":

Al Gore is a Google Senior Advisor

The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource

Earth Hour

One television news channel here is promoting the Earth Hour idea, complete with showing a compact fluorescent bulb as an icon on their website.  I plan to participate.

At 7 p.m., my eco-conscious neighbors will turn out their lights to combat manmade global warming.  The problem is that it will be dark and there will be a great potential for injury from walking around in the dark.  So, in the interest of safety, I will turn all the lights on in my house as a beacon of safety and a refuge from lunacy.  The CO2 these brain-dead "neo-environmentalists" think they are saving will be "spent" by me!

And I have a lot of light fixtures!

Any chance they'll make a real sacrifice?

Wow. So much sacrifice from these guys. That's much better than giving up all, or even one, of their many private jets.

Al Gore's mansion

The real question is what is Al Gore doing at his 221,000 kWh/year mansion -- he, of the "you are all flat-earthers" fame?

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

I Just Switched to Yahoo Search!

Well maybe we can get their attention by going to their competition!  These idiots are only doing this because theythink there's money in it.  Just show them that the money goes to those who use their brains and not their emotions when it comes to science!

Yahoo - Liberal Bias?

 

Has Yahoo Caught the Liberal Bias Virus?

http://www.newsbuste...

Giles

Giles,

For a change, I like your source. Far better than the normal liberal swill you link to! :-) ns

Lights Out Liberals

There's just something hilarious about liberals boasting that their lights are out.

Sure Lefty -- we knew that already. You don't have to make a special event to prove it.

But thanks Google for another pointless sacrifice in a cruel cruel world. And thanks for all the fish too.

Tonights code is "RU A LIGHTS OUT LIBERAL?

Can you imagine having to work at the Godawful Google? I bet you don't mention you're a conservative or a Republican in that bastion of conformity.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

C'est La Vie...

I don't care why they're doing it; Earth Hour, Aliens Are Coming Month, We're Owned by George Soros Day, We Censor Only Conservatives All Day and Every Day - I prefer a black screen.

Easier on the eyes, and on the old computer system.

What Google didn't tell you

So Google is going black for one hour, earth hour. How do we know? Well, as google probably hopes, hundreds of millions of computers will be fired up, sucking up otherwise unused energy to visit their homepage.

So let me get this straight. Google advertises their good faith jesture, requiring untold amounts of energy to do so, saying they are "going black" on their homepage. But for anybody who cares, they will have to use untold amounts of energy to witness what Google is doing to save the earth. Can you say paradox?

I think the whole thing is a scam.

Google

Morons...dangerous morons...

Happy Trails...

How is it a scam? Did they

How is it a scam? Did they ask you for money?

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

"The lady doth protest too

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

Good going Noel. They yipe.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

Google users in the United

Google users in the United States will notice today that we "turned the lights out" on the Google.com homepage as a gesture to raise awareness of a worldwide energy conservation effort called Earth Hour.

Exactly. It is a gesture. No one's pretending that Google is accomplishing anything significant by doing this. They are, indeed, a corporation like any other. But how does participation in an innocuous and well-meaning gesture (turning lights out for a day - oh, the bias!) reveal one's political leanings per se? When Google puts four-leaf clovers in their homepage for St. Patrick's Day, does it mean they're propagandizing for Catholicism? What about their Halloween motif; does it mean they're promoting Druidism?

Your (typical) overreaction to this harmless gesture is nothing short of curmudgeonly. Imagine if a search engine did some small graphical thing to honor US soldiers last week for the 5-year anniversary of the Iraq invasion. Wouldn;t it be absurd of me to say that that site is dmeonstrating its imperialist, pro-war leanings?

As far as I'm concerned, environmentalist concerns are only politicized as leftist because conservatives have constured them as such.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Hey.. Lights Out Liberal..

Hey.. Lights Out Liberal..

I say go for it man. But let us know first.

Wear the the T-Shirt...

"My lights went out... but nobody noticed, maaan."

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

"My lights went out... but

"My lights went out... but nobody noticed, maaan."

I love it.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

"My lights went out... but

"My lights went out... but nobody noticed, maaan."

I love it.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

Like the UK

If someone switched the light off in the UK. Would anyone notice?

Actually, I heard Republicans read better in the dark.

Save a whale, harpoon a conservative!

-

Oh so clever! 

He'll be at the Comedy Connection all next week, folks.  Let's give him a hand.

If someone switched the

If someone switched the light off in the UK. Would anyone notice?

 

Sure, about a gazillian members of the "peaceful" religion of Islam, who will soon be needing plenty of light to change all those signs that currently read "London" to "Londonistan."

Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!

they're already living in

they're already living in the dark ages, with the clock turned back to the year 8oo.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Pale African speak with forked tongue

Hey Pale African (a Palican?)

I made the gag. You made the lame reply. Congratzzzzzzzzzzzzz. You know funny like Mugabe knows economics.

Try coming up with something original.

Oh -- like I give a crap about the ex-Great country formerly known as Britain.

As a barb, that's like being savaged by a dead Thompson's Gazelle.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

I like that

Name calling - very sharp. Like that will win wars - action do baby. But I like it - I might use it at some stage to identify myself.

On the gag - I was trying to see the funny side. But couldn't see it. Must have lost that infamous English humour rather quickly. Sounds like you are stright from a Little Britain sketch without the funny bits.

Jack Bauer - like hell you are. That takes balls and not cute little words.

Save a whale, harpoon an English expat!

If they were serious...

JasonC--

Good faith gesture or not, by publicizing this event Google is defeating the purpose of conservation. If you think people aren't aware you've been living under a rock. How many people who otherwise wouldn't have turned on their computers, thereby using more energy than they otherwise would have, did so just to see what Googles homepage looked like? Probably millions. So by announcing they are going dark they not only didn't help save the earth from certain disaster. They encouraged it.

You think people went to

You think people went to Google just to see what it looks like in black? Thrilling lives they must lead...

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

As Danbo asks/says below:

As Danbo asks/says below: "Aren't you supposed to have your computer turned off? More meaningless retoric."

One more time: not

One more time: not particularly interested in Google's or Gore's message. Just in pointing out conservative hypocrisy/paranoia/inconsistency/stupidity (choose one).

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Aren't you supposed to have

Aren't you supposed to have your computer turned off? More meaningless retoric.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

Why, Danbo? I'm not any

Why, Danbo? I'm not any more into this stuff than you are. I'm just commenting on the rank paranoia of people who think that participating in such a harmless gesture means taking a hard-left political stance.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

amnesiac

much? 

Jason, i would agree if this were an isolated 'tell' but with the many, many you have commented on here there comes a point where the brain does this thing called 'pattern recognition'.

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

Actually, I hardly ever

Actually, I hardly ever comment on AGW. Note that I'm not trying to delve into the science that 99% of us don't even fully understand, but discussing the unfortunate politicization from both sides.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

jase

you think this is about AGW and not Googles on-going support of liberal dogma?

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

Calling attention to an

Calling attention to an event that can only possibly do good (at worst, it might accomplish nothing) is hardly radical liberal dogma. Other than failing to display an American flag motif on Veteran's Day, what else exactly has Google done to put itself in league with the hard-leftists of modern America?

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Anything you want to do

Anything you want to do voluntarily to prevent "global warming" is just fine with me.

It's when you libs try to get the government to coerce us into wasted effort that I have a problem with.

We just spent the last 5 months freezing our &^%$#@! off here in NJ. Global Warming my arse!

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

Exactly. So what about

Exactly. So what about Google's cute little gesture aligns with vigorous political lobbying?

What environmental efforts are automatically wasted?

Really? In New England we've had the two warmest consecutive winters in decades. Of course, anecdotally relating the idiosnycratic weather patterns in our particular region hardly makes for any sort of compelling case one way or the other. That's why it was hard not to just laugh whenever Noel posted a story to the effect that (put down those potables!) because some island off the coast of South American had snow for the first time in 20 years, AGW is clearly not real!

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Wasted Effort

Wasted effort?

  • NJ recycling - huge piles of aluminum cans, and the state has to pay to get it hauled away. That's an old one.
  • How about cutting CO2 emmissions when it only effects  0.2856% of the greenhouse effect (Carbon Dioxide accounts for about 4.2-8.4% of the greenhouse effect. - Source // Humans can only claim responsibility for about 3.4% of carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere annually. - Source)  Go on and knock yourself out for 0.3%

Those are just the obvious ones.

Now, how come you Libs are against Nuke Power Plants?!  They give us cheap and CLEAN power.

I'm not against nuclear

I'm not against nuclear power. I'm wary of it, but not against it.

I'm not against them. Who

I'm not against them.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Bal JasonC

Bal, JasonC;

I'm glad we agree then. Building more Nuke Power planst would be much better for the environment than coal fired plants.

Much cheaper, and much cleaner. Something for everyone! ;-)

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

Just an observation

I don't want to get into a global warming debate here. I don't know the science, but I don't want to be like Condi and say that I saw the memo but thought nothing of it. I'll rather play it safe and try and deal with it even if it is "just in case".

More interesting though. Google's own little stunt actually did nothing for global warming. Their own study of last year showed that a black screen actually chews up MORE electricity. So the black screen might have been a publicity stunt, but a bad one if they are serious about the impact on global warming.

Save a whale, harpoon a conservative!

So I'll mark you down as

So I'll mark you down as "Against Nuclear Power" :-\

When did you decide that coal fired plants were a good idea?

Nooo

No-no. I agree with you. I was just making an observation that the Google stunt wasn't actaully a very good one at that. I agree with you that nuclear is better than coal. We will have risks no matter which way we go. I agree that nuclear is just less of a risk. Even though the impact might be higher if something goes wrong - the chance of that happening with the technology we have today makes that risk worthwhile. So - we agree.

On coal though. I agree it is bad, but we have a problem in most developing countries - China and South Africa for example - where they have so much of it that they continue to use it and expand on it. It puts us in a dilema - should we give them the nuclear technology to not use coal or suffer the consequences of coal. Don't have the answer - just raising the question.

Clean Coal is perfectly fine

jase

nice invention that 'radical liberal dogma' claim when i clearly claimed ongoing support for liberal dogma.  Just keep making up what i post as if no one can check.

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

Sorry for the adjectival

Sorry for the adjectival editorial license. I didn't realize you meant the unradical kind.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

 Unfortunately, now anyone

 Unfortunately, now anyone who dares believe in anything from recycling to conservation is deemed a liberal kook.

Exactly my point. And in

Exactly my point. And in typical knee-jerk fashion, it's become common among conservatives to say things like "I don't recycle anything...and I can't wait to buy that Hummer," just to make sure no one mistakes them for a bleeding-hear lib.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Yup, and it's done in such a

Yup, and it's done in such a way to antagonize any liberal that might be reading, when I could really care less if someone doesn't recycle or drives a Hummer (although, truth be told, that's a stupid car). EVERY issue suddenly comes to political sides. 

It is a stupid car. Though

It is a stupid car. Though I think "compensatory" might be the more fitting adjective.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

Lol. Yup. That's the way I

Lol. Yup. That's the way I feel when packs of "dudes" drive by on their crotchrockets, popping wheelies and revving their engines. 

JasonC

"Exactly my point. And in typical knee-jerk fashion, it's become common among conservatives to say things like "I don't recycle anything...and I can't wait to buy that Hummer," just to make sure no one mistakes them for a bleeding-hear lib."

Arent you doing the same thing your complaining about?Lumping everyone together?The problem is too many extremist in the evironmental movement.That and Limo Libs.Hypocrites who expect others to sacrifice but wont themselves.It has given environmentalist a bad name.Stupid laws put on the books because of politicians catering to these idiots.Oregon in the 60s had recycle laws.You pay a nickel deposit or something and got it back when you turned in the bottle also heavy fines for littering.Which was fine.The problem is states like mine cant clear dead,diseased trees or brush to help keep down forest fires.I been to two forest fires and the rangers have said that was a major problem yet that cant do nothing about it.Common sense needs to be applied.It isnt.Glad to hear you and Bal werent against nuclear power.Your alright for bleeding heart liberals.Just kidding...maybe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4qGqEb-t98&feature=related  For group harmony..Ohhmm Ohhmm .

All I said is "it's become

All I said is "it's become common." That phrase does not equal "All conservatives do X." Look around this site, especially at comments made on stories about suggestions that environmental groups make for every-day things a person can do (or do less of) to "make a difference." My statement is demonstrably true.

But that doesn't mean I believe or follow all of those suggestions myself. There are environmental extremists, obnoxious ones, no doubt about it. My point is merely that the mode of backlash that I've observed in many conservatives only serves to exacerbate the problems, both environmental and political.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

JasonC

So it becomes common for liberals to set up death watchs like Kos Kids?As far as obnoxious well tree spikers and people that burn down houses are more than obnoxious.The problem is the hypocrisy of these do as I say not as I do liberals.How many Ed Begleys compared to Al Gores,Lenardo DohCicaprio or Sheryl(one tissue)Crow.Ed practices what he preaches.The others want us to while they dont.There does need to be discussion about environment/conservation.The problem is the left says the debate is over.

Point well taken. You're

Point well taken. You're right, a smattering of impolitic comments or jokes on a message board of any political persuasion should not be automatically construed as representative of that entire ideology.  Your DailyKos example was spot on.

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

bal

i do conservation and recycling you do it would seem strawman

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

What? Who can revolt if

What?

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

jase

i was saying that i indeed conserve and Balboas post was a strawman argument

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

jase

"nevermind"  --- Emily Latella

"you do it would seem

"you do it would seem strawman"

?

If you were new to this board, people would say "liberal!" But since people know you're a conservative, they say, "Ah, look, evidence of just how wonderful the conservative movement is and how little liberals really know about us. We do SO care!" 

ah the classic 'you

ah the classic 'you people'

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

Doesn't make it any less

Doesn't make it any less true.

what part of conserve-ative

what part of conserve-ative don't you get?

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

Uh-huh...that's why I see so

Uh-huh...that's why I see so many conservatives on this board talking about what they're going to do for Earth Day...

i don't do feel good

i don't do feel good nonsense

lets build lots of mid-sized nuke power plants

lets build some up to date refineries

lets avoid bio-fuels since they are more pollutant than gas

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

bal earth day is in April

this is a one hour twiddle with the power grid .

 

<wake up>SAVVVE The Whales N' Earth; conserve N' recycle !

IranianUranium<sleep>Infrastructure/repair?/ROFLMAO

 

»→ Earth Day

You're right bal.

Far better they pay lip service one day out of the year than live as a conservationist.

♣ a seal

Well CA

It is about being responsible citizens.I agree that it shouldnt be one day a year or Ooooh dark hour but year round.It shouldnt be about political view or party.It should be about taken care of our country.You can drill for oil build nuclear facilities and it be done right.There are laws in place to take care of it.Make sure they are enforced.Hopefully better than laws against illegally entering this country or overstaying visas are.We need to get off this dependency on foreign oil.We also need to bring down the cost of utilities.That makes life alot easier on working people.

Quite untrue, Bal

Recycling and conservation are not deemed "liberal kookism".

I have a book on my coffee table, Green to Gold...about driving the "green agenda" in a business mode to improve the bottom line.  How is that "liberal kookism"?

I am a conservative, I know all about recycling (it's part of how I make my living), as well as being an avid outdoorswoman.  Conservation (and proper use) of natural resources is of huge concern to me.

Warming and the warming agenda is quite another story, however.  So don't make the mistake of conflating a disdain for the warmer agenda for an aversion to recycling or conservation....that's just plain stupid.

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Blonde. I found this.

Blonde. I found this. Thought you would like it. 

With your orchids, and my crinums and gingers. We may be entitled to burn off a lot more carbon.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

Thanks, danbo!

That was great!  A tax return for the warmers....figure out your carbon credits.  You really ought to post that on a forum.  It deserves it's own thread.

I particularly liked the system of measurements.  How big is your home?  Ted Kazynski size?

Are you a minimalist?  Do you wear the same clothes for two weeks?

The instructions were a riot, too.  Unfortunately, couldn't copy/paste my favorite bits from that.

Must run....I have to attend a picnic, although it's raining right now.  Command performance, sheesh. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Carbon Credits for sale.

I have 3 day lilies, a rose bush, a Mexican marigold and a crinum on my patio, ready to plant, as I write. These plants will remove that deadly CO2 from the air and replace it with good old  healthy killer O2.

Buy the credits that these plants will provide. Sooth your guilt. 

 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

"I'm not any more into this

"I'm not any more into this stuff than you are. I'm just commenting on the rank paranoia of people who think that participating in such a harmless gesture means taking a hard-left political stance."

Sure?

They can speak. But not us. You protest seems....

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

Who says you can't speak?

Who says you can't speak? Go ahead. And when it presents itself as contradictory or petty, I'll point it out. the 1st Amendment is a grand thing, ain't it?

Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva

I'm going to behave. I'll

I'm going to behave. I'll let you continue.

 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

This was a meaningless gesture

and meanigness gestures ARE harmfull as they distract attention from meaningful gestures

JC

JC,

"Curmudgeonly?" You're suggesting I'm a grouch?

Give me a break!

Regardless, it is indeed fascinating how telling your indignation is. First, you seem oblivious to how belief in manmade global warming divides strictly along Party lines, and that the vast majority of Democrats believe it whilst the vast majority of Republicans don't.

As such, any company participating in an international climate change awareness promotion is indeed tipping its hand concerning its political leanings. I'm very surprised this was so easily lost upon you.

Of course, maybe more telling was this comment:

Imagine if a search engine did some small graphical thing to honor US soldiers last week for the 5-year anniversary of the Iraq invasion. Wouldn;t [sic] it be absurd of me to say that that site is dmeonstrating [sic] its imperialist, pro-war leanings?

Fascinating. Aren't you admitting here what most Republicans believe: concern for the troops is INDEED exclusive to those on the right, and folks on the left view such as "imperialist" and "pro-war?"

You must be a FABULOUS poker player, JC!!! Thank you for playing my game. :-) ns

You're not the only

You're not the only curmudgeonly one on this issue, Noel. Note the poster below here who plans on switching search engines due to Google's crime of "believing in global warming." But it is not an inherently political issue. It has been made that way by opportunists and stubborn party loyalty. And I have no dog in this fight. I'm neither (D) nor (R).  Nor do I give two s--ts about Google.  I find extremist AGW activists who bother me on the street corners of Boston for donations just as irritating as those who think that a harmless little gesture about energy conservation is grounds for determining one's political stance.

If Google had put a banner