Open Thread


For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: the smartest woman in the world complains about sexism in the campaign (paragraph breaks removed):

In an interview with ABC News' Cynthia McFadden to air on this evening's "Nightline," Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., says it's tougher for her to run as a woman than it is for her male opponent. Asked why she thinks so many women may be feeling sorry for her, Clinton said, "I think a lot of women project their own feelings and their lives onto me, and they see how hard this is. It's hard. It's hard being a woman out there. It is obviously challenging with some of the things that are said that are not even personal to me so much as they are about women."..."Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing field," she said, "but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there."...But apparently Clinton thinks -- based on this comment -- that the "playing field" is easier for a black man than a white woman.

Can you believe this nonsense? And this from the supposedly smartest woman in the world? Is this modern-day feminism: "Woe is Me" rather than "I am Woman, Watch me Grow!"?

Read comments

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

NBers

NBers,

It's stuff like this that validates what many of us were saying months ago when she was crowned the inevitable candidate: contrary to how the media have presented this woman since 1992, she is a truly gross caricature of an American female. More important, once people got to really see and hear her on the campaign trail, they weren't going to like her.

Regardless of how some Republicans feel about her being more beatable than Obama, I honestly hope that Tuesday is her swan song, and that next week will mark the end of her campaign so that we won't have to hear much from this person for at least three years. ns

If it's President Obama, how

If it's President Obama, how much would you bet against it being Associate Justice Clinton replacing Buzzy Ginsberg?

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

ARGHH! That would be unbearble

NO! Please!!! We want to be rid of Hellary.

I cannot imagine having to put up with her for decades as a member of the Supremes

SouthJ... I think it's at

SouthJ... I think it's at least a possibility.

She's 60, Obama would likely be a 2 termer, given he'll import 20 million new voters anyway, and it finally rids the DNC of the Clinton problem forever.

And you know that unless Republicans can elect 41 rock solid votes in the Senate, that she'd get confirmed.

Specter would vote for her. Snow.. horrible to contemplate!

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Specter would vote for


Specter would vote for her. Snow.. horrible to contemplate!

OH, yeah, those two would...in a heartbeat!

And how many other RINO's????

 

BTW, Jack, speaking of Specter, did you catch it when I posted the reply I got from him regarding his NFL investigation?

Wrong Tree

I'll bet anything reasonable, and maybe even give you odds.

Hillary Clinton specialized in corporate law, although most of her practice actually centered around patent infringement and intellectual property law, while her written output was a gross caricaturization of children's (family) law. Her training in constitutional law is minimal, and a barrier that would be almost impossible to overcome. In addition, her reasoning abilities are severely limited with respect to legal fundamentals.

Even the ridiculously liberal ABA would balk at giving her a qualified recomendation for the Supreme Court. This tidbit, along with the "when Hillary is president she's going to appoint Bill to the Supreme Court," is designed to raise the blood pressure of constitutionalists, and create a feeding frenzy that wastes space and time in blogs, but has no basis in reality. Let's remember now that dear, darling Bill was disbarred - and who does that? Other lawyers, and there aren't enough conservative ones in the country to overrule their liberal counterparts, if they too didn't believe he was unfit to be a lawyer.

Now, before someone else brings it up, I am well aware that there is no requirement that a judge/justice must first be a lawyer - and in fact it has been argued they should not be lawyers as far back as Aristotle - but do you really believe the public would accept that?

R/

Clyde 

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

In addition, her reasoning

In addition, her reasoning abilities are severely limited...

I cannot argue here as your knowledge of American jurispudence is clearly far greater than mine... however, regarding the above quote, when has that ever been a bar to serving on SCOTUS?

Penumbras and emanations, anyone?

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

If You Can't Dazzle Them With Brilliance

"...when has that ever been a bar to serving on SCOTUS..."

Clearly not when Douglas was appointed, lol, but that was in 1939, and government worked on a different basis then. The President actually could appoint justices to the Supreme Court when Roosevelt appointed him, without the senate flopping and twitching. Couldn't happen today - and I've already commented about the ABA input - which should have no bearing on the decision, because they should not even be consulted.

Douglas clearly was a member of my old school of thought, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit."

V/R

Clyde

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

Not gonna happen

Not gonna happen for two reasons:

1) Hillary has never been a judge at any level. While this is not mandatory, it's awful hard to justify appointing someone to the Supreme Court who never served on any other Court before that. And I don't think raising Hillary's Rose Law Firm experience would be a benefit to Hillary-it'd probably raise some issues she'd  rather let lie.

and the MAIN reason it won't happen:

2) You can't run for President as a member of the Supreme Court.  If you think Hillary isn't going to run again in 2012 or 2016, you don't know Hillary.

 

I used to think she'd be

I used to think she'd be too old, but McCain is paving the way for her, even without Reagan in the past.

Golda Meir was no spring chicken, and didn't Thatcher serve well into her 70's?

Famous political advisor Sharon Stone said HRC was still "too sexy" to be President at the present time.   Stone said:

a woman should be "past her sexuality" when she runs for the highest office.

"Hillary still has sexual power, and I don't think people will accept that," she said. "It's too threatening."

Yea, that's right, Sharon. She can't win because (sing it!) she's... too sexy for this shirt, too sexy for this.... party.....LOL

 

motherbelt, Hillary needs guarantees

I don't think Hillary would run again unless she had some guarantees from the democrat party.

You know, things like no opposition or, at the very most, only Dennis Kucinich-like candidates to oppose her.

Well then, we needn't

Well then, we needn't worry. By that time, literally ALL infatuation with the Clinton brand will be worn so thin as to be non-existent.

Now that I think about it, I think she would be strongly discouraged by the Democrats, for the reason I just stated. They will move on and have no use for either of them.

I stand corrected, by you and by myself. LOL. This is her swan song.

I did say previously that if it were really close between her and Obama, he could be convinced to take VP and go for the brass ring after her terms (of course they're taking 2 for granted), as he is young and she is not. But since it looks like there's not chance of that, if she loses, she'll just entrench herself in the Senate.

I hereby revert to my first-instinct prediction, which I made below, to lightcable.

Never say 'Hillary Clinton'

Never say 'Hillary Clinton' and 'sexy' in the same sentence again. Ever.

Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet?

What will she do?

Assuming that the Clintons are out of the race soon as now seems inevitable,
does anyone think they'll just go away?

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they left the Democratic Party
and ran an independent campaign. Just imagine, Hil as prez and Bill as VP. I'm
sure there are some big pocket liberals who would love to make it happen.

I've posted my theory

I've posted my theory before: She will go back to the Senate and attempt to be a female Ted Kennedy...the "Queen Mum" of the Senate.

Bill will go on his "Whining, Venom and Vitriol Tour" during which he will alternately get all choked up about how brave his little Hillary was.... and engage in red-faced, finger-pointing rage at everyone who "opposed" her.

motherbelt

Let's be careful about taking the name of the Queen Mum in vane.

I suggest the title "Queen Bee" would be more appropriate for Mrs. Clinton.

I am Queen Mum and I approved this message.

Yes, of course Your

Yes, of course Your Majesty! ;-)

How about "Dowager Queen"? (I'm trying to work the "age" angle LOL!) 

Queenie

Personally, I prefer "Queenie," which  both nods to her desired royal appellation, and is sufficiently diminutive to demonstrate her true stature, :o).

R/
Clyde

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

That sounds a little too

That sounds a little too young and fun-loving. I think "Dowager Queen"  has the proper stiffness and...uh...shall we say....."maturity" to it.

I Concede

Only because I can't think of anything better, lol, I concede the point. If I may point out, however, "Dowager Queen" has a certain ring of both authority and legitimacy to it, and perhaps conveys some slight amount of pomp (and circumstance?)

V/R

Clyde

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

suggestion............

How about "Drama Queen"?

With a little luck

it'll be "Queen Wanna Be".

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

What's the Attraction?

I don't understand why women keep buying into her salespitch.  The women I've known that have voted for her in NY keep saying: "She'll do so much for women and children."  She's had enough time as First Lady and as Senator of NY to really make a mark.  Frankly, her career is rather undistinguished.  Yet these same women will say vicious things about Condi Rice as if she's eating Christian babies for lunch.

Attraction??

Please don't judge all women by those you know in NY, that's quite a liberal group you've got there. I don't know any woman in San Diego that's bought into her salespitch, but we're quite conservative, so we know better.

Chai

“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”

Mea Culpa

Oh, I didn't mean to imply all women were that way.  I know there are women out there that won't vote for Hillary (or any Democrat) because they don't want a socialist government breathing down their neck.

There has been the suggestion

(RL yesterday) that with her candidacy, so goes "feminism". By using the "gender" card, she is admitting that SHE can't make it unless she is treated differently, so sad, but hurray, if you want or need the equality, then you will need or want to be treated as everyone else, no exceptions.

Unfortunately, we will hear from her, as she will still be in the senate, and as the real senior sen from NY, (Chucky is her jr, he's just more verbal and dumber), she will need to keep 'face', by being noticed, using her seats on committees as her pulpit. She will become, like a lot of us here, a loud whiner.     ;>0 

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Meet Ron Paul's Congressional Opponent!

It's a great interview:

Future Congressman Peden on the nuttiness of Ron Paul:

His voting record is … it’s horrid — 351 pieces of legislation he
sponsored, six came out of committee, and none have ever passed. And if
you go back and look, he just regurgitates the same pieces of
legislation. “Restore the Second Amendment.” What does that mean,
exactly?

But that’s his bill, and two years later he submits the bill again.
He just keeps reprinting these and throwing them out there. And now he
doesn’t even get any cosponsors on many of his bills. [With] many of
his amendments, he’s called out of order on the floor for even putting
the amendment in, because he doesn’t follow the rules of operation in
the House.

He’s up there to make a point, not a difference. He wants to be
called out of order because then it’s unique and it’s unusual, and he
gets press, or at least Roll Call will say “Here he goes
again.” But you know, if you do that once a year or once a term, it
works. If you do it three or four times a day, it gets old.

It's time for crazy ol' Uncle Ron Paul to retire.

Even though Ron is nuts he

Even though Ron is nuts he does have some good point about the constitution and wanting to keep America well America.  I think he is nuts and not viable for any office much less congressman, however some of his ideas have been thrown to the wayside by McCain.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Whoa! Wait! Back the

Whoa! Wait! Back the truck UP!!!!

I thought this campaign wasn't about gender or race!!!

As usual, Her Royal Clintoness wants it both ways.

"but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there."

That's right, Hill, whine about it, but then say it doesn't matter. Just like your whining about the first question, then saying you're glad to field it.

What a joke! On another occasion she said it wasn't about sexism, but then says she's trying to "crash the highest and hardest glass ceiling."


I Am Woman; Hear Me Whine!!

And now, today's Ricin-free

And now, today's Ricin-free Shrub Report®:

It's Angel vs. Devil!

It's been a busy week in the Father of the Year competition…

Angelina Jolie surprisingly composes an insightful editorial. Good to see her abreast of the situation…The Hufftards react with their usual peace and love: I used to like Angelina but it seems she has become a Nazi collaborator,Only thing that needs to visit the Green Zone is about 10,000 rockets.

While speaking of Hollywood, NBC has no liberal bias. Proof? Watch next week's episode of Medium. Titled "Aftertaste", it's a story about a politician from Arizona who hides a horrible secret: he committed an atrocity as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. Gee, a Vietnam War POW Senator from Arizona? Doesn't ring a bell to me….

Forty years ago today, "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" wins the Best Album Emmy. Doesn't that make you all feel old?

Today's Culture of Corruption Update. Meanwhile, teamster thug/governor Fast Eddie sings the praises of scumbag.

The Surge is working, and Americans are beginning to see the truth, so, naturally, the Democrat(ic) Party has to ratchet up the "Defeat at all costs!" rhetoric. You lefties just have to be seething at your inept leadership.

The latest in Politically-Correct Douchebaggery

These tards make Ronulons appear normal.

Code Pink cries out for the Marines.

Are kneepads provided?

Are you ready for March Madness?

Who needs the deserts of Libya and Syria when you have England?

A follow-up to a Shrub Report story from a few days ago.

And, finally, The Pic of the Day, and a bonus Second Great Pic of the Day.

 

Re: Fast Eddie

Re: Fast Eddie Rendell

Just so you know..some of us are embarrassed that he is from PA!

 Come, on Rog....stop picking on PA.

Ms. Kitchen's bill would amend Title 18, Pennsylvania's statute
delineating state crimes and offenses, to cover displays of symbols
that are "offensive to the race, color, religion, national origin,
ancestry, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender or
gender identity of any individual or group of individuals," according
to a statement by the senator. As such, the legislation could have
implications for the display of objects other than nooses.

Why don't they just outlaw any symbol that offends anyone, anywhere????

Sheesh.

 

Poor

Poor Billary........ 

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

Romney / Jendil  2012 (if,we survive)

If only they would outlaw

If only they would outlaw Steely McBeam....

 

I am not embarrassed to be from PA, just that we have idiots like Rendell running the show....

I didn't say I'm embarrassed

I didn't say I'm embarrassed to be from PA (and I'm not really from here, I just live here now)....I said I'm embarrassed that Rendell is.

Only because I know who tired you are,

being a Friday and all, but for Pic of the Day, I'd vote for this one, and ask it be Pic of the Decade!

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Forty years ago today,

Forty years ago today, "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" wins the Best Album Emmy. Doesn't that make you all feel old?

Only when I'm 64.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Not that it makes much of a

Not that it makes much of a difference, but "Medium" takes place in AZ, so it makes sense that the senator would be from there, but, you know.

Without so much as a shred

Without so much as a shred of charisma, Hillary Clinton, alpha female, was elected to the U.S. Senate.  I thought the same personal “qualities” assured she would be the presidential nominee of her party.  Instead, she will lose to this passive guy who keeps stepping all over himself in the attempt to show his agreement with her policies.  Goodbye, Hillary.  Hello, Milquetoast.

Looks like everybody's

Looks like everybody's favorite gay journalist, Matt Drudge, blew it once again with his impulsive reporting.

Media Blackout?  Prince's life?  Who cares? 

Not Drudge.

LINK

Prince Harry was serving country honorably, now he may have to go home.  What a shame.

Yeah, we felt the same way

Yeah, we felt the same way when the New York Times blew the cover of a major anti-terrorist operation. But, what's that compared to Prince Harry's ability to serve in Afghanistan?

Yes Chris, Spying on

Yes Chris,

Spying on Americans has yielded tremendous results.  Curse the NYT for letting us know our own government was spying on us.

Anti-Terrorist?  More like anti-freedom, anti-privacy.

Again, the terrorists won on 9/11 when they forced us into this bizarre state of paranoia. 

I understand. You are okay

I understand. You are okay with the NYT doing it, because you are a Liberal, but not Drudge, because Drudge is Conservative.

Drudge should not have broken that story, and neither should the NYT. You are a partisan hack, Hater, and not even a good one.

Also, does his sexual preference really matter, Pumpkin? We all know how homophobic you are, but man, keep the hate to yourself, bigot.

Roger, you should know by

Roger, you should know by now that it's always liberals, the ones for whom such things don't matter, that say the gay journalist or the Latino mayor, or the African-American coach...for people who don't care about that, why is that always the first descriptor that they use?

It's all about groups,

It's all about groups, isn't it? Everybody is separated into their own little group, where they all have their own list of grievances that need to be addressed.

Big tent, my ass.

I keep looking for a better way to put my thoughts onto paper.

Here is a decent example that I recently saw:

"...the left can't survive without groupism, because it generates group grievances. If groups have grievances, liberals can swoop in and save the day by giving them what they want. True Reagan-Conservatives believe (typically) the exact opposite, that individuals make their own way and fend for themselves."

Roger,Whatever happened to

Roger,

What ever happened to the notion of "one person - one vote"?
Now, for the Democrats, it's "one group - lots of votes" and to hell with anyone who isn't in one of those groups...

Bizarre state of paranoia? I

Bizarre state of paranoia? I can't believe you would want to make the things you believe known to others. Perhaps good intelligence, what you call a "bizarre state of paranoia", would have prevented 9/11. I made the mistake of wasting my time responding to your foolish drivel. I won't do that again. You are the kind of person who makes this country less than what it once was.

Live and learn,

Live and learn, Chris.....;-)

You'll love your privacy LEON

You'll love your privacy LEON when they(the terrorists) kill you in private with a gun you turned in because guns kill, people don't!

Leon's world

Hey! All you have to do is sit down and talk to the terrorists. Don't you remember that old song from the groovy sixties from Friend and Lover called 'Reach out of the Darkness?'

(paraphrased)


"There was a man, who I did not care for,

  and then I day, I knocked upon his door,

We sat and talked, and then in a little while,

  this man, became a friend of mine.

So reach out . . ."

Didn't that song teach us something?

I have the LP

I actually have the LP.  Co-produced by Joe South of "GAMES PEOPLE PLAY" fame.  Ever hear "Ode to a Dandelion" on the LP?  James & Cathy Post were CANADIANS, would have never known-RIGHT!  Do you remember CAT MOTHER & THE ALL NIGHT NEWSBOYS?  And MOTHERLODE?

PawpawN

I heard of Joe South, Cat Mother, and possibly, Motherlode (or was it Mothers of Invention?)

 I still prefer the Beatles from that era, though.

Leon, you get the Bronx cheer for the most mindless post o' the

Leon, you get the Bronx cheer for the most mindless post o' the day. Possibly even the week. Did you by chance take your entire month's supply of stupid pills all at once?

First of all, the government is not engaging in "domestic spying," unlike Bill and Al, who were. In fact, Wee Willy and his lackey were data mining just about every electronic pulse that was generated in this country. Funny how you libs were utterly silent while this was going on.

Maybe if Wee Willy had not been spending all his time finding new uses for his stogie collection, and had been paying a little more attention to what was going on in the world, the five attacks Osama's goons pulled off against this country, on his watch, might have been prevented.

Perhaps you would rather have us sitting here blind as a bat, waiting for the next attack. Of course, if that attack were to come, I am wagering that you would be among the first people in here blaming George W. Bush. The fact that we have not been attacked since 9/11 tells me that something is being done right. Who knows?, perhaps one of the attacks that have been thwarted by the government keeping tabs on international calls between potential terrorists may just have been the one that would have taken you out.

The cold hard truth of the matter is that your precious democrat party leaders, Reid and Pelosi, along with their fellow pandering party lap-dogs, are putting all of us in danger in order to pander to one of their largest contributors, the trial lawyers, who are going to make millions filing frivolous lawsuits that the tele-communications companies will most likely settle instead of fight.

I consider this to be criminal negligence on the part of the democrat party.

And when the next attack does come, I'll be here awaiting your attempted expanation as to why said attack is all George W. Bush's fault.

John McCain is a liberal. He said so himself.

 

Please provide proof that a

Please provide proof that a US person has had their communications surveilled by the terrorist surveillance program.

Should be easy to do, right? 

Thought Drudge only relayed news from other outlets!

Does Drudge have it's own reporters?  Was under impression that Drudge only relayed news from other outlets, reporters that gave him info-so he was really outed by some reporter, but who and why? 

If he does, I've never seen

If he does, I've never seen one mentioned. His web site consists mostly of links to stories already out there.

He does do some stories

He does do some stories that are his own...but most are picked up from other places.

For instance, the original Lewinsky story, where he outed Newsweek for spiking it, was his.

Drudge To Blame?

Let's be reasonable here, shall we. While Drudge may have published it, he wasn't the first, by far. For heaven's sake, even I've known about it for some weeks, although I did not know exactly where he was. 

The blame, if you must go that route, lies squarely on all the foolish people on either side, who think that everyone is entitled to know everything about everything and everyone. (Strange as that looks, it's correct, lol) Reporters, editors, and publishers are the worst of the lot, and because of their captive, unthinking audiences the vast majority of the US population believes it is true.

All that aside, I find myself in the very awkward position of agreeing with Leon, to the extent that it was incredibly irresponsible for this even being researched, let alone published.

R/

Clyde

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

More Media Hypocrisy

If this had been a Bush or a Cheney child, CNN would have had this information on a continuous international loop. 

Prince Andrew was just on CNN bashing Bush and the war.  I'm sure CNN knew the Prince was in battle and chose not to disclose it simply because they are protecting a liberal family.

Leon, who leaked this story?

"The Australian women's magazine New Idea reported on Harry's deployment in January. The news appeared Wednesday in the U.S. Web site the Drudge Report, and media around the world subsequently reported it.

The ministry deplored the leak by "elements of the foreign media."

as if this was a secret

as if this was a secret anyway

obsessive UK media: gee, anyone seen harry for the past few months...? We didn't notice he was gone...

...I still think the msm

...I still think the msm and their obsession with the Royal Family is obscene...they should of left well enough alone, for two days this has been a so-called BREAKING STORY....it makes me sad for Prince Harry...like I heard him say this morning, this is most likely the nearest I'll ever get to normalcy....

I despise the msm.

I thank him for his service.

So, from the party of the BIG tent,

what do you have against GAY Drudge? And, your proof?? Maybe, you're Drudgephobia is showing?? And the blackout was agreed to, by those of the Brit media for inside exclusives, sorta tit-for-tat - doesn't sound like "reporting" to me, more like agenda driven market share profit taking.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

FastEd, I don't care if

FastEd, I don't care if Drudge or anyone else is gay. Leon obviously does, since he took care to point that out. I don't even know if it's true.

I do, however, find it interesting that liberals, who claim to not care about stuff like race, gender, and ethnicity etc. always manage to mention one of those in the first 3 words they use to describe someone.

So, now we know Leon hates

So, now we know Leon hates all gay fat people who live in trailers. Am I missing a hated trait?

Chris,

Home schooled, bible thumpers.

Those too? I must have been

Those too? I must have been off that day. This summary could get long...

Mass, I don't hate those

Mass,

I don't hate those people.  I pity them.  They are creepy.

Homeschooling is a form of child abuse and a solid indicator of a mentally disturbed parent.

Hey Chris... Don't forget

Hey Chris...

Don't forget people with teeth missing either...

I'm beginning to understand

I'm beginning to understand something here, BT. Leon offers up evidence that, underneath a liberal's professed compassion, there is a an elitist snob, who wishes folks not living up to certain standards would be eliminated. It's Liberal Fascism going on to it's next, uglier level...

He doesn't hate them; he's

He doesn't hate them and he's not afraid of them; he's repelled (or did he say "repulsed"?) by them.

MB, Here are the people I

MB,

Here are the people I hate:

1)  Racists
2)  Intolerant Religious Wackos
3)  Fat People
4)  Boston Red Sox Fans

That's it.  My whole list.

Oh and I said I was repulsed by fat people and I am.  They are gross with their constant sweating, belabored breathing, and foul odor that eminates from the darkness of their fat folds.

You hate yourself? We've

You hate yourself?

We've already covered, long ago your statement about fat chicks only good for black guys to screw.

Many of us remember those shining moments in Hater Douchebaggery. 

 

Thats it Leon

Thats it buddy!You started a war.Be warned that Red Sox Fans will be signing the offical Declaration of War as soon the quarts of Clams and beer run out.No tailgate partying for you buddy.

I have compassion for

I have compassion for everyone...who doesn't meet my superior standards. :-)

Bal

Yea right.Do you have compassion for these folks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv9Zmy9rSd4

Chris, Just curious.  

Chris,

Just curious.   What specifically in my original post indicates that I hate gay people?

Take your time.

As far as I know, the Matt

As far as I know, the Matt Drudge gay rumors were started by Hater's man-crush, David Brock, the loser who runs Media Matters. You know Media Matters: the website Hater claims he never really visits on a daily basis, but seems to pull story after story from...

Hater a not just homophobic bigot, but worse: an UNINFORMED homophobic bigot.

Who cares if Drudge is gay or not? I notice the only person here bringing criticizing one's sexuality is a liberal.

What a shock.

Rog, Ha.  Homophobic. 

Rog,

Ha.  Homophobic.  Good one.

1)  I point it out b/c I love when the people the NBs worship possess traits the NBs despise, aka gay Drudge, drug addicted Rush, or hate-mongering Coulter.  It's funny to me. 

2)  Drudge is gay & open about it.  He routinely frequents gay bars in the DC & LA area.  AND the biggest piece of evidence, he has sex with men, which I'm pretty sure makes you gay.

3)  So now you hate David Brock eh?  You didn't hate him in the 90s when Scaife was paying him to write fake hit pieces on the Clintons now did you?  In fact, people still cite his articles about Whitewater to use against the Clinton's even though he was thoroughly debunked and exposed as fraud/Scaife puppet.  Brock was a Republican hit man before he was a Democrat hit man and you all looooooved him.  You just hate him now b/c he finally got concerned about his eternal soul and told the truth about his shady past with the Republicans.

4)  I love gays.  I don't hate gays.  In fact, I have a well-documented history of defending gays and their rights against YOU bigots on this site.  Nice try though tiger.

5)  First, where in my post did I criticize his sexuality?  I simply pointed it out.  Secondly, who cares if Drudge is gay or not?  Not me, but the NBs care.  But don't worry, they don't hate Drudge, they just hate his sin.

Rog Rog Rog.  You are slipping.  Drink some more moonshine, that should warm your bitter soul.

1. Thanks for grouping us

1. Thanks for grouping us all together, you tree-hugging, dog-screwing hippy. Whoops! Looks like I grouped you together with a stereotypical liberal! My bad!

2. I have proven quite the opposite. Once again, go to actual news sources and quit being such a Media Matters loser. I posted proof that proven you wrong. Too bad you have no proof of your own.  

3. Brock is a hack. Please show where I ever was a fan of him in the 1990's? Throwing around "you" just is another lame attempt to lump everybody here into a group, which, as usual, you failed.

4. You hate gays. You have shown more than once your omophobia (remember your "only gays use the word 'pumpkin'" comment, genius?) Are you trying to convince us, or yourself, homoophobe? What's next? Will you tell us "Some of my best friends are gay?". Laughable. Please show us your "well-documented history". Prove it.

5. Drudge's liberal-media-accused-but-unproven sexual status had no bearing to the conversation. YOU brought it up, homophobe. Now you are squirming, grasping at straws. You thought you were being clever, but were, as usual, beinng your douchebag self.

Prove me wrong, Hater. You cannot, since you have a track record.

You are a liberal, and being a liberal means accusing the Right of doing what the Left does. You accuse us of being homophobes because YOU are.

Don't get all pissy with all of us because you came here and got smacked down by a dozen people. Sucks to be you, Hater.

Have a nice weekend, homophobe.

 

 

 

Shillary singing a Tammy Wynette song!

"You know it's hard to be a woman"!!!!  Straight from the TAMMY WYNETTE song, and after her failure, guess it will be another TW song "D-I-V-O-R-C-E".  But you know the media is doing her just like they did Romney, saying when the delegate count is tight that she has no chance.  At least the B ain't giving up!

stand by your man?

stand by your man?

You got it!

She'll go from STAND BY YOUR MAN to D-I-V-O-R-C-E quickly!