Open Thread


For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: McCain now ahead of Obama and Clinton (paragraph breaks eliminated):

As he emerges from a sometimes- bitter primary campaign, presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain poses a stiff challenge to either of his potential Democratic opponents in the general election, a new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found. The findings underscore the difficulties ahead for Democrats as they hope to retake the White House during a time of war, with voters giving McCain far higher marks when it comes to experience, fighting terrorism and dealing with the situation in Iraq...In head-to-head contests, the poll found, McCain leads Clinton by 6 percentage points (46% to 40%) and Obama by 2 points (44% to 42%).

Is this an indication of just how absurd it is, with eight months to go before Election Day, for anyone to predict with certainty what's going to happen in November?

Read comments

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And now, today's solemn

And now, today's solemn edition of The Shrub Report®:

The great Myron Cope passed away this morning. He personified the greatest football team in the NFL, invented the Terrible Towel, butchered the English language, and was a Pittsburgh icon. Double yoi

Here's an update on yesterday's "Inbred Pittsburgh" post by Ignatz.

Cyberdyne Systems officials were unavailable for comment.

Today's Global Warming Update. A hearty "BITE ME!" to all your Warmtards out there.

John Murtha will be around dumping pork into central PA for another 2 years.

The Hopeful Changer masters the Space-Time Continuum

You want torture? Inflict this on the terrorists at Gitmo.

Sure, lighting a teacher's hair on fire is in bad taste, but it was a douchey science teacher's ponytail. A GUY's ponytail.

Speaking of guys with long hair, happy 68th, Johnny Fever!

Rock'n'Roll birthdays today: Neil Schon(Journey) turns 54, Adrian Smith(Iron Maiden) turns 51, Johnny van Zant(Skynyrd) turns 49, and Sid's Nancy would have been an extremely skanky, strung-out 50 today.

Party with Islam!

Karl, have you been playing with the machine again?

Poor Lady Pantsuit. Even teamster thug/mobster/governor/Clintonista Fast Eddie Rendell may be jumping ship.

The "Fix me a turkey pot pie, b*tch!" killer dies, saves taxpayers years of paying for his incarceration.

It's time for Fast Ed's Story Du Jour! Hey, Fast Ed, what's up with this?

While we are all still in shock, here's another shock to the heart!

A BBC Update, and Hungarians go wild in the streets, full of Islamic love!

Happy 75th Anniversary of the Reichstag burning…

 

And, finally, a gift for mi amigo, Balboa

 

"Historic cuts" is just another way of saying

we're gonna get you later - he's threatening cutting 3 departments, thereby getting the unions mad, which then leads to NO cuts, or closing or reducing monies to the "children" (those on medicare), and still, in the back of his mind, he will try to borrow more money to pay down the dept, gotten by borrowing. Since there are many unanswered questions and gaps in his proposal, when the dust settles, NJ will probably sue for bankruptcy.

Remember, this budget is presented AFTER his proposal to borrow money, which should have been BEFORE he made his dire predictions - unfortuneatly, the pubs in our state haven't made a proposal of their own, thereby looking like they don't have any idea. BUT, they can propose a hiring freeze, cuting "no show" pension jobs, reducing pensions for "appointees" (those who don't to any work, as opposed to those who go through the trouble of showing up), reduce the number of paid holidays, etc.

so far, theh only solution put forward is to raise the gasoline tax - which doesn't affect the state employees who have state cars.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

"Walter Scott Fordyce, 60,

"Walter Scott Fordyce, 60, of Uniontown died over the weekend at Holy Spirit Hospital in Camp Hill, Cumberland County."

Yikes! My grandmother is in that hospital right now preparing for orthopedic surgery tomorrow (bad leg break on Monday).

Hopefully they have different doctors. 

*****

"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will 

ah, it's spring time for Roger

and his shrubs are in bloom:

http://newsbusters.o...

please do your part to help

there are all kinds of strangely-colored people with different religions out there - and soon one could be living near you

Quakers?

Quakers?

"Speaking of guys with long

"Speaking of guys with long hair, happy 68th, Johnny Fever!"

Nobody in the history of television has dressed as good as Herb Tarlek.

 

We all just KNOW Carl has a

We all just KNOW Carl has a white leather belt in his closet!

Snarky soccer! Woo-hoo!

Snarky soccer! Woo-hoo! Nice fro Stewart has there.

Burnin' down the teacher

"Sure, lighting a teacher's hair on fire is in bad taste, but it was a douchey science teacher's ponytail. A GUY's ponytail."

Shrubber, the guy's last name is Lardas. You can imagine what high school students would do with that name. Don't you think he's suffered enough? ;-)

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Whawhawha?!?!

How the hell did I miss that!
hahaha!

It's only absurb if the MSM is pushing the "Dems Lead" agenda

If the MSM is pushing the early Polls that Obama (now) is unbeatable by Hillary, then you (hopefully) get air time for those Polls that show the Dems are behind of the Republicans.

Otherwise it's just one way propaganda.   If the MSM Agenda is Early polls, Hillary is a winner......like in November...it was an uphill battle for Obama. 

Makes you wonder why the MSM even pushes these numbers out there....unless they want to show Obama as having to play "catch up"...another underdog storyline is building for the Prophet.   Where is Rome when you need them  ?

Jay Tee

I do not see how it is absurd. In 2004 rarely did they say the John Kerry had the momentum and rarely showed him in front of GWB.

That is purpose of polls, to show how people are feeling at the moment. Yes they got it wrong in NH and some got it wrong in California, it does not change the fact that they said McCain had the momentum because he is pretty much mathmatically the nominee 2 months later  right?

This article by the NB staff have people giving McCain high marks for the WOT, but almost every poll shows Obama in front in a General Election.

With so many GOP voters staying home "if people on this site can be used as a cluster sample" Does it really surprise you the Obama is in the lead in almost every single poll?

 

Prove it.

1. Show me evidence that a majority of polls show Obama with the lead.

2. Show me evidence that those polls give Obama a lead outside the margin of error.

3. Show me evidence that those polls who do show Obama with a lead outside the margin of error did not oversample Democrats.

"women and minorities hardest hit"

I can easily do 1, 2, and 3 for Shawn

All in one link. You folks may not like him, but Obama's kicking-ass in the only polls besides the actual election that count -- the ones where all the losers lose some loot. I don't have to prove it, the free marketplace proves it for me.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Thanks Sarc

I appreciate that. All I heard when McCain had momentum was how biased the polls and the msm are. Well all that complaining and now there is a Rhino nominee.

Same case in 06 elections, polls are wrong, the msm are make me sick, no one would vote those liberal whiners back in charge of congress.

And after they took back the house and senate. People conveniently say. Well if you look at history thats always the way......yada yada yada

 

Does anyone else in America, left or right

Think it's a bit odd that TOTALLY-unscientific polls which rely on pestering me at suppertime (a sure way to my heart!) are worshipped by the media and trusted by Republicans & Democrats, while the free marketplace "poll" of overseas gambling on our elections is rarely-if-ever referenced by ANYONE?

I mean, you see a link like that every once in a while here on NB, from-me, but do you ever see any reference to this gaming marketplace elsewhere? I just think it's a bit weird -- and the news media PAY for their pester-me-at-suppertime polls. In the meantime, "evil" "greedy" bookies, from oceans away, provide us a better service FOR FREE, and it's largely-ignored.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

McCain can beat Hussein in a Landslide

The fact is all those polls are useless and will be until the Dem nomination is sealed. McCain can win in a landslide if he simply makes a contract with conservatives.

McCain needs to sign the following:

1. I will not raise any Taxes

2. I will not implement a Cap and Trade system, Carbon Taxes or any other global warming regulation to cripple the economy

3. I will not sign any Amnesty or Comprehensive Immigration reform legislation

4. I will build the Border Fence and secure the border

5. I will only appoint Strict Constructionist Judges

6. I will not close the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp or move any detainees to the United States where they can receive legal representation from groups like the ACLU.

Just like Hussein is driving out the black vote he will also drive out the MUCH larger racial vote.

Hussein is the GOP dream candidate to run against, it is their election to lose. Conservatives need to keep saying in these polls that they will vote for Hussein over McCain until he gets the message and agrees to a compromise.

The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource

IF you're right..

And it's a pretty damn big "IF," then the "polls" I referenced are a way for you to make money, and therefore hardly "useless."
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Groundhog Day

I remember you trotting out the same evidence as "proof" that Ron Paul was going to win.

We all know how that worked out.

Got a cite? Nope.

Because all I was using it to prove was media-bias in terms of the Ron Paul blackout NB didn't cover but others (including AIM's Cliff Kincaid all the way to Jay Leno on the left...) busted. Everyone here knows (if only by my recent refutations of your ravings) just how easily-refuted you are, so "link or slink," as ML used to say. I just hope Obama-fans don't have this-easy of a time with McCain, or the slaughter will be at least as brutal as the marketplace is currently-predicting.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Flip-Fop, Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop...

Hmm...you whine:

so "link or slink,"

When I do link (and hand you your hat) you whine:

You pasted, not posted

Flip-flop, flip-flop, flip-flop...

All your whines will not prove

That I ever-said what you hallucinated. Nor will linking to my post showing how you pasted-not-posted (without honest attribution to your actual source, apparently, but what's new?). I repeat, "link or slink," and this time try to make it support your hallucinations instead of my refutations of them.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Quit Your Whining!!!

I've got you on the ropes again with unassailable evidence. So I guess your only defense is to whine, whine and whine some more. I's getting pretty boring, though.

See above

You're the whiner, and you've been refuted. Again. And it was easy. Again. Link or slink -- no more whines about Ron Paul/supporters. Just deal with the fact that you can't support what you said about me, because you're far from an authority on me (or much-anything else, apparently).
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Whines + Insults

Oooh! Now the whines are combined with personal insults. What a way to argue!

What's so insulting

About pointing-out the fact that you're full of crap when it comes to how I've used the gambling-market to show media-bias rather than some far-fetched proposition?? If you can back your hallucinations up, do it. You've not linked, you've not slinked, and you seem to expect me to respect that. Sorry, it didn't work. I'll keep making fun of you because you can't support your hallucination, instead.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Doesn't this mini-thread

belong in the "Wood Shed"??

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

I sure as hell didn't start it

So if others want it there, they can take it there & quit responding here. I'm going to lunch. Refuting the easily-refuted makes me hungry.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Political retort

no responsibility and blame others - 'nuff said.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

I'm to blame for telling the truth?

You may not want to, but deal with it (see other comment). Pardon me for not-letting lies about me pass unrebutted.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Tsk, Tsk -- More Whining

Most of what you write is too cryptic to understand. You would be better off if you were more to the point. And if you cut out the whining and insults, too.

No link

No slink. No respect from here because you claimed I said something but you can't back it up, and you won't admit it. See why you're losing? I do.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

come on sarc

This is really tedious. You were all over NB for months saying the media dumped on Paul unfairly against the trusted instincts of London bookies.

You said it here and here along with several other places.

 

PS - Not trying to insult you, but whatup with the weird-way you add unneeded hyphens in-the middle of words that-don't go together?

The Bookies Knew Better?

Sarc certainly was suggesting the bookies knew the real score, which was exactly my point.

Here's another good one:

Answer mine, and I'll

You know this wasn't your position when Dr. Paul was excluded, and I don't have to link to prove that, it's obviously your double-standard and you desperately want to get away with it.The problem is, I just busted you.

He busted me without a link, just a claim that I had a double standard. The irony is delicious!

Maybe your point

But not your hallucination. Learn to write more clearly.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Newsbusters:

Newsbusters: 7

DasSarkbot: 0

Nope, Candace

Saying the bookies prove media bias IS NOT the same as some BS-er hallucinating, and I'll quote the hallucination directly:


I remember[SIC] you trotting out the same evidence as "proof" that Ron Paul was going to win.

One thing, market based proof of the antilibertarian media bias I've been continually-busting for longer than most of you have even been here, is not the same as a hallucinated claim that Ron Paul was going to win, which (despite the hallucination I quoted) I have never said. I stand by all my words, even if so-far nobody but me has admitted I've never-said-it (I'll hyphenate when I feel like it, too). It's easy, sometimes, to take-on a BUNCH of you & win the debate, as Roger the Whiner & various others here learned in the past. This is just more proof of it.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

okay sarc

You can hyphenate whenever you feel like it. More power to you. I was only curious.

BTW Is it okay if I start calling you Sarcamo?

I doubt that I will be able to find an iron-clad example of you predicting Paul would win, but you insinuated that on a daily basis.

And no, I don't feel like linking to 55 quotes of you talking about bookies.

No, I said that *markets* say

That Ron Paul had a better chance than the media said, and I used that as free-market proof of media bias (and thanks for digging up confirmation that -- shockingly-enough -- I'm right about me, it saved me the trouble).

When you backtrack all the way to "insinuated," it's basically an admission that -- just as I said -- I never-said-that. Fred Thompson fans "insinuated" he'd win here, too, if anything even more vociferously, and we saw where THAT went. Go find all 55 quotes if you want to, but you will not find me confirming the hallucination about me that I quoted. That was my only point. I was not going to let another lie about me stand unrebutted, even if I had to take-on a bunch of you at once, again.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

okay sarc

I didn't accuse you of anything except what I pointed out, so I am not "backtracking" into anything.

You really need to relax.

You certainly took the side

Of the one who is, or should-be, backtracking. Let's face the truth, shall we? I never said that. I used the free market to prove the variety of media bias to which NB often shows a blind eye. I did it in a non-confrontational manner, even. But I'm not going to "relax" when someone blatantly lies about what I've said, OK?? Liars get my usual liar-treatment around here. Nothing's changed.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

You stand by your word,

You stand by your word, which means absolutely NOTHING. You were taught that painful lesson a few weeks ago, when you went on another  of your laughable Ronulon Rants, accusing me of something you had no proof of.

Your word is worth absolutely ZILCH. You blew your currency by acting like an ass over and over here.

Like I've told you before: You make Libertarians look bad, you sad, sad, little boy. Go to your corner and pout, and do not come back until you are ready to behave like an adult.

Yeah, you're right

If I were "an adult," I'd accuse you of diddling little boys.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Roger, you

should be ashamed of yourself, not an adult, and with no proof to boot - do you do your diddling behind the shrubs??

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Of course you would. You

Of course you would. You wouldn't let something inconvenient like proof to get in the way, right, Mr. Nifong?

I've been

de-panted, and in sombody's world, who needs proof? Isn't the acusation enough?

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

McCain vrs. Obama

When McCain and Obama are side by side in a debate, McCain will be so nervous about offending Obama, he'll stammer and stutter and be very gentle.

Contrast that to the smooth, confident style of the dems latest example of a snake oil salesman running for pres.

McCain could say, "I believe I'll be a better president."

The headline the next day would read, "McCain doesn't think an African-American is ready to be president."

If during our debate, Mr. Obama, if  . . if . . I said anything that could possibly be interpreted as winning this particular debate, then I'm sorry. There is no room in my campaign for victory. - - -A distressed McCain shaking Obama's hand right after their first debate

OK, I need a "reality

OK, I need a "reality check." You mean to say that McCain beats Obama on ability to handle the situation in Iraq by only 2 points?????

The poll was obviously

The poll was obviously taken among liberal Democrats, the rest of the voters were clearly excluded.  They probably polled the newsroom staff since they believe "they" are representative or should be representative of what the country thinks.  What you are seeing here is the divide between Clinton and Obama supporters within the Dem Party.  Even Clinton is not so foolish as to demand an immediate troop pull out of Iraq as Obama has said he would.

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

The reality check is Obama

The reality check is Obama is the front runner in a general election in almost every poll, that is the most important reality isn't it?

mb, 'bama's gonna

mb,

 

'bama's gonna beat those nasty terrorists with love and hope...

It would be 3 if

it were done from the top of the key!

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

College Hoops

Pardon me while I continue to laugh hysterically at the Tennessee Vols. Apparently being #1 for a day was enough for them.

...and that was the team who beat Memphis??

 

Here's the scoop on the

Here's the scoop on the bitter primaries:  The NYT’s stock price has been in decline since W took office in 2001. Why? Because liberalism’s shrill voice grates on the American Public. No one likes to listen to angry people rant all the time about how bad everything is without any hint of good news or solutions with positive outcomes. Negative gossip and salacious stories must be balanced by positive outcomes and the knowledge that despite everything all will turn out well in the end. The NYT had that balance when Clinton was in power because they could at least propagandize “for” the Clinton admin even while covering “problems”. During the last 7 years with W, the NYT had no one to really propagandize for in government so they were left with only negatives.

Human nature is to turn away from hearing a continual stream of negatives when you are not personally involved in the outcome. Doom and gloom sells for the short term but it does not sell for the long term, people tune out. The NYT and the rest of the MSM’s only hope for survival is a Democrat President in the WH to propagandize for in a positive manner to balance off the doom and gloom.

Now on to McCaingate: The reason for the NYT hit piece on McCain is the liberal principle of “false moral equivalence”. We already know the Clinton’s scandal ridden history, Obama with virtually no record, a blank slate if you will, gave the Dems something to latch onto and propagandize without the baggage of the Clintons. The problem is the Clintons are not ready to go along with the program, they want 8 more years and are willing to sacrifice the Dem party future if necessary. The Clintons believe that the Dems will vote for anyone with D behind their name because of pride, so in their mind no matter how ugly the primary is and how sleazy they act, they will get votes in any event. The Clinton opposition research has dug up so much dirt on Obama that once all released, Obama will be no better than the Clintons.

The Dems were left with a problem, both of their candidates have major baggage which can not be swept back under the rug because we nasty Repubs won’t let them play the revisionist game without challenging it. So out comes the NYT hit piece on McCain to lower him to the same level of disrepute as Clinton and Obama. Once the public buys into the “all politicians are the same” premise then the negatives of Obama get cancelled out for the general election. The NYT fell on it’s sword in the hope that their actions would tip the balance enough that a Dem would win in 2008 and thus set the stage for financial recovery of the paper. Yes folks, the NYT made a crass financial gamble. If McCain wins in November the NYT is going belly up in 2009 or Sulzberger and the editors will be sacked to save the paper

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

Ben Shapiro at townhall.com

Ben Shapiro at townhall.com has some advice for John McCain on How to Beat Barack Obama.

The tactic: attack his message of "change."

Money quote:

His focus on change means he despises this country the way it is. His wife, Michelle, is crystal clear on this. "Our souls are broken in this nation," she said this month at UCLA. "That is why I am here, because Barack Obama is the only person in this race who understands that. That before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls."

(Aside: Just what is it that is wrong with our souls and how will electing her husband fix them?)

I agree. It's one thing to claim that certain things in this country need changing is one thing. To imply that we are all sick souls in need of a healer is both condescending and arrogant. Especially when someone then gets into trouble for criticizing that message of sainthood that can heal the masses.

 

Ron Paul's Spraypaint Revolution

Of course Dr. Paul's supporters don't support (*nod*) this kind of behavior (*wink*):

There are at least half a dozen examples of Paul graffiti in the city, and three more that have been scrubbed off already: on the
Penn Square monument, 3-foot-tall letters on the Lititz Pike bridge
near the Lancaster Stockyards, and on the concrete walls high up on
Lancaster Square.

...

Similar graffiti has been reported in Bentonville, Ark., where cops are on the lookout for someone who stenciled "Who is Ron Paul 2008?" on the National Guard Armory. Paul's name was also sprayed on
the Thurgood Marshall Middle School in San Diego, a train bridge in
Austin, Texas, and scores of other public places across the country,
according to media reports.

It's unclear whether the campaign is organized, but a blogger nicknamed "saveamerika" is running what he calls The Ron Paul Spraypaint Revolution, and has posted stencil images of the candidate to download and cut out.

Of course, these folks are the same ones who assure us they never spammed internet polls.

And, as we all know

Accusation, especially from the whiners around here, equals "guilt." (PS Check yesterday, you're making an easily-refuted fool of yourself on 2 open threads at once!)
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

I agree. It OBVIOUSLY is

I agree. It OBVIOUSLY is the work of people trying to discredit that presidential front-runner, world-reknown doctor, and part-time deity, Ron Paul. It is inconceiveable that it might just be the work of a douchebag Paulbot.

It's THAT kind of logic that endears you to us, DasSarkbot. That 4% Revolution is a real threat to McCain, ain't it?

 

 

It's that kind of namecalling

That makes your arguments so-strong, Whiner.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Awww, is somebody about to cry?

Whatever you say, cry-baby. Calling everybody a "whiner" does not change your douchebaggery, or the facts, which, as usual, are not on your side.

But, by all means, keep on trucking, DasSarkBot. Keep the 4% Revolution alive, and keep the rest of laughing.

 Oh, btw, you have yet to deny touching little boys. Why is that?

The funniest thing is that

The funniest thing is that here in Sierra Vista Arizona we have a guy who stands on the main street corner in town with a sign that says "Jesus saves."  Everyone has become accostomed to him occasionally thrusting his sign towards traffic and calling out his profession of faith.

Starting two weeks ago he was joined by a wild haired guy with a "Ron Paul revolution" sign with the "evol" portion painted in a different color to emphasise what, "Backward Love"????

What is particularly intersting is that when you observe the proselytizing christian, he seems to be generally horrified at the antics of the Ron Paul supporter who has taken the christians actions and amplified them five fold.  It is almost the equivalent of watching a hippy dance in the mud at Woodstock.

One must assume that the Ron Paul supporter is undergoing some form of religious awakening, or its wacko equivalent.

The funniest thing to me

Is that it clearly horrifies you & the others here so much, despite the fact that Paul has even less chance of getting the Republican nomination than McCain has of winning the general election. More whines on NB will not change that, either.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Huh? We should not be

Huh?

We should not be horrified because RP has no chance of getting the nomination.

And noticing his supporters lack of sanity is somehow WHINING?

And my whining will not change the fact that RP cannot gain the nomination?

Where is the logic?

Certainly it's in your hallucinations

Which -- as usual -- have nothing to do with what I said.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Is that it clearly

Is that it clearly horrifies you & the others here so much, despite the fact that Paul has even less chance of getting the Republican nomination than McCain has of winning the general election. More whines on NB will not change that, either.
JMR

By the way, as our resident RP translator, what is the backwards "Love" in the RP revolution sign significance?

Google is your friend

And even though you've progressed to copy-and-paste, you have yet to provide anything resembling analysis here. Want to know the meaning? Go look it up instead of whining like a little girl about some irrelevant & hopeless supporter. I met a Fred Thompson supporter once who smelled bad, but somehow I was able to avoid whining about it on NB. Think about it...
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

I Thought You Were Our Friend

Google is your friend

As somebody once told me, link or slink.

Why?

BD asked the question, not me. He needs to get used to that newfangled "link" thing, anyway. I didn't make any proposition in his hallucination that would require me to link to anything -- unlike you.

You're already losing on 2 threads, why make it three???
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

More Insults

BD politely asked you, as a Ron Paul supporter, to explain a facet of the Ron Paul campaign to him. You responded with insults:

And even though you've progressed to copy-and-paste...

and told him to Google. You could've politely answered his question or provide a link to the proper answer (there's a lot of garbage on Google, y'know). But nooooooo, you had to be rude and insulting. Here's a free clue: that's no way to woo people over to your side.

Tinian: That is why RP is

Tinian:

That is why RP is doing SOOOO well in his presidential campaign.  You must use Google to understand his banners and advertising signs.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

Here's a free clue back

BD was rude first, so I responded in kind. And you apparently don't know much about BD to say that he could possibly be "wooed" by a Constitituionalist/noninterventionist choice which I've already repeatedly-said was rejected for McCain. No point in not being direct with him if (like you...) he's going to try to hallucinate about what I've clearly-said.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Sarc:As we all know. 

Sarc:

As we all know.  You do not clearly state ANYTHING

You prefer to link to others who have said something.

Did any of y'all catch the

Did any of y'all catch the story on why the elitist at the academy awards wore orange ribbons? They said they wore orange ribbons for the "prisoners" at Guantanamo.

It just does not get any more overtly anti-American than that. We probably need to hunt down whoever wore an orange ribbon and fly them the hell out of here fast. They can not be trusted, and will sell our country out in a New York minute. They are the American version of Vichy.

William F. Buckley dies

Fox News.com is reporting that Conservative writer William F. Buckley has died at age 82. 

No further details at this point.

*****

"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will 

Now that the cat is out of

Now that the cat is out of the bag pertaining to the Global Warming Fraud, what can the Left do but ratchet up the hype?

This is beginning to look like the Surge in Iraq all over again, and the Warmtards are Harry Reid and co.

OWL GORE

Since the global warming crap is going to go away sooner than I expected it looks like Owl Gore is going to need a new job. How about POTUS?  

If you ain't the lead dog, the scenery never changes.-Lewis Grizzard

What is Castro Up To?

Just a lighthearted photo diary of what Castro has been doing on his retirement.

Enjoy

McCain appologizes for a

McCain appologizes for a conservative refering to Obama by his middle name.

http://ap.google.com...

"McCain wasn't on stage or, he says, in the building when Cunningham
made the comments, but he quickly distanced himself from the radio talk
show host after finishing his speech. McCain spoke to a couple hundred
people at Memorial Hall in downtown Cincinnati.

"I apologize for
it," McCain told reporters, addressing the issue before they had a
chance to ask the Arizona senator about Cunningham's comments."

How can he be this weak? Does Hillary or Hussein say they are sorry when someone slams McCain? NO they say they have nothing to do with it, and that person can say what they want.

Why is Hussein off limits anyway? It IS his middle name!

 

Let me get this straight, things off limits to talk about Obama:

His Name

His background growing up

Drug use

His political votes while a state politician

Possible Ties to Al Qaeda donors

Corruption ties to donors

His Patriotism

His stance on radical Islam

ect...

McCain WAKE UP! We Americans have things called rights, and free speach, you don't have to apologize for things others said! Besides that, maybe you should ask some of these questions yourself!

Things we can talk about:

Change

Hope

Terrorists want change too

DCC1... You said a lot

DCC1...

You said a lot for a lot of us out here...on top of that what Cunningham said was right to the point....I am furious he apologized...with friends like these..who needs enemies..but I guess I am j