Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • MSNBC: Obama and Merkel Are the New 'Ronnie and Maggie'; Matthews Sees Conspiracy to Push Hillary 2016
  • NBC's Todd Excuses Obama's Poor Speech Performance: Crowd Too Small, 'It Was Hot'
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies

Now It’s ABC News and the Washington Post’s Turn to Skew Poll Numbers

By Noel Sheppard | November 04, 2005 | 00:16

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

As NewsBusters has been reporting the past 24 hours here, here, and here, CBS News released a poll yesterday depicting President Bush’s declining job approval numbers that were based on a sample that was in no way reflective of the country’s population. Just hours ago, some new poll numbers were released by the Washington Post and ABC News, and they too have over-sampled Democrats and Independents.

As stated at the ABC News website:

“An increasingly unpopular war, an ethics cloud, and broad economic discontent have pushed public opinion of the Bush administration from bad to worse, infecting not only the president's ratings on political issues but his personal credentials for honesty and leadership as well.

“George W. Bush's approval ratings for handling his job, Iraq, terrorism and the economy are all at career-lows. Sixty percent of Americans disapprove of his work in office overall, a level of discontent unseen since recession chased his father from office.”

Yet, the breakdown of the respondents once again showed an over-sampling of both Democrats and Independents, and, as a result, a significant under-sampling of Republicans. As stated at the Washington Post website, the breakdown is as follows:

            Democrat     Republican     Independent     Other     No op.

11/2/05        31            27              38           3         1

9/11/05        31            27              34           8         1

9/2/05         32            31              31           5         2

8/28/05        32            29              33           5         1

6/26/05        34            28              32           5         1

6/5/05         30            31              34           4         *

4/24/05        35            28              32           5         *

However, when one looks at the political leaning of the respondents, the skew becomes even more apparent:

901/904 Leaned Party:

               Democrat     Republican     Independent     Other     No op.

11/2/05           52            41               6           1         *    

9/11/05           48            39              10           3         * 

Without going through the boring statistics again, the point here is that it is not difficult for a polling agency to create a representative sample of the population. In fact, for their poll to be viewed in any serious fashion, a poll MUST represent a fair and accurate portrayal of the population, or else it is worthless. And, according to the 2004 exit polls, the current population is 37 percent Democrats, 37 percent Republicans, and 26 percent Independents. As a result, any poll that deviates from these percentages is not accurately reflecting the views of the population.

So, how does a polling agency ensure such an accurate reflection? Well, by calling more people on the lists they have. After all, there are many, many millions of registered voters who have identified party affiliation with their registration, correct? If the targeted sample size is 1202 people, there are more than enough Americans out there who are registered to vote and have telephones to ensure that they include 37 percent Democrats, 37 percent Republicans, and 26 percent Independents. Think about it -- this means only 445 Democrats, 445 Republicans, and 312 Independents. A good telemarketing division should certainly be able to accomplish this in two days.

Moreover, as we are twelve months away from a national election, there really isn’t any urgency in releasing poll results, is there? As such, wouldn’t it be more important to try to get this sample right than get the results out as fast as possible? After all, from the above numbers, this polling agency hasn’t been able to accurately replicate the 2004 exit poll numbers since at least April 24 of this year.

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Media Bias Debate
  • ABC
  • Washington Post
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • NewsBusters Interview: Amity Shlaes on Coolidge, Media, and Neo-Keynesianism
  • Facebook Photo Shows Kennedy Girl Shooting Baby Seals
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use