For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: the differing oratory skills of McCain and Obama.
Regardless of what you think about the junior senator from Illinois, this man can give a speech. His "acceptance" proclamation last evening was rousing, thoughtful, and powerful. Yet, hours before, McCain also spoke, and irrespective of substance, was flat, and even dull by comparison.
Is this a huge problem for McCain? Are enough Americans taken by flash and facade that the lack of any true platform coming from Obama will be ignored due to his fabulous oratory skills? Will he appear young, energizing, and uplifting next to the older, less captivating McCain? Or will Americans see through Obama's veneer, recognize that he actually isn't saying anything, and be more interested in hearing real ideas and solutions to real world problems?














Comments Policy
I don't know if they'll see
June 4, 2008 - 09:56 ET by mister josephI don't know if they'll see lack of substance behind the style, but i do think people know 'whiny' when they see it. i think Obama's Achilles heel is his tendency to be whiny and passive. (Re: Leave Michelle alone!) I do hate this tendency to mistake excellent oratory skills for intelligence; it hampered Bush for the past 8 years, and it was unfairly used against him.
As for McCain, those who are going to vote for him won't care. I think if you really want a coup to make things interesting, McCain should approach Hillary as his VP, as I seriously doubt Obama will even consider her. I could see Obama being totally off the wall and asking Michelle to be his Veep--after all, isn't it against the norm for him to even be the nominee?
And, of course, the greater question is this: does Obama's nomination justify considering ending affirmative action and other race-protections?
his achilles heal is his
June 4, 2008 - 12:02 ET by TruthMongerhis achilles heal is his complete lack of qualifications for POTUS - other than he's a natural born citizen and old enough...
it will be like making a toddler Captain of the USS Abraham Lincoln...
it's not beyond our ignorant populace I'm afraid, sufficiently dumbed down by the MSM and US public "education..."
TM who are you talking
June 4, 2008 - 14:22 ET by Dan The Man 2TM who are you talking about? McCain or Obama? I mean it could apply to either.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Of Course
June 4, 2008 - 10:01 ET by MeanderingUnfortunately that’s the society we live in. People really don’t care about substance, but look instead to energy and enthusiasm even if what they are saying is full of fluff. That’s why people say “I only listen to the beat, I don’t listen to the lyrics.” I think McCain will have trouble with the younger audience as their MTV laced brains only response to loud music and scantily clad people. People like Obama because he is youthful and energetic, while McCain is old-fashioned and out of touch. However, the older more experienced demographic will hopefully actually listen to the substance of the candidates instead of the hype. It’ll be interesting.
Well now
June 4, 2008 - 10:04 ET by americaneagleJudging from the way the press swoons over every word that he says and how he says it, I am afraid that many people will be swayed by his oratorical skills. You can have the strongest message, have all the right policy ideas, and be on the right side of every issue and it won't mean a darned thing if you can't get your message out clearly and concisely. We have seen what the utter lack of oratorical abilities has done to the Bush administration, and it it not hard to see a similar thing happening with McCain.
Despite Obama's many shortcomings, he can captivate an audience and when he finishes speaking you go away feeling that you have heard something important. When McCain speaks you go away yawning, since he never seems to speak about any issue with any passion (other than castigating conservatives). Passion moves the needle with people, and Obama seems to have a lock on passion in a race with McCain.
Eagle, I could not agree
June 4, 2008 - 12:45 ET by DEVILDOCMOMmore with your statement and you put it very eloquently. Even when I hear bho speak on the radio his powerful speaking ability comes thru. bho is more like clinton in that respect.
I am not a McCain fan, but will vote for him as the one closer to what I believe...well, on a few things. Certainly on many I am on the other side of his beliefs.
The question is: Do Americans take the top office seriously?
June 4, 2008 - 10:09 ET by ChrisMillsInteresting question. I think Obama's oratory skills will hurt him. It might get him elected ringleader at the circus or head of the motivational speakers guild, but our highest office? Americans recognize that we need a strong leader with a record of accomplishment in that office.I think McCain wins because he's more serious and despite the blinders dems put over their eyes, the majority of Americans understand that national security and the economy are not toys for a child to play with and possibly break.
Americans recognize that we
June 4, 2008 - 10:18 ET by JasonCAmericans recognize that we need a strong leader with a record of accomplishment in that office.
I seriously disagree. McCain will get the conservative vote and Obama will get the liberal/youth vote, of course, regardless of what happens in the next 5 months. As for the rest, well, is there anybody more susceptible to flash and style (rather than substance) than the average swing voter? Obama's election is a few regional colloquialisms and maybe a couple rounds of shooting hoops away.
Il y a la merde quel remort produit quand il a mange trop stupidite.
...is there anybody more
June 4, 2008 - 10:45 ET by Roger the Shrubber...is there anybody more susceptible to flash and style (rather than substance) than the average swing voter?
There sure is: the young voter, who flock like sheep to whatever Democrat(ic) is on the ticket. I believe you accidently were referring to the "young and stupid", not the "swing voter".
So could McCain's choice of
June 4, 2008 - 11:05 ET by balboaSo could McCain's choice of running mate be the only thing to save him?
Or ruin him
June 4, 2008 - 11:08 ET by sarcasmoIf he chooses that RINO Crist.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Well sure. He'd need to
June 4, 2008 - 11:13 ET by balboaWell sure. He'd need to pick someone staunchly conservative.
Nope.
June 4, 2008 - 11:16 ET by FoolicanNot going to happen. It'll either be Crist or Bloomberg. Or he could simply run without a vice president.
"So could McCain's
June 4, 2008 - 11:24 ET by Clear thinker"So could McCain's choice of running mate be the only thing to save him?"
Nope. The racist vote from the Dem party and a sizeable portion of the female vote will go to McCain. At this point, his choice of running mate won't garner that many votes.
"Abstain from McCain"
I agree on the racist vote
June 4, 2008 - 11:39 ET by CortillaenI agree on the racist vote and would add that it will not be inconsequential, but I think Obama's choice of running-mate will be much more important than McCain's.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
Obama's VP pick... To
June 4, 2008 - 11:44 ET by Clear thinkerObama's VP pick...
To tell you the truth, I have been so wrapped up in the "will he pick Hillary" for his VP, I haven't put alot of thought into his other choices. For the moment I will have to bow out of that discussion.
"Abstain from McCain"
Sure Obama has these
June 4, 2008 - 10:10 ET by taterSure Obama has these rousing speeches to people who want to hear change, hope, change, hope...blah blah. He's the anti-Bush. But that's all his speeches are...nothing about his policies, nothing about his plans for the war, economy, abortion, or other issues. It's sad many people are duped by this but when you get the media feeding us this crap it's no surprise there are tons of sheep out there.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather
Oratory skills are one thing...
June 4, 2008 - 11:29 ET by Dooperand yes, this will be a distinct advantage for Obama over McCain. The real problem lies in why a guy like Obama can rise up and capture the imagination of the country and even leap frog over the prohibitive favorite Ms. Clinton. If Republicans would look at the root causes of why this happened, then maybe they could deal with the real issues instead of focusing on his oratory skills, color of his skin, etc. for why he has been so successful. When over 80%, THAT's 80%, feel that the country is headed in the wrong direction, are losing their buying power and are having trouble making ends meet, YOU'VE got a problem. NEVER has there been a bigger transfer of wealth from the US and its citizens to other countries than what has occured over the past decade. First, it was jobs that went overseas...and personally, this has not been a bad thing. The more there is a middle class in the Middle East, in China, in Russia, in India, in S. America, the more safe the US is. This has actually created a more stable world but unfortunately, this has been at the expense of the US middle class. Now throw in a war which has drained the US even more, destroyed our dollar and helped drive oil prices and inflation to rocket upward and this transfer of wealth has just accelerated. WE are filling the pockets of those who would wish to do us harm. They do not need to attack us again when our policies are effectively destroying us economically. I, personally, will be voting for the nominee who will stop this transfer of wealth from America to the rest of the world. I'm not sure if Obama is the answer but I know the current direction is not working. Oh, and this has NOTHING to do with being a liberal.
"Oh, and this has NOTHING to
June 4, 2008 - 11:36 ET by Chris Norman"Oh, and this has NOTHING to do with being a liberal."
Uh huh.
"I will vote for someone who will add even more of the same liberal policies that have been in place for years that got us into this mess in the first place. That'll solve it."
Obama wouldn't be anywhere
June 4, 2008 - 14:05 ET by TruthMongerObama wouldn't be anywhere if the MSM weren't feverishly propping him up...
One major thing going for McCain age - big league political experience and savvy - Obama will have his hands full - Kerry and Gore had way more going for them and couldn't make it work...
Member for 1 week 6 days
June 4, 2008 - 11:46 ET by OldSailor88Anyone out there have kids that like Dora? Sing along....
I'm the grumpy old troll......who lives under the bridge!
Noli habere bovis, vir!
"C'mon vamonos
June 4, 2008 - 13:49 ET by red_dragon311"C'mon vamonos everybody lets go!!!"
it's funny my daughter's name is Laura, and my son ( in true sibling fashion) teases her with the Dora song " La la, la la la, Laura...La la, la la la Laura"
and she hates it.......
( now I know what MY mother went through with my brother and me)
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
-Gerald Ford
What policies are you
June 4, 2008 - 11:48 ET by contraryWhat policies are you looking for to stop the transfer of wealth from America to the rest of the world, and which candidates have spelled those out?
"Republicans always get a huge pass on the racist issue. Huck is just another example. Provided they don't start up with the N word, they seem able to pander directly to the racist vote."
-- Chuck Davis, intellectual heavyweight, bigot
Who the heck is Chuck
June 4, 2008 - 11:55 ET by Clear thinkerWho the heck is Chuck Davis???
"Abstain from McCain"
You're the first person to
June 4, 2008 - 12:25 ET by contraryYou're the first person to ask.
He's a nobody blogger I've interacted with before whose hypocrisy knows no bounds. I use alot of what he says as examples of how low our political dialogue has fallen.
"Republicans always get a huge pass on the racist issue. Huck is just another example. Provided they don't start up with the N word, they seem able to pander directly to the racist vote."
-- Chuck Davis, intellectual heavyweight, bigot
contrary... Then by all
June 4, 2008 - 12:30 ET by Clear thinkercontrary...
Then by all means, raise the political dialogue.
"Abstain from McCain"
Funny how you hit all the
June 4, 2008 - 13:13 ET by motherbeltFunny how you hit all the liberal talking points tho...transfer of wealth...jobs overseas, the war, at the expense of the middle class. The only thing missing is Bush lied, and the stolen election of 2000.
As for your comment that why a guy like Obama can rise up and capture the imagination of the
country and even leap frog over the prohibitive favorite Ms. Clinton.
If Republicans would look at the root causes of why this happened, then
maybe they could deal with the real issues instead of focusing on his
oratory skills, color of his skin, etc. for why he has been so
successful.
I would submit to you that the real issues that caused his rise ARE his oratory skills and his skin color. Many Americans swoon at someone who talks about change, hoping for change, talking about the importance of talking about change (Jonah Goldberg) without ever specifying what those changes are; except that WE are the change. What the heck does that even mean?
It's all feel-good talk...long on rhetorical flourishes and short on substance. So what's not to like? Who's not for hope? What, exactly, has Obama proposed that will increase people's "buying power" and stop the transfer of wealth overseas, reduce the price of oil and halt inflation?
Dooper, what you do not
June 4, 2008 - 13:17 ET by bassndudeDooper, what you do not take into consideration is the 80 percent all have diffrent ideas on which direction is the right direction, and all have diffrent ideas on what part is the wrong direction. When you break it down, the war dosnt figure into the wrong direction. The wrong direction for the most of them, is a lack of drilling and exploration.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I think that McCain is
June 4, 2008 - 10:11 ET by ThatDudeI think that McCain is actually a fairly impressive orator as well. Not that it makes me any more or less inclined to vote for him.
Obama's appeal is not just his appearance and oratory skill, but that empty message he delivers. People are going to cheer when the rockstar screams "HOPE AND CHANGE yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!"
For younger voters...
June 4, 2008 - 10:24 ET by Prester John....it's going to be American Idol. Who looks the best, speaks the best, is the most exciting? At least on American Idol the winners had some talent, with Obama it's all smoke and mirrors. One can only hope that older voters in the important states (Ohio, Florida, Michigan etc) who have a little life experience and can see through Obama will hold their nose long enough to vote for McCain.
I can easily envision a scenario where Obama wins the popular vote (due to huge turnouts in the usual blue states) while McCain wins the Electoral College by barely, and I mean barely, winning places like Ohio, Virginia, Missouri etc.
THE AGE OF GUTLESS CANDIDATES (must end)
June 4, 2008 - 15:25 ET by reelman46THE AGE OF GUTLESS CANDIDATES
What
kind of national candidate is so big a coward, so insecure, so unsure
of their principles or abilities that they only appear on “friendly”
TV-radio stations? Well, many these days. Think JM will speak on RL or
SH or NB radio shows? Why not? What does that tell you? It tells me A
LOT.
Think BHO will (finally) grow up and appear on FNC a few times? Why
not? What does that tell you? It tells me A LOT. Its pathetic. You two
(and HRC for many months) are political media cowards. No questions
given ahead of time like HRC demanded for months. Just 1-2 journalists
allowing adequate response time for, say, 20 questions or so every few
weeks. The ‘town hall” (if unrigged) is even a better format.
If you can’t handle a dozen unscripted “biased” interviews, how can
you do anything in foreign affairs? How can voters trust that you stand
for something and can defend it? Where is your passion “to serve”?
Notice the national candidates never get asked about this cowardice.
They should be hammered. This is very risky for the democrat (secular
socialist) because fog and feeling don’t get it done in these formats
so we understand why they are so fearful.
Its way past time to require certain things of national candidates.
Control freaks must give way to open free challenges by the people.
That means candidate “puppet masters” must change. How many times have
you heard comments from the voters like, “I never agree much with the
guy but I admire him because he stood his ground and showed
passion-competence?” The “puppet masters” simply have no trust or
confidence in their candidates. Ever wonder why we voters have so
little?
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)
Let's see, ideas vs style...
June 4, 2008 - 10:11 ET by sarcasmoI wonder where my own life-experience leads?? And this assumes McCain's ideas are even worthy of being called "an idea," which in the case of the temporary political-season gas tax holiday, they're not IMO. How 'bout some sunsets on your great new tax increase ideas, for once? The odds say it all -- McCain's in deep yogurt unless something changes.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I agree with you Sarc, even
June 4, 2008 - 10:51 ET by Ruths husband BenI agree with you Sarc, even though I don't share your ideology (I'm not a Libertarian or a Librarian), John McCain was not even on my list of who I could vote for. If he doesn't pick the right VP, he's done for and even that may not be enough.
In response to the suggested thread topic: Yes, rhetoric without substance is just what the American masses feed on. Obama can order the trombones later, the important thing is to sell band costumes!
Reagon did not win just because he was a great communicator, but it helped immensely. Since McCain doesn't have the substance to counter Obama's flash, I think he's going to lose in the fall. And it doesn't hurt Obama to have the entire media in his pocket.
"Whatever Michelle Says Is The Message." –
Senator Barack Obama October 1, 2007, Chicago HQ
what gets me is that
June 4, 2008 - 10:57 ET by sarcasmoReally good, really conservative, ideas that would be really-easy to steal get totally ignored instead. This goes beyond media bias or our minor political disagreements to a powerful, major-league form of "not invented here" stupidity, IMO.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Hopefully, people will look
June 4, 2008 - 10:16 ET by motherbeltHopefully, people will look beyond the prepared speeches and pay attention to how he answers questions.
I have noticed that his first line of "defense" when asked an uncomfortable question is to attack the question itself: (paraphrasing) Now you see, that is the kind of politics the American people are tired of!
In other words, the question is inappropriate and therefore not worthy of an answer.
He is definitely eloquent (is that going to become the new "a" word that we're not allowed to use for him?) and talented at rhetorical flourishes, but I think the more people hear him speaking "off the cuff" the more people will realize that his is all sizzle and no steak. At least I hope so.
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bull$**t.
You're right
June 4, 2008 - 10:42 ET by americaneagleObama does have trouble answering tough questions, and he even struggles answering not so tough questions if they're unscripted. He has shown no ability to take a tough question and give a coherent answer to it. But with the media working overtime to burnish his image, I still fear that he will be able to brush off uncomfortable questions as irrelevant and that the media will treat those questions as trivial. They will covr his non answers as somehow being "tough" or "firing back at his critics", when in fact he is simply attempting to dodge any tough questions.
Two words...
June 4, 2008 - 10:25 ET by ontheright...Bill Clinton.
Unfortunately, the American people have fallen back to sleep after 9/11. It will take another catastrophic event to wake the masses and stir the true American spirit again (if it's not too late, that is). The MSM and the DNC puppet masters are using a perfectly orchestrated, "Messianic" lullaby hinging on the promise of secular wants and values and it is having the exact desired affect.
Many, many American's today have the "I want it all, and I want it now" attitude. Long gone are the days of delayed gratification, saving for a rainy day, look before you leap, consider the consequences, etc, etc, etc.
Obama lies, democracy dies
McCain isn't dull,
June 4, 2008 - 10:27 ET by mattmMcCain isn't dull, he merely sounds like he just took a hit of helium.
Yes, enough Americans (and Mexica-ians) are gullible enough to be taken in by a used car salesman like Obama - that's how Clinton got in... This is the product of a 60 year old socialist public school system and media. (And GOP insiders who are to stupid to recognize opportunities and seize them)
McCain's biggest problem is that he's a RINO who loses two GOP voters for every Dem voter he gains.
BTW - No offense to any of you used car salesmen out there...
Why?
June 4, 2008 - 10:26 ET by okiehawk44I'm guilty of playing into the almost daily Joy Behar and Mika "stupid statement of the month club" but it occurs to me -- I'm old and slow -- that we have more important matters to debate on this site.
Can you NBs stop reporting on these two for awhile and get us back to important things. I really do not believe either of these two are worth your time or my time. Just let 'em simmer on a back burner, they aren't going anywhere and the world doesn't need to talk about them anyway. Gives them a status they don't deserve.
Think you may have...
June 4, 2008 - 10:32 ET by ontheright...missed the target (thread) with your reply. :-)
You forget the target
June 4, 2008 - 10:59 ET by FoolicanYou forget the target audience.
Apparently to some on this website, "Si se puede" - the Spanish phrase for "Yes we can", a phrase commonly uttered at Obama rallies - is a double secret code word for illegal immigrants to engage in a violent revolution.
Bob Barr.
June 4, 2008 - 10:44 ET by FoolicanI'm joining the Barr movement. Why?
Because McCain splits the Democratic vote between Obamaramas and scorned Hillary supporters, and Bob Barr will pull in the conservative vote. It's the perfect scenario. Now is the time for a third party win. Let's start from the bottom.
Conservatives will never get elected by sheer force of will alone.
"I'm joining the Barr
June 4, 2008 - 11:15 ET by ckc1227"I'm joining the Barr movement. Why?"
While you're at it, you might want to delve into Barr's connections with that well known conservative group, the ACLU.
Then you tell me who is more
June 4, 2008 - 11:18 ET by FoolicanThen you tell me who is more conservative: John McCain or Bob Barr?
By the same token, who would
June 4, 2008 - 11:31 ET by Roger the ShrubberBy the same token, who would be more damaging to this country: a President McCain or President Obama.
What good will patting yourself on the back for voting for a "bold libertarian, er, conservative" be when this country is in the crapper? I am sure "well, I voted for Barr" will console you when the sh*t hits the fan.
Let's face it folks: all this third-party talk is foolish and unrealistic. Sometimes you have to play with the hand you are dealt.
I agree Roger - I'll be voting for McCain
June 4, 2008 - 16:04 ET by Dee BunkI joke about not voting for him, but I will. I don't think it will make a difference though. I know it won't in my state. Obama has a complete lock in IL. I'll be voting for McCain because he's going to have a huge popular vote victory no matter what and he and the Dems will be taking that as a huge mandate. I'm not going to be responsible for that.
I can't really blame people for not voting for him though. He's the worst candidate we've ever had.
Worse than Bob
June 4, 2008 - 17:49 ET by Roger the ShrubberWorse than Bob Dole?
Ugh.
Holding one's nose when entering the voting booth come November will be a common sight, won't it? I know I will be....
In PA, it should be a tough, close fight.
Yeah Roger - I think worse than Bob Dole
June 4, 2008 - 17:59 ET by Dee BunkI had more respect for Dole. He didn't trash Republicans with liberal talking points. They are equally uncharismatic though.
I'm still dreaming about McCain quitting and Romney stepping in. Or McCain-Hillary ticket. I'll feel a lot less guilty voting for McCain when it's clear that he's a Democrat to everyone and that we are just voting for the more conservative Democrat.
McCain-Shrillary? Nightmares!
June 5, 2008 - 10:40 ET by Roger the ShrubberMcCain-Shrillary?
Nightmares! Nightmares!!
I'd tell you who they're scared
June 4, 2008 - 11:33 ET by sarcasmoTo let in any "debates," but everyone knows the bipartisan fear already, from decades of experience with it...
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
"Gridlock!"
June 4, 2008 - 11:54 ET by Chris Norman"Gridlock!"
More like
June 5, 2008 - 06:23 ET by sarcasmoWhinelock (see below).
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Well, it aint Ron
June 4, 2008 - 15:47 ET by BDWell, it aint Ron Paul.
He was the classic "meat on the table" "easy pickings" of "low hanging fruit" (Cake) who looked more foolish the more they gave him airtime.
So you agree they'll fear Barr?
June 4, 2008 - 15:50 ET by sarcasmoBecause that's what I think, and he's already pollin' 7% in some areas. Ron Paul, as I've repeatedly told you when you whine like this, is irrelevant at this point....
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
So you agree they'll fear
June 4, 2008 - 16:22 ET by BDSo you agree they'll fear Barr? Because that's what I think, and he's already pollin' 7% in some areas.
Good GOD! SARC Actually said what he aactually THINKS without posting a link to someone elses work! I must annotate the time at 15:50 on 4 June 2008 for this historic event.
Ron Paul, as I've repeatedly told you when you whine like this, is irrelevant at this point....
Actually, you have never said that. You might have LINKED to someone else saying that, but never said so yourself.
By the way, this is not whining. THIS IS SHOUTING that you have finally posited a theory in your own words. GOOD WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll have to send UNSANE a note. He would be so proud.
Reading is fundamental, BD
June 4, 2008 - 16:28 ET by sarcasmoI've said this same thing before. I gave up after Super Tuesday, it's all still there. And amid all your ironic self congratulation for finally reading something, you failed to say if you actually agree that they'll fear Barr just as they've feared every other nonbillionaire 3rd party candidate.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Please find a posting in
June 4, 2008 - 17:35 ET by BDPlease find a posting in reply to me in your own words which you indicated that Paul was no longer a viable candidate.
Uh-oh.Poor Sarky cannot
June 4, 2008 - 17:46 ET by Roger the ShrubberUh-oh.
Poor Sarky cannot navigate the complicated search function that Newsbusters has to offer. Recent history has shown that asking him to prove something that supposedly occurred in the past few months will be fruitless.
Since when
June 5, 2008 - 06:18 ET by sarcasmoHave I ever followed orders around here? I'll do as I like, everyone who can read knows I gave up on Super Tuesday, and I feel no need to give reading lessons to those who can't, especially if they're whiners.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I am Paulbot! Hear me roar!
June 5, 2008 - 10:20 ET by Roger the ShrubberAs someone who had to suffer the seemingly-endless weeks of daily Paulbot-spamming by you, Sarky, I find it hilarious you have back-pedalled so much on your former diety. I guess being a douchebag Libertarian means never having to have a spine, back yourself up, or act like you are older than 12.
At least Ron Paul got your hard-earned money, right? How much blood and semen did you donate to your God? How many times were you out, whoring yourself to sailors to raise money for the good doctor?
Too funny.
You get all the respect
June 5, 2008 - 12:01 ET by sarcasmoYou deserve, Whiner.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
How will I be able to sleep
June 5, 2008 - 12:35 ET by Roger the ShrubberHow will I be able to sleep tonight?
Scotch? Pills?
June 5, 2008 - 12:37 ET by sarcasmoI don't know...
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
No, not how will YOU sleep
June 5, 2008 - 12:46 ET by Roger the ShrubberNo, not how will YOU sleep tonight, but me.
Try to keep up, okay?
At least you finally admit what we already knew: you don't know.
Hays County, TX
June 5, 2008 - 01:40 ET by UnsaneSomeone nees to tell many residents of Hays County, TX (where one can find San Marcos and Texas State University) that Ron Paul lost the election. His signage is still to be found all over the place in that county...
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Nope.
June 5, 2008 - 06:15 ET by sarcasmoI gave up after Super Tuesday, and I feel no need to follow your orders. Do it yourself.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Or better yet...
June 5, 2008 - 06:20 ET by sarcasmoFind one thread about Ron Paul THAT I'VE STARTED since Super Tuesday. Plenty of whiners soundly refuted & mocked, but it's gonna be 0. But the whinefest continues. Big government's addictive.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Your claim and boast is
June 5, 2008 - 10:26 ET by Roger the ShrubberYour claim and boast is immaterial.
I do not think I have ever STARTED a thread on this website, genius. Most posters here have never STARTED a thread. You probably have never STARTED a thread in your time here at NB, either.
You never START a thread, but you sure as hell DERAILED countless threads with your Paulbot whining and boasting and spamming.
Nice try on semantics, though.
Whine, whine whine
June 5, 2008 - 10:45 ET by sarcasmoI stand by my words.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Of course you do. And, as
June 5, 2008 - 12:44 ET by Roger the ShrubberOf course you do. And, as has been proven countless times, your words are pretty much worth the same as a Ron Paul Liberty Bathmat.
...they'll fear Barr just
June 4, 2008 - 17:43 ET by Roger the Shrubber...they'll fear Barr just as they've feared every other nonbillionaire 3rd party candidate.
The until-recently-defrocked Bishop of the Church of the Most Holy Paulian is 100% correct: the Dems and Repubs will fear Big Gay Al as much as they fear Cindy McKinney, Chuck Baldwin, or Roger Colero. Or, should I say, as little.
The Whiner worships big government
June 5, 2008 - 06:21 ET by sarcasmoBut she's wrong.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Medication time?
June 5, 2008 - 10:14 ET by Roger the ShrubberWho is "the Whiner"?
And who is "she"?
Nonetheless, prove me wrong.
Whoops. You can't, thus the lame attack.
BD... Now that's
June 4, 2008 - 17:02 ET by Clear thinkerBD...
Now that's funny!
Sarc may be having an off day.
"Abstain from McCain"
I prefer to take the
June 4, 2008 - 17:38 ET by BDI prefer to take the positive tack, that being that we are having a positive effect on Sarc and finally teaching him to perform analysis and form logical arguments in his own words.
Kinda feels somehow like we are sending junior off to school for the first time.
Kinda proud of him.
You haven't learned to read, and you're proud of it??
June 5, 2008 - 06:16 ET by sarcasmoWow. That IS funny!
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Ooops, Sarc seems to have
June 5, 2008 - 11:30 ET by BDOoops, Sarc seems to have had a relapse....
Still funny.
June 5, 2008 - 12:00 ET by sarcasmoAnd still 0 content...
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
0 content?
June 5, 2008 - 17:02 ET by UnsanePlease. This comment from one who can only address legitimate, well-written criticism of his side with "whine whine whine", "You-are-full-of-crap-as-usual", or "Reading is fundamental".
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Well written criticism???
June 7, 2008 - 04:59 ET by sarcasmoAt least you do good humor!
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Yep
June 8, 2008 - 02:04 ET by UnsaneIndeed, it is well-written criticism which sets you off into the unhinged land of extreme rage. As for my sense of humor: once again, another quality I have that you lack in the extreme.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Drivel
June 5, 2008 - 17:05 ET by UnsaneA 20+ year intel officer, illiterate? Hardly.
But that's the kind of immature drivel I have come to expect from you.
I'd rather hear what HE has to say rather than a drug-obsessed egomaniacal reactionary any day of the week.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Whine whine whine...
June 7, 2008 - 04:59 ET by sarcasmo0 content. Again. Look, BD has repeatedly shown reading comprehension problems. This isn't nearly the first instance, like it or not.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Now Sarc: My ability to read
June 7, 2008 - 09:06 ET by BDNow Sarc:
My ability to read that which is placed before me is more than adequate.
THe problem seems to be that you simply cannot formulate a posting longer than it takes to link to someone elses work.
Sort of like.
"BD, you and UNSANE are just whinin - -see link."
What kind of analysis is THAT? ANd this from a supposed chess lover?
Please, but that CHESS HONED mind to work and actually formulate a posting that has the following.
1.) A thesis statement
2.) findings
3.) Material that supports your thesis statement.
4.) A conclusion.
WHen you have finally posted such without simply lifting it in the form of a link from others work, then we shall moveo n to discuss my supposed lack of reading comprehension.
Thank you.
I've repeatedly said "reading is fundamental"
June 7, 2008 - 09:14 ET by